Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Comparing healthcare utilization among health survey respondents with the total population – are respondents representative?

Authors: Janne Agerholm, Daniel Bruce, Bo Burström

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surveys are often used for analysis of health status and healthcare utilization in different socioeconomic groups. However, differential non-response rates may bias results. The aim of this study was to compare register data on outpatient healthcare utilization among respondents to a health survey to that of the total population and to investigate whether socioeconomic differences in outpatient healthcare utilization differ between survey respondents and the total population.

Method

Data from the Stockholm Public Health Survey 2010 (n = 30,767 aged 18 + years) were linked to register data on outpatient healthcare utilization in order to investigate differentials by socioeconomic groups, country of birth and residential areas among respondents, using logistic regression and negative binomial regression. These results were compared to analyses of register data on outpatient healthcare utilization for the total population (n = 1.6 million aged 18 + years) of Stockholm County.

Results

Outpatient healthcare utilization was generally higher among survey respondents than in the total population, especially among men. The proportion of individuals having made at least one visit was significantly higher among survey respondents than in the total population but the differences were smaller regarding the average number of visits. Socioeconomic differences in outpatient healthcare utilization between subgroups were largely similar among survey respondents and in the total population. However, individuals born outside Sweden responding to the survey had significantly higher outpatient healthcare utilisation than individuals born outside Sweden in the total population.

Conclusion

Compared to the total population, a greater proportion of survey respondents had made at least one outpatient visit to the doctor. However, the mean number of registered visits did not differ significantly between survey respondents and the total population. Hence, depending on the outcome measure used survey-based estimates may result in slightly biased prevalence estimates, however, relative differences among survey respondents were to a large degree comparable to relative differences in the total population.
In contrast, survey respondents born outside Sweden differed from persons born outside Sweden in the total population to a degree where they may not be representative and comparisons between this group and other subgroups, using survey data, may be biased.
Literature
1.
Svensson AC, Fredlund P, Laflamme L, Hallqvist J, Alfredsson L, Ekbom A, et al. Cohort profile: the Stockholm public health cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(5):1263–72.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E. Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opin Quart. 2005;69(1):87–98.CrossRef
3.
Tourangeau R, Plewes TJ, editors. Nonresponse in social science survey: a research agenda. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2013.
4.
Rogelberg SG, Luong A. Nonresponse to mailed surveys: a review and guide. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1998;7(2):60–5.CrossRef
5.
Martin CL. The impact of topic interest on mail survey response behavior. J Market Res Soc. 1994;36(4):327–38.
6.
Cohen G, Duffy J. Are nonrespondents to health surveys less healthy than respondents? J Off Stat. 2002;18(1):13–23.
7.
Graham H. Unequal lives. Health and socioeconomic inequalities. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2007.
8.
Launer LJ, Wind AW, Deeg DJ. Nonresponse pattern and bias in a community-based cross-sectional study of cognitive functioning among the elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139(8):803–12.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Hoeymans N, Feskens EJ, Van Den Bos GA, Kromhout D. Non-response bias in a study of cardiovascular diseases, functional status and self-rated health among elderly men. Age Ageing. 1998;27(1):35–40.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Kauppi M, Sokka T, Hannonen P. Survey nonresponse is associated with increased mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and in a community population. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(5):807–10.PubMed
11.
Martikainen P, Laaksonen M, Piha K, Lallukka T. Does survey non-response bias the association between occupational social class and health? Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(2):212–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Nummela O, Sulander T, Helakorpi S, Haapola I, Uutela A, Heinonen H, et al. Register-based data indicated nonparticipation bias in a health study among aging people. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1418–25.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Rupp I, Triemstra M, Boshuizen HC, Jacobi CE, Dinant HJ, van den Bos GA. Selection bias due to non-response in a health survey among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Public Health. 2002;12(2):131–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Metsemakers JF, Knottnerus JA. Morbidity in responders and non-responders in a register-based population survey. Fam Pract. 1998;15(3):261–3.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Korkeila K, Suominen S, Ahvenainen J, Ojanlatva A, Rautava P, Helenius H, et al. Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(11):991–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Andersen LB, Vestbo J, Juel K, Bjerg AM, Keiding N, Jensen G, et al. A comparison of mortality rates in three prospective studies from Copenhagen with mortality rates in the central part of the city, and the entire country. Copenhagen Center for Prospective Population Studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 1998;14(6):579–85.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Lamers LM. Medical consumption of respondents and non-respondents to a mailed health survey. Eur J Public Health. 1997;7(3):267–71.CrossRef
18.
Freudenstein U, Arthur AJ, Matthews RJ, Jagger C. Community surveys of late-life depression: who are the non-responders? Age Ageing. 2001;30(6):517–21.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Gundgaard J, Ekholm O, Hansen EH, Rasmussen NK. The effect of non-response on estimates of health care utilisation: linking health surveys and registers. Eur J Public Health. 2008;18(2):189–94.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Kjoller M, Thoning H. Characteristics of non-response in the Danish Health Interview Surveys, 1987–1994. Eur J Public Health. 2005;15(5):528–35.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Reijneveld SA, Stronks K. The impact of response bias on estimates of health care utilization in a metropolitan area: the use of administrative data. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(6):1134–40.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Lorant V, Demarest S, Miermans PJ, Van Oyen H. Survey error in measuring socio-economic risk factors of health status: a comparison of a survey and a census. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(6):1292–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Svensson A, Magnusson C, Fredlund P. Hälsoenkät 2010 - teknisk rapport [Health survey 2010 - technical report]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutets Folkhälsoakademi; 2011.
24.
Magnussen J, Vrangbaek K, Saltman R, editors. Nordic Health Care Systems Recent Reforms and Current Policy Challenges. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education; 2009.
25.
Tao W, D. B, Burstrom B. Områdesskillnader i sjukdomsförekomst [Area differences in prevalences of ill health]. Stockholm: Center for epidemiology and Community Health 2015. Report No.: 2015:1.
26.
Font J, Mendez M, editors. Surveying ethnic minorities and immigrant populations methodological challenges and research strategies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2013.
27.
Strandhagen E, Berg C, Lissner L, Nunez L, Rosengren A, Toren K, et al. Selection bias in a population survey with registry linkage: potential effect on socioeconomic gradient in cardiovascular risk. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(3):163–72.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparing healthcare utilization among health survey respondents with the total population – are respondents representative?
Authors
Janne Agerholm
Daniel Bruce
Bo Burström
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1745-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Does lean muddy the quality improvement waters? A qualitative study of how a hospital management team understands lean in the context of quality improvement

Research article

Help-seeking for mental health problems by employees in the Australian Mining Industry

Research article

Contextualizing learning to improve care using collaborative communities of practices

Research article

Factors influencing the current practice of self-medication consultations in Eastern Indonesian community pharmacies: a qualitative study

Research article

From personal crisis care to convenience shopping: an interpretive description of the experiences of people with mental illness and addictions in community pharmacies

Research article

The impact of predisposing, enabling, and need factors in utilization of health services among rural residents in Guangxi, China