Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Routine health information system utilization and factors associated thereof among health workers at government health institutions in East Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia

Authors: Atsede Mazengia Shiferaw, Dessalegn Tegabu Zegeye, Solomon Assefa, Melaku Kindie Yenit

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Using reliable information from routine health information systems over time is an important aid to improving health outcomes, tackling disparities, enhancing efficiency, and encouraging innovation. In Ethiopia, routine health information utilization for enhancing performance is poor among health workers, especially at the peripheral levels of health facilities. Therefore, this study aimed to assess routine health information system utilization and associated factors among health workers at government health institutions in East Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

An institution based cross-sectional study was conducted at government health institutions of East Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia from April to May, 2013. A total of 668 health workers were selected from government health institutions, using the cluster sampling technique. Data collected using a standard structured and self-administered questionnaire and an observational checklist were cleaned, coded, and entered into Epi-info version 3.5.3, and transferred into SPSS version 20 for further statistical analysis. Variables with a p-value of less than 0.05 at multiple logistic regression analysis were considered statistically significant factors for the utilization of routine health information systems.

Results

The study revealed that 45.8% of the health workers had a good level of routine health information utilization. HMIS training [AOR = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.60, 4.62], good data analysis skills [AOR = 6.40, 95%CI: 3.93, 10.37], supervision [AOR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.42, 4.75], regular feedback [AOR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.38, 3.51], and favorable attitude towards health information utilization [AOR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.78, 4.54] were found significantly associated with a good level of routine health information utilization.

Conclusion

More than half of the health workers working at government health institutions of East Gojjam were poor health information users compared with the findings of others studies. HMIS training, data analysis skills, supervision, regular feedback, and favorable attitude were factors related to routine health information system utilization. Therefore, a comprehensive training, supportive supervision, and regular feedback are highly recommended for improving routine health information utilization among health workers at government health facilities.
Literature
1.
Lærum H, Karlsen TH, Faxvaag A. Use of and attitudes to a hospital information system by medical secretaries, nurses and physicians deprived of the paper-based medical record: a case report. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2004;4(1):18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Aqil A, Lippeveld T, Hozumi D. PRISM framework: a paradigm shift for designing, strengthening and evaluating routine health information systems. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24(3):217–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Bechky BA. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ Sci. 2003;14(3):312–30.CrossRef
4.
Shaikh BT, Rabbani F. Health management information system: a tool to gauge patient satisfaction and quality of care. 2005.
5.
Nutley T, Reynolds HW. Improving the use of health data for health system strengthening. Glob Health Action 2013;6.
6.
Aqil A. PRISM case studies: strengthening and evaluating RHIS. MEASURE Evaluation, USAID. 2008.
7.
8.
World Health Organization. Developing health management information systems: a practical guide for developing countries. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2004.
9.
Framework W. standards for country health information systems/Health Metrics Network. World Health Organization. 2008.
10.
Heeks R. Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(2):125–37.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Young P, Elul B, Maulsby C, et al. Medical record completeness and accuracy at an HIV clinic in Mozambique, 2005–2006. Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries. 2010;4(2).
12.
Woldemariam Hirpa HT, Nigussie F, Argaw H. Implementation of an integrated health management information system and monitoring and evaluation system in ethiopia: progress and lessons from pioneering regions. 2012.
13.
Odhiambo-Otieno GW. Evaluation of existing district health management information systems: a case study of the district health systems in Kenya. Int J Med Inform. 2005;74(9):733–44.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Godlee F, Pakenham-Walsh N, Ncayiyana D, et al. Can we achieve health information for all by 2015? Lancet. 2004;364(9430):295–300.CrossRef
15.
Hotchkiss DR, Diana ML, Fleischman Foreit KG. How can routine health information systems improve health systems functioning in low-and middle-income countries? Assessing the evidence base. Health Information Technology in the International Context. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2012. p. 25–58.
16.
Chaulagai CN, Moyo CM, Koot J, et al. Design and implementation of a health management information system in Malawi: issues, innovations and results. Health Policy Plan. 2005;20(6):375–84.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Gladwin J, Dixon R, Wilson T. Implementing a new health management information system in Uganda. Health Policy Plan. 2003;18(2):214–24.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Garrib A, Herbst K, Dlamini L, et al. An evaluation of the district health information system in rural South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2008;98(7):549–52.PubMed
19.
Akande T, Monehin J. Health management information system in private clinics in Ilorin, Nigeria. Niger Med Pract. 2004;46(5):103–7.
20.
Kirigia JM, Emrouznejad A, Sambo LG, et al. Using data envelopment analysis to measure the technical efficiency of public health centers in Kenya. J Med Syst. 2004;28(2):155–66.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Andargie G. Assessment of utilization of health information system at district level with particular emphasis to HIV/AIDS program in North Gondar zone Amhara national regional state: aau; 2006.
22.
Abajebel S, Jira C, Beyene W. Utilization of health information system at district level in Jimma zone Oromia regional state, South West Ethiopia. Ethiopian J Health Sci. 2011;21(3).
23.
Team HR. Health management informafion system/M&E: Informafion use guidelines and display tools. Addis Abeba: Federal Ministry of Health; 2007.
24.
25.
Shaikh BT, Hatcher J. Health seeking behaviour and health service utilization in Pakistan: challenging the policy makers. J Public Health. 2005;27(1):49–54.CrossRef
26.
Foreit K, Moreland S, LaFond A. Data demand and information use in the health sector: conceptual framework. MEASURE Evaluation, Carolina Population Center: Chapel Hill; 2006.
27.
Teklegiorgis K, Tadesse K, Mirutse G, et al. Factors associated with low level of health information utilization in resources limited setting, eastern Ethiopia. Inf Syst. 2014;3:4.
28.
Djibuti M, Gotsadze G, Zoidze A, et al. The role of supportive supervision on immunization program outcome-a randomized field trial from Georgia. BMC Int Health Human Rights. 2009;9(1):S11.CrossRef
29.
USAID. Tools for Data Demand and Use in the Health Sector— MEASURE Evaluation. 2011.
30.
31.
Mesfin A. Health policy and the extent of health information use in woreda health care system of Arsi zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia. 2011.
32.
Silva BLS. Health management information system (HMIS). 2012.
33.
Fenenga C, de Jager A. Health management information systems as a tool for organizational development. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Countries. 2007;31.
34.
Ruxwana NL, Herselman ME, Conradie DP. ICT applications as e-health solutions in rural healthcare in the eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Health Inform Manag J. 2010;39(1):17–29.CrossRef
35.
Adam T, Hsu J, De Savigny D, et al. Evaluating health systems strengthening interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: are we asking the right questions? Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(suppl 4):iv9–iv19.PubMed
36.
USAID, evaluation M. Strengthening health information Systems in low- and Middle-Income Countries: a model to frame what we know and what we need to learn. 2017.
37.
Chikovani I. Assessment of the Health Information System in Albania. Curatio International Foundation. 2008.
38.
Krishnan A, Nongkynrih B, Yadav K, et al. Evaluation of computerized health management information system for primary health care in rural India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):310.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Nyamtema AS. Bridging the gaps in the health management information system in the context of a changing health sector. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10(1):36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Mathauer I, Imhoff I. Health worker motivation in Africa: the role of non-financial incentives and human resource management tools. Hum Resour Health. 2006;4(1):24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Belay H, Azim T, Kaddahun H. Assessment of Health Management Information System (HMIS) Performance in SNNPR, Ethiopia. MEASURE Evaluation; 2013.
42.
World Health Organization. Analysing disrupted health systems in countries in crises analysing disrupted health sectors. Geneva; 2008.
Metadata
Title
Routine health information system utilization and factors associated thereof among health workers at government health institutions in East Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia
Authors
Atsede Mazengia Shiferaw
Dessalegn Tegabu Zegeye
Solomon Assefa
Melaku Kindie Yenit
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0509-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

A novel data-driven workflow combining literature and electronic health records to estimate comorbidities burden for a specific disease: a case study on autoimmune comorbidities in patients with celiac disease

Research article

Recognizing difficult trade-offs: values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care in a multi-site survey of adult patients in family practices

Research article

Validation of an algorithm that determines stroke diagnostic code accuracy in a Japanese hospital-based cancer registry using electronic medical records

Research article

Comorbidity study of borderline personality disorder: applying association rule mining to the Taiwan national health insurance research database

Erratum

Erratum to: development and testing of a mobile application to support diabetes self-management for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a design thinking case study

Research article

Implementing technology in healthcare: insights from physicians