Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

EsPRit: ethics committee proposals for Long Term Medical Data Registries in rapidly evolving research fields - a future-proof best practice approach

Authors: S. Oberbichler, W. O. Hackl, A. Hörbst

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Long-term data collection is a challenging task in the domain of medical research. Many effects in medicine require long periods of time to become traceable e.g. the development of secondary malignancies based on a given radiotherapeutic treatment of the primary disease. Nevertheless, long-term studies often suffer from an initial lack of available information, thus disallowing a standardized approach for their approval by the ethics committee. This is due to several factors, such as the lack of existing case report forms or an explorative research approach in which data elements may change over time.
In connection with current medical research and the ongoing digitalization in medicine, Long Term Medical Data Registries (MDR-LT) have become an important means of collecting and analyzing study data. As with any clinical study, ethical aspects must be taken into account when setting up such registries.
This work addresses the problem of creating a valid, high-quality ethics committee proposal for medical registries by suggesting groups of tasks (building blocks), information sources and appropriate methods for collecting and analyzing the information, as well as a process model to compile an ethics committee proposal (EsPRit).

Methods

To derive the building blocks and associated methods software and requirements engineering approaches were utilized. Furthermore, a process-oriented approach was chosen, as information required in the creating process of ethics committee proposals remain unknown in the beginning of planning an MDR-LT. Here, we derived the needed steps from medical product certification. This was done as the medical product certification itself also communicates a process-oriented approach rather than merely focusing on content. A proposal was created for validation and inspection of applicability by using the proposed building blocks. The proposed best practice was tested and refined within SEMPER (Secondary Malignoma - Prospective Evaluation of the Radiotherapeutics dose distribution as the cause for induction) as a case study.

Results

The proposed building blocks cover the topics of “Context Analysis”, “Requirements Analysis”, “Requirements Validation”, “Electronic Case Report (eCRF) Design” and “Overall Concept Creation”. Additional methods are attached with regards to each topic. The goals of each block can be met by applying those methods. The proposed methods are proven methods as applied in e.g. existing Medical Data Registry projects, as well as in software or requirements engineering.

Conclusion

Several building blocks and attached methods could be identified in the creation of a generic ethics committee proposal. Hence, an Ethics Committee can make informed decisions on the suggested study via said blocks, using the suggested methods such as “Defining Clinical Questions” within the Context Analysis. The study creators have to confirm that they adhere to the proposed procedure within the ethic proposal statement. Additional existing Medical Data Registry projects can be compared to EsPRit for conformity to the proposed procedure. This allows for the identification of gaps, which can lead to amendments requested by the ethics committee.
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Klein A, Prokosch H-U, Mueller M, Ganslandt T. Experiences with an interoperable data acquisition platform for multi-centric research networks based on HL7 CDA. Methods Inf Med. 2007;46:580–5. 10.1160/ME9060.PubMed Klein A, Prokosch H-U, Mueller M, Ganslandt T. Experiences with an interoperable data acquisition platform for multi-centric research networks based on HL7 CDA. Methods Inf Med. 2007;46:580–5. 10.​1160/​ME9060.PubMed
6.
8.
go back to reference Hackl WO, Ammenwerth E. SPIRIT: Systematic Planning of Intelligent Reuse of Integrated Clinical Routine Data. A Conceptual Best-practice Framework and Procedure Model. Methods Inf Med 2016;55. doi:10.3414/ME15-01-0045. Hackl WO, Ammenwerth E. SPIRIT: Systematic Planning of Intelligent Reuse of Integrated Clinical Routine Data. A Conceptual Best-practice Framework and Procedure Model. Methods Inf Med 2016;55. doi:10.​3414/​ME15-01-0045.
12.
go back to reference Boice JD Jr, Day NE, Andersen A, Brinton LA, Brown R, Choi NW, et al. Second cancers following radiation treatment for cervical cancer. An international collaboration among cancer registries. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985;74:955–75. 10.1093/jnci/74.5.955.PubMed Boice JD Jr, Day NE, Andersen A, Brinton LA, Brown R, Choi NW, et al. Second cancers following radiation treatment for cervical cancer. An international collaboration among cancer registries. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985;74:955–75. 10.​1093/​jnci/​74.​5.​955.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Curtis RE, Hall EJ, Ron E. Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery. Cancer. 2000;88:398–406.CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ, Curtis RE, Hall EJ, Ron E. Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery. Cancer. 2000;88:398–406.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Recommended format for a Research Protocol. 2014. World Health Organization. Recommended format for a Research Protocol. 2014.
18.
go back to reference Marciniak JJ, editor. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002. Marciniak JJ, editor. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002.
19.
go back to reference Beck K. Extreme programming explained: embrace change. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional; 2000. Beck K. Extreme programming explained: embrace change. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional; 2000.
20.
go back to reference Kruchten P. The rational unified process: an introduction. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional; 2004. Kruchten P. The rational unified process: an introduction. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional; 2004.
21.
go back to reference Sutherland J V, Van Solingen DM, Rustenberg E. The Power of Scrum. North Charleston: Createspace; 2011. Sutherland J V, Van Solingen DM, Rustenberg E. The Power of Scrum. North Charleston: Createspace; 2011.
22.
go back to reference Ambler SW, Lines M. Disciplined agile delivery: a practitioner’s guide to agile software delivery in the enterprise. Upper Saddle River: Prantice Hall; 2012. Ambler SW, Lines M. Disciplined agile delivery: a practitioner’s guide to agile software delivery in the enterprise. Upper Saddle River: Prantice Hall; 2012.
23.
go back to reference IEEE Computer Society. IEEE SA - 29148–2011 - IEEE Systems and software engineering - Life cycle processes - Requirements engineering. 2011. IEEE Computer Society. IEEE SA - 29148–2011 - IEEE Systems and software engineering - Life cycle processes - Requirements engineering. 2011.
24.
go back to reference van Lamsweerde A. Requirements engineering: from system goals to UML models to software specifications. Hoboken: Wiley; 2009. van Lamsweerde A. Requirements engineering: from system goals to UML models to software specifications. Hoboken: Wiley; 2009.
27.
go back to reference Oberbichler S, Hörbst A. Functional requirements regarding medical registries - Preliminary results. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;190:112–4.PubMed Oberbichler S, Hörbst A. Functional requirements regarding medical registries - Preliminary results. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;190:112–4.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Mayring P. Einführung in die Qualitative Sozialforschung. 5. ed. Weinheim Und Basel: Beltz Verlag; 2002. Mayring P. Einführung in die Qualitative Sozialforschung. 5. ed. Weinheim Und Basel: Beltz Verlag; 2002.
31.
go back to reference Michalik C, Dress J, Ngouongo S, Stäubert S, Weber U, Brockmeyer N, et al. Requirements and tasks of cohorts and registers, the German KoRegIT project. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:1085–9.PubMed Michalik C, Dress J, Ngouongo S, Stäubert S, Weber U, Brockmeyer N, et al. Requirements and tasks of cohorts and registers, the German KoRegIT project. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:1085–9.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Ali K, Sutaryo S, Purwanto I, Mulatsih S, Supriyadi E, Widjajanto PH, et al. Yogyakarta Pediatric Cancer Registry: an international collaborative project of University Gadjah Mada, University of Saskatchewan, and the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:131–6.PubMed Ali K, Sutaryo S, Purwanto I, Mulatsih S, Supriyadi E, Widjajanto PH, et al. Yogyakarta Pediatric Cancer Registry: an international collaborative project of University Gadjah Mada, University of Saskatchewan, and the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:131–6.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Berrettini S, Arslan E, Baggiani A, Burdo S, Cassandro E, Cuda D, et al. A registry for the collection of data in cochlear implant patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011;31:328–40.PubMedPubMedCentral Berrettini S, Arslan E, Baggiani A, Burdo S, Cassandro E, Cuda D, et al. A registry for the collection of data in cochlear implant patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011;31:328–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Cassidy LD, Jensen JN, Durkee CT, Calkins CM, Sato T, Tassone C, et al. Creation and implementation of a prospective pediatric clinical outcomes registry. J Registry Manag. 2011;38:138–43.PubMed Cassidy LD, Jensen JN, Durkee CT, Calkins CM, Sato T, Tassone C, et al. Creation and implementation of a prospective pediatric clinical outcomes registry. J Registry Manag. 2011;38:138–43.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Chen PPS. The Entity Relationship Model — Toward a Unified View of Data. In: Broy M., Denert E. (eds) Software Pioneers. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2002. Chen PPS. The Entity Relationship Model — Toward a Unified View of Data. In: Broy M., Denert E. (eds) Software Pioneers. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2002.
38.
go back to reference El Fadly A, Rance B, Lucas N, Mead C, Chatellier G, Lastic P-Y, et al. Integrating clinical research with the Healthcare Enterprise: from the RE-USE project to the EHR4CR platform. J Biomed Inform 2011;44 Suppl 1:94–102. El Fadly A, Rance B, Lucas N, Mead C, Chatellier G, Lastic P-Y, et al. Integrating clinical research with the Healthcare Enterprise: from the RE-USE project to the EHR4CR platform. J Biomed Inform 2011;44 Suppl 1:94–102.
40.
go back to reference Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse - Grundlagen und Techniken. 8. ed. Weinheim Und Basel: Beltz Verlag; 2000. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse - Grundlagen und Techniken. 8. ed. Weinheim Und Basel: Beltz Verlag; 2000.
41.
go back to reference Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:W65–94.CrossRefPubMed Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:W65–94.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
EsPRit: ethics committee proposals for Long Term Medical Data Registries in rapidly evolving research fields - a future-proof best practice approach
Authors
S. Oberbichler
W. O. Hackl
A. Hörbst
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0539-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2017 Go to the issue