Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Centralized or decentralized perinatal surgical care for rural women: a realist review of the evidence on safety

Authors: Jude Kornelsen, Kevin McCartney, Kim Williams

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The precipitous closure of rural maternity services in British Columbia (BC), Canada, and internationally has demanded a reevaluation of how to meet the perinatal surgical needs of rural women in accordance with the Triple Aim objectives of safety, cost-effectiveness, and satisfaction of all key stakeholders. There is emerging international evidence that General Practitioners with Enhanced Surgical Skills (GPESS) are a well-positioned health service solution due to their generalist nature in low-volume settings. A realist review was undertaken to evaluate international evidence on efficacious models of perinatal surgical care. This article presents findings of the safety of such practice, one discrete part of the full realist review.

Methods

This paper was derived from a larger review, which used a realist review methodology to guide the approach, and adhered to the RAMESES quality standard for realist reviews. Seven academic databases were searched in December 2013, using year (1990) and language (English) limiters in keeping with a rapid review approach. Mining of bibliographies in addition to consultation with international experts led to further inclusion of academic and grey literature up to March 2014.

Results

Two hundred fifty-four articles were originally identified; 119 articles were removed from consideration for lack of fit, resulting in the review of 191 articles from the peer reviewed and grey literature. Of these, 53 pertained to safety and are considered herein. Evidence on the safety of GPESS was consistent in the literature cited. Clinical, case study, and qualitative evidence demonstrates that perinatal surgical care is equally safe when provided by GPESS and specialist physicians.

Conclusion

Findings allow health planners to confidently build perinatal surgical services around the contribution of GPs with enhanced surgical skills and focus on educational, regulatory, and continuing professional development mechanisms to ensure their sustainability. Volume-to-outcomes associations are variable and inconclusive with regards to safety, suggesting the need for more evidence. These findings, and the attendant health services planning directions, are reassuring as they suggest the viability of local models of care where feasible.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Hutten-Czapski P. Decline of obstetrical services in northern Ontario. CJRM. 1999;4(2):72–6.
2.
Hutten-Czapski P. The state of rural healthcare. Presentation to the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology; 2001 May 31; Ottawa, Canada.
3.
Nesbitt TS, Connell FA, Hart LG, Rosenblatt RA. Access to obstetric care in rural areas: effect on birth outcomes. Am J Public Health. 1990;80(7):814–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Church J, Barker P. Regionalization of health services in Canada: a critical perspective. Int J Health Serv. 1998;28(3):467–86.CrossRefPubMed
5.
James AM. Closing rural hospitals in Saskatchewan: on the road to wellness? Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(8):1021–34.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Grzybowski S, Stoll K, Kornelsen J. Distance matters: a population based study examining access to maternity services for rural women. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:147–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Biem HJ, Hadjistavropoulous H, Morgan D, Biem HB, Pong RW. Breaks in continuity of care and rural senior transferred for medical care under regionalisation. Int J Integr Care. 2003;3:e03.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Gregory D, Way C, Barrett B, Parfrey P. Health care quality from the perspective of health care providers and patients during and shortly after acute care restructuring in Newfoundland and Labrador. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(S2):S48–57.CrossRef
9.
10.
Rebbeck PM. General surgeons: more are needed. BCMJ. 2005;47(7):379–81.
11.
SOGC. Returning birth to Aboriginal, rural, and remote communities [Policy Statement]. Ottawa: SOGC; 2010. 3 p. No. 251.
12.
Carstairs S, Keon WJ. Canada’s aging population: seizing the opportunity. Ottawa: The Senate (Special Senate Committee on Aging); 2009. p. 247.
13.
Roos N, Black C, Wade J, Decker K. How many general surgeons do you need in rural areas? Three approaches to physician resource planning in southern Manitoba. CMAJ. 1996;155(4):395–401.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Chiasson PM, Henshaw JD, Roy PD. General practice patterns in Nova Scotia: the role of the “generalist” general surgeon. Can J Surg. 1994;37(4):285–8.PubMed
15.
British Columbia Royal Commission on Health Care and Costs. Closer to home: the report of the British Columbia Royal Commission on Health Care and Costs (Vol. 2). Victoria: Crown Publications; 1991.
16.
Homan FF, Olson AL, Johnson DJ. A comparison of cesarean delivery outcomes for rural family physicians and obstetricians. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013;26(4):366–72.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Iglesias A, Iglesias S, Arnold D. Birth in Bella Bella: emergence and demise of a rural family medicine birthing service. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56(6):e233–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Humber N, Dickinson P. Rural patients’ experiences accessing surgery in British Columbia. Can J Surg. 2010;53(6):373–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Tucker J, McVicar A, Pitchforth E, Farmer J, Bryers H. Maternity care models in a remote and rural network: assessing clinical appropriateness and outcome indicators. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(2):83–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Grzybowski S, Stoll K, Kornelsen J. The outcomes of perinatal surgical services in rural British Columbia: a population-based study. Can J Rural Med. 2013;18(4):123–9.PubMed
21.
Kornelsen J, Grzybowski S, Iglesias S. Is rural maternity care sustainable without general practitioner surgeons? Can J Rural Med. 2006;11(3):218–20.PubMed
22.
Iglesias S, Bott N, Ellehoj E, Yee J, Jennissen B, Bunnah T, Schopflocher D. Outcomes of maternity care services in Alberta, 1999 and 2000: a population-based analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005;27(9):855–63.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
Burke L. Projections of physician supply in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Collaborative Centre for Physician Resources, Canadian Medical Association; 2007. p. 11.
25.
Inglis FG. Surgical care in rural Canada: training and planning for the future [Editorial]. CMAJ. 1995;153(10):1453–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
27.
Campbell NA, Kitchen G, Campbell IA. Operative experience of general surgeons in a rural hospital. ANZ J Surg. 2011;81(9):601–3.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Lynge DC, Larson EH, Thompson MJ, Rosenblatt RA, Hart LG. A longitudinal analysis of the general surgery workforce in the United States, 1981-2005. Arch Surg. 2008;143(4):345–50.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
Williams Jr TE, Ellison EC. Population analysis predicts a future critical shortage of general surgeons. Surgery. 2008;144(4):548–54.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Humber N, Frecker T. Delivery models of rural surgical services in British Columbia (1996-2005): are general practitioner-surgeons still part of the picture? Can J Surg. 2008;51(3):173–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Iglesias S, Jones L. Rural Surgical Programs in Western Canada. CJRM. 2002;7(2):103–7.
33.
Iglesias S, Strachan J, Ko G, Jones LC. Advanced Skills by Canada’s Rural Physicians. CJRM. 1999;4(4):227–31.
34.
Chiasson PM, Roy PD. Role of the general practitioner in the delivery of surgical and anesthesia services in rural western Canada. CMAJ. 1995;153(10):1447–52.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Kildea S, Van Wagner V. ‘Birthing on country’ maternity service delivery models: a rapid review. Haymarket, NSW: Sax Institute; 2012. p. 66.
36.
Kornelsen J, McCartney K. Optimal perinatal surgical services for rural women: a realist review. APRU: Vancouver; 2014. p. 119.
37.
Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review–a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Heal Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):21–34.CrossRef
38.
39.
Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhrop G, Pawson R. Quality standards for realist syntheses and meta-narrative reviews. London: RAMESES; 2014. p. 24.
40.
Baker E, Schmitz D, Epperly T, Nukui A, Miller CM. Rural Idaho family physicians’ scope of practice. J Rural Health. 2010;26(1):85–9.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Barclay AM, Knapp DP, Kallail KJ. The provision of labor and delivery services by graduates of four Kansas family practice residencies. Kans Med. 1996;97(1):19–23.PubMed
42.
Breon TA, Scott-Conner CE, Tracy RD. Spectrum of general surgery in rural Iowa. Curr Surg. 2003;60(1):94–9.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Callaghan J. A twenty-five year survey of a solo practice in rural surgical care. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;178(5):459–65.PubMed
44.
Hueston WJ, Murry M. A three-tier model for the delivery of rural obstetrical care using a nurse midwife and family physician copractice. J Rural Health. 1992;8(4):283–90.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Rosenthal TC, Holden DM, Woodward W. Primary care obstetrics in rural Western New York: a multi-center case review. NY State J Med. 1990;90(11):537–40.
46.
Smith DW, Murphy NJ. Alaska’s obstetrical delivery systems: a descriptive epidemiologic study. Alaska Med. 2000;42(3):78–84.PubMed
47.
Wadland WC, Havron AF, Garr D, Schneeweiss R, Smith M. National survey on hospital-based privileges in family practice obstetrics. Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(9):793–800.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Young RA, Byrd AN. Practice patterns of rural Texas physicians trained in a full-service family practice residency program. Tex Med. 1999;95(2):64–8.PubMed
49.
Homer CS, Biggs J, Vaughan G, Sullivan EA. Mapping maternity services in Australia: location, classification and services. Aust Heal Rev. 2011;35(2):222–9.CrossRef
50.
Robinson M, Slaney GM, Jones GI, Robinson JB. GP proceduralists: ‘the hidden heart’ of rural and regional health in Australia. Rural Remote Health. 2010;10(3):1402.PubMed
51.
Swayne A, Eley DS. Synergy and sustainability in rural procedural medicine: views from the coalface. Aust J Rural Health. 2010;18(1):38–42.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Welch R, Power R. General practitioner obstetric practice in rural and remote Western Australia. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;35(3):241–4.CrossRef
53.
Godden DJ. Rural health care in the U.K.: a rapidly changing scene. J Agric Saf Health. 2005;11(2):205–10.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Tucker J, Hundley V, Kiger A, Bryers H, Caldow J, Farmer J, Harris F, Ireland J, van Teijlingen E. Sustainable maternity services in remote and rural Scotland? A qualitative survey of staff views on required skills, competencies and training. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):34–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Simmers D. The few: New Zealand’s diminishing number of rural GPs providing maternity services. NZ Med J. 2006;119(1241):U2151.
56.
57.
Dooley J, Kelly L, St Pierre-Hansen N, Antone I, Guilfoyle J, O’Driscoll T. Rural and remote obstetric care close to home: program description, evaluation and discussion of Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre obstetrics. Can J Rural Med. 2009;14(2):75–9.PubMed
58.
Johnson D, Jin Y. Low-volume obstetrics. Characteristics of family physicians’ practices in Alberta. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:1208–15.PubMedPubMedCentral
59.
60.
Deutchman M, Connor P, Gobbo R, FitzSimmons R. Outcomes of cesarean sections performed by family physicians and the training they received: a 15-year retrospective study. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1995;8(2):81–90.PubMed
61.
Woollard LA, Hays RB. Rural obstetrics in NSW. ANZJOG. 1993;33(3):240–2.PubMed
62.
Kirke AB. How safe is GP obstetrics? An assessment of antenatal risk factors and perinatal outcomes in one rural practice. Rural Remote Health. 2010;10(3):1545.PubMed
63.
Cameron B, Cameron S. Outcomes in rural obstetrics, Atherton Hospital 1991-2000. Aust J Rural Health. 2001;9(S1):S39–42.PubMed
64.
Scherman S, Smith J, Davidson M. The first year of a midwifery-led model of care in Far North Queensland. Med J Aust. 2008;188(2):85–8.PubMed
65.
Aubrey-Bassler K, Newbery S, Kelly L, Weaver B, Wilson S. Maternal outcomes of cesarean sections: do generalists’ patients have different outcomes than specialists’ patients? Can Fam Physician. 2007;53(12):2132–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
66.
Lynch N, Thommasen H, Anderson N, Grzybowski S. Does having cesarean section capability make a difference to a small rural maternity service? Can Fam Physician. 2005;51:1238–9.PubMed
67.
Moster D, Lie RT, Markestad T. Relation between size of delivery unit and neonatal death in low risk deliveries: population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999;80(3):F221–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Norum J, Heyd A, Hjelseth B, Svee T, Mürer FA, Erlandsen R, Vonen B. Quality of obstetric care in the sparsely populated sub-arctic area of Norway 2009-2011. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Viisainen K, Gissler M, Hartikainen AL, Hemminki E. Accidental out-of-hospital births in Finland: incidence and geographical distribution 1963-1995. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78(5):372–8.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Hemminki E, Heino A, Gissler M. Should births be centralised in higher level hospitals? Experiences from regionalised health care in Finland. BJOG. 2011;118(10):1186–95.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Viisainen K, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Birth outcomes by level of obstetric care in Finland: a catchment area based analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994;48(4):400–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Heller G, Richardson DK, Schnell R, Misselwitz B, Künzel W, Schmidt S. Are we regionalized enough? Early-neonatal deaths in low-risk births by the size of delivery units in Hesse, Germany 1990-1999. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(5):1061–8.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Merlo J, Gerdtham U, Eckerlund I, Håkansson S, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pakkanen M, Lindqvist PG. Hospital level of care and neonatal mortality in low- and high-risk deliveries: reassessing the question in Sweden by multilevel reassessing analysis. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1092–100.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Tracy SK, Sullivan E, Dahlen H, Black D, Wang YA, Tracy MB. Does size matter? A population-based study of birth in lower volume maternity hospitals for low risk women. BJOG. 2006;113(1):86–96.CrossRefPubMed
75.
76.
DesMeules M, Pong R. How healthy are rural Canadians? An assessment of their health status and health determinants. Ottawa: Canadian Population Health Initiative, Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2006. p. 205.
77.
Finnström O, Berg G, Norman A, Otterblad OP. Size of delivery unit and neonatal outcome in Sweden. A catchment area analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(1):63–7.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Serenius F, Winbo I, Dahiquist G, Källén B. Cause-specific stillbirth and neonatal death in Sweden: a catchment area-based analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90(9):1054–61.CrossRefPubMed
79.
Urbach DR, Croxford R, MacCallum NL, Stukel T. How are volume-outcome associations related to models of health care funding and delivery? A comparison of the United States and Canada. World J Surg. 2005;29(10):1230–3.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Klein MC, Spence A, Kaczorowski J, Kelly A, Grzybowski S. Does delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcome? CMAJ. 2002;166(10):1257–63.PubMedPubMedCentral
81.
Kornelsen J, Moola S, Grzybowski S. Does distance matter? Increased induction rates for rural women who have to travel for intrapartum care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009;31(1):21–7.CrossRefPubMed
82.
Ravelli AC, Jager KJ, de Groot MH, Erwich JJ, Rijninks-van Driel GC, Tromp M, Eskes M, Abu-Hanna A, Mol BW. Travel time from home to hospital and adverse perinatal outcomes in women at term in the Netherlands. BJOG. 2011;118(4):457–65.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Centralized or decentralized perinatal surgical care for rural women: a realist review of the evidence on safety
Authors
Jude Kornelsen
Kevin McCartney
Kim Williams
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1629-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Continuity of clinical management and information across care levels: perceptions of users of different healthcare areas in the Catalan national health system

Research article

Focused maternity care in Ghana: results of a cluster analysis

Research article

Patient satisfaction with the healthcare system: Assessing the impact of socio-economic and healthcare provision factors

Research article

Transitional care in skilled nursing facilities: a multiple case study

Research article

Antenatal care use in urban areas in two European countries: Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants in Belgium and the Netherlands

Research article

Using meta-regression analyses in addition to conventional systematic review methods to examine the variation in cost-effectiveness results – a case study