Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-06-2015 | Research article

Increased influence and collaboration: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences of community treatment orders within an assertive community treatment setting

Authors: Hanne Kilen Stuen, Jorun Rugkåsa, Anne Landheim, Rolf Wynn

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Since 2009, 14 assertive community treatment (ACT) teams have started up in Norway. Over 30 % of the patients treated by the ACT teams were subject to community treatment orders (CTOs) at intake. CTOs are legal mechanisms to secure treatment adherence for patients with severe mental illness. Little is known about patients’ views and experiences of CTOs within an ACT context.

Methods

The study was based on qualitative in depth interviews with 15 patients that were followed up by ACT teams and that were currently subjected to CTOs. The data were analyzed by using a modified grounded theory approach.

Results

While some participants experienced the CTO as a security net and as an important factor for staying well, others described the CTO as a social control mechanism and as a violation of their autonomy. Although experiencing difficulties and tensions, many participants described the ACT team as a different mental health arena from what they had known before, with another frame of interaction. Despite being legally compelled to receive treatment, many participants talked about how the ACT teams focused on addressing unmet needs, the management of future crises, and finding solutions to daily life problems. Assistance with housing and finances, reduced social isolation, and being able to seek help voluntarily were positive outcomes emphasized by many patients.

Discussion

The participants had different views of being on a CTO within an ACT setting. While some remained clearly negative to the CTO, others described a gradual transition toward regarding the CTO as an acceptablesolution as they gained experience of ACT. Many of the participants valued the supportive relationship withthe ACT team, and communication with the care providers and the care providers’ attitudes could make a significant difference. The study shows that the perception of coercion is context dependent, and that the relationship between care providers and patients is of importance to how patients interpret the providers’ behavior and the restrictive interventions.

Conclusions

Although some patients focused on loss of autonomy and being compelled to take medications, other patients emphasised the supportive relationships they had with the ACT teams and that they had received help with housing, finances, and other daily life problems. Thus, being on mandated community treatment could be acceptable in the opinion of several of the patients, provided that they received other services that they found beneficial.
Literature
1.
Myklebust LH, Sørgaard K, Røtvold K, Wynn R. Factors of importance to involuntary admission. Nordic J Psychiatry. 2012;66:178–82.CrossRef
2.
Myklebust LH, Sørgaard K, Wynn R. Local psychiatric beds appear to decrease the use of involuntary admission: a case-registry study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Rugkåsa J. Compulsion in the community. An overview of legal regimes and current evidence. Impuls Tidsskrift Psykologi. 2011;3:56–63.
4.
Wynn R. Coercion in psychiatric care: clinical, legal, and ethical controversies. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2006;10:247–51.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
Wynn R, Myklebust LH, Bratlid T. Psychologists and coercion: decisions regarding involuntary psychiatric admission and treatment in a group of Norwegian psychologists. Nordic J Psychiatry. 2007;61:433–7.CrossRef
7.
Churchill R. International experiences of using community treatment orders. Kings College London: Institute of Psychiatry; 2007.
8.
Kisely S, Hall K. An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled evidence for the effectiveness of community treatment orders. Can J Psychiatry. 2014;59:561–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Maughan D, Molodynski A, Rugkåsa J, Burns T. A systematic review of the effect of community treatment orders on service use. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49:651–63.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Bremnes R, Pedersen PB, Hellevik V. Bruk av tvang i psykisk helsevern for voksne (The use of coercion in mental health care for adults in 2009). Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2010. Rapport IS-1861.
11.
Bremnes R, Hatling T, Bjørngaard JH. Bruk av psykisk helsevern uten døgnomsorg i 2007. Bruk av legemidler uten samtykke utenfor institusjon i 2007 (The use of involuntary psychiatric outpatient care in 2007, The use of medication without consent outside institutions in 2007). SINTEF rapport A8237. Oslo, Norway: SINTEF Helse; 2008. p. 48–60.
12.
Bedre kvalitet økt frivillighet. Nasjonal strategi for økt frivillighet i psykiske helsetjenester 2012-2015 (Improved quality – reduced coercion. Oslo, Norway: National strategy for reduced coercion in mental health services 2012-2015); 2012.
13.
Marshall M, Lockwood A. Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001089.
14.
Dixon L. Assertive community treatment: twenty-five years of gold. Psychiatric Serv. 2000;51:759–65.CrossRef
15.
Essock SM, Frisman LK, Kontos NJ. Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment teams. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1998;68:179–90.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Mueser KT, Torrey WC, Lynde D, Singer P, Drake RE. Implementing evidence-based practices for people with severe mental illness. Behav Modif. 2003;27:387–411.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Allness DJ, Knoedler WH. The PACT model of community-based treatment for persons with severe and persistent mental illnesses: A manual for PACT start-up. Arlington, VA: NAMI Anti Stigma Foundation; 1998
18.
Monroe-DeVita M, Teague GB, Moser LL. The TMACT: a new tool for measuring fidelity to assertive community treatment. J Am Psychiatric Nurses Ass. 2011;17:17–29.CrossRef
19.
Manuel JI, Appelbaum PS, Le Melle SM, Mancini AD, Huz S, Stellato CB, et al. Use of intervention strategies by assertive community treatment teams to promote patients’ engagement. Psychiatric Serv. 2012;64:579–85.CrossRef
20.
Moser L, Bond G. Scope of agency control: assertive community treatment teams’ supervision of consumers. Psychiatric Serv. 2009;60:922–8.CrossRef
21.
Phelan J, Sinkewicz M, Castille D, Huz S, Link B. Effectiveness and outcomes of assisted outpatient treatment in New York State. Psychiatric Serv. 2010;61:137–43.CrossRef
22.
Rawala M, Gupta S. Use of community treatment orders in an inner-London assertive outreach service. Psychiatric Bull. 2014;38:13–8.CrossRef
23.
Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Wagner HR, Burns BJ, Hiday VA, Borum R. Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce hospital recidivism?: findings from a randomized trial with severely mentally ill individuals. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1968–75.PubMed
24.
Canvin K, Rugkåsa J, Sinclair J, Burns T. Patient, psychiatrist and family carer experiences of community treatment orders: qualitative study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49(12):1–10.CrossRef
25.
Gibbs A, Dawson J, Ansley C, Mullen R. How patients in New Zealand view community treatment orders. J Mental Health. 2005;14:357–68.CrossRef
26.
Riley H, Høyer G, Lorem GF. ‘When coercion moves into your home’–a qualitative study of patient experiences with outpatient commitment in Norway. Health Soc Care Community. 2014;22:506–14.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Canvin K, Bartlett A, Pinfold V. A ‘bittersweet pill to swallow’: learning from mental health service users’ responses to compulsory community care in England. Health Soc Care Community. 2002;10:361–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Newton-Howes G, Banks D. The subjective experience of community treatment orders: Patients’ views and clinical correlations. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013;60:474–81.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd edition. London: Sage; 2014.
30.
Gilbert H, Rose D, Slade M. The importance of relationships in mental health care: A qualitative study of service users’ experiences of psychiatric hospital admission in the UK. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:92.CrossRef
31.
Wynn R. Psychiatric inpatients’ experiences with restraint. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2004;15:124–44.CrossRef
32.
Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc; 1990
33.
34.
Sjöström S. Invocation of coercion context in compliance communication—power dynamics in psychiatric care. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006;29:36–47.CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
Myklebust LH, Olstad R, Bjorbekkmo S, Eisemann M, Wynn R, Sørgaard K. Impact on continuity of care of decentralized versus partly centralized mental health care in Northern Norway. Int J Integr Care. 2011;11:e142.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Stensrud B, Høyer G, Granerud A, Landheim A.”Life on hold”: A qualitative study of patient experiences with outpatient commitment in two Norwegian counties. Issues Mental Health Nursing. In press.
38.
Gault I. Service‐user and carer perspectives on compliance and compulsory treatment in community mental health services. Health Soc Care Community. 2009;17:504–13.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Stein LI, Test MA. Alternative to mental hospital treatment. Archives Gen Psychiatry. 1980;37:392–7.CrossRef
40.
O’Reilly RL. Community treatment orders: an essential therapeutic tool in the face of continuing deinstitutionalization. Can J Psychiatry. 2006;51:686–8.PubMed
41.
Stovall J. Is assertive community treatment ethical care? Harvard Rev Psychiatry. 2001;9:139–43.CrossRef
42.
Williamson T. Ethics of assertive outreach (assertive community treatment teams). Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2002;15:543–7.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Appelbaum PS, Le Melle S. Techniques used by assertive community treatment (ACT) teams to encourage adherence: patient and staff perceptions. Community Ment Health J. 2008;44:459–64.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Neale MS, Rosenheck RA. Therapeutic limit setting in an assertive community treatment program. Psychiatric Serv. 2000;51:499–505.CrossRef
45.
Thøgersen MH, Morthorst B, Nordentoft M. Perceptions of coercion in the community: a qualitative study of patients in a Danish assertive community treatment team. Psychiatric Quart. 2010;81:35–47.CrossRef
46.
Watts J, Priebe S. A phenomenological account of users’ experiences of assertive community treatment. Bioethics. 2002;16:439–54.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Curtis LC, Diamond R. Power and coercion in mental health practice. In: Blackwell B, editor. Treatment compliance and the therapeutic alliance. Chronic mental illness, Vol. 5. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1997. p. 97–122.
48.
Krupa T, Eastabrook S, Hern L, Lee D, North R, Percy K, et al. How do people who receive assertive community treatment experience this service? Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2005;29:18–24.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Tschopp MK, Berven NL, Chan F. Consumer perceptions of assertive community treatment interventions. Community Ment Health J. 2011;47:408–14.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Hiller ML, Knight K, Leukefeld C, Simpson DD. Motivation as a predictor of therapeutic engagement in mandated residential substance abuse treatment. Crim Justice Behav. 2002;29:56–75.CrossRef
51.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55:68.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Wynn R, Kvalvik AM, Hynnekleiv T. Attitudes to coercion at two Norwegian psychiatric units. Nordic J Psychiatry. 2011;65:133–7.CrossRef
53.
Davidson G, Campbell J. An examination of the use of coercion by assertive outreach and community mental health teams in Northern Ireland. Brit J Soc Work. 2007;37:537–55.CrossRef
54.
Killaspy H, Bebbington P, Blizard R, Johnson S, Nolan F, Pilling S, et al. The REACT study: randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment in north London. BMJ. 2006;332:815–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Swartz M, Wilder C, Swanson J, Van Dorn R, Robbins PC, Steadman H, et al. Assessing outcomes for consumers in New York’s assisted outpatient treatment program. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61:976–81.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Kortrijk HE, Kamperman AM, Mulder CL. Changes in individual needs for care and quality of life in Assertive Community Treatment patients: an observational study. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Katsakou C, Bowers L, Amos T, Morriss R, Rose D, Wykes T, et al. Coercion and treatment satisfaction among involuntary patients. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61:286–92.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Stanhope V, Marcus S, Solomon P. The impact of coercion on services from the perspective of mental health care consumers with co-occurring disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60:183–8.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Priebe S, Watts J, Chase M, Matanov A. Processes of disengagement and engagement in assertive outreach patients: qualitative study. Brit J Psychiatry. 2005;187:438–43.CrossRef
60.
Sheehan KA, Burns T. Perceived coercion and the therapeutic relationship: a neglected association? Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62:471–6.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Lamberti JS, Russ A, Cerulli C, Weisman RL, Jacobowitz D, Williams GC. Patient experiences of autonomy and coercion while receiving legal leverage in forensic assertive community treatment. Harvard Rev Psychiatry. 2014;22:222–30.CrossRef
62.
Metadata
Title
Increased influence and collaboration: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences of community treatment orders within an assertive community treatment setting
Authors
Hanne Kilen Stuen
Jorun Rugkåsa
Anne Landheim
Rolf Wynn
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1083-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Health Services Research 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Validation of the Intermountain patient perception of quality (PPQ) survey among survivors of an intensive care unit admission: a retrospective validation study

Research article

Intellectual capital in the healthcare sector: a systematic review and critique of the literature

Study protocol

CoDiab-VD: protocol of a prospective population-based cohort study on diabetes care in Switzerland

Research article

Case vignettes based on EQ-5D to elicit stated preferences for health services utilization from the insurees’ perspective

Research article

The supply of general practitioners across local areas: accounting for spatial heterogeneity

Research article

Developing family rooms in mental health inpatient units: an exploratory descriptive study