Open Access 01-12-2016 | Erratum
Erratum to: The dominance of the private sector in the provision of emergency obstetric care: studies from Gujarat, India
Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016
Login to get accessExcerpt
Following the publication of this article [1] it was brought to our attention that two values in Table 4 were incorrect:
Table 4
Staff and facilities per district compared against WHR 2005 benchmarksa
Indicator
|
Districts and number of births per year
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sabarkantha (births: 67,965)
|
Dahod (births: 64,222)
|
Surendranaga (births: 67,965)
|
|||||||
Number of facilities or staff
|
Number of facilities or staff
|
Number of facilities or staff
|
|||||||
Current
|
WHR 2005
|
Deficit
|
Current
|
WHR 2005
|
Deficit
|
Current
|
WHR 2005
|
Deficit
|
|
CEmOC
|
15
|
19
|
4
|
5
|
18
|
13
|
3
|
11
|
8
|
BEmOC
|
1
|
38
|
37
|
0
|
36
|
36
|
2
|
22
|
20
|
Less–than-BEmOC + C-sections
|
41
|
n.a
|
n.a
|
12
|
n.a
|
n.a
|
19
|
n.a
|
n.a
|
Midwives (nurses)b
|
103
|
378
|
275
|
98
|
357
|
259
|
51
|
224
|
173
|
Doctors (all)
|
126
|
57
|
0
|
55
|
54
|
1
|
59
|
34
|
0
|
1.
In the Sabarkantha district, under the Deficit column, number 73 should read 37.
2.
In the Dahod district, under the Deficit column, number 12 should read 13.