Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Varying viewpoints of Belgian stakeholders on models of interhospital collaboration

Authors: Melissa De Regge, Kaat De Pourcq, Paul Gemmel, Carine Van de Voorde, Koen Van den Heede, Kristof Eeckloo

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hospitals are increasingly parts of larger care collaborations, rather than individual entities. Organizing and operating these collaborations is challenging; a significant number do not succeed, as it is difficult to align the goals of the partners. However, little research has focused on stakeholders’ views regarding hospital collaboration models or on whether these views are aligned with those of hospital management. This study explores Belgian hospital stakeholders’ views on the factors affecting hospital collaborations and their perspectives on different models for Belgian interhospital collaboration.

Methods

Qualitative focus group study on the viewpoints, barriers, and facilitators associated with hospital collaboration models (health system, network, joint venture).

Results

A total of 55 hospital stakeholders (hospital managers, chairs of medical councils, chair of hospital boards and special interest groups) participated in seven focus group sessions. Collaboration in health care is challenging, as the goals of the different stakeholder groups are partly parallel but also sometimes conflicting. Hospital managers and special interest groups favored health systems as the most integrated form. Hospital board members also opted for this model, but believed a coordinated network to be the most pragmatic and feasible model at the moment. Members of physicians’ organizations preferred the joint venture, as it creates more flexibility for physicians. Successful collaboration requires trust and commitment. Legislation must provide a supporting framework and governance models.

Conclusions

Involvement of all stakeholder groups in the process of decision-making within the collaboration is perceived as a necessity, which confirms the importance of the stakeholders’ theory. The health system is the collaboration structure best suited to enhancing task distribution and improving patient quality. However, the existence of networks and joint ventures is considered necessary in the process of transformation towards more solid hospital collaborations such as health systems.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jeurissen P, Duran A, Saltman RB. Uncomfortable realities: the challenge of creating real change in Europe’s consolidating hospital sector. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jeurissen P, Duran A, Saltman RB. Uncomfortable realities: the challenge of creating real change in Europe’s consolidating hospital sector. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Van den Heede K, Dubois C, Devriese S, Baier N, Camaly O, Depuijdt E, et al. Organisation and payment of emergency care services in Belgium: current situation and options for reform. Belgium Brussels: Short report KCE; 2016. Van den Heede K, Dubois C, Devriese S, Baier N, Camaly O, Depuijdt E, et al. Organisation and payment of emergency care services in Belgium: current situation and options for reform. Belgium Brussels: Short report KCE; 2016.
4.
go back to reference Van de Voorde C, Van den Heede K, Beguin C, Bouckaert N, Camberlin C, De Bekker P, et al. Required hospital capacity in 2025 and criteria for rationalisation of complex cancer surgery, radiotherapy and maternity services. Short report KCE: Belgium Brussels; 2017. Van de Voorde C, Van den Heede K, Beguin C, Bouckaert N, Camberlin C, De Bekker P, et al. Required hospital capacity in 2025 and criteria for rationalisation of complex cancer surgery, radiotherapy and maternity services. Short report KCE: Belgium Brussels; 2017.
5.
go back to reference Stordeur S, Vrijens F, Leroy R. Reference centres for adults with rare and complex cancers - policy recommendations to improve the organisation of care in Belgium. Rev Epidemiol Sante. 2016;64:1–6.CrossRef Stordeur S, Vrijens F, Leroy R. Reference centres for adults with rare and complex cancers - policy recommendations to improve the organisation of care in Belgium. Rev Epidemiol Sante. 2016;64:1–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Van den Heede K, Dubois C, Mistiaen P, Stordeur S, Cordon A, Farfan-Portet M. Evaluating the need to reform the organisation of care for major trauma patients in Belgium: an analysis of administrative databases. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0932-9. Van den Heede K, Dubois C, Mistiaen P, Stordeur S, Cordon A, Farfan-Portet M. Evaluating the need to reform the organisation of care for major trauma patients in Belgium: an analysis of administrative databases. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00068-018-0932-9.
7.
go back to reference Brown BB, Patel C, McInnes E, Mays N, Young J, Haines M. The effectiveness of clinical networks in improving quality of care and patient outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brown BB, Patel C, McInnes E, Mays N, Young J, Haines M. The effectiveness of clinical networks in improving quality of care and patient outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Rosko M, Proenca E. Impact of network and system use on hospital X-inefficiency. Health Care Manage Rev. 2005;30(1):69-79.CrossRefPubMed Rosko M, Proenca E. Impact of network and system use on hospital X-inefficiency. Health Care Manage Rev. 2005;30(1):69-79.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Imison C, Ham C, Hopson C, Stoltz B, Fagge F, Marsden N, et al. Future organisational models for the NHS. Perspectives for the Dalton review. United Kingdom: The King’s Fund; 2014. Imison C, Ham C, Hopson C, Stoltz B, Fagge F, Marsden N, et al. Future organisational models for the NHS. Perspectives for the Dalton review. United Kingdom: The King’s Fund; 2014.
10.
go back to reference Grafton J, Abernethy M, Lillis A. Organisational design choices in response to public sector reforms: a case study of mandated hospital networks. Manage Account Res. 2011;22:242–68.CrossRef Grafton J, Abernethy M, Lillis A. Organisational design choices in response to public sector reforms: a case study of mandated hospital networks. Manage Account Res. 2011;22:242–68.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nauenberg E, Brewer CS. Surveying hospital network structure in New York state: how are they structured? Health Care Manag Rev. 2000;25:67–9.CrossRef Nauenberg E, Brewer CS. Surveying hospital network structure in New York state: how are they structured? Health Care Manag Rev. 2000;25:67–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Moscovice I, Christianson J, Johnson J, Kralewski J, Manning W. Rural hospital networks: implications for rural health reform. Health Care Financ R. 1995;17:53–67. Moscovice I, Christianson J, Johnson J, Kralewski J, Manning W. Rural hospital networks: implications for rural health reform. Health Care Financ R. 1995;17:53–67.
13.
go back to reference Gallaghar RJ, LaMontagne MJ, Johnson LJ. Early intervention: the collaborative challenge. In: Johnson LJ, Gallagher RJ, LaMontagne MJ, Jordan BJ, Gallagher JJ, Hutinger PL, Karnes MB, editors. Meeting early intervention challenges: issues from birth to three. Baltimore: PH Brookes; 1995. Gallaghar RJ, LaMontagne MJ, Johnson LJ. Early intervention: the collaborative challenge. In: Johnson LJ, Gallagher RJ, LaMontagne MJ, Jordan BJ, Gallagher JJ, Hutinger PL, Karnes MB, editors. Meeting early intervention challenges: issues from birth to three. Baltimore: PH Brookes; 1995.
14.
go back to reference Stegelin DA, Jones SD. Components of early childhood interagency collaboration: results of a statewide study. Early Educ Dev. 1991;2:54–67.CrossRef Stegelin DA, Jones SD. Components of early childhood interagency collaboration: results of a statewide study. Early Educ Dev. 1991;2:54–67.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hine A, Fenton B, Custance M. Hospital collaboration in the NHS: exposing the myths. United Kingdom: KPMG International; 2015. Hine A, Fenton B, Custance M. Hospital collaboration in the NHS: exposing the myths. United Kingdom: KPMG International; 2015.
16.
go back to reference D'Amour DL, Goulet J, Labadie L, San Martín-Rodriguez L, Pineault R. A model and typology of collaboration between professionals in healthcare organizations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral D'Amour DL, Goulet J, Labadie L, San Martín-Rodriguez L, Pineault R. A model and typology of collaboration between professionals in healthcare organizations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Balser D, McClusky J. Managing stakeholder relationships and nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit Manag Lead. 2005;15:295–315.CrossRef Balser D, McClusky J. Managing stakeholder relationships and nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit Manag Lead. 2005;15:295–315.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Laplume AO, Sonpar K, Litz RA. Stakeholder theory: reviewing a theory that moves us. J Manage. 2008;34:1152–89. Laplume AO, Sonpar K, Litz RA. Stakeholder theory: reviewing a theory that moves us. J Manage. 2008;34:1152–89.
19.
go back to reference Kickbush I, Gleicher D. Governance for health in the 21st century. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2012. Kickbush I, Gleicher D. Governance for health in the 21st century. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2012.
20.
go back to reference Hellings J. Hospital governance aanbevelingen. Belgium Brussels: ICURO; 2012. Hellings J. Hospital governance aanbevelingen. Belgium Brussels: ICURO; 2012.
22.
go back to reference Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Pub Adm Res Theor. 2008;18:543–71.CrossRef Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Pub Adm Res Theor. 2008;18:543–71.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Pub Adm Res Theor. 2012;22:1–29.CrossRef Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Pub Adm Res Theor. 2012;22:1–29.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Allen P. New localism in the English National Health Service: what is it for? Health Policy. 2006;79:244–52.CrossRefPubMed Allen P. New localism in the English National Health Service: what is it for? Health Policy. 2006;79:244–52.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Greener I. Decision making in a time of significant reform: managing in the NHS. Admin Soc. 2008;40:194–210.CrossRef Greener I. Decision making in a time of significant reform: managing in the NHS. Admin Soc. 2008;40:194–210.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Pickard S. Choice, voice and the structures of accountability in the new NHS. In health policy and politics. New York: Routledge; 2007. Pickard S. Choice, voice and the structures of accountability in the new NHS. In health policy and politics. New York: Routledge; 2007.
28.
go back to reference Miles S. Stakeholder: essentially contested or just confused? J Bus Ethics. 2012;108:285–98.CrossRef Miles S. Stakeholder: essentially contested or just confused? J Bus Ethics. 2012;108:285–98.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Freeman RE. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984. Freeman RE. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
30.
go back to reference Hill CWL, Jones TM. Stakeholder-agency theory. J Manage Stud. 1992;29:131–54.CrossRef Hill CWL, Jones TM. Stakeholder-agency theory. J Manage Stud. 1992;29:131–54.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Carroll AB. Business and society: managing corporate social performance. Boston: Little, Brown; 1981. Carroll AB. Business and society: managing corporate social performance. Boston: Little, Brown; 1981.
32.
go back to reference Blair JD, Payne GT, Rotarius TM, Whitehead CJ, Whyte EG. Strategic management of stakeholder relationships. Health Care Administration: Planning, Implementing, and Managing Organized Delivery Systems. Gaithersburg: Aspen; 1999. Blair JD, Payne GT, Rotarius TM, Whitehead CJ, Whyte EG. Strategic management of stakeholder relationships. Health Care Administration: Planning, Implementing, and Managing Organized Delivery Systems. Gaithersburg: Aspen; 1999.
33.
go back to reference Fottler MD, Blair JD, Whitehead CJ, Laus MD, Savage GT. Assessing key stakeholders: who matters to hospitals and why? Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1989;34:525–46.PubMed Fottler MD, Blair JD, Whitehead CJ, Laus MD, Savage GT. Assessing key stakeholders: who matters to hospitals and why? Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1989;34:525–46.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Emerson K, Nabatchi T. Collaborative governance regimes. Washington: Georgetown University press; 2015. Emerson K, Nabatchi T. Collaborative governance regimes. Washington: Georgetown University press; 2015.
35.
go back to reference Savage GT, Taylor RL, Rotarius TM, Buesseler JA. Governance of integrated delivery systems/networks: a stakeholder approach. Health Care Manage Rev. 1997;22:7–20.PubMed Savage GT, Taylor RL, Rotarius TM, Buesseler JA. Governance of integrated delivery systems/networks: a stakeholder approach. Health Care Manage Rev. 1997;22:7–20.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Santilli J, Vogenberg FR. Key strategic trends that impact healthcare decision-making and stakeholder roles in the new marketplace. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015;8:15–20.PubMedPubMedCentral Santilli J, Vogenberg FR. Key strategic trends that impact healthcare decision-making and stakeholder roles in the new marketplace. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015;8:15–20.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plann. 2000;15:239–46.CrossRef Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plann. 2000;15:239–46.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Provan KG, Milward HB. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Admin Rev. 2001;61:414–23.CrossRef Provan KG, Milward HB. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Admin Rev. 2001;61:414–23.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Rowley T. Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influence. Acad Manag Rev. 1997;22:887–910.CrossRef Rowley T. Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influence. Acad Manag Rev. 1997;22:887–910.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Culyer AJ. Involving stakeholders in healthcare decisions: the experience of the National Institute for health and clinical excellence (NICE) in England and Wales. Healthc Q. 2005;8:56–60.CrossRefPubMed Culyer AJ. Involving stakeholders in healthcare decisions: the experience of the National Institute for health and clinical excellence (NICE) in England and Wales. Healthc Q. 2005;8:56–60.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C. The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Acad Manag J. 2005;48:117–34.CrossRef Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C. The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Acad Manag J. 2005;48:117–34.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Gagliardi A, Lemieux-Charles L, Brown A, Sullivan T, Goel V. Stakeholder preferences for cancer care performance indicators. IJHCQA. 2008;21:175–89. Gagliardi A, Lemieux-Charles L, Brown A, Sullivan T, Goel V. Stakeholder preferences for cancer care performance indicators. IJHCQA. 2008;21:175–89.
44.
go back to reference Pate J, Fischbacher M, Mackinnon J. Health improvement: countervailing pillars of partnership and profession. JHOM. 2010;24:200–17. Pate J, Fischbacher M, Mackinnon J. Health improvement: countervailing pillars of partnership and profession. JHOM. 2010;24:200–17.
45.
go back to reference Tregunno D, Baker R, Barnsley J, Murray M. Competing values of emergency department performance: balancing multiple stakeholder perspectives. Health Serv Res. 2004;39:771–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tregunno D, Baker R, Barnsley J, Murray M. Competing values of emergency department performance: balancing multiple stakeholder perspectives. Health Serv Res. 2004;39:771–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Friedman L, Goes J. Why integrated health networks have failed. Front Health Serv Manag. 2001;17:3–54.CrossRef Friedman L, Goes J. Why integrated health networks have failed. Front Health Serv Manag. 2001;17:3–54.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Glouberman S, Mintberg H. Managing the care of health and the cure of disease, part 1: differentiation. Health Care Manag Rev. 2001;26:56–69.CrossRef Glouberman S, Mintberg H. Managing the care of health and the cure of disease, part 1: differentiation. Health Care Manag Rev. 2001;26:56–69.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Glouberman S, Mintberg H. Managing the care of health and the cure of disease, part 2: integration. Health Care Manag Rev. 2001;26:70–84.CrossRef Glouberman S, Mintberg H. Managing the care of health and the cure of disease, part 2: integration. Health Care Manag Rev. 2001;26:70–84.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Cooper K. Exploring stakeholders’ participation in nonprofit collaboration: Doctoreal Dissertation; 2014. Cooper K. Exploring stakeholders’ participation in nonprofit collaboration: Doctoreal Dissertation; 2014.
51.
go back to reference Butterfield KD, Reed R, Lemak DJ. An inductive model of collaboration from the stakeholder’s perspective. Bus Soc. 2004;43:162–95.CrossRef Butterfield KD, Reed R, Lemak DJ. An inductive model of collaboration from the stakeholder’s perspective. Bus Soc. 2004;43:162–95.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Hardy C, Phillips N, Lawrence T. Resources, knowledge and influence: the organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. J Manage Stud. 2003;40:321–47.CrossRef Hardy C, Phillips N, Lawrence T. Resources, knowledge and influence: the organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. J Manage Stud. 2003;40:321–47.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Bailey D, Koney N. Strategic alliances among health and human services organizations: from affiliations to consolidations, vol. 41. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2000.CrossRef Bailey D, Koney N. Strategic alliances among health and human services organizations: from affiliations to consolidations, vol. 41. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2000.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Tirmizi SA, Vogelsang JD. Leading and managing in the social sector: strategies for advancing human dignity and social justice. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2017. p. 2017.CrossRef Tirmizi SA, Vogelsang JD. Leading and managing in the social sector: strategies for advancing human dignity and social justice. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2017. p. 2017.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Krueger R, Casey M. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Vol. 4. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2009. Krueger R, Casey M. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Vol. 4. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2009.
57.
go back to reference Kitzinger J. Focus Group. In: Pope C, Mays N, editors. Qualitative research in health care. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing/ BMJ Books; 2006. p. 21–31.CrossRef Kitzinger J. Focus Group. In: Pope C, Mays N, editors. Qualitative research in health care. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing/ BMJ Books; 2006. p. 21–31.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for Health Research. California: SAGE Publications; 2009. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for Health Research. California: SAGE Publications; 2009.
59.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Evaluation of the Lovell Federal Health Care Center Merger. Findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Washington: National Academies Press; 2012. Institute of Medicine. Evaluation of the Lovell Federal Health Care Center Merger. Findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Washington: National Academies Press; 2012.
61.
go back to reference Provan KG, Kenis P. Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J Pub Adm Res Theor. 2008;18:229–52.CrossRef Provan KG, Kenis P. Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J Pub Adm Res Theor. 2008;18:229–52.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Johnson LJ, Zorn D, Tam BKY, LaMontagne MJ, Johnson SA. Stakeholders’ views of factors that impact successful interagency collaboration. Except Children. 2003;69:195–209.CrossRef Johnson LJ, Zorn D, Tam BKY, LaMontagne MJ, Johnson SA. Stakeholders’ views of factors that impact successful interagency collaboration. Except Children. 2003;69:195–209.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Burns LR, Muller RW. Hospital-physician collaboration: landscape of economic integration and impact on clinical integration. Milbank Q. 2008;86:375–434.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Burns LR, Muller RW. Hospital-physician collaboration: landscape of economic integration and impact on clinical integration. Milbank Q. 2008;86:375–434.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
64.
go back to reference Powell W. Neither market nor hierarchy. The sociology of organizations: classic, contemporary, and critical readings. Res Organ Behav. 2003;315:104–17. Powell W. Neither market nor hierarchy. The sociology of organizations: classic, contemporary, and critical readings. Res Organ Behav. 2003;315:104–17.
65.
go back to reference Lenssen G, Arenas D, Lacy P, Pickard S, Albareda L. Corporate responsibility, governance and accountability: from self-regulation to co-regulation. Corp Gov. 2008;8:430–9.CrossRef Lenssen G, Arenas D, Lacy P, Pickard S, Albareda L. Corporate responsibility, governance and accountability: from self-regulation to co-regulation. Corp Gov. 2008;8:430–9.CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Detomasi DA. The multinational corporation and global governance: modelling global public policy networks. J Bus Ethics. 2007;71:321–34.CrossRef Detomasi DA. The multinational corporation and global governance: modelling global public policy networks. J Bus Ethics. 2007;71:321–34.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Hoetker G, Mellewigt T. Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: matching alliance governance to asset type. Strateg Manag J. 2009;30:1025–44.CrossRef Hoetker G, Mellewigt T. Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: matching alliance governance to asset type. Strateg Manag J. 2009;30:1025–44.CrossRef
69.
go back to reference Probandari A, Utarini A, Lindholm L, Hurtig A. Life of a partnership: the process of collaboration between the National Tuberculosis Program and the hospitals in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:1386–94.CrossRefPubMed Probandari A, Utarini A, Lindholm L, Hurtig A. Life of a partnership: the process of collaboration between the National Tuberculosis Program and the hospitals in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:1386–94.CrossRefPubMed
70.
go back to reference Ruef M, Scott W. A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Admin Sci Quart. 1998;43:877–904.CrossRef Ruef M, Scott W. A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Admin Sci Quart. 1998;43:877–904.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Varying viewpoints of Belgian stakeholders on models of interhospital collaboration
Authors
Melissa De Regge
Kaat De Pourcq
Paul Gemmel
Carine Van de Voorde
Koen Van den Heede
Kristof Eeckloo
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3763-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue