Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is an expectation in current heath care policy that family carers are involved in service delivery. This is also the case with compulsory outpatient mental health care, Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) that were introduced in England in 2008. No study has systematically investigated family involvement through the CTO process.

Method

We conducted qualitative interviews with 24 family carers to ascertain their views and experiences of involvement in CTOs. The transcripts were subjected to thematic analysis that incorporated both deductive and inductive elements.

Results

We found significant variation in both the type and extent of family carer involvement throughout the CTO process (initiation, recall to hospital, renewal, tribunal hearings, discharge). Some were satisfied with their level of involvement while others felt (at least partly) excluded or that they wanted to be more involved. Some wanted less involvement than what they had. From the interviews we identified key factors shaping carers' involvement. These included: perceptions of patient preference; concern over the relationship to the patient; carers’ knowledge of the CTO and of the potential for carer involvement; access to and relationships with health professionals; issues of patient confidentiality; opportunities for private discussions, and; health professionals limiting involvement. These factors show that health professionals have many opportunities to facilitate, or hinder, carer involvement. The various roles attributed to carers, such ‘proxy’ for patient decision, ‘gatekeeper’ to services, ‘mother’ or ‘expert carer’, however, conflict with one another and make the overall role unclear.

Conclusions

There is a need for clarification of the expectations of carers in individual care situations, for carers to be equipped with the information they need to in order to be involved, and for services to find flexible and innovative ways of ensuring continuous, open communication. The introduction of CTOs in England has not been successful in its ambition for carer involvement.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Various terms are used in legal frameworks (e.g., Nearest Relative, Next of Kin, Named Person) to identify a person with specified rights to make decisions in relation to patient care, including in some instances proxy decisions when the patient lacks capacity.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adamson J, Donovan J. Normal disruption': South Asian and African/Caribbean relatives caring for an older family member in the UK. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(1):37–48. Adamson J, Donovan J. Normal disruption': South Asian and African/Caribbean relatives caring for an older family member in the UK. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(1):37–48.
2.
go back to reference Johl N, Patterson T, Pearson L. What do we know about the attitudes, experiences and needs of Black and minority ethnic carers of people with dementia in the United Kingdom? A systematic review of empirical research findings. Dementia. 2014;15(4):721–42. Johl N, Patterson T, Pearson L. What do we know about the attitudes, experiences and needs of Black and minority ethnic carers of people with dementia in the United Kingdom? A systematic review of empirical research findings. Dementia. 2014;15(4):721–42.
3.
go back to reference Brand U. European perspectives: a carer’s view. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;104:96–101.CrossRef Brand U. European perspectives: a carer’s view. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;104:96–101.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hallam L. How involuntary commitment impacts on the burden of care of the family. International J Mental Health Nurs. 2007;16(4):247–56.CrossRef Hallam L. How involuntary commitment impacts on the burden of care of the family. International J Mental Health Nurs. 2007;16(4):247–56.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mullen R, Gibbs A, Dawson J. Family perspective on community treatment orders: a New Zealand study. Int J SocPsychiatr. 2006;52(5):469–78.CrossRef Mullen R, Gibbs A, Dawson J. Family perspective on community treatment orders: a New Zealand study. Int J SocPsychiatr. 2006;52(5):469–78.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Department of Health. Caring at the heart of 21st century families and communities: a caring system on your side, a life of your own. London: Department of Health; 2008. Department of Health. Caring at the heart of 21st century families and communities: a caring system on your side, a life of your own. London: Department of Health; 2008.
7.
go back to reference Department of Health. Recognised, valued and supported: next steps for the Carers strategy. London: Department of Health; 2011. Department of Health. Recognised, valued and supported: next steps for the Carers strategy. London: Department of Health; 2011.
8.
go back to reference Keywood K. Gatekeepers, proxies, advocates? The evolving role of carers under mental health and mental incapacity law reforms. Family Law. 2003;24(4):355–68. Keywood K. Gatekeepers, proxies, advocates? The evolving role of carers under mental health and mental incapacity law reforms. Family Law. 2003;24(4):355–68.
9.
go back to reference Kallert TW. Coercion in psychiatry. Current Op Psychiatr. 2008;21(5):485–9.CrossRef Kallert TW. Coercion in psychiatry. Current Op Psychiatr. 2008;21(5):485–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lefley HP. Mandatory treatment from the family's perspective. New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1997;75:7–16. Lefley HP. Mandatory treatment from the family's perspective. New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1997;75:7–16.
11.
go back to reference Rugkåsa J, Yeeles K, Koshiaris C, Burns T. Recall of patients on community treatment orders over three years in the OCTET CTO cohort. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):392.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rugkåsa J, Yeeles K, Koshiaris C, Burns T. Recall of patients on community treatment orders over three years in the OCTET CTO cohort. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):392.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Department of Health. Code of Practice: Mental Health Act 1983. London: Stationery Office; 2008. Department of Health. Code of Practice: Mental Health Act 1983. London: Stationery Office; 2008.
13.
go back to reference Canvin K, Rugkåsa J, Sinclair J, Burns T. Patient, psychiatrist and family carer experiences of community treatment orders: qualitative study. Soc Psychiatr Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49(12):1873–82.CrossRef Canvin K, Rugkåsa J, Sinclair J, Burns T. Patient, psychiatrist and family carer experiences of community treatment orders: qualitative study. Soc Psychiatr Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49(12):1873–82.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stensrud B, Høyer G, Granerud A, Landheim AS. Responsible, but still not a real treatment Partner': a qualitative study of the experiences of relatives of patients on outpatient commitment orders. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015;36(8):583–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stensrud B, Høyer G, Granerud A, Landheim AS. Responsible, but still not a real treatment Partner': a qualitative study of the experiences of relatives of patients on outpatient commitment orders. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015;36(8):583–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Gibbs A, Dawson J, Mullen R. Community treatment orders for people with serious mental illness: a New Zealand study. Br J Soc Work. 2006;36(7):1085–100. Gibbs A, Dawson J, Mullen R. Community treatment orders for people with serious mental illness: a New Zealand study. Br J Soc Work. 2006;36(7):1085–100.
16.
go back to reference Ridley J, Hunter S, Rosengard A. Partners in care?: views and experiences of carers from a cohort study of the early implementation of the Mental Health (Care & Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. Health & Soc Care Comm. 2010;18(5):474–82. Ridley J, Hunter S, Rosengard A. Partners in care?: views and experiences of carers from a cohort study of the early implementation of the Mental Health (Care & Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. Health & Soc Care Comm. 2010;18(5):474–82.
17.
go back to reference Owens N, Brophy L. Revocation of Community Treatment Orders in a mental health service network. Austr Psychiatr. 2013;21(1):46–50. Owens N, Brophy L. Revocation of Community Treatment Orders in a mental health service network. Austr Psychiatr. 2013;21(1):46–50.
18.
go back to reference Stroud J, Banks L, Doughty K. Community Treatment Orders: learning from experiences of service users, practitioners and nearest relatives. J Ment Health. 2015;24(2):88–92. Stroud J, Banks L, Doughty K. Community Treatment Orders: learning from experiences of service users, practitioners and nearest relatives. J Ment Health. 2015;24(2):88–92.
19.
go back to reference Burns T, Rugkåsa J, Yeeles K, Catty J. Coercion in mental health: a trial of the effectiveness of Community Treatment Orders and an investigation of informal coercion in community mental health care. Progr Grants for Appl Res. 2016:4(21). Burns T, Rugkåsa J, Yeeles K, Catty J. Coercion in mental health: a trial of the effectiveness of Community Treatment Orders and an investigation of informal coercion in community mental health care. Progr Grants for Appl Res. 2016:4(21).
20.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1990. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.
21.
go back to reference Cutcliffe JR. Adapt or adopt: developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. J Adv Nurs. 2005;51(4):421–8.CrossRefPubMed Cutcliffe JR. Adapt or adopt: developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. J Adv Nurs. 2005;51(4):421–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. In: Qualitative research in health care. 3rd ed. Edited by Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. London: BMJ Books; 2006. p. 1–101.CrossRef Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. In: Qualitative research in health care. 3rd ed. Edited by Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. London: BMJ Books; 2006. p. 1–101.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Smart C. Personal life. New directions in sociological thinking. London: Policy Press; 2007. Smart C. Personal life. New directions in sociological thinking. London: Policy Press; 2007.
24.
go back to reference Rugkåsa J. Care and culture. Care relations from the perspectives of mental health caregivers in ethnic minority families Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2015. Rugkåsa J. Care and culture. Care relations from the perspectives of mental health caregivers in ethnic minority families Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2015.
25.
go back to reference Cleary M, Freeman A, Walter G. Carer participation in mental health service delivery. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2006;15(3):189–94. Cleary M, Freeman A, Walter G. Carer participation in mental health service delivery. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2006;15(3):189–94.
26.
go back to reference Slade M, Pinfold V, Rapaport J, Bellringer S, Banerjee S, Kuipers E, Huxley P. Best practice when service users do not consent to sharing information with carers. National multimethod study. BJPsych. 2007;190:148–55.PubMed Slade M, Pinfold V, Rapaport J, Bellringer S, Banerjee S, Kuipers E, Huxley P. Best practice when service users do not consent to sharing information with carers. National multimethod study. BJPsych. 2007;190:148–55.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Gibbs A, Dawson J, Forsyth H, Mullen R. Maori experience of Community Treatment Orders in Otago, New Zealand. Austr NZ J Psychiatr 2004, 38(10):830–835. Gibbs A, Dawson J, Forsyth H, Mullen R. Maori experience of Community Treatment Orders in Otago, New Zealand. Austr NZ J Psychiatr 2004, 38(10):830–835.
Metadata
Title
Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England
Publication date
01-12-2017
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2716-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue