Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

How health system factors affect primary care practitioners’ decisions to refer patients for further investigation: protocol for a pan-European ecological study

Authors: Michael Harris, Gordon Taylor, The Örenäs Research Group

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is wide variation in the overall one-year relative cancer survival rates across Europe, and this is thought to indicate national variations in stage of disease at diagnosis. However, there is little evidence to explain how different national systems influence a primary care practitioner’s (PCP’s) referral decisions, and how these relate to the variation in survival rates.
This study investigates the health system factors that influence the thinking of PCPs when faced with patients who may have cancer, how they compare across European countries, and how they relate to national one-year relative cancer relative survival rates.

Methods

An online quantitative questionnaire with closed-ended questions is used in a cross-sectional survey of 1250 PCPs in Europe, in 25 local health areas in 20 countries. Descriptive data are elicited for each country, including respondents’ demographic details.
An exploratory factor analysis will identify factors underlying the decision to refer patients for further investigations. Between-country variation in these factors will then be further investigated and presented as means with 95% confidence intervals. A regression model will be fitted for the vignettes using one-year relative survival as the outcome, with the proportion of PCPs opting to investigate as a single explanatory variable. Weighted regression will be used to explore which health system factors are associated with opting to investigate and with one-year relative survival.
Linear correlations will be estimated between the proportions opting to investigate and national survival rates. When comparing between countries, weighted linear regression will be used to adjust for different sample sizes in each country.

Discussion

This study investigates which system factors affect PCPs’ decisions to refer and investigate patients who may have cancer, how they compare across 20 European countries, and how these factors relate to cancer survival rates.
Knowledge of the extent and variability of the health system factors that affect referral decisions will inform future health service design, policy and research.
Literature
1.
go back to reference EUROCARE. EUROCARE-5. Istituto Nazionale Tumori (Milan IaISdSR, Italy). Milan and Rome; 2014. EUROCARE. EUROCARE-5. Istituto Nazionale Tumori (Milan IaISdSR, Italy). Milan and Rome; 2014.
2.
go back to reference Abdel-Rahman M, Stockton D, Rachet B, Hakulinen T, Coleman MP. What if cancer survival in Britain were the same as in Europe: how many deaths are avoidable? Br J Cancer. 2009;101(S2):S115–S24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abdel-Rahman M, Stockton D, Rachet B, Hakulinen T, Coleman MP. What if cancer survival in Britain were the same as in Europe: how many deaths are avoidable? Br J Cancer. 2009;101(S2):S115–S24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference EUROCARE. EUROCARE-4 Survival of cancer patients in Europe. Istituto Nazionale Tumori. Milan IaISdSR, Italy: Eurocare; 2011. EUROCARE. EUROCARE-4 Survival of cancer patients in Europe. Istituto Nazionale Tumori. Milan IaISdSR, Italy: Eurocare; 2011.
8.
go back to reference Thomson CS, Forman D. Cancer survival in England and the influence of early diagnosis: what can we learn from recent EUROCARE results? Br J Cancer. 2009;101:S102–S9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thomson CS, Forman D. Cancer survival in England and the influence of early diagnosis: what can we learn from recent EUROCARE results? Br J Cancer. 2009;101:S102–S9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5 - a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(1):23–34.CrossRefPubMed De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5 - a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(1):23–34.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C, et al. Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the international Cancer benchmarking partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):127–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C, et al. Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the international Cancer benchmarking partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):127–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Rubin G, Vedsted P, Emery J. Improving cancer outcomes: better access to diagnostics in primary care could be critical. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(586):317–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rubin G, Vedsted P, Emery J. Improving cancer outcomes: better access to diagnostics in primary care could be critical. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(586):317–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Neal RD, Tharmanathan P, France B, Din NU, Cotton S, Fallon-Ferguson J, et al. Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(Suppl 1):S92–107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Neal RD, Tharmanathan P, France B, Din NU, Cotton S, Fallon-Ferguson J, et al. Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(Suppl 1):S92–107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Foot C, Harrison T. How to improve cancer survival: explaining England’s relatively poor rates. London: The King's Fund; 2011. p. 30. January 2012 Foot C, Harrison T. How to improve cancer survival: explaining England’s relatively poor rates. London: The King's Fund; 2011. p. 30. January 2012
14.
go back to reference Cancer Research UK. CancerStats key facts: all cancers combined. Cancer Research UK: United Kingdom; 2012. Cancer Research UK. CancerStats key facts: all cancers combined. Cancer Research UK: United Kingdom; 2012.
16.
go back to reference Masseria C, Irwin R, Thomson S, Gemmill M, Mossialos E. Primary care in Europe. European Commission: Science TLSoEaP; 2009. Masseria C, Irwin R, Thomson S, Gemmill M, Mossialos E. Primary care in Europe. European Commission: Science TLSoEaP; 2009.
17.
go back to reference Vedsted P, Oleson F. Are the serious problems in cancer survival partly rooted in gatekeeper principles? Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(589):512–3.CrossRef Vedsted P, Oleson F. Are the serious problems in cancer survival partly rooted in gatekeeper principles? Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(589):512–3.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Harris M, Frey P, Esteva M, Gašparović Babić S, Marzo-Castillejo M, Petek D, et al. How the probability of presentation to a primary care clinician correlates with cancer survival rates: a European survey using vignettes. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017;35:1–8.CrossRef Harris M, Frey P, Esteva M, Gašparović Babić S, Marzo-Castillejo M, Petek D, et al. How the probability of presentation to a primary care clinician correlates with cancer survival rates: a European survey using vignettes. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017;35:1–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference International Cancer Benchmarking P. ICBP Newsletter. London: Cancer Research UK; 2011. International Cancer Benchmarking P. ICBP Newsletter. London: Cancer Research UK; 2011.
22.
go back to reference Forbes LJL, Simon AE, Warburton F, Boniface D, Brain KE, Dessaix A, et al. Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the international Cancer benchmarking partnership): do they contribute to differences in cancer survival? Br J Cancer. 2013;108(2):292–300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Forbes LJL, Simon AE, Warburton F, Boniface D, Brain KE, Dessaix A, et al. Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the international Cancer benchmarking partnership): do they contribute to differences in cancer survival? Br J Cancer. 2013;108(2):292–300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Brown S, Castelli M, Hunter D, Erskine J, Vedsted P, Foot C, et al. How might healthcare systems influence speed of cancer diagnosis: a narrative review. Soc Sci Med. 2014;116:56–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brown S, Castelli M, Hunter D, Erskine J, Vedsted P, Foot C, et al. How might healthcare systems influence speed of cancer diagnosis: a narrative review. Soc Sci Med. 2014;116:56–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Harris M, Frey P, Esteva M, Gašparović-Babić S, Marzo-Castillejo M, Petek D, et al. How health system factors influence referral decisions in patients that may have cancer: European symposium report. J Cancer Res Ther. 2016;4(1):7–10. Harris M, Frey P, Esteva M, Gašparović-Babić S, Marzo-Castillejo M, Petek D, et al. How health system factors influence referral decisions in patients that may have cancer: European symposium report. J Cancer Res Ther. 2016;4(1):7–10.
26.
go back to reference Pit SW, Vo T, Pyakurel S. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pit SW, Vo T, Pyakurel S. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Shaghaghi A, Bhopal RS, Sheikh A. Approaches to recruiting ‘hard-to-reach’ populations into research: a review of the literature. Health Promot Perspect. 2011;1(2):86–94.PubMedPubMedCentral Shaghaghi A, Bhopal RS, Sheikh A. Approaches to recruiting ‘hard-to-reach’ populations into re­search: a review of the literature. Health Promot Perspect. 2011;1(2):86–94.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Atkinson R, Flint J. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Guildford, UK: University of Surrey; 2001. Atkinson R, Flint J. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Guildford, UK: University of Surrey; 2001.
29.
go back to reference van Belle G. Statistical rules of thumb, 2nd Edition. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley; 2008.CrossRef van Belle G. Statistical rules of thumb, 2nd Edition. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley; 2008.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd; 2009. Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd; 2009.
31.
go back to reference Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(2):175–86.CrossRefPubMed Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(2):175–86.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Center for Aging in Diverse Communities. Guidelines for translating surveys in cross-cultural research. San Francisco: University of California; 2007. Center for Aging in Diverse Communities. Guidelines for translating surveys in cross-cultural research. San Francisco: University of California; 2007.
33.
go back to reference Dobrow MJ, Orchard MC, Golden B, Holowaty E, Paszat L, Brown AD, et al. Response audit of an internet survey of health care providers and administrators: implications for determination of response rates. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(4):e30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dobrow MJ, Orchard MC, Golden B, Holowaty E, Paszat L, Brown AD, et al. Response audit of an internet survey of health care providers and administrators: implications for determination of response rates. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(4):e30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol. 1933;24(6):417–41.CrossRef Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol. 1933;24(6):417–41.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Greenacre Z. The importance of selection Bias in internet surveys. Open J Stat. 2016;6:397–404.CrossRef Greenacre Z. The importance of selection Bias in internet surveys. Open J Stat. 2016;6:397–404.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Choi BCK, Pak AWP. A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2(1):A13.PubMed Choi BCK, Pak AWP. A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2(1):A13.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Harzing A-W. Response styles in cross-national survey research: a 26-country study. Int J Cross Cult Manag. 2006;6(2):243–65. Harzing A-W. Response styles in cross-national survey research: a 26-country study. Int J Cross Cult Manag. 2006;6(2):243–65.
39.
go back to reference Evans SC, Roberts MC, Keeley JW, Blossom JB, Amaro CM, Garcia AM, et al. Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015;15(2):160–70.CrossRef Evans SC, Roberts MC, Keeley JW, Blossom JB, Amaro CM, Garcia AM, et al. Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015;15(2):160–70.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Hrisos S, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, Dickinson HO, Kaner EF, Beyer F, et al. Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour? A systematic review Implement Sci. 2009;4:37.CrossRefPubMed Hrisos S, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, Dickinson HO, Kaner EF, Beyer F, et al. Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour? A systematic review Implement Sci. 2009;4:37.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
How health system factors affect primary care practitioners’ decisions to refer patients for further investigation: protocol for a pan-European ecological study
Authors
Michael Harris
Gordon Taylor
The Örenäs Research Group
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3170-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue