Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 5/2016

Open Access 01-08-2016 | Research

Institutional analysis of health promotion for older people in Europe - concept and research tool

Authors: Stojgniew J. Sitko, Iwona Kowalska-Bobko, Anna Mokrzycka, Michał Zabdyr-Jamróz, Alicja Domagała, Nicola Magnavita, Andrea Poscia, Maciej Rogala, Anna Szetela, Stanisława Golinowska

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Special Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

European societies are ageing rapidly and thus health promotion for older people (HP4OP) is becoming an increasingly relevant issue. Crucial here is not only the clinical aspect of health promotion but also its organisational and institutional dimension. The latter has been relatively neglected in research on HP4OP. This issue is addressed in this study, constituting a part of the EU project ProHealth65+, engaging ten member countries. This paper is based on two intertwining research goals: (1) exploring which institutions/organisations are performing HP4OP activities in selected European countries (including sectors involved, performed roles of these institutions, organisation of those activities); (2) developing an institutional approach to HP4OP. Thus, the paper provides a description of the analytical tools for further research in this area.

Methods

The mentioned aims were addressed through the mutual use of two complementary methods: (a) a literature review of scientific and grey literature; and (b) questionnaire survey with selected expert respondents from 10 European countries. The expert respondents, selected by the project’s collaborating partners, were asked to fill in a custom designed questionnaire concerning HP4OP institutional aspects.

Results

The literature review provided an overview of the organisational arrangements in different HP4OP initiatives. It also enabled the development of functional institutional definitions of health promotion, health promotion activities and interventions, as well as an institutional definition adequate to the health promotion context. The distinctions between sectors were also clarified. The elaborated questionnaires provided in-depth information on countries specifically indicating the key sectors involved in HP4OP in those selected countries. These are: health care, regional/local authorities, NGO’s/voluntary institutions. The questionnaire and literature review both resulted in the indication of a significant level of cross-sectorial cooperation in HP4OP.

Conclusions

The inclusion of the institutional analysis within the study of HP4OP provides a valuable opportunity to analyse, in a systematic way, good practices in this respect, also in terms of institutional arrangements. A failure to address this aspect in policymaking might potentially cause organisational failure even in evidence-based programmes. This paper frames the perception of this problem.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hawe P, Noort M, King L, Jordens C. Multiplying health gains: the critical role of capacity-building within health promotion programs. Health Policy Amst Neth. 1997;39:29–42.CrossRef Hawe P, Noort M, King L, Jordens C. Multiplying health gains: the critical role of capacity-building within health promotion programs. Health Policy Amst Neth. 1997;39:29–42.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Harre R. Social Being. Oxford: Blackwell; 1979. Harre R. Social Being. Oxford: Blackwell; 1979.
4.
go back to reference Cardona B. “Healthy Ageing” policies and anti-ageing ideologies and practices: on the exercise of responsibility. Med Health Care Philos. 2008;11:475–83.CrossRefPubMed Cardona B. “Healthy Ageing” policies and anti-ageing ideologies and practices: on the exercise of responsibility. Med Health Care Philos. 2008;11:475–83.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lis K, Reichert M, Cosack A, Billings J, Brown P, editors. Evidence-Based Guidelines on Health Promotion for Older People. Vienna: Austrian Red Cross; 2008. Lis K, Reichert M, Cosack A, Billings J, Brown P, editors. Evidence-Based Guidelines on Health Promotion for Older People. Vienna: Austrian Red Cross; 2008.
17.
go back to reference Strümpel C, Billings J. HealthPROelderly: European Overview (Overview on health promotion for older people. European Summary Report). healthPROelderly Project; 2008. Strümpel C, Billings J. HealthPROelderly: European Overview (Overview on health promotion for older people. European Summary Report). healthPROelderly Project; 2008.
20.
go back to reference Schaap LA, Peeters GM, Dennison EM, Zambon S, Nikolaus T, Sanchez-Martinez M, et al. European project on OSteoArthritis (EPOSA): methodological challenges in harmonization of existing data from five European population-based cohorts on aging. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schaap LA, Peeters GM, Dennison EM, Zambon S, Nikolaus T, Sanchez-Martinez M, et al. European project on OSteoArthritis (EPOSA): methodological challenges in harmonization of existing data from five European population-based cohorts on aging. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Huisman M, Poppelaars J, Horst M, Beekman A, Brug J, van Tilburg TG, et al. Cohort profile: the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:868–76.CrossRefPubMed Huisman M, Poppelaars J, Horst M, Beekman A, Brug J, van Tilburg TG, et al. Cohort profile: the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:868–76.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Pfeiffer M, Bock E, Hohenberger T, Kröger K. The arteriomobil project for peripheral arterial disease. Vasa. 2008;37:345–52.CrossRefPubMed Pfeiffer M, Bock E, Hohenberger T, Kröger K. The arteriomobil project for peripheral arterial disease. Vasa. 2008;37:345–52.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Alexa J, Recka L, Votapkova J, van Ginneken E, Spranger A, Wittenbecher F. Czech Republic: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2015;17:1–165.PubMed Alexa J, Recka L, Votapkova J, van Ginneken E, Spranger A, Wittenbecher F. Czech Republic: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2015;17:1–165.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Gaal P, Szigeti S, Csere M, Gaskins M, Panteli D. Hungary health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010;13:1–266. Gaal P, Szigeti S, Csere M, Gaskins M, Panteli D. Hungary health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010;13:1–266.
25.
go back to reference Murauskiene L, Janoniene R, Veniute M, van Ginneken E, Karanikolos M. Lithuania: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012;15:1–150. Murauskiene L, Janoniene R, Veniute M, van Ginneken E, Karanikolos M. Lithuania: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012;15:1–150.
26.
go back to reference Sagan A, Panteli D, Borkowski W, Dmowski M, Domanski F, Czyzewski M, et al. Poland health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010;13:1–193. Sagan A, Panteli D, Borkowski W, Dmowski M, Domanski F, Czyzewski M, et al. Poland health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010;13:1–193.
27.
go back to reference Schäfer W, Kroneman, Boerma W, van den Berg M, Westert G, Westert W, et al. The Netherlands: health system review. Health Syst. Transit. 2009;12:v – xxvii, 1–228. Schäfer W, Kroneman, Boerma W, van den Berg M, Westert G, Westert W, et al. The Netherlands: health system review. Health Syst. Transit. 2009;12:v – xxvii, 1–228.
30.
go back to reference Raphael D. The political economy of health promotion: part 1, national commitments to provision of the prerequisites of health. Health Promot Int. 2013;28:95–111.CrossRefPubMed Raphael D. The political economy of health promotion: part 1, national commitments to provision of the prerequisites of health. Health Promot Int. 2013;28:95–111.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Gotsadze G, Chikovani I, Goguadze K, Balabanova D, McKee M. Reforming sanitary-epidemiological service in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union: an exploratory study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:440.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gotsadze G, Chikovani I, Goguadze K, Balabanova D, McKee M. Reforming sanitary-epidemiological service in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union: an exploratory study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:440.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference WHO. Evaluation of Public Health Services in South-eastern Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009. WHO. Evaluation of Public Health Services in South-eastern Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009.
35.
go back to reference Maier CB, Martin-Moreno JM. Quo vadis SANEPID? A cross-country analysis of public health reforms in 10 post-Soviet states. Health Policy Amst Neth. 2011;102:18–25.CrossRef Maier CB, Martin-Moreno JM. Quo vadis SANEPID? A cross-country analysis of public health reforms in 10 post-Soviet states. Health Policy Amst Neth. 2011;102:18–25.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Rechel B, McKee M. Health promotion. Facets Public Health Eur. WHO/Open University Press; 2014. p. 171–81. Rechel B, McKee M. Health promotion. Facets Public Health Eur. WHO/Open University Press; 2014. p. 171–81.
37.
go back to reference Lloyd L. Health and care in ageing societies: a new international approach. Bristol: Policy Press; 2012.CrossRef Lloyd L. Health and care in ageing societies: a new international approach. Bristol: Policy Press; 2012.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Mittelmark MB, Wise M, Nam EW, Santos-Burgoa C, Fosse E, Saan H, et al. Mapping national capacity to engage in health promotion: Overview of issues and approaches. Health Promot Int. 2006;21:91–8.CrossRefPubMed Mittelmark MB, Wise M, Nam EW, Santos-Burgoa C, Fosse E, Saan H, et al. Mapping national capacity to engage in health promotion: Overview of issues and approaches. Health Promot Int. 2006;21:91–8.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Smith BJ, Tang KC, Nutbeam D. WHO health promotion glossary: new terms. Health Promot Int. 2006;21:340–5.CrossRefPubMed Smith BJ, Tang KC, Nutbeam D. WHO health promotion glossary: new terms. Health Promot Int. 2006;21:340–5.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Government Resolution on the Health 2015 public health programme. Helsinki: Publications of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2001. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Government Resolution on the Health 2015 public health programme. Helsinki: Publications of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2001.
46.
go back to reference Golinowska S, Groot W, Pavlova M. Funding of public health and health promotion. Theoretical points. Draft. 2016. (private communication, to be published). Golinowska S, Groot W, Pavlova M. Funding of public health and health promotion. Theoretical points. Draft. 2016. (private communication, to be published).
47.
go back to reference Mariño RJ. Cultural aspects of ageing and health promotion. Aust Dent J. 2015;60 Suppl 1:131–43.CrossRefPubMed Mariño RJ. Cultural aspects of ageing and health promotion. Aust Dent J. 2015;60 Suppl 1:131–43.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference NRC. Preparing for an Aging World: The Case for Cross-National Research. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. NRC. Preparing for an Aging World: The Case for Cross-National Research. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
49.
go back to reference Bryant LL, Altpeter M, Whitelaw NA. Evaluation of health promotion programs for older adults: an introduction. J Appl Gerontol. 2006;25:197–213.CrossRef Bryant LL, Altpeter M, Whitelaw NA. Evaluation of health promotion programs for older adults: an introduction. J Appl Gerontol. 2006;25:197–213.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Beattie A. Knowledge and control in health promotion: a test case for social policy. Sociol. Health Serv. London: Routledge; 1991. Beattie A. Knowledge and control in health promotion: a test case for social policy. Sociol. Health Serv. London: Routledge; 1991.
51.
go back to reference Boote J, Baird W, Sutton A. Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy Amst Neth. 2011;102:105–16.CrossRef Boote J, Baird W, Sutton A. Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy Amst Neth. 2011;102:105–16.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Downie RS, Fyfe G, Tannahill A. Health promotion models and values. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1990. Downie RS, Fyfe G, Tannahill A. Health promotion models and values. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1990.
53.
go back to reference Duplaga M. The evolving concept of health promotion: definitions, outcomes and classification of interventions. Zdr Publiczne Zarządzanie. 2015;2015:141149. Duplaga M. The evolving concept of health promotion: definitions, outcomes and classification of interventions. Zdr Publiczne Zarządzanie. 2015;2015:141149.
54.
55.
go back to reference Dean K, Holstein BE. Health promotion among elderly. In: Badura B, Kickbusch I, editors. Health Promot. Res. New Soc. Epidemio Logy. WHO. Regional Publications. European Series 37; 1991. p. 341–63. Dean K, Holstein BE. Health promotion among elderly. In: Badura B, Kickbusch I, editors. Health Promot. Res. New Soc. Epidemio Logy. WHO. Regional Publications. European Series 37; 1991. p. 341–63.
59.
go back to reference Scott R. Institutions and organisations. London: Sage; 2001. Scott R. Institutions and organisations. London: Sage; 2001.
Metadata
Title
Institutional analysis of health promotion for older people in Europe - concept and research tool
Authors
Stojgniew J. Sitko
Iwona Kowalska-Bobko
Anna Mokrzycka
Michał Zabdyr-Jamróz
Alicja Domagała
Nicola Magnavita
Andrea Poscia
Maciej Rogala
Anna Szetela
Stanisława Golinowska
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue Special Issue 5/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1516-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 5/2016

BMC Health Services Research 5/2016 Go to the issue