Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Clarity, conviction and coherence supports buy-in to positive youth sexual health services: focused results from a realist evaluation

Authors: Katie Shearn, Hilary Piercy, Peter Allmark, Julia Hirst

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a call for sexual health services to support young people achieve sexual wellbeing in addition to treating or preventing sexual ill-health. Progress towards realising this ambition is limited. This study aimed to contribute theory and evidence explaining key processes to support local delivery of positive youth sexual health services.

Methods

A realist evaluation was conducted, comprising four research cycles, with a total of 161 data sources, primarily from the UK. Theory was refined iteratively using existing substantive theories, secondary and primary research data (including interviews, documentary analysis, feedback workshops and a literature search of secondary case studies). A novel explanatory framework for articulating the theories was utilised.

Results

The results focused on local level buy-in to positive services. Positive services were initiated when influential teams had clarity that positive services should acknowledge youth sexuality, support young people’s holistic sexual wellbeing and involve users in design and delivery of services, and conviction that this was the best or right way to proceed. How positive services were operationalised differed according to whether the emphasis was placed on meeting service objectives or supporting young people to flourish. Teams were able to effect change in local services by improving coherence between a positive approach and existing processes and practices. For example, that a) users were involved in decision making, b) multi-disciplinary professional working was genuinely integrated, and c) evidence of positive services’ impact was gathered from a breadth of sources. New services were fragile. Progress was frequently stymied due to a lack of shared understanding and limited compatibility between characteristics of a positive approach and the wider cultural and structural systems including medical hegemony and narrow accountability frameworks. These challenges were exacerbated by funding cuts.

Conclusions

This study offers clarity on how positive youth sexual health services may be defined. It also articulates theory explaining how dissonance, at various levels, between positive models of sexual health service delivery and established cultural and structural systems may restrict their successful inception. Future policy and practice initiatives should be theoretically informed and address barriers at societal, organisational and interpersonal levels to stimulate change.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Theory development began in 2015 utilising the iteration of NPT illustrated in the 2009, 2011 and to a lesser extent 2013, papers.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Developing sexual health programmes: a framework for action. Geneva; 2010. World Health Organization. Developing sexual health programmes: a framework for action. Geneva; 2010.
2.
go back to reference United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals. The global strategy for women’s, children’s and adolescents health. 2016. United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals. The global strategy for women’s, children’s and adolescents health. 2016.
3.
go back to reference United Nations Population Fund. Framework of actions for the follow-up to the Programme of action of the international conference on population and development beyond 2014. 2014. United Nations Population Fund. Framework of actions for the follow-up to the Programme of action of the international conference on population and development beyond 2014. 2014.
5.
go back to reference Department of Health. A Framework for Sexual Health Improvement in England. London; 2013. Department of Health. A Framework for Sexual Health Improvement in England. London; 2013.
6.
go back to reference Scottish Executive. Respect and Responsibility Strategy and Action Plan for Improving Sexual Health. Edinburgh; 2005. Scottish Executive. Respect and Responsibility Strategy and Action Plan for Improving Sexual Health. Edinburgh; 2005.
7.
go back to reference Welsh Assembly. Sexual Health and Wellbeing Action Plan for Wales, 2010–2015. 2010. Welsh Assembly. Sexual Health and Wellbeing Action Plan for Wales, 2010–2015. 2010.
8.
go back to reference European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. A comprehensive approach to HIV / STI prevention in the context of sexual health in the EU / EEA. Stockholm: ECDC; 2013. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. A comprehensive approach to HIV / STI prevention in the context of sexual health in the EU / EEA. Stockholm: ECDC; 2013.
11.
go back to reference Satcher D, Hook EW, Coleman E. Sexual health in America improving patient care and public health; 2015. Satcher D, Hook EW, Coleman E. Sexual health in America improving patient care and public health; 2015.
13.
go back to reference Wellings K, Johnson AM. Framing sexual health research: adopting a broader perspective. Lancet. 2013;382:1759–62.CrossRef Wellings K, Johnson AM. Framing sexual health research: adopting a broader perspective. Lancet. 2013;382:1759–62.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference All-Party Parliamentary Group on Sexual and Reproductive Health in the UK. Breaking down the barriers : the need for accountability and integration in sexual health , reproductive health and HIV services in England. London; 2015. All-Party Parliamentary Group on Sexual and Reproductive Health in the UK. Breaking down the barriers : the need for accountability and integration in sexual health , reproductive health and HIV services in England. London; 2015.
16.
go back to reference MEDFASH. Progress and priorities – working together for high quality sexual health. 2008. MEDFASH. Progress and priorities – working together for high quality sexual health. 2008.
18.
go back to reference McGeeney E. What is good sex?: young people, sexual pleasure and sexual health services; 2013. McGeeney E. What is good sex?: young people, sexual pleasure and sexual health services; 2013.
19.
go back to reference Aggleton P, Campbell C. Working with young people - towards an agenda for sexual health. Sex Relatsh Ther. 2000;15:283–96.CrossRef Aggleton P, Campbell C. Working with young people - towards an agenda for sexual health. Sex Relatsh Ther. 2000;15:283–96.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hirst J. Evaluation of sexual health Sheffield’s services in community settings: perspectives from young people aged 15–25 years. Sheffield; 2015. Hirst J. Evaluation of sexual health Sheffield’s services in community settings: perspectives from young people aged 15–25 years. Sheffield; 2015.
23.
go back to reference Williams D, Thomas JN, Prior EE, Walters W. Introducing a multidisciplinary framework of positive sexuality. J Posit Sex. 2015;(1 February):6–11. Williams D, Thomas JN, Prior EE, Walters W. Introducing a multidisciplinary framework of positive sexuality. J Posit Sex. 2015;(1 February):6–11.
24.
go back to reference Ivankovich MB, Fenton KA, Douglas JM Jr. Considerations for National Public Health Leadership in advancing sexual health. Public Health Rep. 2013;128:102–10.CrossRef Ivankovich MB, Fenton KA, Douglas JM Jr. Considerations for National Public Health Leadership in advancing sexual health. Public Health Rep. 2013;128:102–10.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Humphrey C, Hughes J, MacFarlane F, Butler C, Connell P, et al. The modernisation initiative independent evaluation: final report. London; 2008. Greenhalgh T, Humphrey C, Hughes J, MacFarlane F, Butler C, Connell P, et al. The modernisation initiative independent evaluation: final report. London; 2008.
27.
go back to reference Elliott L, Henderson M, Wight D, Nixon C, Claveirole A, Raab G, et al. Evaluation of healthy respect phase two: final report: Edinburgh; 2010. Elliott L, Henderson M, Wight D, Nixon C, Claveirole A, Raab G, et al. Evaluation of healthy respect phase two: final report: Edinburgh; 2010.
31.
go back to reference United Nations. Programme of action of the international conference on population and development: 20th anniversary edition. Geneva; 2014. United Nations. Programme of action of the international conference on population and development: 20th anniversary edition. Geneva; 2014.
33.
go back to reference Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015:228–38.CrossRef Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015:228–38.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Funnell SC, Rogers PJ. Purposeful program theory; 2009. Funnell SC, Rogers PJ. Purposeful program theory; 2009.
36.
go back to reference Marchal B, Kegels G, Van Belle S. Theory and realist methods. In: Emmel N, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Monaghan M, Dalkin S, editors. Doing realist research. 1st edition. London, UK: Sage Publications, Ltd.; 2018. p. 79–91. Marchal B, Kegels G, Van Belle S. Theory and realist methods. In: Emmel N, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Monaghan M, Dalkin S, editors. Doing realist research. 1st edition. London, UK: Sage Publications, Ltd.; 2018. p. 79–91.
37.
go back to reference Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto: Sage; 2013. Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto: Sage; 2013.
38.
go back to reference Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project. Heal Serv Deliv Res. 2017;5:2050–4349. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr05280.CrossRef Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project. Heal Serv Deliv Res. 2017;5:2050–4349. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3310/​hsdr05280.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Pawson R. Realist memorabilia. In: Emmel N, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Monaghan M, Dalkin S, editors. Doing realist research. 1st ed. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018. p. 203–21.CrossRef Pawson R. Realist memorabilia. In: Emmel N, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Monaghan M, Dalkin S, editors. Doing realist research. 1st ed. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018. p. 203–21.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Clark. Complex Critical Realism. Tenets and application in nursing research. Postdisciplinary Humanit Soc Sci Q. 2013;23:124–47. Clark. Complex Critical Realism. Tenets and application in nursing research. Postdisciplinary Humanit Soc Sci Q. 2013;23:124–47.
41.
go back to reference Westhorp G. Using complexity-consistent theory for evaluating complex systems. Evaluation. 2012. Westhorp G. Using complexity-consistent theory for evaluating complex systems. Evaluation. 2012.
42.
go back to reference Clark AM. What are the components of complex interventions in healthcare? Theorizing approaches to parts, powers and the whole intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:185–93.CrossRef Clark AM. What are the components of complex interventions in healthcare? Theorizing approaches to parts, powers and the whole intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:185–93.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Westhorp G. Understanding mechanisms in realist evaluation and research. In: Emmel N, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Monaghan M, Dalkin S, editors. Doing realist research. 1st ed. London, UK: Sage Publications, Ltd.; 2018. Westhorp G. Understanding mechanisms in realist evaluation and research. In: Emmel N, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Monaghan M, Dalkin S, editors. Doing realist research. 1st ed. London, UK: Sage Publications, Ltd.; 2018.
45.
go back to reference Archer M. Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach: Cambridge University Press; 1995. Archer M. Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
46.
go back to reference Sayer A. Why things matter to people: social science, values and ethical life: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Sayer A. Why things matter to people: social science, values and ethical life: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
47.
go back to reference Porter S. The uncritical realism of realist evaluation. Evaluation. 2015;21:65–82.CrossRef Porter S. The uncritical realism of realist evaluation. Evaluation. 2015;21:65–82.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Shearn K. Delivering positive youth sexual health services: a realist evaluation: Sheffield Hallam University; 2018. Shearn K. Delivering positive youth sexual health services: a realist evaluation: Sheffield Hallam University; 2018.
52.
go back to reference May C. Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement Sci. 2013;8. May C. Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement Sci. 2013;8.
53.
go back to reference Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46.
55.
go back to reference Emmel N. Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: a realist approach. London, UK: Sage; 2013.CrossRef Emmel N. Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: a realist approach. London, UK: Sage; 2013.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Koenig G. Realistic evaluation and case studies: stretching the potential. Evaluation. 2009;15:9–30.CrossRef Koenig G. Realistic evaluation and case studies: stretching the potential. Evaluation. 2009;15:9–30.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Wong G, Westhorp G, Pawson R, Greenhalgh T. Realist synthesis. RAMESES Training Materials RAMESES Proj 2013; July 2013:55. Wong G, Westhorp G, Pawson R, Greenhalgh T. Realist synthesis. RAMESES Training Materials RAMESES Proj 2013; July 2013:55.
63.
go back to reference Department of Health. You’re welcome - quality criteria for young people friendly health services - 2011 edition. London; 2011. Department of Health. You’re welcome - quality criteria for young people friendly health services - 2011 edition. London; 2011.
64.
go back to reference Department of Health. Public health outcomes framework: improving outcomes and supporting transparency part 1A. London; 2013. Department of Health. Public health outcomes framework: improving outcomes and supporting transparency part 1A. London; 2013.
66.
go back to reference Kolb D. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. 2nd ed. New Jersey; 2014. Kolb D. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. 2nd ed. New Jersey; 2014.
69.
go back to reference Macfarlane F, Barton-Sweeney C, Woodard F, Greenhalgh T. Achieving and sustaining profound institutional change in healthcare: case study using neo-institutional theory. Soc Sci Med. 2013;80:10–8.CrossRef Macfarlane F, Barton-Sweeney C, Woodard F, Greenhalgh T. Achieving and sustaining profound institutional change in healthcare: case study using neo-institutional theory. Soc Sci Med. 2013;80:10–8.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Paley J. Phenomenology as qualitative research: a critical analysis of meaning. London: Routledge; 2016.CrossRef Paley J. Phenomenology as qualitative research: a critical analysis of meaning. London: Routledge; 2016.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clarity, conviction and coherence supports buy-in to positive youth sexual health services: focused results from a realist evaluation
Authors
Katie Shearn
Hilary Piercy
Peter Allmark
Julia Hirst
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4298-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue