Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Multiple Sclerosis | Research article

Patient autonomy in dentistry: demonstrating the role for shared decision making

Authors: Mareike Benecke, Jürgen Kasper, Christoph Heesen, Nina Schäffler, Daniel R. Reissmann

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Evidence-based practice, decision aids, patient preferences and autonomy preferences (AP) play an important role in making decisions with the patient. They are crucial in the process of a shared decision making (SDM) and can be incorporated into quality criteria for patient involvement in health care. However, there are few studies on SDM and AP in the field of dentistry. This study explored patients’ autonomy preferences in dentistry in comparison to other medical domains, comparing them with patient preferences in two other cohorts of patients with different conditions and in different health care settings.

Methods

A sample of 100 dental patients attending 16 dentists was consecutively recruited in a university-based prosthodontic clinic. Patients’ and dentists’ preferences regarding their roles in dental decision making for commonly performed diagnostic and treatment decisions were compared using the Control Preference Scale (CPS). This was followed by cross sectional surveys to study autonomy preferences in three additional cohorts recruited from general practices (n = 100), a multiple sclerosis clinic (n = 109), and a university-based prosthodontic clinic (n = 100). A questionnaire with combined items from the Autonomy Preference Index (API) to assess general and the CPS to assess specific preferences was used in the additional cohorts.

Results

Dentists were less willing to give patients control than patients were willing to enact autonomy. However, decisions about management of tooth loss were considered relevant for a shared decision making by both parties. When comparing cohorts from different samples, the highest AP was expressed by people with multiple sclerosis and the lowest by patients in dentistry (means: dentistry 2.5, multiple sclerosis 2.1, general practice 2.4, p = .035). There were considerable intra-individual differences in autonomy preferences referring to different decision types (p < .001). In general, more autonomy was desired for treatment decisions in comparison to diagnostic decisions, for trivial compared to severe conditions, and for dental care compared to general practice (all: p < .001).

Conclusion

There is an important role of patient participation in decision making in dentistry. Furthermore, PA should be considered with respect to specific medical decisions instead of assessing autonomy preferences in general implying a need for communication skills training of health care professionals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92.CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference General Medical Council. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. London: General Medical Council; 2008. General Medical Council. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. London: General Medical Council; 2008.
3.
go back to reference Kalsi JS, Hemmings K: The influence of patients' decisions on treatment planning in restorative dentistry. Dent Update 2013, 40(9):698–700, 702–704, 707–708, 710. Kalsi JS, Hemmings K: The influence of patients' decisions on treatment planning in restorative dentistry. Dent Update 2013, 40(9):698–700, 702–704, 707–708, 710.
4.
go back to reference Barratt A. Evidence Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):407–12.CrossRefPubMed Barratt A. Evidence Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):407–12.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.PubMed Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Janssen D. Because I have a choice, I will choose to do the right thing. J Am Coll Dent. 2009;76(4):24–6.PubMed Janssen D. Because I have a choice, I will choose to do the right thing. J Am Coll Dent. 2009;76(4):24–6.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bauer J, Chiappelli F, Spackman S, Prolo P, Stevenson R. Evidence-based dentistry: fundamentals for the dentist. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006;34(6):427–32.PubMed Bauer J, Chiappelli F, Spackman S, Prolo P, Stevenson R. Evidence-based dentistry: fundamentals for the dentist. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006;34(6):427–32.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bauer J, Spackman S, Chiappelli F, Prolo P, Stevenson R. Evidence-based dentistry: a clinician’s perspective. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006;34(7):511–7.PubMed Bauer J, Spackman S, Chiappelli F, Prolo P, Stevenson R. Evidence-based dentistry: a clinician’s perspective. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006;34(7):511–7.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Schouten BC, Hoogstraten J, Eijkman MA. Patient participation during dental consultations: the influence of patients’ characteristics and dentists’ behavior. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31(5):368–77.CrossRefPubMed Schouten BC, Hoogstraten J, Eijkman MA. Patient participation during dental consultations: the influence of patients’ characteristics and dentists’ behavior. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31(5):368–77.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schouten BC, Eijkman MA, Hoogstraten J. Information and participation preferences of dental patients. J Dent Res. 2004;83(12):961–5.CrossRefPubMed Schouten BC, Eijkman MA, Hoogstraten J. Information and participation preferences of dental patients. J Dent Res. 2004;83(12):961–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cronin M, Meaney S, Jepson NJ, Allen PF. A qualitative study of trends in patient preferences for the management of the partially dentate state. Gerodontology. 2009;26(2):137–42.CrossRefPubMed Cronin M, Meaney S, Jepson NJ, Allen PF. A qualitative study of trends in patient preferences for the management of the partially dentate state. Gerodontology. 2009;26(2):137–42.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Miller JR, Larson BE, Satin D, Schuster L. Information-seeking and decision-making preferences among adult orthodontic patients: an elective health care model. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011;39(1):79–86.CrossRefPubMed Miller JR, Larson BE, Satin D, Schuster L. Information-seeking and decision-making preferences among adult orthodontic patients: an elective health care model. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011;39(1):79–86.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chapple H, Shah S, Caress AL, Kay EJ: Exploring dental patients' preferred roles in treatment decision-making—a novel approach. Br Dent J 2003, 194(6):321–327; discussion 317. Chapple H, Shah S, Caress AL, Kay EJ: Exploring dental patients' preferred roles in treatment decision-making—a novel approach. Br Dent J 2003, 194(6):321–327; discussion 317.
14.
go back to reference Sondell K, Soderfeldt B. Dentist-patient communication: a review of relevant models. Acta Odontol Scand. 1997;55(2):116–26.CrossRefPubMed Sondell K, Soderfeldt B. Dentist-patient communication: a review of relevant models. Acta Odontol Scand. 1997;55(2):116–26.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Brennan D, Spencer A. Development and testing of revised practice belief scales among private general dental practitioners. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(3):217–25.CrossRefPubMed Brennan D, Spencer A. Development and testing of revised practice belief scales among private general dental practitioners. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(3):217–25.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Johnson BR, Schwartz A, Goldberg J, Koerber A. A chairside aid for shared decision making in dentistry: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Educ. 2006;70(2):133–41.CrossRefPubMed Johnson BR, Schwartz A, Goldberg J, Koerber A. A chairside aid for shared decision making in dentistry: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Educ. 2006;70(2):133–41.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bekker HL, Luther F, Buchanan H. Developments in making patients’ orthodontic choices better. J Orthod. 2010;37(3):217–24.CrossRefPubMed Bekker HL, Luther F, Buchanan H. Developments in making patients’ orthodontic choices better. J Orthod. 2010;37(3):217–24.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gilmore D, Sturmey P, Newton JT. A comparison of the impact of information from a clinician and research-based information on patient treatment choice in dentistry. J Public Health Dent. 2006;66(4):242–7.CrossRefPubMed Gilmore D, Sturmey P, Newton JT. A comparison of the impact of information from a clinician and research-based information on patient treatment choice in dentistry. J Public Health Dent. 2006;66(4):242–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ryan F, Shute J, Cedro M, Singh J, Lee E, Lee S, Lloyd TW, Robinson A, Gill D, Hunt NP, et al. A new style of orthognathic clinic. J Orthod. 2011;38(2):124–33.CrossRefPubMed Ryan F, Shute J, Cedro M, Singh J, Lee E, Lee S, Lloyd TW, Robinson A, Gill D, Hunt NP, et al. A new style of orthognathic clinic. J Orthod. 2011;38(2):124–33.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nel WR, Dawjee SM: Compliance and satisfaction in the orthodontic patient. Sadj 2012, 67(8):452, 454–456. Nel WR, Dawjee SM: Compliance and satisfaction in the orthodontic patient. Sadj 2012, 67(8):452, 454–456.
21.
go back to reference Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29(3):21–43.PubMed Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29(3):21–43.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4(1):23–30.CrossRefPubMed Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4(1):23–30.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Reissmann DR, Bellows JC, Kasper J. Patient preferred and perceived control in dental care decision making. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019;4(2):151–9.PubMed Reissmann DR, Bellows JC, Kasper J. Patient preferred and perceived control in dental care decision making. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019;4(2):151–9.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen JA, Makoul G. Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(1):9–18.CrossRefPubMed Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen JA, Makoul G. Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(1):9–18.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ghane A, Huynh HP, Andrews SE, Legg AM, Tabuenca A, Sweeny K. The relative importance of patients’ decisional control preferences and experiences. Psychol Health. 2014;29(10):1105–18.CrossRefPubMed Ghane A, Huynh HP, Andrews SE, Legg AM, Tabuenca A, Sweeny K. The relative importance of patients’ decisional control preferences and experiences. Psychol Health. 2014;29(10):1105–18.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Zhang YH, Su HX, Shang L, Li DA, Wang R, Zhang RQ, Xu YY. Preferences and perceived involvement in treatment decision making among Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis. Med Decis Mak. 2011;31(2):245–53.CrossRef Zhang YH, Su HX, Shang L, Li DA, Wang R, Zhang RQ, Xu YY. Preferences and perceived involvement in treatment decision making among Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis. Med Decis Mak. 2011;31(2):245–53.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Entwistle V, Prior M, Skea ZC, Francis JJ. Involvement in treatment decision-making: its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(2):362–75.CrossRefPubMed Entwistle V, Prior M, Skea ZC, Francis JJ. Involvement in treatment decision-making: its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(2):362–75.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Entwistle VA, Skea ZC, O’Donnell MT. Decisions about treatment: interpretations of two measures of control by women having a hysterectomy. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(6):721–32.CrossRefPubMed Entwistle VA, Skea ZC, O’Donnell MT. Decisions about treatment: interpretations of two measures of control by women having a hysterectomy. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(6):721–32.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Bunge M, Muhlhauser I, Steckelberg A. What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(3):316–28.CrossRefPubMed Bunge M, Muhlhauser I, Steckelberg A. What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(3):316–28.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Legare F, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Cossi MJ, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, Lyddiatt A, Politi MC, Thomson R, Elwyn G, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD006732. Legare F, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Cossi MJ, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, Lyddiatt A, Politi MC, Thomson R, Elwyn G, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD006732.
31.
go back to reference Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(2):102–14.CrossRefPubMed Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(2):102–14.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Kasper J, Liethmann K, Heesen C, Reissmann DR, Geiger F. Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions—preliminary testing of a newly developed module. Health Expect. 2017;20(6):1254–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kasper J, Liethmann K, Heesen C, Reissmann DR, Geiger F. Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions—preliminary testing of a newly developed module. Health Expect. 2017;20(6):1254–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Geiger F, Liethmann K, Reitz D, Galalae R, Kasper J. Efficacy of the doktormitSDM training module in supporting shared decision making—results from a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:2331–8.CrossRefPubMed Geiger F, Liethmann K, Reitz D, Galalae R, Kasper J. Efficacy of the doktormitSDM training module in supporting shared decision making—results from a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:2331–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JCJM. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(10):1172–9.CrossRefPubMed Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JCJM. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(10):1172–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient autonomy in dentistry: demonstrating the role for shared decision making
Authors
Mareike Benecke
Jürgen Kasper
Christoph Heesen
Nina Schäffler
Daniel R. Reissmann
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01317-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2020 Go to the issue