Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Multidisciplinary teams and ICT: a qualitative study exploring the use of technology and its impact on multidisciplinary team meetings

Authors: Anna Janssen, Tracy Robinson, Melissa Brunner, Paul Harnett, Kylie E. Museth, Tim Shaw

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are an integral component in the delivery of health care. This is particularly evident in the delivery of cancer care, where multidisciplinary teams are internationally recognized as the preferred method for service delivery. The use of health information systems and technology are key enabling factors for building the capacity of MDTs to engage in improvement and implementation projects but there is scant research on how MDTs make use of technology and information systems or the kinds of systems needed for them to undertake improvement and implementation research. This paper reports findings on how seven MDTs in cancer care utilized technological and information systems and the barriers and enabling factors that impacted on their uptake.

Methods

Seven multidisciplinary teams from two large metropolitan hospitals participated in the study. Qualitative methods including structured observations and semi structured interviews that explored how teams engaged in research and improvement activities were utilized. Participants were also observed and interviewed in relation to their use of data and health information systems. Findings were subject to content analysis and key themes were identified. Interviews were transcribed and de-identified and key themes were subsequently discussed with participants to allow for member checking and further clarification of findings.

Results

A total of 43 MDT meetings across seven tumor streams were observed. Of these, observation notes from 13 meetings contained direct references to emerging technologies and health information systems. Findings from 15 semi-structured interviews were also analyzed in relation to how MDTs used technology in weekly meetings, and the perceived impact of technology. Three broad themes emerged: (1) methods for data collection and use by MDTs, (2) the impact of technology on the MDT meeting environment, and (3) the impact of technology and information systems on clinical decision making.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates that real time data collection and imaging may improve patient centered care coordination. However, ICTs can be used sub-optimally by teams. We therefore urge additional research to identify the enabling factors that support better collection and use of outcome data from ICT.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Marsch LA, Gustafson DH. The role of technology in health care innovation: a commentary. J Dual Diagn. 2013;9(1):101–3.CrossRefPubMed Marsch LA, Gustafson DH. The role of technology in health care innovation: a commentary. J Dual Diagn. 2013;9(1):101–3.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Booth RG. Educating the future eHealth professional nurse. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2006;3(1) Booth RG. Educating the future eHealth professional nurse. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2006;3(1)
3.
go back to reference Rosenberg L. Are healthcare leaders ready for the real revolution? J Behav Health Serv Res. 2012;39(3):215–9.CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg L. Are healthcare leaders ready for the real revolution? J Behav Health Serv Res. 2012;39(3):215–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kayyali B, Knott D, Van Kuiken S: The big-data revolution in US health care: accelerating value and innovation. New York: Mc Kinsey & Company. 2013:1–13. Kayyali B, Knott D, Van Kuiken S: The big-data revolution in US health care: accelerating value and innovation. New York: Mc Kinsey & Company. 2013:1–13.
5.
go back to reference Groves P, Kayyali B, Knott D, Kuiken SV: The'big data'revolution in healthcare: accelerating value and innovation. 2016. Groves P, Kayyali B, Knott D, Kuiken SV: The'big data'revolution in healthcare: accelerating value and innovation. 2016.
6.
go back to reference Clauser SB, Wagner EH, Bowles EJA, Tuzzio L, Greene SM. Improving modern cancer care through information technology. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(5):S198–207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clauser SB, Wagner EH, Bowles EJA, Tuzzio L, Greene SM. Improving modern cancer care through information technology. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(5):S198–207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Rothman B, Leonard JC, Vigoda MM. Future of electronic health records: implications for decision support. Mt Sinai J Med. 2012;79(6):757–68.CrossRefPubMed Rothman B, Leonard JC, Vigoda MM. Future of electronic health records: implications for decision support. Mt Sinai J Med. 2012;79(6):757–68.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG, Shields A, Rosenbaum S, Blumenthal D. Use of electronic health records in US hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(16):1628–38.CrossRefPubMed Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG, Shields A, Rosenbaum S, Blumenthal D. Use of electronic health records in US hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(16):1628–38.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Warrington L, Absolom K, Velikova G. Integrated care pathways for cancer survivors–a role for patient-reported outcome measures and health informatics. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(5):600–8.CrossRefPubMed Warrington L, Absolom K, Velikova G. Integrated care pathways for cancer survivors–a role for patient-reported outcome measures and health informatics. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(5):600–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shiloach M, Frencher SK, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG, Richards KE, Ko CY, Hall BL. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):6–16.CrossRefPubMed Shiloach M, Frencher SK, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG, Richards KE, Ko CY, Hall BL. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):6–16.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bowman S: Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2013, 10:1c (Fall). Bowman S: Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2013, 10:1c (Fall).
12.
go back to reference Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff. 2004;23(2):116–26.CrossRef Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff. 2004;23(2):116–26.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Leeder S, Russell L, Beaton A. Towards more meaningful measures in healthcare. Asia Pac J Health Manag. 2016;11(3):22. Leeder S, Russell L, Beaton A. Towards more meaningful measures in healthcare. Asia Pac J Health Manag. 2016;11(3):22.
14.
go back to reference Xylinas E, Rouprêt M, Kluth L, Scherr DS, Shariat SF. Collaborative research networks as a platform for virtual multidisciplinary, international approach to managing difficult clinical cases: an example from the upper tract urothelial carcinoma collaboration. Eur Urol. 2012;62(5):943–5.CrossRefPubMed Xylinas E, Rouprêt M, Kluth L, Scherr DS, Shariat SF. Collaborative research networks as a platform for virtual multidisciplinary, international approach to managing difficult clinical cases: an example from the upper tract urothelial carcinoma collaboration. Eur Urol. 2012;62(5):943–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jalil R, Ahmed M, Green JS, Sevdalis N. Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective. Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):389–94.CrossRefPubMed Jalil R, Ahmed M, Green JS, Sevdalis N. Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective. Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):389–94.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Van Dijk-de Vries A, Duimel-Peeters I, Muris J, Wesseling G, Beusmans G, Vrijhoef H. Effectiveness of teamwork in an integrated care setting for patients with COPD: development and testing of a self-evaluation instrument for interprofessional teams. Int J Integrated Care. 2016;16(1) Van Dijk-de Vries A, Duimel-Peeters I, Muris J, Wesseling G, Beusmans G, Vrijhoef H. Effectiveness of teamwork in an integrated care setting for patients with COPD: development and testing of a self-evaluation instrument for interprofessional teams. Int J Integrated Care. 2016;16(1)
17.
go back to reference Reiss-Brennan B, Brunisholz KD, Dredge C, Briot P, Grazier K, Wilcox A, Savitz L, James B. Association of integrated team-based care with health care quality, utilization, and cost. Jama. 2016;316(8):826–34.CrossRefPubMed Reiss-Brennan B, Brunisholz KD, Dredge C, Briot P, Grazier K, Wilcox A, Savitz L, James B. Association of integrated team-based care with health care quality, utilization, and cost. Jama. 2016;316(8):826–34.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference O'leary KJ, Sehgal NL, Terrell G, Williams MV. Interdisciplinary teamwork in hospitals: a review and practical recommendations for improvement. J Hosp Med. 2012;7(1):48–54.CrossRefPubMed O'leary KJ, Sehgal NL, Terrell G, Williams MV. Interdisciplinary teamwork in hospitals: a review and practical recommendations for improvement. J Hosp Med. 2012;7(1):48–54.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Groves P, Kayyali B, Knott D, Kuiken SV: The “big data” revolution in healthcare. Accelerating value and innovation. New York: McKinsey & Company. 2013. In.; 2016. Groves P, Kayyali B, Knott D, Kuiken SV: The “big data” revolution in healthcare. Accelerating value and innovation. New York: McKinsey & Company. 2013. In.; 2016.
20.
go back to reference Clarke S, Wilson ML, Terhaar M. Using dashboard technology and clinical decision support systems to improve heart team efficiency and accuracy: review of the literature. In: Nursing informatics: 2016; 2016. p. 364–6. Clarke S, Wilson ML, Terhaar M. Using dashboard technology and clinical decision support systems to improve heart team efficiency and accuracy: review of the literature. In: Nursing informatics: 2016; 2016. p. 364–6.
21.
go back to reference Rinfret S, Lussier M-T, Peirce A, Duhamel F, Cossette S, Lalonde L, Tremblay C, Guertin M-C, LeLorier J, Turgeon J. The impact of a multidisciplinary information technology–supported program on blood pressure control in primary care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(3):170–7.CrossRefPubMed Rinfret S, Lussier M-T, Peirce A, Duhamel F, Cossette S, Lalonde L, Tremblay C, Guertin M-C, LeLorier J, Turgeon J. The impact of a multidisciplinary information technology–supported program on blood pressure control in primary care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(3):170–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tran V, Lam MK, Amon KL, Brunner M, Hines M, Penman M, Lowe R, Togher L. Interdisciplinary eHealth for the care of people living with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2017;31(13–14):1701–10.CrossRefPubMed Tran V, Lam MK, Amon KL, Brunner M, Hines M, Penman M, Lowe R, Togher L. Interdisciplinary eHealth for the care of people living with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2017;31(13–14):1701–10.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Robinson TE, Janssen A, Harnett P, Museth KE, Provan PJ, Hills DJ, Shaw T. Embedding continuous quality improvement processes in multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: exploring the boundaries between quality and implementation science. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41(3):291–6.CrossRefPubMed Robinson TE, Janssen A, Harnett P, Museth KE, Provan PJ, Hills DJ, Shaw T. Embedding continuous quality improvement processes in multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: exploring the boundaries between quality and implementation science. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41(3):291–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Patkar V, Acosta D, Davidson T, Jones A, Fox J, Keshtgar M. Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011;2011:831605.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patkar V, Acosta D, Davidson T, Jones A, Fox J, Keshtgar M. Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011;2011:831605.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Aapro M, Astier A, Audisio R, Banks I, Bedossa P, Brain E, Cameron D, Casali P, Chiti A, De Mattos-Arruda L. Identifying critical steps towards improved access to innovation in cancer care: a European CanCer organisation position paper. Eur J Cancer. 2017;82:193–202.CrossRefPubMed Aapro M, Astier A, Audisio R, Banks I, Bedossa P, Brain E, Cameron D, Casali P, Chiti A, De Mattos-Arruda L. Identifying critical steps towards improved access to innovation in cancer care: a European CanCer organisation position paper. Eur J Cancer. 2017;82:193–202.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Li J, Robertson T. Physical space and information space: studies of collaboration in distributed multi-disciplinary medical team meetings. Behav Inform Technol. 2011;30(4):443–54.CrossRef Li J, Robertson T. Physical space and information space: studies of collaboration in distributed multi-disciplinary medical team meetings. Behav Inform Technol. 2011;30(4):443–54.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Creswell JD: Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: sage publications; 2017. Creswell JW, Creswell JD: Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: sage publications; 2017.
28.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference de Lusignan S, van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Fam Pract. 2006;23(2):253–63.CrossRefPubMed de Lusignan S, van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Fam Pract. 2006;23(2):253–63.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Howell D, Fitch M, Bakker D, Green E, Sussman J, Mayo S, Mohammed S, Lee C, Doran D. Core domains for a person-focused outcome measurement system in cancer (PROMS-Cancer Core) for routine care: a scoping review and Canadian Delphi consensus. Value Health. 2013;16(1):76–87.CrossRefPubMed Howell D, Fitch M, Bakker D, Green E, Sussman J, Mayo S, Mohammed S, Lee C, Doran D. Core domains for a person-focused outcome measurement system in cancer (PROMS-Cancer Core) for routine care: a scoping review and Canadian Delphi consensus. Value Health. 2013;16(1):76–87.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Weiner MG, Embi PJ. Toward reuse of clinical data for research and quality improvement: the end of the beginning? Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(5):359–60.CrossRefPubMed Weiner MG, Embi PJ. Toward reuse of clinical data for research and quality improvement: the end of the beginning? Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(5):359–60.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Girgis A, Delaney GP, Arnold A, Miller AA, Levesque JV, Kaadan N, Carolan MG, Cook N, Masters K, Tran TT. Development and feasibility testing of prompt-care, an ehealth system for collection and use of patient-reported outcome measures for personalized treatment and care: a study protocol. JMIR Res Protocols. 2016;5(4):e227.CrossRef Girgis A, Delaney GP, Arnold A, Miller AA, Levesque JV, Kaadan N, Carolan MG, Cook N, Masters K, Tran TT. Development and feasibility testing of prompt-care, an ehealth system for collection and use of patient-reported outcome measures for personalized treatment and care: a study protocol. JMIR Res Protocols. 2016;5(4):e227.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lluch M. Healthcare professionals’ organisational barriers to health information technologies—a literature review. Int J Med Inf. 2011;80(12):849–62.CrossRef Lluch M. Healthcare professionals’ organisational barriers to health information technologies—a literature review. Int J Med Inf. 2011;80(12):849–62.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2006;6(1):3.CrossRef Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2006;6(1):3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multidisciplinary teams and ICT: a qualitative study exploring the use of technology and its impact on multidisciplinary team meetings
Authors
Anna Janssen
Tracy Robinson
Melissa Brunner
Paul Harnett
Kylie E. Museth
Tim Shaw
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3242-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue