Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Indirect effects of contextual factors on patients’ consultations with healthcare professionals about health information found online

Author: Younsook Yeo

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

E-health users are encouraged to consult healthcare professionals about the health information they found online because it facilitates e-health users to participate in an informed decision-making process with healthcare professionals on treatment options. However, few studies have examined the path of how e-health users consult healthcare professionals about the health information. Using psychological empowerment, which claims that empowering individuals requires understanding contextual factors that interact with the individuals’ intrapsychic factors, this study tested a hypothesis: the contextual factors play an indirect role between patients’ perceived poor health and their consultations with healthcare professionals about the health information found online, holding predisposing factors constant.

Methods

The data were collected from the Health Information National Trends Survey and used a subsample of e-health users who used healthcare services during the past year. The subsample (N = 2,297) was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM).

Results

The SEM analysis supported the hypothesized indirect model. Meanwhile, patients with low socioeconomic statuses tended to score high in the outcome measurement of the contextual factors; however, they tended not to consult professionals.

Conclusions

It is important to acknowledge contextual factors, which encompass communication and relational aspects as well as the process and outcomes of treatments, when empowering e-health users to use e-health tools meaningfully and become empowered in caring for their own health. Particularly, those with low income and education levels were the less powered or powerless patients: they tended not to be competent in having a voice and discussing the health information that they found online with professionals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: Myths and misconceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79:277–82.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Te Boveldt N, Vernooij-Dassen M, Leppink I, Samwel H, Vissers K, Engels Y. Patient empowerment in cancer pain management: an integrative literature review. Psychooncology. 2014;23:1203–11.CrossRef
4.
5.
6.
Dutta-Bergman MJ. Health attitudes, health cognitions, and health behaviors among Internet health information seekers: population-based survey. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:e15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Lemire M, Sicotte C, Paré G. Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health. Health Policy. 2008;88:130–40.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Calvillo J, Román I, Roa LM. How technology is empowering patients? A literature review. Health Expect. 2015;18:643–52.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Anderson JG. Consumers of e-health: patterns of use and barriers. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2004;22:242–8.CrossRef
11.
Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR. Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JAMA. 2002;287:2869–71.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Purcell GP, Wilson P, Delamothe T. The quality of health information on the Internet. Br Med J. 2002;324:557–8.CrossRef
13.
Helft PR, Eckles RE, Johnson-Calley CS, Daugherty CK. Use of the internet to obtain cancer information among cancer patients at an urban county hospital. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4954–62.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Kitchens B, Harle CA, Li S. Quality of health-related online search results. Dec Support Syst. 2014;57:454–62.CrossRef
15.
Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA. 2003;289:2400–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
van den Berg MH, Ronday HK, Peeters AJ, Voogt-van der Harst EM, Munneke M, Breedveld FC, Vliet Vlieland TP. Engagement and satisfaction with an internet-based physical activity intervention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2007;46:545–52.CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
Gauld R. Factors associated with e-mail and Internet use for health information and communications among Australians and New Zealanders. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2011;29:161–71.CrossRef
19.
Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients’ use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:180–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Menon ST. Toward a model of psychological health empowerment: implications for health care in multicultural communities. Nurse Educ Today. 2002;22:28–39.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Feste C, Anderson RM. Empowerment: from philosophy to practice. Patient Educ Couns. 1995;26:139–44.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zimmerman MA. Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. Am J Community Psychol. 1995;23:581–99.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Rice RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75:8–28.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Silver MP. Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: a qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94:291–309.CrossRefPubMed
26.
McAllister M, Dunn G, Payne K, Davies L, Todd C. Patient empowerment: the need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
28.
Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, Hager A, Wasson JH, Lindblad S. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. Br Med J. 2015;350:g7818.CrossRef
29.
Dutta-Bergman MN. Developing a profile of consumer intention to seek out additional information beyond a doctor: the role of communicative and motivation variables. Health Commun. 2005;17:1–16.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Barr PJ, Scholl I, Bravo P, Faber MJ, Elwyn G, McAllister M. Assessment of patient empowerment - a systematic review of measures. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126553.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
32.
33.
Bravo P, Edwards A, Barr PJ, Scholl I, Elwyn G, McAllister M. Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:252.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zimmerman MC. Taking aim on empowerment research: on the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions. Am J Community Psychol. 1990;18:169–77.CrossRef
35.
Zimmerman MA. Empowerment theory: psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In: Rapaport J, Seldman E, editors. Handbook of Community Psychology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 2000. p. 43–63.CrossRef
36.
Charise A, Witteman H, Whyte S, Sutton EJ, Bender JL, Massimi M, Stephens L, Evans J, Logie C, Mirza RM, Elf M. Questioning context: a set of interdisciplinary questions for investigating contextual factors affecting health decision making. Health Expect. 2011;14:115–32.CrossRefPubMed
37.
38.
Holmström I, Roïng M. The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: a discussion on concepts. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79:167–72.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Marmsen JAM, Bernsen RMD, Bruijnzeels MA, Meeuwesen L. Patients’ evaluation of quality of care in general practice: what are the cultural and linguistic barriers? Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72:155–62.CrossRef
40.
Hall JA, Feldstein M, Fretwell MD, Rowe JW, Epstein AM. Older patients’ health status and satisfaction with medical care in an HMO population. Med Care. 1990;28:261–70.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Jackson JL, Chamberlin JC, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:609–20.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Hou J, Shim MS. The role of provider-patient communication and trust in online sources in Internet use for health-related activities. J Health Commun. 2010;15:186–99.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Suziedelyte A. How does searching for health information on the Internet affect individuals’ demand for health care services. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:1828–35.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Agarwal R, Angst CM. Technology-enabled transformations in health care: Early findings on personal health records and individual use. In: Galletta D, Zhang P, editors. Human-computer interaction and management Information Systems: Applications. NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc.; 2006. p. 357–78.
45.
Hou SI. Health literacy, ehealth, and communication: Putting the consumer first. Health Promot Pract. 2010;11:303–5.CrossRef
46.
Lau AYS, Proudfoot J, Andrews A, Liaw ST, Crimmins J, Arguel A, Coiera E. Which bundles of features in a web-based personally Controlled health management system are associated with consumer help-seeking behaviors for physical and emotional well-being? J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Martinez M, Baum A, Gomez Saldaño AM, Gomez A, Luna D, González Bernaldo de Quirós F. Predictive variables of the use of personal health record: the hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1171.PubMed
48.
Yamin CK, Emani S, Williams DH, Lipsitz SR, Karson AS, Wald JS, Bates DW. The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:568–74.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Ybarra ML, Suman M. Help seeking behavior and the Internet: a national survey. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75:29–41.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Wald HS, Dube CE, Anthony DC. Untangling the Web: the impact of Internet use on health care and the physician–patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68:218–24.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Renahy E, Chauvin P. Internet uses for health information seeking: A literature review. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2006;54:263–75.CrossRefPubMed
52.
53.
Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:671–92.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Dedding C, van Doorn R, Winkler L, Reis R. How will e-health affect patient participation in the clinic? A review of e-health studies and the current evidence for changes in the relationship between medical professionals and patients. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:49–53.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Maloney EK, D'Agostino TA, Heerdt A, Dickler M, Li Y, Ostroff JS, Bylund CL. Sources and types of online information that breast cancer patients read and discuss with their doctors. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13:107–14.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Henselmans I, Heijmans M, Rademakers J, van Dulmen S. Participation of chronic patients in medical consultations: patients’ perceived efficacy, barriers and interest in support. Health Expect. 2015;18:2375–88.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Street Jr RL, Millay B. Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters. Health Commun. 2001;13:61–73.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Rosner F. Patient noncompliance: causes and solutions. Mount Sinai J Med. 2006;73:553–9.
59.
60.
Norman G, Sigman R. Using addresses as sampling units in the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey. In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods. 2009. p. 4741–54.
61.
Harteloh PPM. The meaning of quality in health care: a conceptual analysis. Health Care Anal. 2003;11:259–67.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Small N, Bower P, Chew-Graham CA, Whalley D, Protheroe J. Patient empowerment in long-term conditions: development and preliminary testing of a new measure. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
63.
Bulsara C, Styles I, Ward AM, Bulsara M. The psychometrics of developing the patient empowerment scale. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;24:1–16.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Banks J, Marmot M, Oldfield Z, Smith JP. Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. JAMA. 2006;295:2037–45.CrossRefPubMed
65.
66.
Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103:411–23.CrossRef
67.
68.
Baron RM, Kenny DA. Moderator-mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986;51(6):1173–82.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Zhao X, Lynch JG, Chen Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consum Res. 2010;37:197–206.CrossRef
70.
Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum; 1993.
71.
Engestrom Y. Developmental studies on work as a testbench of activity theory. In: Chaiklin S, Lave J, editors. Understanding Practice: perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993. p. 64–103.CrossRef
72.
Young IM. Five faces of oppression. In: Young IM, Allen DS, editors. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990. p. 39–63.
73.
Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Health literacy and patient empowerment in health communication: The importance of separating conjoined twins. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;90:4–11.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Trummer UF, Mueller UO, Nowak P, Stidl T, Pelikan JM. Does physician–patient communication that aims at empowering patients improve clinical outcome? a case study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:299–306.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Street RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:295–301.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Spreitzer GM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad Manage J. 1995;38:1442–65.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Indirect effects of contextual factors on patients’ consultations with healthcare professionals about health information found online
Author
Younsook Yeo
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1713-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

State-civil society partnerships for HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention in Ghana: exploring factors associated with successes and challenges

Research article

“I go I die, I stay I die, better to stay and die in my house”: understanding the barriers to accessing health care in Timor-Leste

Research article

Childhood fever in well-child clinics: a focus group study among doctors and nurses

Research article

Comparing healthcare utilization among health survey respondents with the total population – are respondents representative?

Research article

Validating abortion procedure coding in Canadian administrative databases

Research article

Demographic profile of physician participants in short-term medical missions