Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Meaning and barriers to quality care service provision in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: Qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives

Authors: Nadzeya Svirydzenka, Pablo Ronzoni, Nisha Dogra

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Defining quality in health presents many challenges. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) defined quality clinical care as care that is equitable, timely, safe, efficient, effective and patient centred. However, it is not clear how different stakeholders within a child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS) understand and/or apply this framework. This project aims to identify key stakeholders“ understanding of the meaning of quality in the context of CAMHS.

Method

The study sample comprised of three groups: (i) patients and carers, (ii) CAMHS clinical staff, and (iii) commissioners (Total N = 24). Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data and thematic analysis was applied to explore participant’s views on the meaning and measurement of quality and how these might reflect the IOM indicators and their relevance in CAMHS.

Results

An initial barrier to implementing quality care in CAMHS was the difficulty and limited agreement in defining the meaning of quality care, its measurement and implementation for all participants. Clinical staff defined quality as personal values, a set of practical rules, or clinical discharge rates; while patients suggested being more involved in the decision-making process. Commissioners, while supportive of adequate safeguarding and patient satisfaction procedures, did not explicitly link their view on quality to commissioning guidelines. Identifying practical barriers to implementing quality care was easier for all interviewees and common themes included: lack of meaningful measures, recourses, accountability, and training. All interviewees considered the IOM six markers as comprehensive and relevant to CAMHS.

Conclusions

No respondent individually or within one stakeholder group identified more than a few of the indicators or barriers of a quality CAMHS service. However, the composite responses of the respondents enable us to develop a more complete picture of how to improve quality care in practice and guide future research in the area.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McGlynn EA. Six challenges in measuring the quality of health care. Health Aff. 1997;16:7–21.CrossRef McGlynn EA. Six challenges in measuring the quality of health care. Health Aff. 1997;16:7–21.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nuffield Trust. The NHS and social care: quality and finance. 2014. http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/sites/files/nuffield/publication/nhs_and_social_care_quality_and_finance_briefing.pdf. accessed 25 Feb 2015. Nuffield Trust. The NHS and social care: quality and finance. 2014. http://​www.​nuffieldtrust.​org.​uk/​sites/​files/​nuffield/​publication/​nhs_​and_​social_​care_​quality_​and_​finance_​briefing.​pdf.​ accessed 25 Feb 2015.
5.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The uptake of NICE quality standards. Reporting on quality standards QS1–57. 2014. http://www.nice.org.uk/media/default/Standards-and-indicators/Quality-standards/qs-uptake-report-dec-14.pdf. accessed 25 Feb 2015. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The uptake of NICE quality standards. Reporting on quality standards QS1–57. 2014. http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​media/​default/​Standards-and-indicators/​Quality-standards/​qs-uptake-report-dec-14.​pdf.​ accessed 25 Feb 2015.
6.
go back to reference Care Quality Commission. Essential standards of quality and safety. 2010. http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/gac_-_dec_2011_update.pdf. accessed 25 Feb 2015. Care Quality Commission. Essential standards of quality and safety. 2010. http://​www.​cqc.​org.​uk/​sites/​default/​files/​documents/​gac_​-_​dec_​2011_​update.​pdf.​ accessed 25 Feb 2015.
7.
go back to reference Health and Social Care Act. 2012. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/7/contents/enacted. accessed 25 Feb 2015. Health and Social Care Act. 2012. http://​www.​legislation.​gov.​uk/​ukpga/​2012/​7/​contents/​enacted.​ accessed 25 Feb 2015.
8.
go back to reference Lohr KN. Outcomes measures: concepts and questions. Inquiry. 1988;25:37–50.PubMed Lohr KN. Outcomes measures: concepts and questions. Inquiry. 1988;25:37–50.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Mitchell, P. Patient safety and quality. An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. 2008. Mitchell, P. Patient safety and quality. An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. 2008.
10.
go back to reference Donabedian A. The quality of care: How can it be assessed? J Am Med Assoc. 1988;121:1145–50. Donabedian A. The quality of care: How can it be assessed? J Am Med Assoc. 1988;121:1145–50.
11.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Improving information services for health services researchers: a report to the National Library of Medicine. Washington: National Academy Press; 1999. Institute of Medicine. Improving information services for health services researchers: a report to the National Library of Medicine. Washington: National Academy Press; 1999.
12.
go back to reference Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Your guide to choosing quality health care. 2003. http://www.ahrq.gov/consumer/qnt/. accessed 25 Feb 2015. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Your guide to choosing quality health care. 2003. http://​www.​ahrq.​gov/​consumer/​qnt/​.​ accessed 25 Feb 2015.
13.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001.
14.
go back to reference Lee H, Delene ML, Bunda MA, Kim C. Methods of measuring Health-Care service quality. J Bus Res. 2000;48:233–46.CrossRef Lee H, Delene ML, Bunda MA, Kim C. Methods of measuring Health-Care service quality. J Bus Res. 2000;48:233–46.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dagger TS, Sweeney JC, Johnson LW. A Hierarchical model of health service quality: Scale development and investigation of an integrated model. J Serv Res. 2007;10:123–42.CrossRef Dagger TS, Sweeney JC, Johnson LW. A Hierarchical model of health service quality: Scale development and investigation of an integrated model. J Serv Res. 2007;10:123–42.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Carson P, Carson K, Roe C. Towards understanding the patient's perception of quality. Health Care Supervision. 1998;16:36–42. Carson P, Carson K, Roe C. Towards understanding the patient's perception of quality. Health Care Supervision. 1998;16:36–42.
17.
go back to reference Stichler J, Weiss M. Through the eye of the beholder: Multiple perspectives on quality in women's health care. Qual Manag Health Care. 2000;8:1–13.CrossRefPubMed Stichler J, Weiss M. Through the eye of the beholder: Multiple perspectives on quality in women's health care. Qual Manag Health Care. 2000;8:1–13.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference NHS commissioners. designate commissioner requested services (CRS). 2013. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/nhs-commissioners-designate-commissioner-requested-services. accessed 05 Sep 2016. NHS commissioners. designate commissioner requested services (CRS). 2013. https://​www.​gov.​uk/​guidance/​nhs-commissioners-designate-commissioner-requested-services.​ accessed 05 Sep 2016.
20.
go back to reference Ovretveit J. A comparison of approaches to health service quality in the UK, USA & Sweden and of the use of organizational audit frameworks. Eur J Public Health. 1994;4:46–54.CrossRef Ovretveit J. A comparison of approaches to health service quality in the UK, USA & Sweden and of the use of organizational audit frameworks. Eur J Public Health. 1994;4:46–54.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference O'Reilly M, Parker N. ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2013;13:190–7.CrossRef O'Reilly M, Parker N. ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2013;13:190–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Morse J, Field P. Qualitative Methods for Health Professionals (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995. Morse J, Field P. Qualitative Methods for Health Professionals (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
23.
go back to reference Clarke V, Braun V. Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. Psychologist. 2013;26:120–3. Clarke V, Braun V. Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. Psychologist. 2013;26:120–3.
24.
go back to reference Boyatzis R. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code. Development. London: Sage; 1998. Boyatzis R. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code. Development. London: Sage; 1998.
25.
go back to reference Dogra N, Svirydzenka N, Dugard P, Singh SP, Vostanis P. Characteristics and rates of mental health problems among Indian and White adolescents in two English cities. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:1–7.CrossRef Dogra N, Svirydzenka N, Dugard P, Singh SP, Vostanis P. Characteristics and rates of mental health problems among Indian and White adolescents in two English cities. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:1–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Meaning and barriers to quality care service provision in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: Qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives
Authors
Nadzeya Svirydzenka
Pablo Ronzoni
Nisha Dogra
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2080-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue