Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Transitioning a home telehealth project into a sustainable, large-scale service: a qualitative study

Authors: Victoria A. Wade, Alan D. Taylor, Michael R. Kidd, Colin Carati

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study was a component of the Flinders Telehealth in the Home project, which tested adding home telehealth to existing rehabilitation, palliative care and geriatric outreach services. Due to the known difficulty of transitioning telehealth projects services, a qualitative study was conducted to produce a preferred implementation approach for sustainable and large-scale operations, and a process model that offers practical advice for achieving this goal.

Methods

Initially, semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior clinicians, health service managers and policy makers, and a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was undertaken to identify the range of options for ongoing operations, plus the factors affecting sustainability. Subsequently, the interviewees and other decision makers attended a deliberative forum in which participants were asked to select a preferred model for future implementation. Finally, all data from the study was synthesised by the researchers to produce a process model.

Results

19 interviews with senior clinicians, managers, and service development staff were conducted, finding strong support for home telehealth but a wide diversity of views on governance, models of clinical care, technical infrastructure operations, and data management. The deliberative forum worked through these options and recommended a collaborative consortium approach for large-scale implementation. The process model proposes that the key factor for large-scale implementation is leadership support, which is enabled by 1) showing solutions to the problems of service demand, budgetary pressure and the relationship between hospital and primary care, 2) demonstrating how home telehealth aligns with health service policies, and 3) achieving clinician acceptance through providing evidence of benefit and developing new models of clinical care. Two key actions to enable change were marketing telehealth to patients, clinicians and policy-makers, and building a community of practice.

Conclusions

The implementation of home telehealth services is still in an early stage. Change agents and a community of practice can contribute by marketing telehealth, demonstrating policy alignment and providing potential solutions for difficult health services problems. This should assist health leaders to move from trials to large-scale services.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Munro J, Angus N, Leslie SJ. Patient focused internet-based approaches to cardiovascular rehabilitation - a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19(6):347–53.CrossRefPubMed Munro J, Angus N, Leslie SJ. Patient focused internet-based approaches to cardiovascular rehabilitation - a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19(6):347–53.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bradford NK, Armfield NR, young J, Smith AC: The case for home based telehealth in pediatric palliative care: a systematic review. BMC Palliative Care 2013:12(4). doi:10.1186/1472-684X-12-4. Bradford NK, Armfield NR, young J, Smith AC: The case for home based telehealth in pediatric palliative care: a systematic review. BMC Palliative Care 2013:12(4). doi:10.​1186/​1472-684X-12-4.
3.
go back to reference Crotty M, Killington M, van der Burgh M, Morris C, Taylor A, Carati C. Telerehabilitation for older people using off-the-shelf applications: acceptability and feasibility. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20(7):370–6.CrossRefPubMed Crotty M, Killington M, van der Burgh M, Morris C, Taylor A, Carati C. Telerehabilitation for older people using off-the-shelf applications: acceptability and feasibility. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20(7):370–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tieman J, Morgan DD, Swetenham K, To TMT, Currow DC. Designing clinically valuable telehealth resources: processes to develop a community-based palliative care prototype. J Med Internet Res. 2014;3(3):e41. Tieman J, Morgan DD, Swetenham K, To TMT, Currow DC. Designing clinically valuable telehealth resources: processes to develop a community-based palliative care prototype. J Med Internet Res. 2014;3(3):e41.
5.
6.
go back to reference Miller EA. Solving the disjuncture between research and practice: telehealth trends in the 21st century. Health Policy. 2007;82(2):133–41.CrossRefPubMed Miller EA. Solving the disjuncture between research and practice: telehealth trends in the 21st century. Health Policy. 2007;82(2):133–41.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Broens TH, Veld RM H i't, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ, van Halteren AT, Nieuwenhuis LJ. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(6):303–9.CrossRefPubMed Broens TH, Veld RM H i't, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ, van Halteren AT, Nieuwenhuis LJ. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(6):303–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jarvis-Selinger S, Chan E, Payne R, Plohman K, Ho K. Clinical telehealth across the disciplines: lessons learned. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(7):720–5.CrossRefPubMed Jarvis-Selinger S, Chan E, Payne R, Plohman K, Ho K. Clinical telehealth across the disciplines: lessons learned. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(7):720–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Obstfelder A, Engeseth K, Wynn R. Characteristics of successfully implemented telemedical applications. Implement Sci. 2007;2(25):1–11. Obstfelder A, Engeseth K, Wynn R. Characteristics of successfully implemented telemedical applications. Implement Sci. 2007;2(25):1–11.
10.
go back to reference Robert G, Greenhalgh T, MacFarlane F, Peacock R. Adopting and assimilating new non-pharmacological technologies into health care: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15(4):243–50.CrossRefPubMed Robert G, Greenhalgh T, MacFarlane F, Peacock R. Adopting and assimilating new non-pharmacological technologies into health care: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15(4):243–50.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cresswell K, Sheikh A. Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretive review. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82:e73–86.CrossRefPubMed Cresswell K, Sheikh A. Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretive review. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82:e73–86.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference May C, Harrison R, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Mair F, Wallace P. Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:596–604.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral May C, Harrison R, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Mair F, Wallace P. Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:596–604.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Wade V, Eliott J. The role of the champion in telehealth service development: a qualitative analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(8):490–2.CrossRefPubMed Wade V, Eliott J. The role of the champion in telehealth service development: a qualitative analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(8):490–2.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wade VA, Eliott JA, Hiller JE. Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(5):682–94.CrossRefPubMed Wade VA, Eliott JA, Hiller JE. Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(5):682–94.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wade V, Eliott J, Karnon J, Elshaugh AG. A qualitative study of sustainability and vulnerability in Australian telehealth services. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;161:190–201.PubMed Wade V, Eliott J, Karnon J, Elshaugh AG. A qualitative study of sustainability and vulnerability in Australian telehealth services. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;161:190–201.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Hendy J, Chrysanthaki T, Barlow J, Knapp M, Rogers A, Sanders C, Bower P, Bowen R, Fitzpatrick R, Bardsley M, et al. An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hendy J, Chrysanthaki T, Barlow J, Knapp M, Rogers A, Sanders C, Bower P, Bowen R, Fitzpatrick R, Bardsley M, et al. An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Darkins A. The growth of telehealth services in the Veterans Health Administration between 1994 and 2014: a study in the diffusion of innovation. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(9):761–8.CrossRefPubMed Darkins A. The growth of telehealth services in the Veterans Health Administration between 1994 and 2014: a study in the diffusion of innovation. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(9):761–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Waterman H, Marshall M, Noble J, Davies H, Walshe K, Sheaff R, Elwyn G. The role of action research in the investigation and diffusion of innovations in health care: the PRIDE project. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(3):373–81.CrossRefPubMed Waterman H, Marshall M, Noble J, Davies H, Walshe K, Sheaff R, Elwyn G. The role of action research in the investigation and diffusion of innovations in health care: the PRIDE project. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(3):373–81.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Birks M, Mills J. Grounded theory: a practical guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011. Birks M, Mills J. Grounded theory: a practical guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011.
20.
go back to reference QSR International: NVivo In., 8 edn: QSR International; 2009: Computer software. QSR International: NVivo In., 8 edn: QSR International; 2009: Computer software.
21.
go back to reference Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin F-P. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(2):239–51.CrossRefPubMed Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin F-P. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(2):239–51.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Boyko JA, Lavis JN, Abelson J, Dobbins M, Carter N. Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:1938–45.CrossRefPubMed Boyko JA, Lavis JN, Abelson J, Dobbins M, Carter N. Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:1938–45.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kelle U. "Emergence" vs. "forcing" of empirical data? A crucial problem of "Grounded Theory" reconsidered. Forum. 2005;6:27. Kelle U. "Emergence" vs. "forcing" of empirical data? A crucial problem of "Grounded Theory" reconsidered. Forum. 2005;6:27.
24.
go back to reference Annells M. Grounded theory method: philosophical perspectives, paradigm of enquiry, and postmodernism. Qual Health Res. 1996;6(3):379–93.CrossRef Annells M. Grounded theory method: philosophical perspectives, paradigm of enquiry, and postmodernism. Qual Health Res. 1996;6(3):379–93.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ranmuthugala G, Plumb JJ, Cunningham FC, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:273.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ranmuthugala G, Plumb JJ, Cunningham FC, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:273.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Hinder S, Stramer K, Bratan T. Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace. Br Med J. 2010;341:c5814.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Hinder S, Stramer K, Bratan T. Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace. Br Med J. 2010;341:c5814.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kidd MR. Personal electronic health records: MySpace or HealthSpace? Br Med J. 2008;336(7652):1029–30.CrossRef Kidd MR. Personal electronic health records: MySpace or HealthSpace? Br Med J. 2008;336(7652):1029–30.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lluch M. Healthcare professionals’ organisational barriers to health information technologies - a literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80:849–62.CrossRefPubMed Lluch M. Healthcare professionals’ organisational barriers to health information technologies - a literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80:849–62.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Wade R, Cartwright C, Shaw K. Factors relating to home telehealth acceptance and usage compliance. Risk Mgmt Healthcare Policy. 2012;5:25–33.CrossRef Wade R, Cartwright C, Shaw K. Factors relating to home telehealth acceptance and usage compliance. Risk Mgmt Healthcare Policy. 2012;5:25–33.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Taylor A, Wade V, Morris G, Pech J, Rechter S, Kidd M, Carati C. Technology support to a telehealth in the home service: qualitative observations. J Telemed Telecare 2015:1357633X15601523. Taylor A, Wade V, Morris G, Pech J, Rechter S, Kidd M, Carati C. Technology support to a telehealth in the home service: qualitative observations. J Telemed Telecare 2015:1357633X15601523.
33.
Metadata
Title
Transitioning a home telehealth project into a sustainable, large-scale service: a qualitative study
Authors
Victoria A. Wade
Alan D. Taylor
Michael R. Kidd
Colin Carati
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1436-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue