Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Public health opportunities and challenges in the provision of partner notification services: the New England experience

Authors: Sarah Magaziner, Madeline C. Montgomery, Thomas Bertrand, Daniel Daltry, Heidi Jenkins, Brenda Kendall, Lauren Molotnikov, Lindsay Pierce, Emer Smith, Lynn Sosa, Jacob J. van den Berg, Theodore Marak, Don Operario, Philip A. Chan

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Partner notification services (PNS) are recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a public health intervention for addressing the spread of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Barriers and facilitators to the partner notification process from a public health perspective have not been well described.

Methods

In 2015, a coalition of New England public health STD directors and investigators formed to address the increasing STD prevalence across the region (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont) and to promote communication between state STD programs. To evaluate barriers and facilitators of PNS programs, a survey was administered to representatives from each state to describe PNS processes and approaches.

Results

Of the six PNS programs, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire had combined HIV and STD PNS programs; Rhode Island’s programs were integrated but employed separate disease intervention specialists (DIS). All states performed PNS for HIV and syphilis. Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont performed services for all gonorrhea cases. Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts performed limited partner notification for gonorrhea due to lack of resources. None of the six states routinely provided services for chlamydia, though Maine and Vermont did so for high-priority populations such as HIV co-infected or pregnant individuals. Across all programs, clients received risk reduction counseling and general STD education as a component of PNS, in addition to referrals for HIV/STD care at locations ranging from Planned Parenthood to community- or hospital-based clinics. Notable barriers to successful partner notification across all states included anonymous partners and index cases who did not feel comfortable sharing partners’ names with DIS. Other common barriers included insufficient staff, inability of DIS to identify and contact partners, and index cases declining to speak with DIS staff.

Conclusions

In New England, state health departments use different strategies to implement PNS programs and referral to STD care. Despite this, similar challenges exist across settings, including difficulty with anonymous partners and limited state resources.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Cohen MS. HIV and sexually transmitted diseases: lethal synergy. Top HIV Med. 2003;12:104–7. Cohen MS. HIV and sexually transmitted diseases: lethal synergy. Top HIV Med. 2003;12:104–7.
4.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for partner services programs for HIV infection, syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydial infection. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1–83. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for partner services programs for HIV infection, syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydial infection. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1–83.
5.
go back to reference Cowan FM, French R, Johnson AM. The role and effectiveness of partner notification in STD control: a review. Genitourin Med. 1996;72:247–52.PubMedPubMedCentral Cowan FM, French R, Johnson AM. The role and effectiveness of partner notification in STD control: a review. Genitourin Med. 1996;72:247–52.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Wilson TE, Hogben M, Malka ES, Liddon N, McCormack WM, Rubin SR, et al. A randomized controlled trial for reducing risks for sexually transmitted infections through enhanced patient-based partner notification. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(Suppl 1):S104–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilson TE, Hogben M, Malka ES, Liddon N, McCormack WM, Rubin SR, et al. A randomized controlled trial for reducing risks for sexually transmitted infections through enhanced patient-based partner notification. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(Suppl 1):S104–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Fenton KA, Chippindale S, Cowan FM. Partner notification techniques. Dermatol Clin. 1998;16:669–72.CrossRefPubMed Fenton KA, Chippindale S, Cowan FM. Partner notification techniques. Dermatol Clin. 1998;16:669–72.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hogben M, McNally T, McPheeters M, Hutchinson AB. The effectiveness of HIV partner counseling and referral services in increasing identification of HIV-positive individuals a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:S89–100.CrossRefPubMed Hogben M, McNally T, McPheeters M, Hutchinson AB. The effectiveness of HIV partner counseling and referral services in increasing identification of HIV-positive individuals a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:S89–100.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Udeagu, et al. Bringing HIV partner services into the age of social media and mobile connectivity. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:631–6.CrossRefPubMed Udeagu, et al. Bringing HIV partner services into the age of social media and mobile connectivity. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:631–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mathews C, Coetzee N, Zwarenstein M, Lombard C, Guttmacher S, Oxman A, et al. A systematic review of strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS. Int J STD AIDS. 2002;13:285–300.CrossRefPubMed Mathews C, Coetzee N, Zwarenstein M, Lombard C, Guttmacher S, Oxman A, et al. A systematic review of strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS. Int J STD AIDS. 2002;13:285–300.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gorbach PM, Aral SO, Celum C, Stoner BP, Whittington WL, Galea J, et al. To notify or not to notify: STD patients’ perspectives of partner notification in Seattle. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27:193–200.CrossRefPubMed Gorbach PM, Aral SO, Celum C, Stoner BP, Whittington WL, Galea J, et al. To notify or not to notify: STD patients’ perspectives of partner notification in Seattle. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27:193–200.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Apoola A, Radcliffe KW, Das S, Robshaw V, Gilleran G, Kumari BS, et al. Preferences for partner notification method: variation in responses between respondents as index patients and contacts. Int J STD AIDS. 2007;18:493–4.CrossRefPubMed Apoola A, Radcliffe KW, Das S, Robshaw V, Gilleran G, Kumari BS, et al. Preferences for partner notification method: variation in responses between respondents as index patients and contacts. Int J STD AIDS. 2007;18:493–4.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference McCann L, Allan W, Read P, McNulty A. Contact tracing using provider referral: how difficult is it? Sex Health. 2013;10:472–3.CrossRefPubMed McCann L, Allan W, Read P, McNulty A. Contact tracing using provider referral: how difficult is it? Sex Health. 2013;10:472–3.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chan PA, Towey C, Poceta J, Rose J, Bertrand T, Kantor R, et al. Online hookup sites for meeting sexual partners among men who have sex with men in Rhode Island, 2013: a call for public health action. Public Health Rep. 2016;131:273–80.CrossRef Chan PA, Towey C, Poceta J, Rose J, Bertrand T, Kantor R, et al. Online hookup sites for meeting sexual partners among men who have sex with men in Rhode Island, 2013: a call for public health action. Public Health Rep. 2016;131:273–80.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schneider JA. Next-generation partner services: an HIV elimination strategy. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:149–50.CrossRefPubMed Schneider JA. Next-generation partner services: an HIV elimination strategy. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:149–50.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pennise M, Inscho R, Herpin K, Owens J, Bedard BA, Weimer AC, et al. Using smartphone apps in STD interviews to find sexual partners. Public Health Rep. Wash. DC 1974. 2015;130:245–252. Pennise M, Inscho R, Herpin K, Owens J, Bedard BA, Weimer AC, et al. Using smartphone apps in STD interviews to find sexual partners. Public Health Rep. Wash. DC 1974. 2015;130:245–252.
17.
go back to reference Götz HM, van Rooijen MS, Vriens P, Op de Coul E, Hamers M, Heijman T, et al. Initial evaluation of use of an online partner notification tool for STI, called “suggest a test”: a cross sectional pilot study. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90:195–200.CrossRefPubMed Götz HM, van Rooijen MS, Vriens P, Op de Coul E, Hamers M, Heijman T, et al. Initial evaluation of use of an online partner notification tool for STI, called “suggest a test”: a cross sectional pilot study. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90:195–200.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hightow-Weidman L, Beagle S, Pike E, Kuruc J, Leone P, Mobley V, et al. “No one’s at home and they won’t pick up the phone”: using the internet and text messaging to enhance partner services in North Carolina. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:143–8.CrossRefPubMed Hightow-Weidman L, Beagle S, Pike E, Kuruc J, Leone P, Mobley V, et al. “No one’s at home and they won’t pick up the phone”: using the internet and text messaging to enhance partner services in North Carolina. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:143–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tomnay JE, Pitts MK, Fairley CK. General practitioners’ use of internet-based patient materials for partner notification. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34:613–6.PubMed Tomnay JE, Pitts MK, Fairley CK. General practitioners’ use of internet-based patient materials for partner notification. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34:613–6.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Jenkins WD, Wold B. Use of the internet for the surveillance and prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Microbes Infect. 2012;14:427–37.CrossRefPubMed Jenkins WD, Wold B. Use of the internet for the surveillance and prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Microbes Infect. 2012;14:427–37.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Althaus CL, Turner KME, Mercer CH, Auguste P, Roberts TE, Bell G, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of traditional and new partner notification technologies for curable sexually transmitted infections: observational study, systematic reviews and mathematical modelling. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2014;18:1–100. vii–viii Althaus CL, Turner KME, Mercer CH, Auguste P, Roberts TE, Bell G, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of traditional and new partner notification technologies for curable sexually transmitted infections: observational study, systematic reviews and mathematical modelling. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2014;18:1–100. vii–viii
Metadata
Title
Public health opportunities and challenges in the provision of partner notification services: the New England experience
Authors
Sarah Magaziner
Madeline C. Montgomery
Thomas Bertrand
Daniel Daltry
Heidi Jenkins
Brenda Kendall
Lauren Molotnikov
Lindsay Pierce
Emer Smith
Lynn Sosa
Jacob J. van den Berg
Theodore Marak
Don Operario
Philip A. Chan
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2890-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue