Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Contraception | Study protocol

Pharmacists expand access to reproductive heaLthcare: PEARL study protocol

Authors: Maria I. Rodriguez, Blair G. Darney, Alison B. Edelman, Kimberly Yee, Lorinda B. Anderson, K. John McConnell

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In 2016, Oregon became the first of eight states to allow pharmacists to directly prescribe hormonal contraception (HC), including the pill, patch, or ring, without a clinic visit. In the two years following this policy change, the majority of ZIP codes across the state of Oregon had a pharmacist certified to prescribe HC.

Methods

We will utilize complementary methodologies to evaluate the effect of this policy change on convenient access to contraception (cost, supply dispensed), safety, contraceptive continuation and unintended pregnancy rates. We will conduct a prospective clinical cohort study to directly measure the impact of provider type on contraceptive continuation and to understand who is accessing hormonal contraception directly from pharmacists. We will concurrently conduct a retrospective analysis using medical claims data to evaluate the state-level effect of the policy. We will examine contraceptive continuation rates, incident pregnancy, and safety measures. The combination of these methodologies allows us to examine key woman-level factors, such as pregnancy intention and usual place of care, while also estimating the impact of the pharmacist prescription policy at the state level.

Discussion

Pharmacist prescription of HC is emerging nationally as a strategy to reduce unintended pregnancy. This study will provide data on the effect of this practice on convenient access to care, contraceptive safety and continuation rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Landau SC, Tapias MP, McGhee BT. Birth control within reach: a national survey on women's attitudes toward and interest in pharmacy access to hormonal contraception. Contraception. 2006;74(6):463–70.CrossRef Landau SC, Tapias MP, McGhee BT. Birth control within reach: a national survey on women's attitudes toward and interest in pharmacy access to hormonal contraception. Contraception. 2006;74(6):463–70.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hopkins K, Grossman D, White K, Amastae J, Potter JE. Reproductive health preventive screening among clinic vs. over-the-counter oral contraceptive users. Contraception. 2012;86(4):376–82.CrossRef Hopkins K, Grossman D, White K, Amastae J, Potter JE. Reproductive health preventive screening among clinic vs. over-the-counter oral contraceptive users. Contraception. 2012;86(4):376–82.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Grossman D, White K, Hopkins K, Amastae J, Shedlin M, Potter JE. Contraindications to combined oral contraceptives among over-the-counter compared with prescription users. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):558–65.CrossRef Grossman D, White K, Hopkins K, Amastae J, Shedlin M, Potter JE. Contraindications to combined oral contraceptives among over-the-counter compared with prescription users. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):558–65.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shotorbani S, Miller L, Blough DK, Gardner J. Agreement between women's and providers' assessment of hormonal contraceptive risk factors. Contraception. 2006;73(5):501–6.CrossRef Shotorbani S, Miller L, Blough DK, Gardner J. Agreement between women's and providers' assessment of hormonal contraceptive risk factors. Contraception. 2006;73(5):501–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Potter JE, McKinnon S, Hopkins K, Amastae J, Shedlin MG, Powers DA, et al. Continuation of prescribed compared with over-the-counter oral contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):551–7.CrossRef Potter JE, McKinnon S, Hopkins K, Amastae J, Shedlin MG, Powers DA, et al. Continuation of prescribed compared with over-the-counter oral contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):551–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rodriguez MI, Biel FM, Swartz JJ, Anderson L, Edelman AB. Pharmacists' experience with prescribing hormonal contraception in Oregon. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018;58(6):608–13.CrossRef Rodriguez MI, Biel FM, Swartz JJ, Anderson L, Edelman AB. Pharmacists' experience with prescribing hormonal contraception in Oregon. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018;58(6):608–13.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rodriguez MI, Anderson L, Edelman AB. Prescription of hormonal contraception by pharmacists in Oregon: implementation of house bill 2879. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):168–70.CrossRef Rodriguez MI, Anderson L, Edelman AB. Prescription of hormonal contraception by pharmacists in Oregon: implementation of house bill 2879. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):168–70.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Touloumis AAA, Kateri M. Generalized estimating equations for multinomial responses using a local odds ratio parameterization. Biometrics. 2013;69:633–40.CrossRef Touloumis AAA, Kateri M. Generalized estimating equations for multinomial responses using a local odds ratio parameterization. Biometrics. 2013;69:633–40.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Stuart EA. Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat Sci. 2010;25(1):1–21. Stuart EA. Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat Sci. 2010;25(1):1–21.
11.
go back to reference Raftery A. In: Marsden PV, editor. Bayesian model selection in social research. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995.CrossRef Raftery A. In: Marsden PV, editor. Bayesian model selection in social research. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J. Making the Most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. Am J Polit Sci. 2000;44:341–55.CrossRef King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J. Making the Most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. Am J Polit Sci. 2000;44:341–55.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Williams R. Using the margins command to estiamte and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 2012;12(2):308–31.CrossRef Williams R. Using the margins command to estiamte and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 2012;12(2):308–31.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dehlendorf C, Rodriguez MI, Levy K, Borrero S, Steinauer J. Disparities in family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(3):214–20.CrossRef Dehlendorf C, Rodriguez MI, Levy K, Borrero S, Steinauer J. Disparities in family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(3):214–20.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shih G, Vittinghoff E, Steinauer J, Dehlendorf C. Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive method choice in California. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;43(3):173–80.CrossRef Shih G, Vittinghoff E, Steinauer J, Dehlendorf C. Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive method choice in California. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;43(3):173–80.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dehlendorf C, Park SY, Emeremni CA, Comer D, Vincett K, Borrero S. Racial/ethnic disparities in contraceptive use: variation by age and women's reproductive experiences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(6):526 e1–9.CrossRef Dehlendorf C, Park SY, Emeremni CA, Comer D, Vincett K, Borrero S. Racial/ethnic disparities in contraceptive use: variation by age and women's reproductive experiences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(6):526 e1–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dehlendorf C, Harris LH, Weitz TA. Disparities in abortion rates: a public health approach. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(10):1772–9.CrossRef Dehlendorf C, Harris LH, Weitz TA. Disparities in abortion rates: a public health approach. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(10):1772–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pharmacists expand access to reproductive heaLthcare: PEARL study protocol
Authors
Maria I. Rodriguez
Blair G. Darney
Alison B. Edelman
Kimberly Yee
Lorinda B. Anderson
K. John McConnell
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4038-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue