Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Validation of the Dutch language version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-NL)

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As the first objective of caring for patients is to do no harm, patient safety is a priority in delivering clinical care. An essential component of safe care in a clinical department is its safety climate. Safety climate correlates with safety-specific behaviour, injury rates, and accidents. Safety climate in healthcare can be assessed by the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), which provides insight by scoring six dimensions: Teamwork Climate, Job Satisfaction, Safety Climate, Stress Recognition, Working Conditions and Perceptions of Management.
The objective of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Dutch language version of the SAQ in a variety of clinical departments in Dutch hospitals.

Methods

The Dutch version (SAQ-NL) of the SAQ was back translated, and analyzed for semantic characteristics and content. From October 2010 to November 2015 SAQ-NL surveys were carried out in 17 departments in two university and seven large non-university teaching hospitals in the Netherlands, prior to a Crew Resource Management human factors intervention. Statistical analyses were used to examine response patterns, mean scores, correlations, internal consistency reliability and model fit. Cronbach’s α’s and inter-item correlations were calculated to examine internal consistency reliability.

Results

One thousand three hundred fourteen completed questionnaires were returned from 2113 administered to health care workers, resulting in a response rate of 62 %. Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed the 6-factor structure fit the data adequately. Response patterns were similar for professional positions, departments, physicians and nurses, and university and non-university teaching hospitals. The SAQ-NL showed strong internal consistency (α = .87). Exploratory analysis revealed differences in scores on the SAQ dimensions when comparing different professional positions, when comparing physicians to nurses and when comparing university to non-university hospitals.

Conclusions

The SAQ-NL demonstrated good psychometric properties and is therefore a useful instrument to measure patient safety climate in Dutch clinical work settings. As removal of one item resulted in an increased reliability of the Working Conditions dimension, revision or deletion of this item should be considered. The results from this study provide researchers and practitioners with insight into safety climate in a variety of departments and functional positions in Dutch hospitals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Inman T. Foundation for a new theory and practice of medicine. J. Churchill; 1860. Inman T. Foundation for a new theory and practice of medicine. J. Churchill; 1860.
2.
go back to reference Cooper JB, Gaba DM, Liang B, Woods D, Blum LN. The National Patient Safety Foundation agenda for research and development in patient safety. MedGenMed. 2000;2(3):E38.PubMed Cooper JB, Gaba DM, Liang B, Woods D, Blum LN. The National Patient Safety Foundation agenda for research and development in patient safety. MedGenMed. 2000;2(3):E38.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cooper MD, Phillips RA. Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. J Safety Res. 2004;35(5):497–512.CrossRefPubMed Cooper MD, Phillips RA. Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. J Safety Res. 2004;35(5):497–512.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Huang DT, Clermont G, Kong L, Weissfeld LA, Sexton JB, Rowan KM, Angus DC. Intensive care unit safety culture and outcomes: a US multicenter study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(3):151–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang DT, Clermont G, Kong L, Weissfeld LA, Sexton JB, Rowan KM, Angus DC. Intensive care unit safety culture and outcomes: a US multicenter study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(3):151–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Valentin A, Schiffinger M, Steyrer J, Huber C, Strunk G. Safety climate reduces medication and dislodgement errors in routine intensive care practice. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(3):391–8.CrossRefPubMed Valentin A, Schiffinger M, Steyrer J, Huber C, Strunk G. Safety climate reduces medication and dislodgement errors in routine intensive care practice. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(3):391–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Katz-Navon T, Naveh E, Stern Z. Safety climate in healthcare organizations: a multidimensional approach. Acad Manag J. 2005;48:1075–89.CrossRef Katz-Navon T, Naveh E, Stern Z. Safety climate in healthcare organizations: a multidimensional approach. Acad Manag J. 2005;48:1075–89.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Singer S, Lin S, Falwell A, Gaba D, Baker L. Relationship of safety climate and safety performance in hospitals. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(2 Pt 1):399–421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singer S, Lin S, Falwell A, Gaba D, Baker L. Relationship of safety climate and safety performance in hospitals. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(2 Pt 1):399–421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Health and Safety Commission AHFSG. Third Report: Organising for Safety. 1993. Health and Safety Commission AHFSG. Third Report: Organising for Safety. 1993.
10.
go back to reference Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB, Rowan K, Vella K, Boyden J, Roberts PR, Thomas EJ. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB, Rowan K, Vella K, Boyden J, Roberts PR, Thomas EJ. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Helmreich RL. Cockpit management attitudes. Hum Factors. 1984;26(5):583–9.PubMed Helmreich RL. Cockpit management attitudes. Hum Factors. 1984;26(5):583–9.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Poley MJ, van der Starre C, van den Bos A, van Dijk M, Tibboel D. Patient safety culture in a Dutch pediatric surgical intensive care unit: an evaluation using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(6):e310–316.CrossRefPubMed Poley MJ, van der Starre C, van den Bos A, van Dijk M, Tibboel D. Patient safety culture in a Dutch pediatric surgical intensive care unit: an evaluation using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(6):e310–316.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Haerkens MH, Kox M, Lemson J, Houterman S, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Crew resource management in the intensive care unit: a prospective 3-year cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(10):1319–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haerkens MH, Kox M, Lemson J, Houterman S, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Crew resource management in the intensive care unit: a prospective 3-year cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(10):1319–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Devriendt E, Van den Heede K, Coussement J, Dejaeger E, Surmont K, Heylen D, Schwendimann R, Sexton B, Wellens NI, Boonen S, et al. Content validity and internal consistency of the Dutch translation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: an observational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(3):327–37.CrossRefPubMed Devriendt E, Van den Heede K, Coussement J, Dejaeger E, Surmont K, Heylen D, Schwendimann R, Sexton B, Wellens NI, Boonen S, et al. Content validity and internal consistency of the Dutch translation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: an observational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(3):327–37.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zimmermann N, Kung K, Sereika SM, Engberg S, Sexton B, Schwendimann R. Assessing the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals--a validation study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zimmermann N, Kung K, Sereika SM, Engberg S, Sexton B, Schwendimann R. Assessing the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals--a validation study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Brislin RW. The wording and translation of research instruments. In: Lonner WJ, Berry JW, editors. Field methods in cross-cultural research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1986. p. 137–64. Brislin RW. The wording and translation of research instruments. In: Lonner WJ, Berry JW, editors. Field methods in cross-cultural research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1986. p. 137–64.
17.
go back to reference Jones PS, Lee JW, Phillips LR, Zhang XE, Jaceldo KB. An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research. Nurs Res. 2001;50(5):300–4.CrossRefPubMed Jones PS, Lee JW, Phillips LR, Zhang XE, Jaceldo KB. An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research. Nurs Res. 2001;50(5):300–4.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Arbuckle JL. Amos (Version 23.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS; 2014. Arbuckle JL. Amos (Version 23.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS; 2014.
19.
go back to reference Shevlina M, Miles JNV. Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personal Individ Differ. 1998;25(1):85–90.CrossRef Shevlina M, Miles JNV. Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personal Individ Differ. 1998;25(1):85–90.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1998;6(1):1–55.CrossRef Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1998;6(1):1–55.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(2):130–49.CrossRef MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(2):130–49.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Warne RT. A primer on multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) for behavioral scientists. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2014;19(17):1–10. Warne RT. A primer on multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) for behavioral scientists. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2014;19(17):1–10.
23.
go back to reference Deilkas ET, Hofoss D. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Generic version (Short Form 2006). BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:191.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Deilkas ET, Hofoss D. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Generic version (Short Form 2006). BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:191.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA, Holzmueller CG, Millman EA, Rowen L, Pronovost PJ. Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(5):746–52.CrossRefPubMed Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA, Holzmueller CG, Millman EA, Rowen L, Pronovost PJ. Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(5):746–52.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bondevik GT, Hofoss D, Hansen EH, Deilkas EC. The safety attitudes questionnaire - ambulatory version: psychometric properties of the Norwegian translated version for the primary care setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bondevik GT, Hofoss D, Hansen EH, Deilkas EC. The safety attitudes questionnaire - ambulatory version: psychometric properties of the Norwegian translated version for the primary care setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Sexton JB, Berenholtz SM, Goeschel CA, Watson SR, Holzmueller CG, Thompson DA, Hyzy RC, Marsteller JA, Schumacher K, Pronovost PJ. Assessing and improving safety climate in a large cohort of intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(5):934–9.CrossRefPubMed Sexton JB, Berenholtz SM, Goeschel CA, Watson SR, Holzmueller CG, Thompson DA, Hyzy RC, Marsteller JA, Schumacher K, Pronovost PJ. Assessing and improving safety climate in a large cohort of intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(5):934–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Validation of the Dutch language version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-NL)
Publication date
01-12-2016
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1648-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue