Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

The acceptability to patients of PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice services; a qualitative interview study

Authors: Jennifer Pearson, Jane Richardson, Michael Calnan, Chris Salisbury, Nadine E. Foster

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In response to long waiting lists and problems with access to primary care physiotherapy, several Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) (now Clinical Commissioning Groups CCGs) developed physiotherapy-led telephone assessment and treatment services. The Medical Research Council (MRC) funded PhysioDirect trial was a randomised control trial (RCT) in four PCTs, with a total of 2252 patients that compared this approach with usual physiotherapy care. This nested qualitative study aimed to explore the acceptability of the PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice service to patients with musculoskeletal conditions.

Methods

We conducted 57 semi-structured interviews with adults from 4 PCTs who were referred from general practice to physiotherapy with musculoskeletal conditions and were participating in the PhysioDirect trial. The Framework method was used to analyse the qualitative data.

Results

The PhysioDirect service was largely viewed as acceptable although some saw it as a first step to subsequent face-to-face physiotherapy. Most participants found accessing the PhysioDirect service straightforward and smooth, and they valued the faster access to physiotherapy advice offered by the telephone service. Participants generally viewed both the PhysioDirect service and the physiotherapists providing the service as helpful. Participants’ preferences and priorities for treatment defined the acceptable features of PhysioDirect but the acceptable features were traded off against less acceptable features. Some participants felt that the PhysioDirect service was impersonal and impaired the development of a good relationship with their physiotherapist, which made the service feel remote and less valuable.

Conclusion

The PhysioDirect service was broadly acceptable to participants since it provided faster access to physiotherapy advice for their musculoskeletal conditions. Participants felt that it is best placed as one method of accessing physiotherapy services, in addition to, rather than as a replacement for, more traditional face-to-face physiotherapy assessment and treatment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R, Porcheret M, Young C, Croft P. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: An observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:144.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R, Porcheret M, Young C, Croft P. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: An observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:144.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Jones R, Jenkins F. A survey of NHS physiotherapy waiting times and musculoskeletal workload and caseload in England 2010–11. London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy; 2011. Jones R, Jenkins F. A survey of NHS physiotherapy waiting times and musculoskeletal workload and caseload in England 2010–11. London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy; 2011.
4.
go back to reference Salisbury C, Montgomery AA, Hollinghurst S, Hopper C, Bishop A, Franchini A, Kaur S, Coast J, Hall J, Grove S, Foster NE. Effectiveness of PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice services for patients with musculoskeletal problems: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salisbury C, Montgomery AA, Hollinghurst S, Hopper C, Bishop A, Franchini A, Kaur S, Coast J, Hall J, Grove S, Foster NE. Effectiveness of PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice services for patients with musculoskeletal problems: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
7.
go back to reference Field MJ. Telemedicine: A guide to assessing telecommunications in health care. Washington: National Academic Press; 1996. Field MJ. Telemedicine: A guide to assessing telecommunications in health care. Washington: National Academic Press; 1996.
8.
go back to reference Salisbury C, Foster N, Hopper C, Bishop A, Hollinghurst S, Coast J, Kaur S, Pearson J, Franchini A, Hall J.Grove S, Calnan M. Busby J, Montgomery A. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ‘PhysioDirect’ telephone assessment and advice services for physiotherapy. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:1–157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salisbury C, Foster N, Hopper C, Bishop A, Hollinghurst S, Coast J, Kaur S, Pearson J, Franchini A, Hall J.Grove S, Calnan M. Busby J, Montgomery A. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ‘PhysioDirect’ telephone assessment and advice services for physiotherapy. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:1–157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Salisbury C, Foster NE, Bishop A, Calnan M, Coast J, Hall J, Hay E, Hollinghurst S, Hopper C, Grove S. ‘PhysioDirect’ telephone assessment and advice services for physiotherapy: Protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:136.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salisbury C, Foster NE, Bishop A, Calnan M, Coast J, Hall J, Hay E, Hollinghurst S, Hopper C, Grove S. ‘PhysioDirect’ telephone assessment and advice services for physiotherapy: Protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:136.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Hollinghurst S, Coast J, Busby J, et al. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of ‘PhysioDirect’ telephone assessment and advice services for patients with musculoskeletal problems: Economic evaluation. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hollinghurst S, Coast J, Busby J, et al. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of ‘PhysioDirect’ telephone assessment and advice services for patients with musculoskeletal problems: Economic evaluation. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Hennink MM, Hutter I, Bailey A. Qualitative research methods. London: Sage; 2011. Hennink MM, Hutter I, Bailey A. Qualitative research methods. London: Sage; 2011.
12.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
13.
go back to reference Pinnock H, Madden V, Snellgrove C, Sheikh A. Telephone or surgery asthma reviews? preferences of participants in a primary care randomised controlled trial. Prim Care Respir J. 2005;14:42–6.CrossRefPubMed Pinnock H, Madden V, Snellgrove C, Sheikh A. Telephone or surgery asthma reviews? preferences of participants in a primary care randomised controlled trial. Prim Care Respir J. 2005;14:42–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference O’Cathain A, Knowles E, Turner J, Nicholl J. Acceptability of NHS 111 the telephone service for urgent health care: Cross sectional postal survey of users’ views. Fam Pract. 2014;31:193–200.CrossRefPubMed O’Cathain A, Knowles E, Turner J, Nicholl J. Acceptability of NHS 111 the telephone service for urgent health care: Cross sectional postal survey of users’ views. Fam Pract. 2014;31:193–200.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jiwa M, Mathers N, Campbell M. The effect of GP telephone triage on numbers seeking same-day appointments. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:390–1.PubMedPubMedCentral Jiwa M, Mathers N, Campbell M. The effect of GP telephone triage on numbers seeking same-day appointments. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:390–1.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Long AF. Gambling T, Young RJ, Taylor J, Mason JM, PACCTS Team. Acceptability and satisfaction with a telecarer approach to the management of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:283–9.CrossRefPubMed Long AF. Gambling T, Young RJ, Taylor J, Mason JM, PACCTS Team. Acceptability and satisfaction with a telecarer approach to the management of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:283–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Morse JM. Researching illness and injury: Methodological considerations. Qual Health Res. 2000;10:538–46.CrossRefPubMed Morse JM. Researching illness and injury: Methodological considerations. Qual Health Res. 2000;10:538–46.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference McCracken LM, Evon D, Karapas ET. Satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain in a specialty service: Preliminary prospective results. Eur J Pain. 2002;6:387–93.CrossRefPubMed McCracken LM, Evon D, Karapas ET. Satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain in a specialty service: Preliminary prospective results. Eur J Pain. 2002;6:387–93.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Knight PK, Cheng AN, Lee GM. Results of a survey of client satisfaction with outpatient physiotherapy care. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26:297–307.CrossRefPubMed Knight PK, Cheng AN, Lee GM. Results of a survey of client satisfaction with outpatient physiotherapy care. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26:297–307.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Salisbury C, Goodall S, Montgomery AA, Pickin DM, Edwards S, Sampson F, Simons L, Lattimer V. Does advanced access improve access to primary health care? questionnaire survey of patients. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:615–21.PubMedPubMedCentral Salisbury C, Goodall S, Montgomery AA, Pickin DM, Edwards S, Sampson F, Simons L, Lattimer V. Does advanced access improve access to primary health care? questionnaire survey of patients. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:615–21.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Gerard K, Salisbury C, Street D, Pope C, Baxter H. Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients’ preferences. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:3–10.CrossRefPubMed Gerard K, Salisbury C, Street D, Pope C, Baxter H. Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients’ preferences. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:3–10.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rubin G, Bate A, George A, Shackley P, Hall N. Preferences for access to the GP: A discrete choice experiment. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:743–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Rubin G, Bate A, George A, Shackley P, Hall N. Preferences for access to the GP: A discrete choice experiment. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:743–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Egbunike JN, Shaw C, Porter A, Button LA, Kinnersley P, Hood K, Bowden S, Bale S, Snooks H, Edwards A. Streamline triage and manage user expectations: Lessons from a qualitative study of GP out-of-hours services. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60:e83–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Egbunike JN, Shaw C, Porter A, Button LA, Kinnersley P, Hood K, Bowden S, Bale S, Snooks H, Edwards A. Streamline triage and manage user expectations: Lessons from a qualitative study of GP out-of-hours services. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60:e83–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The acceptability to patients of PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice services; a qualitative interview study
Authors
Jennifer Pearson
Jane Richardson
Michael Calnan
Chris Salisbury
Nadine E. Foster
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1349-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue