Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-06-2015 | Study protocol

HeLP-Diabetes: randomised controlled trial protocol

Authors: Elizabeth Murray, Charlotte Dack, Maria Barnard, Andrew Farmer, Jinshuo Li, Susan Michie, Kingshuk Pal, Steve Parrott, Jamie Ross, Michael Sweeting, Bindie Wood, Lucy Yardley

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is common, affecting nearly 400 million people worldwide. Achieving good health for people with T2DM requires active self-management; however, uptake of self-management education is poor, and there is an urgent need to find better, more acceptable, cost-effective methods of providing self-management support. Web-based self-management support has many potential benefits for patients and health services. The aim of this trial is to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a web-based self-management support programme for people with T2DM.

Methods

This will be a multi-centre individually randomised controlled trial in primary care, recruiting adults with T2DM who are registered with participating general practices in England. Participants will be randomised to receive either an evidence-based, theoretically informed, web-based self-management programme for people with T2DM which addresses medical, emotional, and role management, called Healthy Living for People with type 2 Diabetes (HeLP-Diabetes) or a simple information website. The joint primary outcomes are glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and diabetes-related distress, measured by the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular risk factors, depression and anxiety, and self-efficacy for self-management of diabetes. Health economic data include health service use, costs due to the intervention, and EQ-5D for calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYS). Data will be collected at baseline, 3 months and 12 months, with the primary endpoint at 12 months. Practice nurses, blinded to patient allocation, collect clinical data; patients complete online questionnaires for patient reported measures. A sample size of 350 recruited participants allows for attrition of up to 15 % and will provide 90 % power of detecting at a 5 % significance level a true average difference in the PAID score of 4.0 and 0.25 % change in HbA1c (both small effect sizes). The analysis will follow a pre-specified analysis plan, based on comparing the groups as randomised (intention-to-treat).

Discussion

The findings of this trial are likely to be of interest to policy makers, clinicians, and commissioners, all of whom are actively seeking additional forms of self-management support for people with T2DM.

Trial registration

The Trial Registration number is ISRCTN02123133; date of registration 14.2.13.
Literature
3.
go back to reference National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Type 2 diabetes: national clinical guideline for management in primary and secondary care (update). Royal College of Physicians; 2008. pp. 1 – 279. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Type 2 diabetes: national clinical guideline for management in primary and secondary care (update). Royal College of Physicians; 2008. pp. 1 – 279.
4.
go back to reference Hex N, Bartlett C, Wright D, Taylor M, Varley D. Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs. DiabetMed. 2012;29(7):855–62. Hex N, Bartlett C, Wright D, Taylor M, Varley D. Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs. DiabetMed. 2012;29(7):855–62.
5.
go back to reference Ellis SE, Speroff T, Dittus RS, Brown A, Pichert JW, Elasy TA. Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Patient EducCouns. 2004;52(1):97–105.CrossRef Ellis SE, Speroff T, Dittus RS, Brown A, Pichert JW, Elasy TA. Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Patient EducCouns. 2004;52(1):97–105.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD: Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database SystRev. 2005;18(2):CD003417. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD: Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database SystRev. 2005;18(2):CD003417.
7.
go back to reference Davies MJ, Heller S, Skinner TC, Campbell MJ, Carey ME, Cradock S, et al. Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;336(7642):491–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davies MJ, Heller S, Skinner TC, Campbell MJ, Carey ME, Cradock S, et al. Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;336(7642):491–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Deakin TA, Cade JE, Williams R, Greenwood DC. Structured patient education: the diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference. DiabetMed. 2006;23(9):944–54. Deakin TA, Cade JE, Williams R, Greenwood DC. Structured patient education: the diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference. DiabetMed. 2006;23(9):944–54.
9.
go back to reference Newbronner L, Chamberlain R, Borthwick R, Baxter M, Sanderson D. Sustaining and spreading self-management support: lessons from Co-creating Health phase 2. London: Health Foundation; 2013. p. 1–84. Newbronner L, Chamberlain R, Borthwick R, Baxter M, Sanderson D. Sustaining and spreading self-management support: lessons from Co-creating Health phase 2. London: Health Foundation; 2013. p. 1–84.
10.
go back to reference Khunti K, Gray LJ, Skinner T, Carey ME, Realf K, Dallosso H, et al. Effectiveness of a diabetes education and self management programme (DESMOND) for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: three year follow-up of a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMJ. 2012;344:e2333. doi:10.1136/bmj.e2333.:e2333.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khunti K, Gray LJ, Skinner T, Carey ME, Realf K, Dallosso H, et al. Effectiveness of a diabetes education and self management programme (DESMOND) for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: three year follow-up of a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMJ. 2012;344:e2333. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​e2333.​:​e2333.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Corbin JM, Strauss A. Unending Work and Care. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc; 1988. Corbin JM, Strauss A. Unending Work and Care. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc; 1988.
14.
go back to reference May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. ImplementSci. 2009;4:29. 29.CrossRef May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. ImplementSci. 2009;4:29. 29.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Welch G, Weinger K, Anderson B, Polonsky WH. Responsiveness of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. DiabetMed. 2003;20(1):69–72. Welch G, Weinger K, Anderson B, Polonsky WH. Responsiveness of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. DiabetMed. 2003;20(1):69–72.
16.
go back to reference Eigenmann CA, Colagiuri R, Skinner TC, Trevena L. Are current psychometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes education? DiabetMed. 2009;26(4):425–36. Eigenmann CA, Colagiuri R, Skinner TC, Trevena L. Are current psychometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes education? DiabetMed. 2009;26(4):425–36.
17.
go back to reference Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta PsychiatrScand. 1983;67(6):361–70.CrossRef Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta PsychiatrScand. 1983;67(6):361–70.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bijl JV, Poelgeest-Eeltink AV, Shortridge-Baggett L. The psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAdvNurs. 1999;30(2):352–9. Bijl JV, Poelgeest-Eeltink AV, Shortridge-Baggett L. The psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAdvNurs. 1999;30(2):352–9.
19.
go back to reference Bradley C, Lewis KS. Measures of psychological well-being and treatment satisfaction developed from the responses of people with tablet-treated diabetes. DiabetMed. 1990;7(5):445–51. Bradley C, Lewis KS. Measures of psychological well-being and treatment satisfaction developed from the responses of people with tablet-treated diabetes. DiabetMed. 1990;7(5):445–51.
20.
go back to reference Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. AnnMed. 2001;33(5):337–43. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. AnnMed. 2001;33(5):337–43.
21.
go back to reference Kinmonth AL, Woodcock A, Griffin S, Spiegal N, Campbell MJ. Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team. BMJ. 1998;317(7167):1202–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kinmonth AL, Woodcock A, Griffin S, Spiegal N, Campbell MJ. Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team. BMJ. 1998;317(7167):1202–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference White IR, Kalaitzaki E, Thompson SG. Allowing for missing outcome data and incomplete uptake of randomised interventions, with application to an Internet-based alcohol trial. Stat Med. 2011;30(27):3192–207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral White IR, Kalaitzaki E, Thompson SG. Allowing for missing outcome data and incomplete uptake of randomised interventions, with application to an Internet-based alcohol trial. Stat Med. 2011;30(27):3192–207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Becque T, White IR. Regaining power lost by non-compliance via full probability modelling. StatMed. 2008;27(27):5640–63. Becque T, White IR. Regaining power lost by non-compliance via full probability modelling. StatMed. 2008;27(27):5640–63.
24.
go back to reference National Institute for H, Clinical E. Methods for development of NICE public health guidance. London: NICE; 2006. p. 1–131. National Institute for H, Clinical E. Methods for development of NICE public health guidance. London: NICE; 2006. p. 1–131.
25.
go back to reference National Institute for H, Clinical E. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE; 2008. p. 1–66. National Institute for H, Clinical E. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE; 2008. p. 1–66.
26.
go back to reference Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, Farmer AJ, Fenn P, Stevens RJ, et al. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia. 2004;47(10):1747–59.CrossRefPubMed Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, Farmer AJ, Fenn P, Stevens RJ, et al. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia. 2004;47(10):1747–59.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kennedy-Martin T, Curtis S, Faries D, Robinson S, Johnston J. A literature review on the representativeness of randomized controlled trial samples and implications for the external validity of trial results. Trials. 2015;16(1):495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kennedy-Martin T, Curtis S, Faries D, Robinson S, Johnston J. A literature review on the representativeness of randomized controlled trial samples and implications for the external validity of trial results. Trials. 2015;16(1):495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Royal College of General Practitioners: Patient safety implications of general practice workload. In. London; 2015: 1–11. Royal College of General Practitioners: Patient safety implications of general practice workload. In. London; 2015: 1–11.
Metadata
Title
HeLP-Diabetes: randomised controlled trial protocol
Authors
Elizabeth Murray
Charlotte Dack
Maria Barnard
Andrew Farmer
Jinshuo Li
Susan Michie
Kingshuk Pal
Steve Parrott
Jamie Ross
Michael Sweeting
Bindie Wood
Lucy Yardley
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1246-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Health Services Research 1/2015 Go to the issue