Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Comparing private and public transport access to diabetic health services across inner, middle, and outer suburbs of Melbourne, Australia

Authors: Rebecca Madill, Hannah Badland, Suzanne Mavoa, Billie Giles-Corti

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Melbourne, Australia is experiencing rapid population growth, with much of this occurring in metropolitan outer suburban areas, also known as urban growth areas. Currently little is known about differences in travel times when using private and public transport to access primary and secondary services across Melbourne’s urban growth areas. Plan Melbourne Refresh, a recent strategic land use document has called for a 20 min city, which is where essential services including primary health care, can be accessed within a 20 min journey. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major chronic condition in Australia, with some of Melbourne’s growth areas having some of the highest prevalence across Australia. This study explores travel times to diabetic health care services for populations residing in inner, middle and outer suburbs of metropolitan Melbourne.

Method

Geographic information systems (GIS) software were used to map the location of selected diabetic primary and secondary health care service providers across metropolitan inner, middle, outer established, outer urban growth and outer fringe areas of Melbourne. An origin-destination matrix was used to estimate travel distances from point of origin (using a total of approximately 50,000 synthetic residential addresses) to the closest type of each diabetic health care service provider (destinations) across Melbourne. ArcGIS was used to estimate travel times for private transport and public transport; comparisons were made by area.

Results

Our study indicated increased travel times to diabetic health services for people living in Melbourne’s outer growth and outer fringe areas compared with the rest of Melbourne (inner, middle and outer established). Compared with those living in inner city areas, the median time spent travelling to diabetic services was between 2.46 and 23.24 min (private motor vehicle) and 12.01 and 43.15 min (public transport) longer for those living in outer suburban areas. Irrespective of travel mode used, results indicate that those living in inner and middle suburbs of Melbourne have shorter travel times to access diabetic health services, compared with those living in outer areas of Melbourne. Private motor vehicle travel times were approximately 4 to 5 times faster than public transport modes to access diabetic health services in all areas.

Conclusion

Those living in new urban growth communities spend considerably more time travelling to access diabetic health services – particularly specialists - than those living in established areas across Melbourne.
Literature
1.
State Government of Victoria. Plan Melbourne 2017–2050 metropolitan planning strategy. Brunswick, Melbourne: The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2017; 2017.
2.
Breen K. There’s something about... Community planning for healthy, well functioning communities on the urban fringes of our cities. Rosanna, Melbourne: North East Neighbourhood House Network; 2011.
3.
Coffee N, et al. Measuring national accessibility to cardiac services using geographic information systems. Appl Geogr. 2012;34:445–55.CrossRef
4.
State Government of Victoria. Metropolitian planning strategy a vision for Victoria. Melbourne: Department of Planning and Community Development; 2012.
5.
State Government of Victoria. In: Department of Health, editor. Metropolitan health plan technical paper. Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2011.
6.
Department of Health, 2012 Regional health status profiles North and West Metropolitan region, in 2012 Regional health status profiles. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria; 2012.
7.
McGrail MR, Humphreys JS. The index of rural access: an innovative integrated approach for measuring primary care access. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Hurley C, et al. Access and acceptability of community-based services for older Greek migrants in Australia: user and provider perspectives. Health Soc Care Community. 2013;21(2):140–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
State Government of Victoria. In: Department of Health, editor. Victorian health priorities framework 2012–2022: metropolitan health plan. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria; 2011.
10.
Australian Government. In: Department of Health and Ageing, editor. Primary health care reform in Australia report to support Australia’s first National Primary Health Care Strategy. Barton ACT: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.
11.
Department of Health. North & West Metropolitan region. Fitzroy: State Government of Victoria; 2012.
12.
Erny-Albrecht K, Bywood P, Oliver-Baxter J. The role of primary health care in primary and secondary prevention of diabetes. PHCRIS policy issue review. Adelaide: Primary Health Care Research and Information Centre; 2015.
13.
Diabetes National Election Agenda 2013 – 2015. Type 2 diabetes the 21st century pandemic. Canberra: National Diabetes Services Scheme; 2013.
14.
15.
16.
Wyndham CIty Council. Wyndham community health and wellbeing profiles - summary. Wyndham: Wyndham City Council; 2017.
17.
18.
Gulliford M, et al. Access to health care report of a scoping exercise for the National co-ordinating Centre for NHS service delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO) 26 February 2001. London: The Public Health and Health Services Research Group Department of Public Health Sciences King’s College London; 2001.
19.
Penchansky R, Thomas JW. The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care. 1981;19(2):127–40.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Cromley EK, McLafferty SL. In: Cromley EK, McLafferty SL, editors. Analyzing access to health services, in GIS and public health. New York: The Guilford press; 2012.
21.
Neutens T. Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers. J Transp Geogr. 2015;43:14–27.CrossRef
22.
Hawthorne TL, Kwan MP. Using GIS and perceived distance to understand the unequal geographies of healthcare in lower-income urban neighbourhoods. Geogr J. 2012;178:18–30.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Australian Institute of Health Welfare. Australia’s Health 2016, in Australia’s health series no. 15. Cat. no. AUS 199. Canberra: AIHW. Canberra: Australian Government; 2016.
24.
Hiscock R, et al. Is neighborhood access to health care provision associated with individual-level utilization and satisfaction? Health Serv Res. 2008;43(6):2183–200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Luo W, Wang F, Douglass C. Temporal changes of access to primary health care in Illinois (1990-2000) and policy implications. J Med Syst. 2004;28(3):287–99.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Lovett A, et al. Car travel time and accessibility by bus to general practitioner services: a study using patient registers and GIS. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:97–111.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Tackett S, et al. The impact of health plan physician-tiering on access to care. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(4):440–5.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Martin D, Jordan H, Roderick P. Taking the bus: incorporating public transport timetable data into health care accessibility modelling. Environ Plan A. 2008;40(10):2510–25.CrossRef
29.
30.
World Health Organization, Shanghai Declaration on promoting health in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, in 9th Global Conference on Health Promotion, Shanghai 2016. Shanghai, China. World Health Organization; 2016.
31.
Booth SL, et al. Environmental and societal factors affect food choice and physical activity: rationale. Nutr Rev. 2001;59(3):S21.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Booth, G.L., et al., Unwalkable Neighborhoods, Poverty, and the Risk of Diabetes Among Recent Immigrants to Canada Compared With Long-Term Residents. Diabetes Care. 2012;41(4):302–8.
33.
State of Victoria, Melbourne 2030 planning for sustainable growth, Department of Infrastructure, Editor. 2002. p. 1–206.
34.
Lowe M, Boulange C, Giles-Corti B. Urban design and health: progress to date and future challenges. Health Promot J Austr. 2014;25(1):14–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Department of Infrastructure and Transport. Our cities, our future a national urban policy for a productive, sustainable and liveable future. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2011.
36.
Casey S. Establishing standards for social infrastructure. Brisbane: The University of Queensland; 2005.
37.
Growth Areas Authority. Growth corridor plans managing Melbourne’s growth. Melbourne: Growth Areas Authority; 2012.
38.
Carson D, et al. Geography of primary mental health care through the better access initiative in South Australia 2006–2010. Aust J Rural Health. 2016;24(3):188–92.CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
Australian Social and Recreation Research. Planning for community infrastructure in growth areas. Melbourne: Metropolitan Planning Authority; 2008. p. 1–165.
41.
42.
Luo W, Wang F. Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environ Plann B. 2003;30:865–84.CrossRef
43.
44.
45.
State Government of Victoria, Vicmap Planning. Department of Sustainability and Environment; 2013.
46.
State Government of Victoria. Victorian planning provisions. Melbourne: Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning; 2015.
47.
Sloas LB, Steele PD, Hare TS. Geographical access to treatment for sex offenders under community supervision in Kentucky. J Sex Aggress. 2012;18(3):294–310.CrossRef
48.
49.
Eppell, V.A.T., McClurg, B.A. and Bunker, J.M.. A four level road hierarchy for network planning and management. in 20th ARRB Conference. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria; 2001.
50.
VicRoads. Traffic engineering manual volume 1 chapter 7: speed zoning guidelines. Victoria: VicRoads; 2013.
51.
52.
53.
Department of Transport. Victorian integrated survey of travel and activity 2007 (VISTA 07). South Melbourne: Department of Transport, State Government of Victoria; 2009.
54.
55.
Haynes R, Lovett A, Sunnenberg G. Potential accessibility, travel time, and consumer choice: geographical variations in general medical practice registrations in eastern England. Environ Plan A. 2003;35(10):1733–50.CrossRef
56.
Onega T, Duell EJ, Shi X, Wang D, Demidenko E, Goodman D. Geographic access to cancer care in the U.S. Cancer. 2008;112(4):909–18.
57.
Currie G, et al. Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne – updated results. Res Transp Econ. 2010;29:287–95.CrossRef
58.
Delbosc A, Currie G. The spatial context of transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being. J Transp Geogr. 2011;19:1130–7.CrossRef
59.
60.
Roeger LS, Reed RL, Smith BP. Equity of access in the spatial distribution of GPs within an Australian metropolitan city. Austr J Prim Health. 2010;16(4):284.CrossRef
61.
Department of Health. Victorian renal health plan discussion paper. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria; 2011.
62.
McLafferty S, et al. Rural - urban inequalities in late-stage breast cancer: spatial and social dimensions of risk and access. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 2011;38(4):726–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
63.
Mei-Po K. Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: a study using space-time measures. Prof Geogr. 1999;51(2):210.
64.
65.
66.
67.
The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and Diabetes Australia. General practice management of type 2 diabetes 2014–15. East Melbourne: The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; 2014.
68.
World Health Organization. Atlas of eHealth country profiles in the use of eHealth in support of universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2016. p. 1–392.
69.
Park S, et al. The role of digital engagement in the self-Management of Type 2 diabetes. Health Commun. 2016;31(12):1557–65.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Carlisle K, et al. Randomised controlled trial of an in-home monitoring intervention to improve health outcomes for type 2 diabetes: study protocol. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;182:43–51.PubMed
71.
Goode AD, et al. Relationship between intervention dose and outcomes in living well with diabetes--a randomized trial of a telephone-delivered lifestyle-based weight loss intervention. Am J Health Promot. 2015;30(2):120–9.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Varnfield M, et al. Telehealth for chronic disease management: do we need to RE-AIM? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;206:93–100.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparing private and public transport access to diabetic health services across inner, middle, and outer suburbs of Melbourne, Australia
Authors
Rebecca Madill
Hannah Badland
Suzanne Mavoa
Billie Giles-Corti
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3079-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Integrating depression management into HIV primary care in central Malawi: the implementation of a pilot capacity building program

Research article

Indigenous land management as primary health care: qualitative analysis from the Interplay research project in remote Australia

Research article

Mundane? Demographic characteristics as predictors of enrolment onto the National Health Insurance Scheme in two districts of Ghana

Research article

Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review

Research article

Validity of parental recalls to estimate vaccination coverage: evidence from Tanzania

Research article

Geographic variations in involuntary care and associations with the supply of health and social care: results from a nationwide study