Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Development of a benchmark tool for cancer centers; results from a pilot exercise

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Differences in cancer survival exist between countries in Europe. Benchmarking of good practices can assist cancer centers to improve their services aiming for reduced inequalities. The aim of the BENCH-CAN project was to develop a cancer care benchmark tool, identify performance differences and yield good practice examples, contributing to improving the quality of interdisciplinary care. This paper describes the development of this benchmark tool and its validation in cancer centers throughout Europe.

Methods

A benchmark tool was developed and executed according to a 13 step benchmarking process. Indicator selection was based on literature, existing accreditation systems, and expert opinions. A final format was tested in eight cancer centers. Center visits by a team of minimally 3 persons, including a patient representative, were performed to verify information, grasp context and check on additional questions (through semi-structured interviews). Based on the visits, the benchmark methodology identified opportunities for improvement.

Results

The final tool existed of 61 qualitative and 141 quantitative indicators, which were structured in an evaluative framework. Data from all eight participating centers showed inter-organization variability on many indicators, such as bed utilization and provision of survivorship care. Subsequently, improvement suggestions for centers were made; 85% of which were agreed upon.

Conclusion

A benchmarking tool for cancer centers was successfully developed and tested and is available in an open format. The tool allows comparison of inter-organizational performance. Improvement opportunities were successfully identified for every center involved and the tool was positively evaluated.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(1):23–34.CrossRefPubMed De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(1):23–34.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ettorchi-Tardy A, Levif M, Michel P. Benchmarking: a method for continuous quality improvement in health. Healthc Policy. 2012;7(4):e101.PubMedPubMedCentral Ettorchi-Tardy A, Levif M, Michel P. Benchmarking: a method for continuous quality improvement in health. Healthc Policy. 2012;7(4):e101.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Joint CommissionBenchmarking in health care. Joint commission. Resources; 2011. Joint CommissionBenchmarking in health care. Joint commission. Resources; 2011.
4.
go back to reference Gudmundsson H, Wyatt A, Gordon L. Benchmarking and sustainable transport policy: learning from the BEST network. Transp Rev. 2005;25(6):669–90.CrossRef Gudmundsson H, Wyatt A, Gordon L. Benchmarking and sustainable transport policy: learning from the BEST network. Transp Rev. 2005;25(6):669–90.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Longbottom D. Benchmarking in the UK: an empirical study of practitioners and academics. BIJ. 2000;7(2):98–117. Longbottom D. Benchmarking in the UK: an empirical study of practitioners and academics. BIJ. 2000;7(2):98–117.
6.
go back to reference van Lent W, de Beer R, van Harten W. International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:253.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed van Lent W, de Beer R, van Harten W. International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:253.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hakes C. The EFQM excellence model for assessing organizational performance. Van Haren Publishing; 2007. Hakes C. The EFQM excellence model for assessing organizational performance. Van Haren Publishing; 2007.
13.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
16.
go back to reference De Korne DF, Sol KJCA, van Wijngaarden JDH, et al. Evaluation of an international benchmarking initiative in nine eye hospitals. Health Care Manag Rev. 2010;35:23.CrossRef De Korne DF, Sol KJCA, van Wijngaarden JDH, et al. Evaluation of an international benchmarking initiative in nine eye hospitals. Health Care Manag Rev. 2010;35:23.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cowper J, Samuels M. Performance benchmarking in the public sector: the United Kingdom experience. Benchmarking, evaluation and strategic Management in the Public Sector. Paris: OECD; 1997. Cowper J, Samuels M. Performance benchmarking in the public sector: the United Kingdom experience. Benchmarking, evaluation and strategic Management in the Public Sector. Paris: OECD; 1997.
18.
go back to reference Brinkmann S. Interview. In: Teo T, editor. Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York: Springer; 2014. Brinkmann S. Interview. In: Teo T, editor. Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York: Springer; 2014.
21.
go back to reference Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Jha AK. Public reporting of mortality rates for hospitalized Medicare patients and trends in mortality for reported conditions. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(3):153–60.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Jha AK. Public reporting of mortality rates for hospitalized Medicare patients and trends in mortality for reported conditions. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(3):153–60.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
go back to reference Wind A, Lobo MF, van Dijk J, et al. Management and performance features of cancer centers in Europe: a fuzzy-set analysis. JBR. 2016;69(11):5507–11.CrossRef Wind A, Lobo MF, van Dijk J, et al. Management and performance features of cancer centers in Europe: a fuzzy-set analysis. JBR. 2016;69(11):5507–11.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wulff CN, Thygesen M, Søndergaard J, Vedsted P. Case management used to optimize cancer care pathways: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8(1):1.CrossRef Wulff CN, Thygesen M, Søndergaard J, Vedsted P. Case management used to optimize cancer care pathways: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8(1):1.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wind A, van Harten W. Benchmarking specialty hospitals, a scoping review on theory and practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):245. Wind A, van Harten W. Benchmarking specialty hospitals, a scoping review on theory and practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):245.
Metadata
Title
Development of a benchmark tool for cancer centers; results from a pilot exercise
Publication date
01-12-2018
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3574-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue