Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Next-of-kin involvement in improving hospital cancer care quality and safety – a qualitative cross-case study as basis for theory development

Authors: Inger Johanne Bergerød, Bjørnar Gilje, Geir S. Braut, Siri Wiig

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Next-of-kin are an extension of healthcare professionals in all stages of cancer care. They offer care activities such as interpretations of symptoms, and reporting of negative or adverse effects of treatment, without any professional knowledge or skills. Their participation is often expected from healthcare professionals, managers, or the patient. However, there is limited knowledge of next-of-kin’s role in and contribution to quality and safety improvement in hospital cancer care. The aim of this study was to explore how managers and healthcare professionals understand the role of next-of-kin in cancer care, and what methods they use for next-of-kin involvement.

Methods

The study design was a comparative multiple embedded case study of cancer departments in two Norwegian university hospitals. Data collection methods consist of qualitative interviews with managers (13) and healthcare professionals (19) collected in 2016, and document analysis of policy documents and regulation. The interviews were analyzed according to a directed content analysis approach guided by the theoretical framework ‘Organizing for Quality’.

Results

Both hospitals have a strategy to involve next-of-kin in treatment and care but have no formal way of doing so. Managers and healthcare professionals in the two hospitals illuminated nine areas where next-of-kin are important stakeholders in improving quality and safety. These nine areas (e.g. nutrition, observations, transitions, pain treatment, information, palliative and terminal care) are common across the two hospitals. Key challenges in the next-of-kin involvement pertain to insufficient physical working conditions and room facilities, and lack of continuity of experienced nurses and consultants.

Conclusion

Hospital employees and managers regard next-of-kin as a safety net or a buffer that cannot be replaced by other stakeholders. This study shows a close collaboration between patient, next-of-kin and healthcare professionals in cancer care, but more effort should be invested in more systematic approaches for next-of-kin involvement in quality and safety improvement such as a guide for managers and healthcare professionals on methods and areas of involvement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ekstedt M, et al. Health care professionals’ perspectives of the experiences of family caregivers during in-patient cancer care. J Fam Nurs. 2014;20(4):462–86.CrossRefPubMed Ekstedt M, et al. Health care professionals’ perspectives of the experiences of family caregivers during in-patient cancer care. J Fam Nurs. 2014;20(4):462–86.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Given BA, Given CW, Sherwood PR. Family and caregiver needs over the course of the cancer trajectory. J Support Oncol. 2012;10(2):57–64.CrossRefPubMed Given BA, Given CW, Sherwood PR. Family and caregiver needs over the course of the cancer trajectory. J Support Oncol. 2012;10(2):57–64.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Given BA, Given CW, Sherwood P. The challenge of quality Cancer Care for Family Caregivers. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2012;28(4):205–12.CrossRefPubMed Given BA, Given CW, Sherwood P. The challenge of quality Cancer Care for Family Caregivers. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2012;28(4):205–12.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference van Ryn M, et al. Objective burden, resources, and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: a hidden quality issue? Psychooncology. 2011;20(1):44–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Ryn M, et al. Objective burden, resources, and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: a hidden quality issue? Psychooncology. 2011;20(1):44–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Stenberg U, Ruland CM, Miaskowski C. Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psychooncology. 2010;19(10):1013–25.CrossRefPubMed Stenberg U, Ruland CM, Miaskowski C. Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psychooncology. 2010;19(10):1013–25.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference IOM, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century: Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences; 2001. IOM, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century: Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences; 2001.
7.
go back to reference Haukland EC, et al. Adverse events in hospitalised cancer patients: a comparison to a general hospital population. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:1–6.CrossRef Haukland EC, et al. Adverse events in hospitalised cancer patients: a comparison to a general hospital population. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:1–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sapountzi-Krepia D, et al. Dimensions of informal care in Greece: the family's contribution to the care of patients hospitalized in an oncology hospital. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(10):1287–94.CrossRefPubMed Sapountzi-Krepia D, et al. Dimensions of informal care in Greece: the family's contribution to the care of patients hospitalized in an oncology hospital. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(10):1287–94.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Care Services, NOU 2011:11 Innovation in the Care Services. 2011. Ministry of Health and Care Services, NOU 2011:11 Innovation in the Care Services. 2011.
10.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Care Services, NOU 2011:17 Når sant skal sies om pårørendeomsorgen - fra usynlig til verdsatt og inkludert. 2011 (In Norwegian). Ministry of Health and Care Services, NOU 2011:17 Når sant skal sies om pårørendeomsorgen - fra usynlig til verdsatt og inkludert. 2011 (In Norwegian).
11.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Care Services, Meld.St.29 (2012–2013) Care future. 2012–2013. Ministry of Health and Care Services, Meld.St.29 (2012–2013) Care future. 2012–2013.
12.
13.
go back to reference Bragstad LK, Kirkevold M, Foss C. The indispensable intermediaries: a qualitative study of informal caregivers’ struggle to achieve influence at and after hospital discharge. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bragstad LK, Kirkevold M, Foss C. The indispensable intermediaries: a qualitative study of informal caregivers’ struggle to achieve influence at and after hospital discharge. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Rustad EC, et al. Next of kin’s experiences of information and responsibility during their older relatives’ care transitions from hospital to municipal health care. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(7–8):964–74.CrossRefPubMed Rustad EC, et al. Next of kin’s experiences of information and responsibility during their older relatives’ care transitions from hospital to municipal health care. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(7–8):964–74.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Daniels JP, et al. Identification by families of pediatric adverse events and near misses overlooked by health care providers. Can Med Assoc J. 2012;184(1):29–34.CrossRef Daniels JP, et al. Identification by families of pediatric adverse events and near misses overlooked by health care providers. Can Med Assoc J. 2012;184(1):29–34.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lyndon A, et al. Parents’ perspectives on navigating the work of speaking up in the NICU. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017;46(5):716–26.CrossRefPubMed Lyndon A, et al. Parents’ perspectives on navigating the work of speaking up in the NICU. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017;46(5):716–26.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Davis R, et al. Predictors of healthcare professionals’ attitudes towards family involvement in safety-relevant behaviours: a cross-sectional factorial survey study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):e005549.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davis R, et al. Predictors of healthcare professionals’ attitudes towards family involvement in safety-relevant behaviours: a cross-sectional factorial survey study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):e005549.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Chen S-C, et al. Support needs of patients with oral Cancer and burden to their family caregivers. Cancer Nurs. 2009;32(6):473–81.CrossRefPubMed Chen S-C, et al. Support needs of patients with oral Cancer and burden to their family caregivers. Cancer Nurs. 2009;32(6):473–81.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Donnelly M, et al. Oesophageal cancer: caregiver mental health and strain. Psycho-Oncology. 2008;17(12):1196–201.CrossRefPubMed Donnelly M, et al. Oesophageal cancer: caregiver mental health and strain. Psycho-Oncology. 2008;17(12):1196–201.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Creswell JW. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE: Thousand Oaks; 2015. Creswell JW. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE: Thousand Oaks; 2015.
22.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case study research : design and methods. 5th ed. ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014. Yin RK. Case study research : design and methods. 5th ed. ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
23.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Care Services, National cancer strategy. Together- against cancer. 2013–2017: Norway. Ministry of Health and Care Services, National cancer strategy. Together- against cancer. 2013–2017: Norway.
24.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Care Services, Meld.St.11 (2014–2015) Quality and patient safety 2013. Ministry of Health and Care Services, Meld.St.11 (2014–2015) Quality and patient safety 2013.
25.
go back to reference Bate P, Mendel P, Robert G. Organizing for quality : the improvement journeys of leading hospitals in Europe and the United States. Oxford: Radcliffe; 2008. Bate P, Mendel P, Robert G. Organizing for quality : the improvement journeys of leading hospitals in Europe and the United States. Oxford: Radcliffe; 2008.
26.
go back to reference Wiig S, et al. Talking about quality: exploring how ‘quality’ is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:478.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wiig S, et al. Talking about quality: exploring how ‘quality’ is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:478.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Bergerød IJ, Wiig S. In: Aase K, editor. Management and patient safety, in patient safety -theory and practice. Norway: Universitetsforlaget; 2015. p. 113–26. (in Norwegian). Bergerød IJ, Wiig S. In: Aase K, editor. Management and patient safety, in patient safety -theory and practice. Norway: Universitetsforlaget; 2015. p. 113–26. (in Norwegian).
29.
go back to reference Bergerød IJ. Management, quality and patient safety: a comparative case study of two Norwegian hospitals. 2012. Norway: University of Stavanger. (In Norwegian) Bergerød IJ. Management, quality and patient safety: a comparative case study of two Norwegian hospitals. 2012. Norway: University of Stavanger. (In Norwegian)
30.
go back to reference Bergerød IJ, Wiig S. Leading quality and patient safety improvement in Norwegian hospitals. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2016. p. 161–79. (In Norwegian) Bergerød IJ, Wiig S. Leading quality and patient safety improvement in Norwegian hospitals. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2016. p. 161–79. (In Norwegian)
31.
go back to reference Robert GB, et al. A longitudinal, multi-level comparative study of quality and safety in European hospitals: the QUASER study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:285.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Robert GB, et al. A longitudinal, multi-level comparative study of quality and safety in European hospitals: the QUASER study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:285.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Krein SL, et al. The influence of organizational context on quality improvement and patient safety efforts in infection prevention: a multi-center qualitative study. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(9):1692–701.CrossRefPubMed Krein SL, et al. The influence of organizational context on quality improvement and patient safety efforts in infection prevention: a multi-center qualitative study. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(9):1692–701.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRefPubMed Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Pedersen AW, Kuhnle S. In: Knutsen O, editor. The Nordic welfare state model, in the Nordic models in political science. Challenged, but still viable? Bergen: Fagbokforlaget; 2017. Pedersen AW, Kuhnle S. In: Knutsen O, editor. The Nordic welfare state model, in the Nordic models in political science. Challenged, but still viable? Bergen: Fagbokforlaget; 2017.
36.
go back to reference Hannisdal E, et al. A risk analysis of cancer care in Norway: the top 16 patient safety hazards. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39(11):511–6.CrossRefPubMed Hannisdal E, et al. A risk analysis of cancer care in Norway: the top 16 patient safety hazards. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39(11):511–6.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Wiig S, et al. Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality? BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wiig S, et al. Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality? BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Stenberg U, et al. Living close to a person with cancer: a review of the international literature and implications for social work practice. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2014;57(6–7):531–55.CrossRefPubMed Stenberg U, et al. Living close to a person with cancer: a review of the international literature and implications for social work practice. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2014;57(6–7):531–55.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Croskerry P, Abbass A, Wu AW. Emotional influences in patient safety. J Patient Saf. 2010;6(4):199–205.CrossRefPubMed Croskerry P, Abbass A, Wu AW. Emotional influences in patient safety. J Patient Saf. 2010;6(4):199–205.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Croskerry P, Abbass AA, Wu AW. How doctors feel: affective issues in patients’ safety. The Lancet. 2008;372(9645):1205–6. Croskerry P, Abbass AA, Wu AW. How doctors feel: affective issues in patients’ safety. The Lancet. 2008;372(9645):1205–6.
41.
go back to reference Kooken WC, Haase JE. A big word for something we do all the time: oncology nurses lived experience of vigilance. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37(6):E15–24.CrossRefPubMed Kooken WC, Haase JE. A big word for something we do all the time: oncology nurses lived experience of vigilance. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37(6):E15–24.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Storm M, Coulter A. Patient-centred care in the Nordic countries. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2016. p. 25–37. Storm M, Coulter A. Patient-centred care in the Nordic countries. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2016. p. 25–37.
43.
go back to reference Cho JY, Lee E. Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. Qual Rep. 2014;19(32):1–20. Cho JY, Lee E. Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. Qual Rep. 2014;19(32):1–20.
Metadata
Title
Next-of-kin involvement in improving hospital cancer care quality and safety – a qualitative cross-case study as basis for theory development
Authors
Inger Johanne Bergerød
Bjørnar Gilje
Geir S. Braut
Siri Wiig
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3141-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue