Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Ebola Virus | Research article

Utilizing the focused conversation method in qualitative public health research: a team-based approach

Authors: Charissa Fritzen-Pedicini, Susan C. Bleasdale, Lisa M. Brosseau, Donna Moritz, Monica Sikka, Emily Stiehl, Rachael M. Jones, for the CDC Prevention Epicenter Program

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Qualitative research studies are becoming increasingly necessary to understand the complex challenges in the healthcare setting. Successfully integrating interdisciplinary teams of investigators can be challenging, as investigators inherently view data through their disciplinary lens. Thus, new methods, such as focused conservation, are needed to facilitate qualitative data analysis by interdisciplinary teams. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a clear description of how we implemented the focused conversation method to facilitate an organized data-driven discussion that responded to our study objectives and ensured participation of our interdisciplinary team. The focused conversation method has not, to our knowledge, been utilized for this purpose to date.

Methods

To better understand the experience of healthcare personnel (HCP) during preparations for the 2014–2015 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak, we interviewed HCP who participated in decision making about EVD preparations and training of workers in the use of enhanced personal protective equipment ensembles in the metropolitan Chicagoland area of Illinois to attain a priori research objectives. We identified a systematic method – the focused conversation method – that enabled our interdisciplinary team to interactively contribute to the framing, analysis and interpretation of the data that would enable us to focus on our research objectives.

Results

The focused conversation developed to support our a priori research objective about the training of HCP in preparations included objective, reflective, interpretive and decisional questions. These questions grounded the conversation in the data, while leveraging discipline-specific lenses and professional experience in the analysis and interpretation. Insights from the conversation were reviewed later against interview transcripts to ensure validity. The conversation identified areas for future research directions and deficiencies in the interview instrument.

Conclusions

The focused conversation is an efficient, organized method for analysis of qualitative data by an interdisciplinary team.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Forman J, Creswell JW, Damschroder L, Kowalski CP, Krein SL. Qualitative research methods: key features and insights gained from use in infection prevention research. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:764–71.CrossRef Forman J, Creswell JW, Damschroder L, Kowalski CP, Krein SL. Qualitative research methods: key features and insights gained from use in infection prevention research. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:764–71.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.
3.
go back to reference Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.CrossRef Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick R, Boulton M. Qualitative methods for assessing health care. Qual Health Care. 1994;3:107–13.CrossRef Fitzpatrick R, Boulton M. Qualitative methods for assessing health care. Qual Health Care. 1994;3:107–13.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The sage handbook of qualitative research, 4th Edition. London: Sage; 2011. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The sage handbook of qualitative research, 4th Edition. London: Sage; 2011.
6.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers, 2nd Edition. London: Sage; 2013. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers, 2nd Edition. London: Sage; 2013.
7.
go back to reference Glaser BG, Strauss AL, Strutzel E. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nurs Res. 1968;17:364.CrossRef Glaser BG, Strauss AL, Strutzel E. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nurs Res. 1968;17:364.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stanfield B, Canadian Institute of Cultural Affairs. The art of focused conversation: 100 ways to access group wisdom in the workplace. Gabriola Island, B.C.: New society publishers; 2013. Stanfield B, Canadian Institute of Cultural Affairs. The art of focused conversation: 100 ways to access group wisdom in the workplace. Gabriola Island, B.C.: New society publishers; 2013.
9.
go back to reference Spee JC. Using focused conversation in the classroom. J Manage Ed. 2005;29:833–51. Spee JC. Using focused conversation in the classroom. J Manage Ed. 2005;29:833–51.
10.
go back to reference Caress A-L, Luker K, Woodcock A, Beaver K. An exploratory study of priority information needs in adult asthma patients. Patient Ed Counsl. 2002;47:319–27.CrossRef Caress A-L, Luker K, Woodcock A, Beaver K. An exploratory study of priority information needs in adult asthma patients. Patient Ed Counsl. 2002;47:319–27.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Realpe A, Adams A, Wall P, Griffin D, Donovan JL. A new simple six-step model to promote recruitment to RCTs was developed and successfully implemented. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;76:166–74.CrossRef Realpe A, Adams A, Wall P, Griffin D, Donovan JL. A new simple six-step model to promote recruitment to RCTs was developed and successfully implemented. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;76:166–74.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Boeije HA. Purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002;36:391–409.CrossRef Boeije HA. Purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002;36:391–409.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Leonhardt KK, Keuler M, Safdar N, Hunter P. Ebola preparedness planning and collaboration by two health Systems in Wisconsin, September to December 2014. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10:691–7.CrossRef Leonhardt KK, Keuler M, Safdar N, Hunter P. Ebola preparedness planning and collaboration by two health Systems in Wisconsin, September to December 2014. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10:691–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Conlon C, Carney G, Timonen V, Scharf T. “Emergent reconstruction” in grounded theory: learning from team-based interview research. Qual Res. 2015;15:39–56.CrossRef Conlon C, Carney G, Timonen V, Scharf T. “Emergent reconstruction” in grounded theory: learning from team-based interview research. Qual Res. 2015;15:39–56.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference DeHart D. Team science: a qualitative study of benefits, challenges and lessons learned. Soc Sci J. 2017;54:458–67.CrossRef DeHart D. Team science: a qualitative study of benefits, challenges and lessons learned. Soc Sci J. 2017;54:458–67.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stokols D, Shalini M, Moser RP, Hall KL, Taylor BK. The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:S96–S115.CrossRef Stokols D, Shalini M, Moser RP, Hall KL, Taylor BK. The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:S96–S115.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hesse-Biber S. Doing interdisciplinary mixed methods healthcare research: working the boundaries, tensions, and synergistic potential of team-based research. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:649–58.CrossRef Hesse-Biber S. Doing interdisciplinary mixed methods healthcare research: working the boundaries, tensions, and synergistic potential of team-based research. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:649–58.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bennett LM, Gadlin H. Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. J Investig Med. 2012;60:768–75.CrossRef Bennett LM, Gadlin H. Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. J Investig Med. 2012;60:768–75.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utilizing the focused conversation method in qualitative public health research: a team-based approach
Authors
Charissa Fritzen-Pedicini
Susan C. Bleasdale
Lisa M. Brosseau
Donna Moritz
Monica Sikka
Emily Stiehl
Rachael M. Jones
for the CDC Prevention Epicenter Program
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Ebola Virus
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4107-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue