Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

IMatter: validation of the NHS Scotland Employee Engagement Index

Authors: Austyn Snowden, Ewan MacArthur

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Employee engagement is a fundamental component of quality healthcare. In order to provide empirical data of engagement in NHS Scotland an Employee Engagement Index was co-constructed with staff. `iMatter’ consists of 25 Likert questions developed iteratively from the literature and a series of validation events with NHS Scotland staff. The aim of this study was to test the face, content and construct validity of iMatter.

Methods

Cross sectional survey of NHS Scotland staff. In January 2013 iMatter was sent to 2300 staff across all disciplines in NHS Scotland. 1280 staff completed it. Demographic data were collected. Internal consistency of the scale was calculated. Construct validity consisted of concurrent application of factor analysis and Rasch analysis. Face and content validity were checked using 3 focus groups.

Results

The sample was representative of the NHSScotland population. iMatter showed very strong reliability (α = 0.958). Factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure consistent with the following interpretation:
1. My experience as an individual
2. My experience with my direct line manager
3. My experience with my team
4. My experience with my organisation
Each subscale also showed high level of internal consistency within all disciplines. Rasch analysis confirmed the majority of items fit with the latent trait of staff engagement with infit statistics between 0.7 and 1.3; and showed a good spread of item difficulty covering person ability. Focus groups found the questionnaire valid it terms of brevity, relevance and clarity.

Conclusions

iMatter showed evidence of high reliability and validity. It is a popular measure of staff engagement in NHS Scotland. Implications for practice focus on the importance of coproduction in psychometric development.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Harter JK, Schmidt FL, Hayes TL: Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2002, 87: 268-279. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268.CrossRefPubMed Harter JK, Schmidt FL, Hayes TL: Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2002, 87: 268-279. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Van Bogaert P, Clarke S, Willems R, Mondelaers M: Staff engagement as a target for managing work environments in psychiatric hospitals: implications for workforce stability and quality of care. J Clin Nurs. 2013, 22: 1717-1728. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04341.x.CrossRefPubMed Van Bogaert P, Clarke S, Willems R, Mondelaers M: Staff engagement as a target for managing work environments in psychiatric hospitals: implications for workforce stability and quality of care. J Clin Nurs. 2013, 22: 1717-1728. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04341.x.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference The Healthcare Quality Strategy for NHSScotland. 2010, The Scottish Government, Edinburgh The Healthcare Quality Strategy for NHSScotland. 2010, The Scottish Government, Edinburgh
4.
go back to reference Francis R: Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry Executive Summary.London: 2013. Francis R: Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry Executive Summary.London: 2013.
5.
go back to reference Rights , Relationships and Recovery: Refreshed Action Plan 2010-2011. 2010 Rights , Relationships and Recovery: Refreshed Action Plan 2010-2011. 2010
6.
go back to reference Safe and Well at Work: Occupational Health and Safety Framework for NHSScotland. 2011 Safe and Well at Work: Occupational Health and Safety Framework for NHSScotland. 2011
7.
go back to reference Patient Rights (Scotland) Act 2011. 2011, The Scottish Government, Scotland Patient Rights (Scotland) Act 2011. 2011, The Scottish Government, Scotland
8.
go back to reference Bacon N, Hoque K: NHS Scotland Staff Survey 2010 Highlights report. 2011 Bacon N, Hoque K: NHS Scotland Staff Survey 2010 Highlights report. 2011
9.
go back to reference Macleod D, Clarke N: Engaging for Success. 2009, A Report to Government, London Macleod D, Clarke N: Engaging for Success. 2009, A Report to Government, London
10.
go back to reference The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework (NHS KSF) and the Development Review Process. 2004, Department of Health, London The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework (NHS KSF) and the Development Review Process. 2004, Department of Health, London
11.
go back to reference Staff Governance Standard. A Framework for NHSScotland Organisations and Employees. 2012, NHSScotland, Edinburgh, 22-4. Staff Governance Standard. A Framework for NHSScotland Organisations and Employees. 2012, NHSScotland, Edinburgh, 22-4.
13.
14.
go back to reference Seppälä P, Mauno S, Feldt T, Hakanen J, Kinnunen U, Tolvanen A, Schaufeli W: The construct validity of the Utrecht work engagement scale: multisample and longitudinal evidence. J Happiness Stud. 2008, 10: 459-481. 10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y.CrossRef Seppälä P, Mauno S, Feldt T, Hakanen J, Kinnunen U, Tolvanen A, Schaufeli W: The construct validity of the Utrecht work engagement scale: multisample and longitudinal evidence. J Happiness Stud. 2008, 10: 459-481. 10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mills MJ, Culbertson SS, Fullagar CJ: Conceptualizing and measuring engagement: an analysis of the Utrecht work engagement scale. J Happiness Stud. 2011, 13: 519-545. 10.1007/s10902-011-9277-3.CrossRef Mills MJ, Culbertson SS, Fullagar CJ: Conceptualizing and measuring engagement: an analysis of the Utrecht work engagement scale. J Happiness Stud. 2011, 13: 519-545. 10.1007/s10902-011-9277-3.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bond TG, Fox CM: Applying the Rasch Model. Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 2007, Routeledge, New York, NY Bond TG, Fox CM: Applying the Rasch Model. Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 2007, Routeledge, New York, NY
17.
go back to reference Streiner D, Norman GR: Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 2008, Oxford University Press, New York, NYCrossRef Streiner D, Norman GR: Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 2008, Oxford University Press, New York, NYCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kaiser HF: An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974, 39: 31-36. 10.1007/BF02291575.CrossRef Kaiser HF: An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974, 39: 31-36. 10.1007/BF02291575.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Linacre JM: A Users Guide to WINSTEPS.Chicago: 2011. Linacre JM: A Users Guide to WINSTEPS.Chicago: 2011.
21.
go back to reference Pilkonis PA, Choi S, Reise SP, Stover AM: Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Depression, Anxiety and Anger. Assessment. 2011, 18: 263-283. 10.1177/1073191111411667.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pilkonis PA, Choi S, Reise SP, Stover AM: Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Depression, Anxiety and Anger. Assessment. 2011, 18: 263-283. 10.1177/1073191111411667.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Risjord M, Moloney M, Dunbar S: Methodological Triangulation in Nursing Research. Philos Soc Sci. 2001, 31: 40-59. 10.1177/004839310103100103.CrossRef Risjord M, Moloney M, Dunbar S: Methodological Triangulation in Nursing Research. Philos Soc Sci. 2001, 31: 40-59. 10.1177/004839310103100103.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Engelhard G: Rasch menaurement theory and factor analysis. Trans Rasch Meas SIG. 2012, 26: 1375. Engelhard G: Rasch menaurement theory and factor analysis. Trans Rasch Meas SIG. 2012, 26: 1375.
24.
go back to reference Randall J, Engelhard G: Using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch measurement theory to assess measurement invariance in a high stakes reading assessment. Appl Meas Educ. 2010, 23: 286-306. 10.1080/08957347.2010.486289.CrossRef Randall J, Engelhard G: Using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch measurement theory to assess measurement invariance in a high stakes reading assessment. Appl Meas Educ. 2010, 23: 286-306. 10.1080/08957347.2010.486289.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Saltzberger T: The Rasch model and factor analysis: complementary or mutually exclusive?. Rasch Meas Trans. 2012, 26: 1376-1378. Saltzberger T: The Rasch model and factor analysis: complementary or mutually exclusive?. Rasch Meas Trans. 2012, 26: 1376-1378.
Metadata
Title
IMatter: validation of the NHS Scotland Employee Engagement Index
Authors
Austyn Snowden
Ewan MacArthur
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0535-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Health Services Research 1/2014 Go to the issue