Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Associations between degrees of task delegation and job satisfaction of general practitioners and their staff: a cross-sectional study

Authors: Helle Riisgaard, Jens Søndergaard, Maria Munch, Jette V. Le, Loni Ledderer, Line B. Pedersen, Jørgen Nexøe

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In recent years, the healthcare system in the western world has undergone a structural development caused by changes in demography and pattern of disease. In order to maintain the healthcare system cost-effective, new tasks are placed in general practice urging the general practitioners to rethink the working structure without compromising the quality of care. However, there is a substantial variation in the degree to which general practitioners delegate tasks to their staff, and it is not known how these various degrees of task delegation influence the job satisfaction of general practitioners and their staff.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional study based on two electronic questionnaires, one for general practitioners and one for their staff. Both questionnaires were divided into two parts, a part exploring the degree of task delegation regarding management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice and a part concerning the general job satisfaction and motivation to work.

Results

We found a significant association between perceived “maximal degree” of task delegation in management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the staff’s overall job satisfaction. The odds ratio of the staff’s satisfaction with the working environment displayed a tendency that there is also an association with “maximal degree” of task delegation. In the analysis of the general practitioners, the odds ratios of the results indicate that there is a tendency that “maximal degree” of task delegation is associated with overall job satisfaction, satisfaction with the challenges in work, and satisfaction with the working environment.

Conclusions

We conclude that a high degree of task delegation is significantly associated with overall job satisfaction of the staff, and that there is a tendency that a high degree of task delegation is associated with the general practitioners’ and the staff’s satisfaction with the working environment as well as with general practitioners’ overall job satisfaction and satisfaction with challenges in work. To qualify future delegation processes within general practice, further research could explore the reasons for our findings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parkinson AM, Parker R. Addressing chronic and complex conditions: What evidence is there regarding the role primary healthcare nurses can play? Aust Health Rev. 2013;37:588–93.CrossRefPubMed Parkinson AM, Parker R. Addressing chronic and complex conditions: What evidence is there regarding the role primary healthcare nurses can play? Aust Health Rev. 2013;37:588–93.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Organisation of General Practice. General Practice in the Healthcare System of the Future. Copenhagen: Danish Regions; 2007. Organisation of General Practice. General Practice in the Healthcare System of the Future. Copenhagen: Danish Regions; 2007.
3.
go back to reference Sibbald B, McDonald R, Roland M. Shifting care from hospitals to the community: a review of the evidence on quality and efficiency. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12:110–7.CrossRefPubMed Sibbald B, McDonald R, Roland M. Shifting care from hospitals to the community: a review of the evidence on quality and efficiency. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12:110–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Laurant M, Reeves D, Hermens R, Braspenning J, Grol R, Sibbald B. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2:Cd001271. Laurant M, Reeves D, Hermens R, Braspenning J, Grol R, Sibbald B. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2:Cd001271.
5.
go back to reference Kinnersley P, Anderson E, Parry K, Clement J, Archard L, Turton P, et al. Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting “same day” consultations in primary care. Br Med J. 2000;320:1043–8.CrossRef Kinnersley P, Anderson E, Parry K, Clement J, Archard L, Turton P, et al. Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting “same day” consultations in primary care. Br Med J. 2000;320:1043–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mundinger MO, Kane RL, Lenz ER, Totten AM, Tsai WY, Cleary PD, et al. Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2000;283:59–68.CrossRefPubMed Mundinger MO, Kane RL, Lenz ER, Totten AM, Tsai WY, Cleary PD, et al. Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2000;283:59–68.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Laurant MGH, Hermens RPM, Braspenning JCC, Akkermans RP, Sibbald B, Grol RPT. An overview of patients’ preference for, and satisfaction with, care provided by general practitioners and nurse practitioners. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:2690–8.CrossRefPubMed Laurant MGH, Hermens RPM, Braspenning JCC, Akkermans RP, Sibbald B, Grol RPT. An overview of patients’ preference for, and satisfaction with, care provided by general practitioners and nurse practitioners. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:2690–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gardner K, Mazza D. Quality in general practice - definitions and frameworks. Aust Fam Physician. 2012;41:151–4.PubMed Gardner K, Mazza D. Quality in general practice - definitions and frameworks. Aust Fam Physician. 2012;41:151–4.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Grol R, Mokkink H, Smits A, van Eijk J, Beek M, Mesker P, et al. Work satisfaction of general practitioners and the quality of patient care. Fam Pract. 1985;2:128–35.CrossRefPubMed Grol R, Mokkink H, Smits A, van Eijk J, Beek M, Mesker P, et al. Work satisfaction of general practitioners and the quality of patient care. Fam Pract. 1985;2:128–35.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kvist T, Voutilainen A, Mantynen R, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. The relationship between patients’ perceptions of care quality and three factors: nursing staff job satisfaction, organizational characteristics and patient age. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:466.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kvist T, Voutilainen A, Mantynen R, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. The relationship between patients’ perceptions of care quality and three factors: nursing staff job satisfaction, organizational characteristics and patient age. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:466.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Szecsenyi J, Goetz K, Campbell S, Broge B, Reuschenbach B, Wensing M. Is the job satisfaction of primary care team members associated with patient satisfaction? BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:508–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Szecsenyi J, Goetz K, Campbell S, Broge B, Reuschenbach B, Wensing M. Is the job satisfaction of primary care team members associated with patient satisfaction? BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:508–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Lu H, While AE, Barriball KL. Job satisfaction among nurses: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005;42:211–27.CrossRefPubMed Lu H, While AE, Barriball KL. Job satisfaction among nurses: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005;42:211–27.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference McGregor W, Jabareen H, O’Donnell CA, Mercer SW, Watt GCM. Impact of the 2004 GMS contract on practice nurses: A qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58:711–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McGregor W, Jabareen H, O’Donnell CA, Mercer SW, Watt GCM. Impact of the 2004 GMS contract on practice nurses: A qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58:711–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Hegney DG, Patterson E, Eley DS, Mahomed R, Young J. The feasibility, acceptability and sustainability of nurse-led chronic disease management in Australian general practice: The perspectives of key stakeholders. Int J Nurs Pract. 2013;19:54–9.CrossRefPubMed Hegney DG, Patterson E, Eley DS, Mahomed R, Young J. The feasibility, acceptability and sustainability of nurse-led chronic disease management in Australian general practice: The perspectives of key stakeholders. Int J Nurs Pract. 2013;19:54–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Maisey S, Steel N, Marsh R, Gillam S, Fleetcroft R, Howe A. Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:133–9.CrossRefPubMed Maisey S, Steel N, Marsh R, Gillam S, Fleetcroft R, Howe A. Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:133–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cousins R, Donnell C. Nurse prescribing in general practice: A qualitative study of job satisfaction and work-related stress. Fam Pract. 2012;29:223–7.CrossRefPubMed Cousins R, Donnell C. Nurse prescribing in general practice: A qualitative study of job satisfaction and work-related stress. Fam Pract. 2012;29:223–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Finlayson Mary P, Raymont A. Teamwork-general practitioners and practice nurses working together in New Zealand. J Prim Health Care. 2012;4:150–5.PubMed Finlayson Mary P, Raymont A. Teamwork-general practitioners and practice nurses working together in New Zealand. J Prim Health Care. 2012;4:150–5.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1976;16:250–79.CrossRef Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1976;16:250–79.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jacobsen DI, Thorsvik J. How organisations function: an introduction to organisation and management. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag; 2008. p. 225–9. Jacobsen DI, Thorsvik J. How organisations function: an introduction to organisation and management. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag; 2008. p. 225–9.
20.
go back to reference Pedersen KM, Andersen JS, Sondergaard J. General practice and primary health care in Denmark. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25:34–8.CrossRef Pedersen KM, Andersen JS, Sondergaard J. General practice and primary health care in Denmark. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25:34–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hak T, Kvd V, Jansen H. An Application of the Three‐Step Test‐Interview (TSTI): A Validation Study of the Dutch and Norwegian Versions of the ‘Illegal Aliens Scale’. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2006;9:215–27.CrossRef Hak T, Kvd V, Jansen H. An Application of the Three‐Step Test‐Interview (TSTI): A Validation Study of the Dutch and Norwegian Versions of the ‘Illegal Aliens Scale’. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2006;9:215–27.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Hogh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire--a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31:438–49.CrossRefPubMed Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Hogh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire--a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31:438–49.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Poulsen L, Gilså-Hansen D, Munck A. The practice staff’s clinical work. Odense: Audit Project Odense; 2007. Poulsen L, Gilså-Hansen D, Munck A. The practice staff’s clinical work. Odense: Audit Project Odense; 2007.
24.
go back to reference Weisman CS, Alexander CS, Chase GA. Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: a longitudinal study. Health Serv Res. 1980;15:341–64.PubMedPubMedCentral Weisman CS, Alexander CS, Chase GA. Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: a longitudinal study. Health Serv Res. 1980;15:341–64.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Pedersen LB, Kjaer T, Kragstrup J, Gyrd-Hansen D. General practitioners’ preferences for the organisation of primary care: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2012;106:246–56. Amsterdam, Netherlands.CrossRefPubMed Pedersen LB, Kjaer T, Kragstrup J, Gyrd-Hansen D. General practitioners’ preferences for the organisation of primary care: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2012;106:246–56. Amsterdam, Netherlands.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Allen D, Hughes D. Nursing and the Division of Labour in Healthcare. Gordonsville: Palgrave Macmillan; 2001. p. 3–4. Allen D, Hughes D. Nursing and the Division of Labour in Healthcare. Gordonsville: Palgrave Macmillan; 2001. p. 3–4.
27.
go back to reference Charles-Jones H, Latimer J, May C. Transforming general practice: the redistribution of medical work in primary care. Sociol Health Illn. 2003;25:71–92.CrossRefPubMed Charles-Jones H, Latimer J, May C. Transforming general practice: the redistribution of medical work in primary care. Sociol Health Illn. 2003;25:71–92.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Associations between degrees of task delegation and job satisfaction of general practitioners and their staff: a cross-sectional study
Authors
Helle Riisgaard
Jens Søndergaard
Maria Munch
Jette V. Le
Loni Ledderer
Line B. Pedersen
Jørgen Nexøe
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-1984-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue