Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

A novel approach to educate hospitalized cardiovascular disease patients about lifestyle and behavior modifications

Authors: Atiyeh Saboktakin, Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri, Roghaye Khasha

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are always considered by healthcare specialists for different reasons, including extensive prevalence, increased costs, chronicity, and high risk of death. The control of CVDs is highly influenced by behavior and lifestyle and it seems necessary to train special abilities about lifestyle and behavior modification to improve self-care skills for patients, and their caregivers. As a result, the development of effective training systems should be considered by healthcare specialists.

Methods

Hence, in this study, a framework for improving cardiovascular patients’ education processes is presented. Initially, an existing training system for cardiovascular patients is reviewed. Using field observations and targeted interviews with hospital experts, all components of its educating processes are identified, and their process maps are drawn up. After that, challenges in the training system are extracted with the aid of in-depth semi-structured interviews with experts. Due to the importance and different influence of the identified challenges, they are prioritized using a Multiple Criteria Decision-making (MCDM) method, and then their root causes were investigated. Finally, a novel framework is proposed and evaluated with hospital experts' help to improve the main challenges.

Results

The most important challenges included high nursing workload and shortage of time, lack of understanding of training concepts by patients, lack of attention to training, disruption of the training processes by the patients’ caregivers, and patient's weakness in understanding the standard language. In identifying the root causes, learner, educator, and educational tools are the most effective in the training process; therefore, the improvement scenarios were designed accordingly in the proposed framework.

Conclusions

Our study indicated that presenting a framework with applying different quantitative and qualitative methods has great potential to improve the processes of patient education for chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Roth GA, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: Update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021.CrossRef Roth GA, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: Update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Psaltopoulou T, et al. Socioeconomic status and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: impact of dietary mediators. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017;58(1):32–42.CrossRef Psaltopoulou T, et al. Socioeconomic status and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: impact of dietary mediators. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017;58(1):32–42.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference John H, et al. Development and initial validation of a heart disease knowledge questionnaire for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77(1):136–43.CrossRef John H, et al. Development and initial validation of a heart disease knowledge questionnaire for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77(1):136–43.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine Committee on Health L. In: Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA, editors. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004. Institute of Medicine Committee on Health L. In: Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA, editors. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
5.
go back to reference WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
6.
go back to reference Farahaniashgali M, et al. The effect of using The Organizational Culture Improvement Model of patient education on anxiety and satisfaction of patients with coronary artery disease. Iran J Nurs Res. 2008;3(9):59–69. Farahaniashgali M, et al. The effect of using The Organizational Culture Improvement Model of patient education on anxiety and satisfaction of patients with coronary artery disease. Iran J Nurs Res. 2008;3(9):59–69.
7.
go back to reference Riegel B, et al. Self-care for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease and stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(9):e006997.CrossRef Riegel B, et al. Self-care for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease and stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(9):e006997.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bartlett EE. Cost-benefit analysis of patient education. Patient Educ Couns. 1995;26(1):87–91.CrossRef Bartlett EE. Cost-benefit analysis of patient education. Patient Educ Couns. 1995;26(1):87–91.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hoving C, et al. A history of patient education by health professionals in Europe and North America: from authority to shared decision making education. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(3):275–81.CrossRef Hoving C, et al. A history of patient education by health professionals in Europe and North America: from authority to shared decision making education. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(3):275–81.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dickson VV, Riegel B. Are we teaching what patients need to know? Building skills in heart failure self-care. Heart Lung. 2009;38(3):253–61.CrossRef Dickson VV, Riegel B. Are we teaching what patients need to know? Building skills in heart failure self-care. Heart Lung. 2009;38(3):253–61.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Litaker D, et al. Physician—nurse practitioner teams in chronic disease management: the impact on costs, clinical effectiveness, and patients’ perception of care. J Interprof Care. 2003;17(3):223–37.CrossRef Litaker D, et al. Physician—nurse practitioner teams in chronic disease management: the impact on costs, clinical effectiveness, and patients’ perception of care. J Interprof Care. 2003;17(3):223–37.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Boyde M, et al. What have our patients learnt after being hospitalised for an acute myocardial infarction? Aust Crit Care. 2015;28(3):134–9.CrossRef Boyde M, et al. What have our patients learnt after being hospitalised for an acute myocardial infarction? Aust Crit Care. 2015;28(3):134–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Maloney LR, Weiss ME. Patients’ perceptions of hospital discharge informational content. Clin Nurs Res. 2008;17(3):200–19.CrossRef Maloney LR, Weiss ME. Patients’ perceptions of hospital discharge informational content. Clin Nurs Res. 2008;17(3):200–19.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Riegel B, Carlson B. Facilitators and barriers to heart failure self-care. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46(4):287–95.CrossRef Riegel B, Carlson B. Facilitators and barriers to heart failure self-care. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46(4):287–95.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bergh A-L, et al. Registered nurses’ patient education in everyday primary care practice: managers’ discourses. Global Qual Nursing Res. 2015;2:2333393615599168–2333393615599168.CrossRef Bergh A-L, et al. Registered nurses’ patient education in everyday primary care practice: managers’ discourses. Global Qual Nursing Res. 2015;2:2333393615599168–2333393615599168.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Currie K, et al. The importance of interactions between patients and healthcare professionals for heart failure self-care: a systematic review of qualitative research into patient perspectives. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015;14(6):525–35.CrossRef Currie K, et al. The importance of interactions between patients and healthcare professionals for heart failure self-care: a systematic review of qualitative research into patient perspectives. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015;14(6):525–35.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Arian M, et al. The comparison between motivational factors and barriers to patient education based on the viewpoints of nurses and nurse managers. J Nurs Educ. 2015;4(3):66–77. Arian M, et al. The comparison between motivational factors and barriers to patient education based on the viewpoints of nurses and nurse managers. J Nurs Educ. 2015;4(3):66–77.
18.
go back to reference Poorhosseini H, Abbasi SH. The Tehran heart center. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(29):2695–6.CrossRef Poorhosseini H, Abbasi SH. The Tehran heart center. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(29):2695–6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jeston J, Nelis J. Business Process Management. London: Taylor & Francis; 2014.CrossRef Jeston J, Nelis J. Business Process Management. London: Taylor & Francis; 2014.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jamshed S. Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2014;5(4):87–8.CrossRef Jamshed S. Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2014;5(4):87–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Behzadian M, et al. PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;200(1):198–215.CrossRef Behzadian M, et al. PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;200(1):198–215.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Köksalan MM, Wallenius J, Zionts S. Multiple criteria decision making: from early history to the 21st century. Singapore: World Scientific; 2011.CrossRef Köksalan MM, Wallenius J, Zionts S. Multiple criteria decision making: from early history to the 21st century. Singapore: World Scientific; 2011.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Brans J-P, De Smet Y. PROMETHEE methods. In: Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira JR, editors. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 187–219.CrossRef Brans J-P, De Smet Y. PROMETHEE methods. In: Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira JR, editors. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 187–219.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Birt L, et al. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1802–11.CrossRef Birt L, et al. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1802–11.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Thomas DR. Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? Qual Res Psychol. 2017;14(1):23–41.CrossRef Thomas DR. Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? Qual Res Psychol. 2017;14(1):23–41.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yarnall KS, et al. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635–41.CrossRef Yarnall KS, et al. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635–41.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A novel approach to educate hospitalized cardiovascular disease patients about lifestyle and behavior modifications
Authors
Atiyeh Saboktakin
Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri
Roghaye Khasha
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01680-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2021 Go to the issue