Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Understanding patients’ satisfaction with physician assistant/associate encounters through communication experiences: a qualitative study in acute hospitals in England

Authors: Francesca Taylor, Mary Halter, Vari M Drennan

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Physician assistants/associates (PAs) are a recent innovation in acute hospital teams in England and many other countries worldwide. Although existing evidence indicates generally high levels of patient satisfaction with their PA hospital encounters, little is known about the factors associated with this outcome. There is a lack of evidence on the process of PA-patient communication in hospital encounters and how this might influence satisfaction. This study therefore aimed to understand patients’ satisfaction with PA acute hospital encounters through PA-patient communication experiences.

Methods

A qualitative study was conducted among patients and representatives of patients seen by or receiving care from one of the PAs working in acute hospital services in England. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken face-to-face with study participants in the hospital setting and shortly after their PA encounter. Data were coded and analysed using thematic analysis. The study was framed within a theoretical model of core functions of medical encounter communication.

Results

Fifteen patients and patient representatives who had experienced a PA encounter participated in interviews, across five hospitals in England. Four interrelated communication experiences were important to participants who were satisfied with the encounter in general: feeling trust and confidence in the relationship, sharing relevant and meaningful information, experiencing emotional care and support, and sharing discussion on illness management and treatment. However, many participants misconceived PAs to be doctors, raising a potential risk of reduced trust in the PA relationship and negative implications for satisfaction with their PA encounter. Participants considered it beneficial that patients be informed about the PA role to prevent confusion.

Conclusions

PA encounters offer a constructive example of successful clinician-patient communication experiences in acute hospital encounters from the patient’s perspective. Study participants were generally naïve to the PA role. Hospital services and organisations introducing these mid-level or advanced care practitioner roles should consider giving attention to informing patients about the roles.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Hooker RS, Cawley JF, Everett CM. Introduction and overview of the profession. In: Hooker RS, Cawley JF, Everett CM, editors. Physician assistants: policy and practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 2017. p. 1–14.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Maier CB, Batenburg R, Birch S, Zander B, Elliott R, Busse R. Health workforce planning: which countries include nurse practitioners and physician assistants and to what effect? Health Policy. 2018;122:1085–92.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Farmer J, Currie M, Hyman J, West C, Arnott N. Evaluation of physician assistants in National Health Service Scotland. Scott Med J. 2011;56:130–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
11.
12.
Maxfield RG. Use of physician’s assistants in a general surgical practice. Am J Surg. 1975;131:504–8.CrossRef
13.
Bohm ER, Dunbar M, Pitman D, Rhule C, Araneta J. Experience with physician assistants in a Canadian arthroplasty program. Can J Surg. 2010;53(2):103–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Hepp SL, Suter E, Nagy D, Knorren T, Bergman JW. Utilizing the physician assistant role: case study in an upper-extremity orthopedic surgical program. Can J Surg. 2017;60(2):115–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Counselman FL, Graffeo CA, Hill JT. Patient satisfaction with physician assistants (PAs) in an ED fast track. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18(6):661–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Berg GM, Crowe RE, Nyberg S, Burdsal C. Trauma patient satisfaction with physician assistants: testing a structural equation model. JAAPA. 2012;25(5):42–52.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Timmermans MJC, van Vught AJAH, Peters YAS, Meermans G, Peute JGM, Postma CT, et al. The impact of the implementation of physician assistants in inpatient care: A multicenter matched-controlled study. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0178212.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zaman Q, Yogamoorthy S, Zaman M, Fouda RMFR. Patients’ perspective of physician associates in an acute medical unit within an English district general teaching hospital – a pilot survey study. Future Hosp J. 2018;5(3):213–7.CrossRef
19.
Drennan VM, Halter M, Wheeler C, Nice L, Brearley S, Ennis J, et al. What is the contribution of physician associates in hospital care in England? A mixed methods, multiple case study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Floyd K, Generous MA, Clark L, McLeod I, Simon A. Cumulative risk on the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) predicts empathic communication by physician assistant students. Health Commun. 2017;32(10):1210–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Rhodes KV, Vieth T, He T, Miller A, Howes DS, Bailey O, et al. Resuscitating the physician-patient relationship: emergency department communication in an academic medical center. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:262–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Becker G, Kempf DE, Xander CJ, Momm F, Olschewski M, Blum HE. Four minutes for a patient, twenty seconds for a relative – an observational study at a university hospital. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Ong LML, de Haes JCJM, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(7):903–18.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152(9):1423–33.
25.
Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826–34.CrossRef
26.
Howick J, Moscrop A, Mebius A, Fanshawe RR, Lewith G, Bishop FL, et al. Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J R Soc Med. 2018;111(7):240–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
De Haes H, Bensing J. Endpoint in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:287–94.CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
Hillen MA, de Haes HCJM, Stalpers LJA, Klinkenbijl JHG, Eddes EH, Butow PN, et al. How can communication by oncologists enhance patients’ trust? An experimental study. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(4):869–901.CrossRef
30.
Roter DL, Yost KJ, O’Byrne T, Branda M, Leppin A, Kimball B, et al. Communication predictors and consequences of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) discussions in oncology visits. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:1519–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Hojat M, Louis DZ, Maxwell K, Markham F, Wender R, Gonnella JS. Patient perceptions of physician empathy, satisfaction with physician, interpersonal trust, and compliance. Int J Med Educ. 2010;1:83–7.CrossRefPubMedCentral
32.
Schrooten I, de Jong MDT. If you could read my mind: the role of healthcare providers’ empathetic communication and communicative competencies in clients’ satisfaction with consultations. Health Commun. 2017;32(1):111–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Visser LNC, Scheppers S, Tollenaar MS, de Haes HCJM, Smets EMA. Patients’ and oncologists’ views on how oncologists may best address patients’ emotions during consultations: an interview study. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101:1223–31.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Smets EMA, Deveugele M, Kripalani S, Cameron KA. New insights on information provision, decision making and patient autonomy. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:1439–40.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Schoenfeld EM, Goff SL, Downs G, Wenger RJ, Lindenauer PK, Mazor KM. A qualitative analysis of patient’s perceptions of shared decision making in the emergency department: “let me know I have a choice”. Acad Emerg Med. 2018;25(7):716–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Hack TF, Ruether JD, Pickles T, Bultz BD, Chateau D, Degner LF. Behind closed doors 11: systematic analysis of prostate cancer patients’ primary treatment consultations with radiation oncologists and predictors of satisfaction with communication. Psychooncology. 2012;21:809–17.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Rao JK, Anderson LA, Sukumar B, Beauchesne DA, Stein T, Frankel RM. Engaging communication experts in a Delphi process to identify patient behaviors that could enhance communication in medical encounters. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.
39.
Holloway I, Wheeler S. Qualitative research in nursing and health care. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2010.
40.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef
41.
42.
Akabogu U, Jenkins N, Stanfield R, Baker-Lacey D. The National Physician Associate Expansion Programme. Future Healthcare J. 2017;4(2):s9.
43.
44.
Koch T, Harrington A. Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for reflexivity. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28(4):882–90.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Scholl I, Zill JM, Härter M, Dirmaier J. An integrative model of patient-centeredness - a systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107828.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Flickinger TE, Saha S, Roter D, Korthuis PT, Sharp V, Cohn J, et al. Respecting patients is associated with more patient-centered communication behaviours in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(2):250–5.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Mead N, Bower P. Patient centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1087–110.CrossRef
48.
Castro EM, Regenmortel TV, Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W, Hecke AV. Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: a concept analysis based on a literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:1923–39.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Street R. The many “disguises” of patient centered-communication: problems of conceptualization and measurement. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:2131–4.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, Shields CG, Meldrum SC, Kravitz RL, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1516–28.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Berger ZD, Boss EF, Beach MC. Communication behaviors and patient autonomy in hospital care: a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:1473–81.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Joosten EAG. Systematic review on the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(4):219–26.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:102–14.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Timmermans MJC, van Vught AJAH, Maassen ITHM, Draaijer L, Hoofwijk AGM, Spanier M, et al. Determinants of the sustained employment of physician assistants in hospitals: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011949.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Joyce P, Arnett R, Hill A, Hooker RS. Patient willingness to be seen by a physician associate in Ireland. Int J Healthcare. 2018;4(2):41–50.CrossRef
56.
Prey JE, Woollen J, Wilcox L, Sackeim AD, Hripcsak G, Bakken S, et al. Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21:742–50.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Understanding patients’ satisfaction with physician assistant/associate encounters through communication experiences: a qualitative study in acute hospitals in England
Authors
Francesca Taylor
Mary Halter
Vari M Drennan
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4410-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research article

Manpower capacity and reasons for staff shortage in primary health care maternity centres in Nigeria: a mixed-methods study

Research article

Organizational change and the risk of sickness absence: a longitudinal multilevel analysis of organizational unit-level change in hospitals

Research article

The safety attitudes questionnaire – ambulatory version: psychometric properties of the Norwegian version for nursing homes

Research article

The feasibility and acceptability of collaborative learning in improving health worker performance on adolescent health: findings from implementation research in Moldova

Research article

Nurses striving to provide caregiver with excellent support and care at a distance: a qualitative study

Research article

Ready for the Triple Aim? Perspectives on organizational readiness for implementing change from a Danish obstetrics and gynecology department