Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Research article

Advancing the status of nursing: reconstructing professional nursing identity through patient safety work

Authors: Frode Heldal, Trond Kongsvik, Erna Håland

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recent decades have seen increased attention to patient safety in health care. This is often in the form of programmes aiming to change professional behaviours. Health professionals in hospitals have traditionally resented such initiatives because patient safety programmes often take a managerialist form that may be interpreted as a challenge to professional identity. Research, however, has mostly paid attention to the role of physicians. This study aims to highlight how such programmes may affect professional nursing identity.

Methods

We qualitatively investigated the implementation of a patient safety programme in Norway, paying attention to changes in nurses’ practices and values. Based on purposive sampling, two group interviews, four individual interviews and five hours of observational studies were conducted in a hospital department, involving ten nurses and three informants from the hospital management. Interviews were conducted in offices at the hospital, and observations were performed in situ. All the interviews lasted from one to one and a half hours, and were recorded and transcribed ad verbatim. Data was analysed according to ad-hoc meaning generation.

Results

The following analytical categories were developed: reconstructing trust, reconstructing work, reconstructing values and reconstructing professional status. The patient safety programme involved a shift in patient safety-related decisions, from being based on professional judgement to being more system based. Some of the patient safety work that previously had been invisible and tacit became more visible. The patient safety programme involved activities that were more in accordance with the ‘cure’ discourse than traditional ‘care’ work within nursing. As a result, this implied a heightened perceived professional status among the nurses. The safety programme was – contrary to the ‘normal’ resistance against audit systems – well received because of the raised perceived professional status among the nurses.

Conclusions

Reconstructing trust, work, values and status, and even the profession itself, is being reconstructed through the work involved in implementing the procedures from the safety programme. Professional knowledge and identity are being challenged and changed, and what counts as good, professional nursing of high quality is being reconstructed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fournier V. Boundary work and the (un)making of the professions. In: Malin N, editor. Professionalism, Boundaries and the Workplace. London: Routledge; 2000. Fournier V. Boundary work and the (un)making of the professions. In: Malin N, editor. Professionalism, Boundaries and the Workplace. London: Routledge; 2000.
2.
go back to reference Mclaughlin J, Webster A. Rationalising knowledge: IT systems, professional identiteties and power. Sociol Rev. 1998;46(4):781–802.CrossRef Mclaughlin J, Webster A. Rationalising knowledge: IT systems, professional identiteties and power. Sociol Rev. 1998;46(4):781–802.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dadich A, Doloswala N. What can organisational theory offer knowledge translation in healthcare? A thematic and lexical analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:351.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dadich A, Doloswala N. What can organisational theory offer knowledge translation in healthcare? A thematic and lexical analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:351.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Moraros J, Lemstra M, Nwankwo C. Lean interventions in healthcare: do they actually work? A systematic literature review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(2):150–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Moraros J, Lemstra M, Nwankwo C. Lean interventions in healthcare: do they actually work? A systematic literature review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(2):150–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ekeland T-J. Autonomi og evidensbasert praksis. In: Høgskolen i Oslo - senter for profesjonsstudier; 2004. Ekeland T-J. Autonomi og evidensbasert praksis. In: Høgskolen i Oslo - senter for profesjonsstudier; 2004.
8.
go back to reference Runciman W, Hibbert P, Thomson R, Schaaf TVD, Sherman H, Lewalle P. Towards an international classification for patient safety: key concepts and terms. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21(1):18–26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Runciman W, Hibbert P, Thomson R, Schaaf TVD, Sherman H, Lewalle P. Towards an international classification for patient safety: key concepts and terms. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21(1):18–26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kongsvik T, Halvorsen K, Osmundsen T, Gjøsund G. Strengthening patient safety in transitions of care: an emerging role for local medical centres in Norway. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):452.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kongsvik T, Halvorsen K, Osmundsen T, Gjøsund G. Strengthening patient safety in transitions of care: an emerging role for local medical centres in Norway. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):452.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ed V, Ramrattan M, Smorenburg S, Gouma D, Boermeester M. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):216–23.CrossRef Ed V, Ramrattan M, Smorenburg S, Gouma D, Boermeester M. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):216–23.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brennan T, Leape L, Laird N. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard medical practice study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6.PubMedCrossRef Brennan T, Leape L, Laird N. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard medical practice study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Health TDo. Patient injuries in Norway 2017. Oslo: Measured by Global Trigger Tool; 2018. Health TDo. Patient injuries in Norway 2017. Oslo: Measured by Global Trigger Tool; 2018.
13.
go back to reference Griffin F, Resar R. IHI global trigger tool for measuring adverse events. In: IHI Innovation series. 2nd ed. Cambridge; 2009. Griffin F, Resar R. IHI global trigger tool for measuring adverse events. In: IHI Innovation series. 2nd ed. Cambridge; 2009.
14.
go back to reference Van de Castle B, Kim J, Pedreira MLG, Paiva A, Goosen W, Bates DW. Information technology and patient safety in nursing practice: an international perspective. Int J Med Inform. 2004;73(7):607–14.PubMedCrossRef Van de Castle B, Kim J, Pedreira MLG, Paiva A, Goosen W, Bates DW. Information technology and patient safety in nursing practice: an international perspective. Int J Med Inform. 2004;73(7):607–14.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Steven A, Magnusson C, Smith P, Pearson PH. Patient safety in nursing education: contexts, tensions and feeling safe to learn. Nurse Educ Today. 2014;34(2):277–84.PubMedCrossRef Steven A, Magnusson C, Smith P, Pearson PH. Patient safety in nursing education: contexts, tensions and feeling safe to learn. Nurse Educ Today. 2014;34(2):277–84.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wakefield A, Attree M, Braidman I, Carlisle C, Johnson M, Cooke H. Patient safety: do nursing and medical curricula address this theme? Nurse Educ Today. 2005;25(4):333–40.PubMedCrossRef Wakefield A, Attree M, Braidman I, Carlisle C, Johnson M, Cooke H. Patient safety: do nursing and medical curricula address this theme? Nurse Educ Today. 2005;25(4):333–40.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Allen D. The invisible work of nurses: hospitals, organisation and healthcare. New York: Routledge; 2014.CrossRef Allen D. The invisible work of nurses: hospitals, organisation and healthcare. New York: Routledge; 2014.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference WHO. World alliance for patient safety. Forward programme. Switzerland; 2004. WHO. World alliance for patient safety. Forward programme. Switzerland; 2004.
20.
go back to reference Services MoHaC. Pasientsikkerhetsprogrammet I trygge hender 24–7. Strategi 2014–2018. [The patient safety program In Safe Hands 24–7. Strategy 2014–2018]. Oslo: Norwegian Government Department of Health; 2013. Services MoHaC. Pasientsikkerhetsprogrammet I trygge hender 24–7. Strategi 2014–2018. [The patient safety program In Safe Hands 24–7. Strategy 2014–2018]. Oslo: Norwegian Government Department of Health; 2013.
21.
go back to reference Deloitte: Process evaluation of the patient safety program. Part 2, in Norwegian only; 2017. Deloitte: Process evaluation of the patient safety program. Part 2, in Norwegian only; 2017.
22.
go back to reference Nancarrow SA, Borthwick AM. Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2005;27(7):897–919. Nancarrow SA, Borthwick AM. Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2005;27(7):897–919.
23.
go back to reference Martin GP, Currie G, Finn R. Reconfiguring or reproducing intra-professional boundaries? Specialist expertise, generalist knowledge and the 'modernization' of the medical workforce. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(7):1191–8.PubMedCrossRef Martin GP, Currie G, Finn R. Reconfiguring or reproducing intra-professional boundaries? Specialist expertise, generalist knowledge and the 'modernization' of the medical workforce. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(7):1191–8.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Currie G, Finn R, Martin G. Professional competition and modernizing the clinical workforce in the NHS. Work Employ Soc. 2009;23(2):267–84.CrossRef Currie G, Finn R, Martin G. Professional competition and modernizing the clinical workforce in the NHS. Work Employ Soc. 2009;23(2):267–84.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Timmermans S, Berg M. The gold standard - the challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2003. Timmermans S, Berg M. The gold standard - the challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2003.
27.
go back to reference Timmermans S, Epstein S. A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annu Rev Sociol. 2010;36:69–89.CrossRef Timmermans S, Epstein S. A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annu Rev Sociol. 2010;36:69–89.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Jacobsson B. Standardization and expert knowledge. In: Brunsson N, Jacobsson B, editors. A world of standards. Oxford: Oford University Press; 2000. p. 40–9. Jacobsson B. Standardization and expert knowledge. In: Brunsson N, Jacobsson B, editors. A world of standards. Oxford: Oford University Press; 2000. p. 40–9.
29.
go back to reference Heldal F. Managerial control versus professional autonomy in organizational change: tearing down the walls and fighting fire with fire. J Chang Manag. 2015;15(3):188–209.CrossRef Heldal F. Managerial control versus professional autonomy in organizational change: tearing down the walls and fighting fire with fire. J Chang Manag. 2015;15(3):188–209.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Timmermans S. From autonomy to accountability: the role of clinical practice guidelines in professional power. p. 0031–5982. Print Timmermans S. From autonomy to accountability: the role of clinical practice guidelines in professional power. p. 0031–5982. Print
31.
go back to reference Garrison A. Between a rock and a hard place. JAMA. 2003;290(9):1217–8.PubMed Garrison A. Between a rock and a hard place. JAMA. 2003;290(9):1217–8.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Rao AD, Kumar A, McHugh M. Better nurse autonomy decreases the odds of 30-day mortality and failure to rescue. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017;49(1):73–9.PubMedCrossRef Rao AD, Kumar A, McHugh M. Better nurse autonomy decreases the odds of 30-day mortality and failure to rescue. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017;49(1):73–9.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Dunleavey P, Margetts H, Bastow S, Tinkler J. New public management is dead - long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration and Theory. 2005;16:467–94.CrossRef Dunleavey P, Margetts H, Bastow S, Tinkler J. New public management is dead - long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration and Theory. 2005;16:467–94.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Heldal F. Cross-boundary relationships. The object, the social and the health professional. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2008. Heldal F. Cross-boundary relationships. The object, the social and the health professional. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2008.
35.
go back to reference McGivern G, Ferlie E. Playing tick-box games: interrelating defences in professional appraisal. Hum Relat. 2007;60(9):1361–82.CrossRef McGivern G, Ferlie E. Playing tick-box games: interrelating defences in professional appraisal. Hum Relat. 2007;60(9):1361–82.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Freidson E. Professional powers: a study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1986. Freidson E. Professional powers: a study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1986.
37.
go back to reference Abbott A. The system of professions: an essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1988.CrossRef Abbott A. The system of professions: an essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1988.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books; 1983. Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books; 1983.
39.
go back to reference Polanyi M. The tacit dimension. Garden City: Doubleday & Co; 1966. Polanyi M. The tacit dimension. Garden City: Doubleday & Co; 1966.
41.
go back to reference Heldal F. Nettverkspasienten. In: Tjora A, editor. Den Moderne Pasienten. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS; 2008. Heldal F. Nettverkspasienten. In: Tjora A, editor. Den Moderne Pasienten. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS; 2008.
42.
go back to reference Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge-creating company : how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge-creating company : how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
43.
go back to reference Star SL, Griesemer JR. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Soc Stud Sci. 1989;19(3):387–420.CrossRef Star SL, Griesemer JR. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Soc Stud Sci. 1989;19(3):387–420.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Star S, Strauss A. Layers of silence, arenas of voice: the ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1999;8:9–30.CrossRef Star S, Strauss A. Layers of silence, arenas of voice: the ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1999;8:9–30.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Bowker GC, Star S, Spasser M. Classifying nurses’ work. Issues in Nursing. 2001;6(2). Bowker GC, Star S, Spasser M. Classifying nurses’ work. Issues in Nursing. 2001;6(2).
46.
47.
go back to reference Mintzberg H. Managers not MBAs. San Francisco: Berret-Kohlers Publishers, Inc; 2004. Mintzberg H. Managers not MBAs. San Francisco: Berret-Kohlers Publishers, Inc; 2004.
48.
go back to reference Tjora A. Den Moderne Pasienten. Oslo: Gyldendal; 2008. Tjora A. Den Moderne Pasienten. Oslo: Gyldendal; 2008.
49.
go back to reference Heldal F. Integrasjonsprosesser på sykehus: Hvilken rolle spiller ledelse og profesjonsgrenser? In: Tjora A, Melby L, editors. Samhandling for helse: Kunnskap, kommunikasjon og teknologi i helsetjenesten. Oslo: Gyldendal; 2014. Heldal F. Integrasjonsprosesser på sykehus: Hvilken rolle spiller ledelse og profesjonsgrenser? In: Tjora A, Melby L, editors. Samhandling for helse: Kunnskap, kommunikasjon og teknologi i helsetjenesten. Oslo: Gyldendal; 2014.
50.
go back to reference Richardson A, Storr J. Patient safety: a literative review on the impact of nursing empowerment, leadership and collaboration. Internationl Nursing Review. 2010;57(1):12–21.CrossRef Richardson A, Storr J. Patient safety: a literative review on the impact of nursing empowerment, leadership and collaboration. Internationl Nursing Review. 2010;57(1):12–21.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Glouberman S, Mintzberg H. Managing the Care of Health and the cure of disease—part I: differentiation. Health Care Manag Rev. 2001;26(1):55–69. Glouberman S, Mintzberg H. Managing the Care of Health and the cure of disease—part I: differentiation. Health Care Manag Rev. 2001;26(1):55–69.
52.
go back to reference Heldal F, Steinsbekk A. Perceptions of patient knowledge and involvement as basis for decision-making. A qualitative study of the view of health professionals in a Norwegian haematology unit. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009;36(2). Heldal F, Steinsbekk A. Perceptions of patient knowledge and involvement as basis for decision-making. A qualitative study of the view of health professionals in a Norwegian haematology unit. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009;36(2).
53.
go back to reference Broom A. Medical specialists' accounts of the impact of the internet on the doctor/patient relationship. Health (London). 2005;9(3):319–38.CrossRef Broom A. Medical specialists' accounts of the impact of the internet on the doctor/patient relationship. Health (London). 2005;9(3):319–38.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Broom A. Virtually he@lthy: the impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(3):325–45.PubMedCrossRef Broom A. Virtually he@lthy: the impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(3):325–45.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Steinsbekk A, Launso L. Empowering the Cancer patient or controlling the tumor? A qualitative study of how Cancer patients experience consultations with complementary and alternative medicine practitioners and physicians, respectively. Integr Cancer Ther. 2005;4(2):195–200.PubMedCrossRef Steinsbekk A, Launso L. Empowering the Cancer patient or controlling the tumor? A qualitative study of how Cancer patients experience consultations with complementary and alternative medicine practitioners and physicians, respectively. Integr Cancer Ther. 2005;4(2):195–200.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Kvale S. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications, Inc; 1996. Kvale S. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications, Inc; 1996.
57.
go back to reference Casey MA, Kueger RA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. Casey MA, Kueger RA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000.
58.
go back to reference Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for Analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage; 2001. Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for Analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage; 2001.
59.
go back to reference Battaglia Michael P. "Nonprobability Sampling." In: Lavrakas P, editor. "Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods". Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2008. p. 524–7. Battaglia Michael P. "Nonprobability Sampling." In: Lavrakas P, editor. "Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods". Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2008. p. 524–7.
60.
go back to reference Tjora A. Writing small discoveries: an exploration of fresh observers' observations. Qual Res. 2006;6(4):429–51.CrossRef Tjora A. Writing small discoveries: an exploration of fresh observers' observations. Qual Res. 2006;6(4):429–51.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice. 2018;24(1):120–4.PubMedCrossRef Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice. 2018;24(1):120–4.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Schön DA. The reflective practitioner. United States of America: Basic Books; 1983. Schön DA. The reflective practitioner. United States of America: Basic Books; 1983.
63.
go back to reference Jenkins T. New roles for nursing professionals. In: Ball MJ, Hannah KJ, Jelger UG, Peterson H, editors. Nursing informatics: where caring and technology meet. New York: Springer; 1988. p. 88–95.CrossRef Jenkins T. New roles for nursing professionals. In: Ball MJ, Hannah KJ, Jelger UG, Peterson H, editors. Nursing informatics: where caring and technology meet. New York: Springer; 1988. p. 88–95.CrossRef
64.
go back to reference McGivern G, Currie G, Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Waring J. Hybrid manager-Professionals' identity work: the maintenance and hybridization of medical professionalism in managerial contexts. Public Adm. 2015;93(2):412–32.CrossRef McGivern G, Currie G, Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Waring J. Hybrid manager-Professionals' identity work: the maintenance and hybridization of medical professionalism in managerial contexts. Public Adm. 2015;93(2):412–32.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Advancing the status of nursing: reconstructing professional nursing identity through patient safety work
Authors
Frode Heldal
Trond Kongsvik
Erna Håland
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4222-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue