Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Correspondence

Measuring interoperable EHR adoption and maturity: a Canadian example

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An interoperable electronic health record is a secure consolidated record of an individual’s health history and care, designed to facilitate authorized information sharing across the care continuum.  Each Canadian province and territory has implemented such a system and for all, measuring adoption is essential to understanding progress and optimizing use in order to realize intended benefits.

Results

About 250,000 health professionals—approximately half of Canada’s anticipated potential physician, nurse, pharmacist, and administrative users—indicated that they electronically access data, such as those found in provincial/territorial lab or drug information systems, in 2015.  Trends suggest further growth as maturity of use increases.

Conclusions

There is strong interest in health information exchange through the iEHR in Canada, and continued growth in adoption is expected. Central to managing the evolution of digital health is access to robust data about who is using solutions, how they are used, where and when.  Stakeholders such as government, program leads, and health system administrators must critically assess progress and achievement of benefits, to inform future strategic and operational decisions.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. HIMSS Dictionary of Healthcare Information Technology Terms, Acronyms and Organizations. Thirdth ed. 2013. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. HIMSS Dictionary of Healthcare Information Technology Terms, Acronyms and Organizations. Thirdth ed. 2013.
5.
go back to reference Adler-Milstein J, Ronchi E, Cohen GR, Winn LAP, Jha AK. Benchmarking health IT among OECD countries: better data for better policy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(1):111–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adler-Milstein J, Ronchi E, Cohen GR, Winn LAP, Jha AK. Benchmarking health IT among OECD countries: better data for better policy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(1):111–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty M, Rasmussen P, Pierson R, et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff. 2012;31(12):2805–16.CrossRef Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty M, Rasmussen P, Pierson R, et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff. 2012;31(12):2805–16.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe; 1962. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe; 1962.
13.
go back to reference Gladwell M. The tipping point: how little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little Brown; 2000. Gladwell M. The tipping point: how little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little Brown; 2000.
Metadata
Title
Measuring interoperable EHR adoption and maturity: a Canadian example
Publication date
01-12-2016
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0247-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2016 Go to the issue