Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Intellectual Disability | Research article

Development of nursing quality care process metrics and indicators for intellectual disability services: a literature review and modified Delphi consensus study

Authors: Owen Doody, Fiona Murphy, Rosemary Lyons, Anne Gallen, Judy Ryan, Johanna Downey, Duygu Sezgin

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Nursing process quality care metrics and indicators are quantifiable measures of the nursing care delivered to clients. They can be used to identify and support nurses’ contribution to high quality, safe, client care and are lacking in specialist intellectual disability nursing. In a national Nursing Quality Care-Metrics project for Irish intellectual disability services, a set of nursing quality care process metrics and associated indicators were established for intellectual disability services.

Methods

A two-stage design approach was undertaken; a broad scoping review of the literature and a modified Delphi consensus process. The Delphi included a four round e-Delphi survey and a consensus meeting. Four hundred one intellectual disability nurses working in Ireland were recruited for the surveys and 20 stakeholders attended the consensus meeting.

Results

From the review, 20 existing and 16 potential intellectual disability nursing metrics were identified for nurses to prioritise in the e-surveys. After the four survey rounds, 12 intellectual disability nursing metrics and 84 associated indicators were identified. Following the consensus meeting, these were reduced to 12 metrics and 79 indicators.

Conclusions

This first set of intellectual disability nursing process metrics and associated indicators has been identified for implementation in practice. These metrics while developed in Ireland have international relevance and their application and appropriateness in practice needs to be evaluated.
Literature
18.
go back to reference Ryan J, Rice MB. Literature review: role of registered nurse intellectual disability (RNID) and skill mix. Health Service Executive: Dublin; 2012. Ryan J, Rice MB. Literature review: role of registered nurse intellectual disability (RNID) and skill mix. Health Service Executive: Dublin; 2012.
20.
go back to reference Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260:1743–8.CrossRef Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260:1743–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mant J, Hicks N. Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction. BMJ. 1995;311:793–6.CrossRef Mant J, Hicks N. Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction. BMJ. 1995;311:793–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Linstone HA, Turoff M. Introduction. In: Linstone HA, Turoff M, editors. The delphi method: techniques and applications. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 2002. p. 3–12. Linstone HA, Turoff M. Introduction. In: Linstone HA, Turoff M, editors. The delphi method: techniques and applications. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 2002. p. 3–12.
32.
go back to reference Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12:10. Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12:10.
33.
go back to reference Health Service Executive. Standard operating procedure for nursing and midwifery quality care metrics data collection in intellectual disability version 2. Dublin: Office of the Nursing and Midwifery Services Director - Health Service Executive; 2015. Health Service Executive. Standard operating procedure for nursing and midwifery quality care metrics data collection in intellectual disability version 2. Dublin: Office of the Nursing and Midwifery Services Director - Health Service Executive; 2015.
36.
go back to reference Davis R, Proulx R, van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk H. Health issues for people with intellectual disabilities: the evidence base. In: Taggart L, Cousins W, editors. Health promotion for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. England: Open University Press; 2014. p. 7–16. Davis R, Proulx R, van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk H. Health issues for people with intellectual disabilities: the evidence base. In: Taggart L, Cousins W, editors. Health promotion for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. England: Open University Press; 2014. p. 7–16.
37.
go back to reference Wilson NJ, Charnock D. Developmental and intellectual disability. In: Chang E, Johnson A, editors. Living with chronic illness and disability: principles for nursing practice. Sydney: Elsevier; 2017. p. 129–45. Wilson NJ, Charnock D. Developmental and intellectual disability. In: Chang E, Johnson A, editors. Living with chronic illness and disability: principles for nursing practice. Sydney: Elsevier; 2017. p. 129–45.
39.
go back to reference Hatton C, Emerson E. Introduction: health disparities, health inequity, and people with intellectual disabilities. Int Rev Res Dev Disabil. 2015;48:1–9.CrossRef Hatton C, Emerson E. Introduction: health disparities, health inequity, and people with intellectual disabilities. Int Rev Res Dev Disabil. 2015;48:1–9.CrossRef
40.
58.
Metadata
Title
Development of nursing quality care process metrics and indicators for intellectual disability services: a literature review and modified Delphi consensus study
Authors
Owen Doody
Fiona Murphy
Rosemary Lyons
Anne Gallen
Judy Ryan
Johanna Downey
Duygu Sezgin
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4749-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue