Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Evaluating the implementation of a national disclosure policy for large-scale adverse events in an integrated health care system: identification of gaps and successes

Authors: Elizabeth M. Maguire, Barbara G. Bokhour, Todd H. Wagner, Steven M. Asch, Allen L. Gifford, Thomas H. Gallagher, Janet M. Durfee, Richard A. Martinello, A. Rani Elwy

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many healthcare organizations have developed disclosure policies for large-scale adverse events, including the Veterans Health Administration (VA). This study evaluated VA’s national large-scale disclosure policy and identifies gaps and successes in its implementation.

Methods

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with leaders, hospital employees, and patients at nine sites to elicit their perceptions of recent large-scale adverse events notifications and the national disclosure policy. Data were coded using the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Results

We conducted 97 interviews. Insights included how to handle the communication of large-scale disclosures through multiple levels of a large healthcare organization and manage ongoing communications about the event with employees. Of the 5 CFIR constructs and 26 sub-constructs assessed, seven were prominent in interviews. Leaders and employees specifically mentioned key problem areas involving 1) networks and communications during disclosure, 2) organizational culture, 3) engagement of external change agents during disclosure, and 4) a need for reflecting on and evaluating the policy implementation and disclosure itself. Patients shared 5) preferences for personal outreach by phone in place of the current use of certified letters. All interviewees discussed 6) issues with execution and 7) costs of the disclosure.

Conclusions

CFIR analysis reveals key problem areas that need to be addresses during disclosure, including: timely communication patterns throughout the organization, establishing a supportive culture prior to implementation, using patient-approved, effective communications strategies during disclosures; providing follow-up support for employees and patients, and sharing lessons learned.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Prouty CD, Foglia MB, Gallagher TH. Patients’ experiences with disclosure of a large-scale adverse event. J Clin Ethics. 2013;24(4):353–63.PubMed Prouty CD, Foglia MB, Gallagher TH. Patients’ experiences with disclosure of a large-scale adverse event. J Clin Ethics. 2013;24(4):353–63.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Dudzinski DM, Hebert PC, Foglia MB, Gallagher TH. The disclosure dilemma—large scale adverse events. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:978–86.CrossRefPubMed Dudzinski DM, Hebert PC, Foglia MB, Gallagher TH. The disclosure dilemma—large scale adverse events. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:978–86.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Holodniy M, Oda G, Schirmer P, Lucero CA, Khudyakov YE, Xia G, et al. Results from a large-scale epidemiologic look-back investigation of improperly reprocessed endoscopy equipment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(7):649–56.CrossRefPubMed Holodniy M, Oda G, Schirmer P, Lucero CA, Khudyakov YE, Xia G, et al. Results from a large-scale epidemiologic look-back investigation of improperly reprocessed endoscopy equipment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(7):649–56.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Patel PR, Srinivasan A, Perz JF. Developing a broader approach to management of infection control breaches in health care settings. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(10):685–90.CrossRefPubMed Patel PR, Srinivasan A, Perz JF. Developing a broader approach to management of infection control breaches in health care settings. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(10):685–90.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fischhoff, B., Brewer, N., & Downs, J.S. (eds.). (2011). Communicating risks and benefits: An evidence-based user’s guide. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration. Fischhoff, B., Brewer, N., & Downs, J.S. (eds.). (2011). Communicating risks and benefits: An evidence-based user’s guide. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration.
6.
go back to reference Kathleen M. Mazor, EdD; Steven R. Simon, MD; Robert A. Yood, MD; Brian C. Martinson, PhD; Margaret J. Gunter, PhD; George W. Reed, PhD; and Jerry H. Gurwitz, MD. Health Plan Members’ Views on forgiving medical errors. Am J Manag Care. 2005 Jan;11(1):49–52. Kathleen M. Mazor, EdD; Steven R. Simon, MD; Robert A. Yood, MD; Brian C. Martinson, PhD; Margaret J. Gunter, PhD; George W. Reed, PhD; and Jerry H. Gurwitz, MD. Health Plan Members’ Views on forgiving medical errors. Am J Manag Care. 2005 Jan;11(1):49–52.
7.
go back to reference Gallagher TH, Studdert D, Levinson W. Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2713–9.CrossRefPubMed Gallagher TH, Studdert D, Levinson W. Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2713–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci. 2013;8:51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci. 2013;8:51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Powell BJ, Proctor EK, Glisson CA, Kohl PL, Raghavan R, Brownson RC, Stoner BP, Carpenter CR, Palinkas LA.A mixed methods multiple case study of implementation as usual in children’s social service organizations: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 20;8:92. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-92. Powell BJ, Proctor EK, Glisson CA, Kohl PL, Raghavan R, Brownson RC, Stoner BP, Carpenter CR, Palinkas LA.A mixed methods multiple case study of implementation as usual in children’s social service organizations: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 20;8:92. doi: 10.​1186/​1748-5908-8-92.
14.
go back to reference Damachroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.CrossRef Damachroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51.CrossRefPubMed O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. 2. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1994. Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. 2. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.
18.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000. Institute of Medicine. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
20.
go back to reference McDonald T. Error disclosure: Within a principled approach to adverse events. Am Soc Anesthesiol News lett. 2009;73:20–2. McDonald T. Error disclosure: Within a principled approach to adverse events. Am Soc Anesthesiol News lett. 2009;73:20–2.
21.
go back to reference The Full Disclosure Working Group. When things go wrong: Responding to adverse events. A consensus statement of the Harvard Hospitals. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors, 2006. The Full Disclosure Working Group. When things go wrong: Responding to adverse events. A consensus statement of the Harvard Hospitals. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors, 2006.
22.
go back to reference Conway J, Federico F, Stewart K, Campbell M. Respectful management of serious clinical adverse events. IHI Innovation series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2010. Conway J, Federico F, Stewart K, Campbell M. Respectful management of serious clinical adverse events. IHI Innovation series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2010.
23.
go back to reference Souter KJ, Gallagher TH. The disclosure of unanticipated outcomes of care and medical errors: what does this mean for anesthesiologists? Anesth Analg. 2012;114(3):615–21.CrossRefPubMed Souter KJ, Gallagher TH. The disclosure of unanticipated outcomes of care and medical errors: what does this mean for anesthesiologists? Anesth Analg. 2012;114(3):615–21.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Elwy AR, Bokhour BG, Maguire EM, Wagner TH, Asch SM, Gifford AL, et al. Improving healthcare systems’ disclosures of large-scale adverse events: a Department of Veterans Affairs leadership, policymaker, research and stakeholder partnership. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29 Suppl 4:895–903. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3034-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elwy AR, Bokhour BG, Maguire EM, Wagner TH, Asch SM, Gifford AL, et al. Improving healthcare systems’ disclosures of large-scale adverse events: a Department of Veterans Affairs leadership, policymaker, research and stakeholder partnership. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29 Suppl 4:895–903. doi:10.​1007/​s11606-014-3034-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Maguire EM, Bokhour BG, Asch SM, et al. Disclosing large scale adverse events in the US Veterans Health Administration: lessons from media responses. Public Health. 2016;135:75–82.CrossRefPubMed Maguire EM, Bokhour BG, Asch SM, et al. Disclosing large scale adverse events in the US Veterans Health Administration: lessons from media responses. Public Health. 2016;135:75–82.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Wagner TH, Taylor T, Cowgill E, et al. Intended and unintended effects of large-scale adverse event disclosure: a controlled before-after analysis of five large-scale notifications. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(5):295–302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wagner TH, Taylor T, Cowgill E, et al. Intended and unintended effects of large-scale adverse event disclosure: a controlled before-after analysis of five large-scale notifications. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(5):295–302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the implementation of a national disclosure policy for large-scale adverse events in an integrated health care system: identification of gaps and successes
Authors
Elizabeth M. Maguire
Barbara G. Bokhour
Todd H. Wagner
Steven M. Asch
Allen L. Gifford
Thomas H. Gallagher
Janet M. Durfee
Richard A. Martinello
A. Rani Elwy
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1903-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue