Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

The Staff Observation Aggression Scale – Revised (SOAS-R) – adjustment and validation for emergency primary health care

Authors: Tone Morken, Valborg Baste, Grethe E. Johnsen, Knut Rypdal, Tom Palmstierna, Ingrid Hjulstad Johansen

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many emergency primary health care workers experience aggressive behaviour from patients or visitors. Simple incident-reporting procedures exist for inpatient, psychiatric care, but a similar and simple incident-report for other health care settings is lacking. The aim was to adjust a pre-existing form for reporting aggressive incidents in a psychiatric inpatient setting to the emergency primary health care settings. We also wanted to assess the validity of the severity scores in emergency primary health care.

Methods

The Staff Observation Scale - Revised (SOAS-R) was adjusted to create a pilot version of the Staff Observation Scale – Revised Emergency (SOAS-RE). A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was added to the form to judge the severity of the incident. Data for validation of the pilot version of SOAS-RE were collected from ten casualty clinics in Norway during 12 months. Variance analysis was used to test gender and age differences. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relative impact that each of the five SOAS-RE columns had on the VAS score. The association between SOAS-RE severity score and VAS severity score was calculated by the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results

The SOAS-R was adjusted to emergency primary health care, refined and called The Staff Observation Aggression Scale - Revised Emergency (SOAS-RE). A total of 350 SOAS-RE forms were collected from the casualty clinics, but due to missing data, 291 forms were included in the analysis. SOAS-RE scores ranged from 1 to 22. The mean total severity score of SOAS-RE was 10.0 (standard deviation (SD) =4.1) and the mean VAS score was 45.4 (SD = 26.7). We found a significant correlation of 0.45 between the SOAS-RE total severity scores and the VAS severity ratings. The linear regression analysis showed that individually each of the categories, which described the incident, had a low impact on the VAS score.

Conclusions

The SOAS-RE seems to be a useful instrument for research, incident-recording and management of incidents in emergency primary care. The moderate correlation between SOAS-RE severity score and the VAS severity score shows that application of both the severity ratings is valuable to follow-up of workers affected by workplace violence.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Hills D, Joyce CM. Workplace aggression in clinical medical practice: associations with job satisfaction, life satisfaction and self-rated health. Med J Aust. 2014;201:535–40.CrossRefPubMed Hills D, Joyce CM. Workplace aggression in clinical medical practice: associations with job satisfaction, life satisfaction and self-rated health. Med J Aust. 2014;201:535–40.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Saeki K, Okamoto N, Tomioka K, Obayashi K, Nishioka H, Ohara K, et al. Work-related aggression and violence committed by patients and its psychological influence on doctors. J Occup Health. 2011;53:356–64.CrossRefPubMed Saeki K, Okamoto N, Tomioka K, Obayashi K, Nishioka H, Ohara K, et al. Work-related aggression and violence committed by patients and its psychological influence on doctors. J Occup Health. 2011;53:356–64.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Phillips JP. Workplace violence against health Care Workers in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1661–9.CrossRefPubMed Phillips JP. Workplace violence against health Care Workers in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1661–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nijman HLI, Muris P, Merckelbach HLGJ, Palmstierna T, Wistedt B, Vos AM, et al. The staff observation aggression scale-revised (SOAS-R). Aggressive Behav. 1999;25:197–209.CrossRef Nijman HLI, Muris P, Merckelbach HLGJ, Palmstierna T, Wistedt B, Vos AM, et al. The staff observation aggression scale-revised (SOAS-R). Aggressive Behav. 1999;25:197–209.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wu S, Zhu W, Li H, Lin S, Chai W, Wang X. Workplace violence and influencing factors among medical professionals in China. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55:1000–8.CrossRefPubMed Wu S, Zhu W, Li H, Lin S, Chai W, Wang X. Workplace violence and influencing factors among medical professionals in China. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55:1000–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Magnavita N, Heponiemi T. Violence towards health care workers in a public health Care Facility in Italy: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Magnavita N, Heponiemi T. Violence towards health care workers in a public health Care Facility in Italy: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Arimatsu M, Wada K, Yoshikawa T, Oda S, Taniguchi H, Aizawa Y, et al. An epidemiological study of work-related violence experienced by physicians who graduated from a medical school in Japan. J Occup Health. 2008;50:357–61.CrossRefPubMed Arimatsu M, Wada K, Yoshikawa T, Oda S, Taniguchi H, Aizawa Y, et al. An epidemiological study of work-related violence experienced by physicians who graduated from a medical school in Japan. J Occup Health. 2008;50:357–61.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sato K, Wakabayashi T, Kiyoshi-Teo H, Fukahori H. Factors associated with nurses’ reporting of patients’ aggressive behavior: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:1368–76.CrossRefPubMed Sato K, Wakabayashi T, Kiyoshi-Teo H, Fukahori H. Factors associated with nurses’ reporting of patients’ aggressive behavior: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:1368–76.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nijman H, Evers C, Merckelbach H, Palmstierna T. Assessing aggression severity with the revised staff observation aggression scale. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002;190:198–200.CrossRefPubMed Nijman H, Evers C, Merckelbach H, Palmstierna T. Assessing aggression severity with the revised staff observation aggression scale. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002;190:198–200.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Palmstierna T, Wistedt B. Staff observation aggression scale, SOAS: presentation and evaluation. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1987;76:657–63.CrossRefPubMed Palmstierna T, Wistedt B. Staff observation aggression scale, SOAS: presentation and evaluation. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1987;76:657–63.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nijman HL, Palmstierna T, Almvik R, Stolker JJ. Fifteen years of research with the staff observation aggression scale: a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005;111:12–21.CrossRefPubMed Nijman HL, Palmstierna T, Almvik R, Stolker JJ. Fifteen years of research with the staff observation aggression scale: a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005;111:12–21.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nijman H, Palmstierna T. Measuring aggression with the staff observation aggression scale - revised. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2002;412;101–2. Nijman H, Palmstierna T. Measuring aggression with the staff observation aggression scale - revised. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2002;412;101–2.
14.
go back to reference Hvidhjelm J, Sestoft D, Skovgaard LT, Bue Bjorner J. Sensitivity and specificity of the Broset violence checklist as predictor of violence in forensic psychiatry. Nord J Psychiatry. 2014;68:536–42.CrossRefPubMed Hvidhjelm J, Sestoft D, Skovgaard LT, Bue Bjorner J. Sensitivity and specificity of the Broset violence checklist as predictor of violence in forensic psychiatry. Nord J Psychiatry. 2014;68:536–42.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Lesage FX, Berjot S. Validity of occupational stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occup Med (Lond). 2011;61:434–6.CrossRef Lesage FX, Berjot S. Validity of occupational stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occup Med (Lond). 2011;61:434–6.CrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Morken T, Alsaker K, Johansen IH. Emergency primary care personnel's perception of professional-patient interaction in aggressive incidents -- a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morken T, Alsaker K, Johansen IH. Emergency primary care personnel's perception of professional-patient interaction in aggressive incidents -- a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink H, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine. Practical guide to biostatistics and epidemiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 338.CrossRef De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink H, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine. Practical guide to biostatistics and epidemiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 338.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Johansen IH, Morken T, Hunskaar S. How Norwegian casualty clinics handle contacts related to mental illness: a prospective observational study. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2012;6:3.CrossRef Johansen IH, Morken T, Hunskaar S. How Norwegian casualty clinics handle contacts related to mental illness: a prospective observational study. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2012;6:3.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Eikeland OJ, Raknes G, Hunskår S. Vakttårnprosjektet. Epidemiologiske data frå legevakt. Samlerapport for 2014. Rapport nr. 3-2015. (The watchtower project. Epidemiological data from casualty clinics. Report no. 3-2015). Bergen: Nasjonalt kompetansesenter for legevaktmedisin, Uni Research Helse; 2015. Norwegian. Eikeland OJ, Raknes G, Hunskår S. Vakttårnprosjektet. Epidemiologiske data frå legevakt. Samlerapport for 2014. Rapport nr. 3-2015. (The watchtower project. Epidemiological data from casualty clinics. Report no. 3-2015). Bergen: Nasjonalt kompetansesenter for legevaktmedisin, Uni Research Helse; 2015. Norwegian.
22.
go back to reference Campbell CL, Burg MA, Gammonly D. Measures for incident reporting of patient violence and aggression towards healthcare providers: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2015;25:314–22.CrossRef Campbell CL, Burg MA, Gammonly D. Measures for incident reporting of patient violence and aggression towards healthcare providers: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2015;25:314–22.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Arnetz JE. The violent iNcident form (VIF): a practical instrument for the registration of violent incidents in the health care workplace. Work Stress. 1998;12:17–28.CrossRef Arnetz JE. The violent iNcident form (VIF): a practical instrument for the registration of violent incidents in the health care workplace. Work Stress. 1998;12:17–28.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lambrechts G, Maes B. Analysis of staff reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30:863–72.CrossRefPubMed Lambrechts G, Maes B. Analysis of staff reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30:863–72.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hyland S, Watts J, Fry M. Rates of workplace aggression in the emergency department and nurses’ perceptions of this challenging behaviour: a multimethod study. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2016;19:143–8.CrossRefPubMed Hyland S, Watts J, Fry M. Rates of workplace aggression in the emergency department and nurses’ perceptions of this challenging behaviour: a multimethod study. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2016;19:143–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Staff Observation Aggression Scale – Revised (SOAS-R) – adjustment and validation for emergency primary health care
Authors
Tone Morken
Valborg Baste
Grethe E. Johnsen
Knut Rypdal
Tom Palmstierna
Ingrid Hjulstad Johansen
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3157-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue