Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Fetal birthweight prediction with measured data by a temporal machine learning method

Authors: Jing Tao, Zhenming Yuan, Li Sun, Kai Yu, Zhifen Zhang

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Birthweight is an important indicator during the fetal development process to protect the maternal and infant safety. However, birthweight is difficult to be directly measured, and is usually roughly estimated by the empirical formulas according to the experience of the doctors in clinical practice.

Methods

This study attempts to combine multiple electronic medical records with the B-ultrasonic examination of pregnant women to construct a hybrid birth weight predicting classifier based on long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. The clinical data were collected from 5,759 Chinese pregnant women who have given birth, with more than 57,000 obstetric electronic medical records. We evaluated the prediction by the mean relative error (MRE) and the accuracy rate of different machine learning classifiers at different predicting periods for first delivery and multiple deliveries. Additionally, we evaluated the classification accuracies of different classifiers respectively for the Small-for-Gestational-age (SGA), Large-for-Gestational-Age (LGA) and Appropriate-for-Gestational-Age (AGA) groups.

Results

The results show that the accuracy rate of the prediction model using Convolutional Neuron Networks (CNN), Random Forest (RF), Linear-Regression, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Back Propagation Neural Network(BPNN), and the proposed hybrid-LSTM at the 40th pregnancy week for first delivery were 0.498, 0.662, 0.670, 0.680, 0.705 and 0.793, respectively. Among the groups of less than 39th pregnancy week, the 39th pregnancy week and more than 40th week, the hybrid-LSTM model obtained the best accuracy and almost the least MRE compared with those of machine learning models. Not surprisingly, all the machine learning models performed better than the empirical formula. In the SGA, LGA and AGA group experiments, the average accuracy by the empirical formula, logistic regression (LR), BPNN, CNN, RF and Hybrid-LSTM were 0.780, 0.855, 0.890, 0.906, 0.916 and 0.933, respectively.

Conclusions

The results of this study are helpful for the birthweight prediction and development of guidelines for clinical delivery treatments. It is also useful for the implementation of a decision support system using the temporal machine learning prediction model, as it can assist the clinicians to make correct decisions during the obstetric examinations and remind pregnant women to manage their weight.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yu Z, Han S, Zhu J, Sun X, Ji C, Guo C. Pre-pregnancy body mass index in relation to infant birth weight and offspring overweight/obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(4):61627.CrossRef Yu Z, Han S, Zhu J, Sun X, Ji C, Guo C. Pre-pregnancy body mass index in relation to infant birth weight and offspring overweight/obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(4):61627.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shepard M, Richards V, Berkowitz R, Warsof S, Hobbins J. An evaluation of two equations for predicting birthweight by ultrasound. Am J Obstetr Gyneco. 1982;142(1):47–544.CrossRef Shepard M, Richards V, Berkowitz R, Warsof S, Hobbins J. An evaluation of two equations for predicting birthweight by ultrasound. Am J Obstetr Gyneco. 1982;142(1):47–544.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hadlock F, Harrist R, Carpenter R, Deter R, Park S. Sonographic estimation of birthweight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology. 1984;150(2):535–40.CrossRef Hadlock F, Harrist R, Carpenter R, Deter R, Park S. Sonographic estimation of birthweight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology. 1984;150(2):535–40.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zhu T, Zhao X, Ai M, Ma R, Lei J, Liu J. Comparison of accuracy of six calculations for predicting fetal body weight. Chin Mater Child Health Care. 2016;(20):4179–81. Zhu T, Zhao X, Ai M, Ma R, Lei J, Liu J. Comparison of accuracy of six calculations for predicting fetal body weight. Chin Mater Child Health Care. 2016;(20):4179–81.
5.
go back to reference Möst L, Schmid M, Faschingbauer F, Torsten H. Predicting birth weight with conditionally linear transformation models. Chin Mater Child Health Care. 2016;25(6):2781–810. Möst L, Schmid M, Faschingbauer F, Torsten H. Predicting birth weight with conditionally linear transformation models. Chin Mater Child Health Care. 2016;25(6):2781–810.
6.
go back to reference Hong C, Ji Y. Comparison of common methods for birthweight prediction and clinical value. Chin Women Children Health Res. 2017;5:2781–810. Hong C, Ji Y. Comparison of common methods for birthweight prediction and clinical value. Chin Women Children Health Res. 2017;5:2781–810.
7.
go back to reference Kuhle S, Maguire B, Zhang H, Hamilton D, Allen A, Joseph K, Victoria M. Comparison of logistic regression with machine learning methods for the prediction of fetal growth abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregn Childbirth. 2018;18(1):333.CrossRef Kuhle S, Maguire B, Zhang H, Hamilton D, Allen A, Joseph K, Victoria M. Comparison of logistic regression with machine learning methods for the prediction of fetal growth abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregn Childbirth. 2018;18(1):333.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Farmer R, Medearis A, Hirata G, Platt L. The use of a neural network for the ultrasonographic estimation of birthweight in the macrosomic fetus. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 1992;166(5):1467–72.CrossRef Farmer R, Medearis A, Hirata G, Platt L. The use of a neural network for the ultrasonographic estimation of birthweight in the macrosomic fetus. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 1992;166(5):1467–72.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cheng Y, Hsia C, Chang F, Hou C, ChiU Y, Chung K. Zeolites and synthetic mechanisms. In: 6th World Congress of Biomechanics (WCB 2010), Singapore 2010;1514–1517 Cheng Y, Hsia C, Chang F, Hou C, ChiU Y, Chung K. Zeolites and synthetic mechanisms. In: 6th World Congress of Biomechanics (WCB 2010), Singapore 2010;1514–1517
10.
go back to reference Mohammadi H, Nemati M, Allahmoradi Z, Forghani H, Sheikhani A. Ultrasound estimation of birthweight in twins by artificial neural network. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2011;4(1):46–50.CrossRef Mohammadi H, Nemati M, Allahmoradi Z, Forghani H, Sheikhani A. Ultrasound estimation of birthweight in twins by artificial neural network. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2011;4(1):46–50.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Feng M, Wan L, Li Z, Qing L, Qi X. Fetal weight estimation via ultrasound using machine learning. IEEE Access. 2019;7:87783–91.CrossRef Feng M, Wan L, Li Z, Qing L, Qi X. Fetal weight estimation via ultrasound using machine learning. IEEE Access. 2019;7:87783–91.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chen G, Fu K, Liang Z, Sema T, Li C, Idem R. The genetic algorithm based back propagation neural network for MMP prediction in CO2-EOR process. Fuel. 2014;126:202–12.CrossRef Chen G, Fu K, Liang Z, Sema T, Li C, Idem R. The genetic algorithm based back propagation neural network for MMP prediction in CO2-EOR process. Fuel. 2014;126:202–12.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rumelhart D, Hinton G, Williams R. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1987. p. 318–362. Rumelhart D, Hinton G, Williams R. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1987. p. 318–362.
14.
go back to reference Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM. 2017;60(6):84–90.CrossRef Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM. 2017;60(6):84–90.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lu Y, Fu X, Chen F, Wong K. Prediction of fetal weight at varying gestational age in the absence of ultrasound examination using ensemble learning. Artif Intell Med. 2020;102:101748.CrossRef Lu Y, Fu X, Chen F, Wong K. Prediction of fetal weight at varying gestational age in the absence of ultrasound examination using ensemble learning. Artif Intell Med. 2020;102:101748.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yang Q, Jiang J, Zhang G. Improvement of genetic algorithm optimization speed. Softw J. 2001;12(2):270–5. Yang Q, Jiang J, Zhang G. Improvement of genetic algorithm optimization speed. Softw J. 2001;12(2):270–5.
17.
go back to reference Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15(1):1929–58. Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15(1):1929–58.
18.
go back to reference Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In: the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations(ICLR), San Diego, 2015. Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In: the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations(ICLR), San Diego, 2015.
Metadata
Title
Fetal birthweight prediction with measured data by a temporal machine learning method
Authors
Jing Tao
Zhenming Yuan
Li Sun
Kai Yu
Zhifen Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01388-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2021 Go to the issue