Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Caesarean section rate and postnatal bed occupancy: a retrospective study replacing assumptions with evidence

Authors: Subhadeep Roy, L Montgomery Irvine

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Obstetric units across the UK face resource pressures alongside a rising rate of Caesarean section (CS). It is assumed that this places a further burden in the form of postnatal bed demands. The number of inpatient beds has fallen nationally, and this may be used to justify attempts to restrict the CS rate. We set out to replace such assumptions with evidence. We did not find any similar contemporary analysis in a literature search.

Methods

The postnatal length of stay (LOS) of women delivering at Watford General Hospital, a large unit hosting around 5500 deliveries per annum, was stratified by mode of delivery. Differences within and across time periods were analysed.

Results

The CS rate rose from 14.5% in 1995 to 30.9% in 2015. The mean LOS post-CS declined from 4.2 to 2.4 days. These data were statistically significant to p < 0.001. Over this period the standardised total postnatal bed use for all delivery modes fell from 11083 days to 7894 days. A 113% rise in the CS rate was accommodated by only a 19.8% rise in postnatal bed use attributable to CS patients.

Conclusions

Whatever pressures may be exacerbated by the rising CS rate, bed occupancy is not one of them. In discussion we widen our argument to suggest that resource pressures should not be used to justify limitations in the CS rate.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Vogel JP, Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multi-country surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e260–70.CrossRef Vogel JP, Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multi-country surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e260–70.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, et al. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3:CD004660.PubMedCentral Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, et al. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3:CD004660.PubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Bragg F, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2010;341:c5065.CrossRef Bragg F, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2010;341:c5065.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Smith GC, Cordeaux Y, White IR, et al. The effect of delaying childbirth on primary caesarean section rates. PLoS Med. 2008;5(7):e144.CrossRef Smith GC, Cordeaux Y, White IR, et al. The effect of delaying childbirth on primary caesarean section rates. PLoS Med. 2008;5(7):e144.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dammer U, Bogner R, Weiss C, et al. Influence of body mass index on induction of labour: a historical cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(4):697–707.CrossRef Dammer U, Bogner R, Weiss C, et al. Influence of body mass index on induction of labour: a historical cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(4):697–707.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Moore EK, Irvine LM. The impact of maternal age over forty years on the caesarean section rate: six year experience at a busy district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(3):238–40.CrossRef Moore EK, Irvine LM. The impact of maternal age over forty years on the caesarean section rate: six year experience at a busy district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(3):238–40.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Irvine LM, Shaw RW. Trial of scar or elective repeat caesarean section at maternal request? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;21(5):463–7.CrossRef Irvine LM, Shaw RW. Trial of scar or elective repeat caesarean section at maternal request? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;21(5):463–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jackson NV, Irvine LM. The influence of maternal request on the elective caesarean section rate. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;18(2):115–9.CrossRef Jackson NV, Irvine LM. The influence of maternal request on the elective caesarean section rate. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;18(2):115–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Solheim KN, Esakott TF, Little SE, et al. The effect of caesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accrete, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1341–6.CrossRef Solheim KN, Esakott TF, Little SE, et al. The effect of caesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accrete, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1341–6.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kenyon SL, Johns N, Duggal S, Hewston R, Gale N. Improving the care pathway for women who request caesarean section: an experience-based co-design study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):348.CrossRef Kenyon SL, Johns N, Duggal S, Hewston R, Gale N. Improving the care pathway for women who request caesarean section: an experience-based co-design study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):348.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy D. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth. 2007;34:65–79.CrossRef McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy D. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth. 2007;34:65–79.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Caesarean section rate and postnatal bed occupancy: a retrospective study replacing assumptions with evidence
Authors
Subhadeep Roy
L Montgomery Irvine
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3570-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue