Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research Article

Rough set theory based prognostic classification models for hospice referral

Authors: Eleazar Gil-Herrera, Garrick Aden-Buie, Ali Yalcin, Athanasios Tsalatsanis, Laura E. Barnes, Benjamin Djulbegovic

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This paper explores and evaluates the application of classical and dominance-based rough set theory (RST) for the development of data-driven prognostic classification models for hospice referral. In this work, rough set based models are compared with other data-driven methods with respect to two factors related to clinical credibility: accuracy and accessibility. Accessibility refers to the ability of the model to provide traceable, interpretable results and use data that is relevant and simple to collect.

Methods

We utilize retrospective data from 9,103 terminally ill patients to demonstrate the design and implementation RST- based models to identify potential hospice candidates. The classical rough set approach (CRSA) provides methods for knowledge acquisition, founded on the relational indiscernibility of objects in a decision table, to describe required conditions for membership in a concept class. On the other hand, the dominance-based rough set approach (DRSA) analyzes information based on the monotonic relationships between condition attributes values and their assignment to the decision class. CRSA decision rules for six-month patient survival classification were induced using the MODLEM algorithm. Dominance-based decision rules were extracted using the VC-DomLEM rule induction algorithm.

Results

The RST-based classifiers are compared with other predictive and rule based decision modeling techniques, namely logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and C4.5. The RST-based classifiers demonstrate average AUC of 69.74 % with MODLEM and 71.73 % with VC-DomLEM, while the compared methods achieve average AUC of 74.21 % for logistic regression, 73.52 % for support vector machines, 74.59 % for random forests, and 70.88 % for C4.5.

Conclusions

This paper contributes to the growing body of research in RST-based prognostic models. RST and its extensions posses features that enhance the accessibility of clinical decision support models. While the non-rule-based methods—logistic regression, support vector machines and random forests—were found to achieve higher AUC, the performance differential may be outweighed by the benefits of the rule-based methods, particularly in the case of VC-DomLEM. Developing prognostic models for hospice referrals is a challenging problem resulting in substandard performance for all of the evaluated classification methods.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kane RL, Klein SJ, Bernstein L, Rothenberg R, Wales J. Hospice role in alleviating the emotional stress of terminal patients and their families. Medical Care. 1985; 23(3):189–97.CrossRefPubMed Kane RL, Klein SJ, Bernstein L, Rothenberg R, Wales J. Hospice role in alleviating the emotional stress of terminal patients and their families. Medical Care. 1985; 23(3):189–97.CrossRefPubMed
2.
4.
go back to reference Christakis NA. Timing of referral of terminally ill patients to an outpatient hospice. J Gen Intern Med. 1994; 9(6):314–20.CrossRefPubMed Christakis NA. Timing of referral of terminally ill patients to an outpatient hospice. J Gen Intern Med. 1994; 9(6):314–20.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Teno JM, Shu JE, Casarett D, Spence C, Rhodes R, Connor S. Timing of referral to hospice and quality of care: length of stay and bereaved family members’ perceptions of the timing of hospice referral. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007; 34(2):120–5.CrossRef Teno JM, Shu JE, Casarett D, Spence C, Rhodes R, Connor S. Timing of referral to hospice and quality of care: length of stay and bereaved family members’ perceptions of the timing of hospice referral. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007; 34(2):120–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Christakis NA, Escarce JJ. Survival of medicare patients after enrollment in hospice programs. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335(3):172–8.CrossRefPubMed Christakis NA, Escarce JJ. Survival of medicare patients after enrollment in hospice programs. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335(3):172–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lee KL, Pryor DB, Harrell FE, Califf RM, Behar VS, Floyd WL, et al. Predicting outcome in coronary disease statistical models versus expert clinicians. Am J Med. 1986; 80(4):553–60.CrossRefPubMed Lee KL, Pryor DB, Harrell FE, Califf RM, Behar VS, Floyd WL, et al. Predicting outcome in coronary disease statistical models versus expert clinicians. Am J Med. 1986; 80(4):553–60.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science. 1989; 243(4899):1668–74.CrossRefPubMed Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science. 1989; 243(4899):1668–74.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Beck JR, Pauker SG, Gottlieb JE, Klein K, Kassirer JP. A convenient approximation of life expectancy (the “deale”) ii: use in medical decision-making. Am J Med. 1982; 73(6):889–97.CrossRefPubMed Beck JR, Pauker SG, Gottlieb JE, Klein K, Kassirer JP. A convenient approximation of life expectancy (the “deale”) ii: use in medical decision-making. Am J Med. 1982; 73(6):889–97.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991; 100(6):1619–36.CrossRefPubMed Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991; 100(6):1619–36.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Knaus WA, Harrell FE, Lynn J, Goldman L, Phillips RS, Connors AF, et al. The SUPPORT prognostic model: Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122(3):191–203.CrossRefPubMed Knaus WA, Harrell FE, Lynn J, Goldman L, Phillips RS, Connors AF, et al. The SUPPORT prognostic model: Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122(3):191–203.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Christakis NA. Predicting patient survival before and after hospice enrollment. Hosp J. 1998; 13:71–88.PubMed Christakis NA. Predicting patient survival before and after hospice enrollment. Hosp J. 1998; 13:71–88.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Gripp S, Moeller S, Bölke E, Schmitt G, Matuschek C, Asgari So. Survival prediction in terminally ill cancer patients by clinical estimates, laboratory tests, and self-rated anxiety and depression. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(22):3313–20.CrossRefPubMed Gripp S, Moeller S, Bölke E, Schmitt G, Matuschek C, Asgari So. Survival prediction in terminally ill cancer patients by clinical estimates, laboratory tests, and self-rated anxiety and depression. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(22):3313–20.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Glare P, Sinclair C, Downing M, Stone P, Maltoni M, Vigano A. Predicting survival in patients with advanced disease. Eur J Cancer. 2008; 44(8):1146–56.CrossRefPubMed Glare P, Sinclair C, Downing M, Stone P, Maltoni M, Vigano A. Predicting survival in patients with advanced disease. Eur J Cancer. 2008; 44(8):1146–56.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hyodo I, Morita T, Adachi I, Shima Y, Yoshizawa A, Hiraga K. Development of a predicting tool for survival of terminally ill cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010; 40(5):442–8.CrossRefPubMed Hyodo I, Morita T, Adachi I, Shima Y, Yoshizawa A, Hiraga K. Development of a predicting tool for survival of terminally ill cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010; 40(5):442–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Han PKJ, Lee M, Reeve BB, Mariotto AB, Wang Z, Hays RD, et al. Development of a prognostic model for six-month mortality in older adults with declining health. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2012; 43(3):527–39.CrossRef Han PKJ, Lee M, Reeve BB, Mariotto AB, Wang Z, Hays RD, et al. Development of a prognostic model for six-month mortality in older adults with declining health. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2012; 43(3):527–39.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Inc N. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2008, p. 404.CrossRef Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Inc N. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2008, p. 404.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dybowski R, Gant V, Weller P, Chang R. Prediction of outcome in critically ill patients using artificial neural network synthesised by genetic algorithm. The Lancet. 1996; 347(9009):1146–50.CrossRef Dybowski R, Gant V, Weller P, Chang R. Prediction of outcome in critically ill patients using artificial neural network synthesised by genetic algorithm. The Lancet. 1996; 347(9009):1146–50.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jayasurya K, Fung G, Yu S, Dehing-Oberije C, De Ruysscher D, Hope A, et al. Comparison of bayesian network and support vector machine models for two-year survival prediction in lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2010; 37(4):1401–7.CrossRefPubMed Jayasurya K, Fung G, Yu S, Dehing-Oberije C, De Ruysscher D, Hope A, et al. Comparison of bayesian network and support vector machine models for two-year survival prediction in lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2010; 37(4):1401–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Clermont G, Angus DC, DiRusso SM, Griffin M, Linde-Zwirble WT. Predicting hospital mortality for patients in the intensive care unit: a comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression models. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29(2):291–296.CrossRefPubMed Clermont G, Angus DC, DiRusso SM, Griffin M, Linde-Zwirble WT. Predicting hospital mortality for patients in the intensive care unit: a comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression models. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29(2):291–296.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Segal MR. Features of tree-structured survival analysis. Epidemiology. 1997; 8(4):344–6.PubMed Segal MR. Features of tree-structured survival analysis. Epidemiology. 1997; 8(4):344–6.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Hwang SS, Scott CB, Chang VT, Cogswell J, Srinivas S, Kasimis B. Prediction of survival for advanced cancer patients by recursive partitioning analysis: role of karnofsky performance status, quality of life and symptom distress. Cancer Invest. 2004; 22(5):678–87.CrossRefPubMed Hwang SS, Scott CB, Chang VT, Cogswell J, Srinivas S, Kasimis B. Prediction of survival for advanced cancer patients by recursive partitioning analysis: role of karnofsky performance status, quality of life and symptom distress. Cancer Invest. 2004; 22(5):678–87.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bazan J, Osmólski A, Skowron A, Ślçezak D, Szczuka M, Wroblewski J. Rough set approach to the survival analysis In: Alpigini J, Peters J, Skowron A, Zhong N, editors. Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2475. Malvern, PA, USA: Springer: 2002. p. 522–529. Bazan J, Osmólski A, Skowron A, Ślçezak D, Szczuka M, Wroblewski J. Rough set approach to the survival analysis In: Alpigini J, Peters J, Skowron A, Zhong N, editors. Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2475. Malvern, PA, USA: Springer: 2002. p. 522–529.
25.
go back to reference Pattaraintakorn P, Cercone N, Naruedomkul K. Hybrid rough sets intelligent system architecture for survival analysis In: Peters JF, Skowron A, Marek VW, Orłowska E, Słowinski R, Ziarko W, editors. Transactions on Rough Sets VII. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2007. p. 206–24. Pattaraintakorn P, Cercone N, Naruedomkul K. Hybrid rough sets intelligent system architecture for survival analysis In: Peters JF, Skowron A, Marek VW, Orłowska E, Słowinski R, Ziarko W, editors. Transactions on Rough Sets VII. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2007. p. 206–24.
26.
go back to reference Delen D, Walker G, Kadam A. Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Artif Intell Med. 2005; 34(2):113–27.CrossRefPubMed Delen D, Walker G, Kadam A. Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Artif Intell Med. 2005; 34(2):113–27.CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
go back to reference Simons P. Critical notice of timothy williamson, nagueness. Int J Philos Stud. 1996; 4:321–7. Simons P. Critical notice of timothy williamson, nagueness. Int J Philos Stud. 1996; 4:321–7.
29.
go back to reference Pawlak Z. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Norwell, MA: Springer; 1992. Pawlak Z. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Norwell, MA: Springer; 1992.
30.
go back to reference Pawlak Z. Vagueness a rough set view In: Mycielski J, Rozenberg G, Salomaa A, editors. Structures in Logic and Computer Science, vol. 1261. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 1997. p. 106–117, doi:10.1007/3-540-63246-8_7. Pawlak Z. Vagueness a rough set view In: Mycielski J, Rozenberg G, Salomaa A, editors. Structures in Logic and Computer Science, vol. 1261. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 1997. p. 106–117, doi:10.​1007/​3-540-63246-8_​7.
31.
go back to reference Pattaraintakorn P, Cercone N. Integrating rough set theory and medical applications. Appl Math Lett. 2008; 21(4):400–3.CrossRef Pattaraintakorn P, Cercone N. Integrating rough set theory and medical applications. Appl Math Lett. 2008; 21(4):400–3.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hart A, Wyatt J. Evaluating black-boxes as medical decision aids: issues arising from a study of neural networks. Inform Health Soc Care. 1990; 15(3):229–36. Hart A, Wyatt J. Evaluating black-boxes as medical decision aids: issues arising from a study of neural networks. Inform Health Soc Care. 1990; 15(3):229–36.
33.
go back to reference Tsumoto S. Modelling medical diagnostic rules based on rough sets In: Polkowski L, Skowron A, editors. Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1424. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 1998. p. 475–82, doi:10.1007/3-540-69115-4_65. Tsumoto S. Modelling medical diagnostic rules based on rough sets In: Polkowski L, Skowron A, editors. Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1424. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 1998. p. 475–82, doi:10.​1007/​3-540-69115-4_​65.
34.
go back to reference Komorowski J, Øhrn A. Modelling prognostic power of cardiac tests using rough sets. Artif Intell Med. 1999; 15(2):167–91.CrossRefPubMed Komorowski J, Øhrn A. Modelling prognostic power of cardiac tests using rough sets. Artif Intell Med. 1999; 15(2):167–91.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Paszek P, Wakulicz-Deja A. Applying rough set theory to medical diagnosing In: Kryszkiewicz M, Peters J, Rybinski H, Skowron A, editors. Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4585. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2007. p. 427–35. Paszek P, Wakulicz-Deja A. Applying rough set theory to medical diagnosing In: Kryszkiewicz M, Peters J, Rybinski H, Skowron A, editors. Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4585. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2007. p. 427–35.
36.
go back to reference Ningler M, Stockmanns G, Schneider G, Kochs HD, Kochs E. Adapted variable precision rough set approach for EEG analysis. Artif Intell Med. 2009; 47(3):239–61.CrossRefPubMed Ningler M, Stockmanns G, Schneider G, Kochs HD, Kochs E. Adapted variable precision rough set approach for EEG analysis. Artif Intell Med. 2009; 47(3):239–61.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Long-Jun H, Li-pin D, Cai-Ying Z. Prognosis system for lung cancer based on rough set theory. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Third International Conference on Information and Computing, vol. 4. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society: 2010. p. 7–10. Long-Jun H, Li-pin D, Cai-Ying Z. Prognosis system for lung cancer based on rough set theory. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Third International Conference on Information and Computing, vol. 4. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society: 2010. p. 7–10.
38.
go back to reference Son CS, Kim YN, Kim HS, Park HS, Kim MS. Decision-making model for early diagnosis of congestive heart failure using rough set and decision tree approaches. J Biomed Inform. 2012; 5(45):999–1008.CrossRef Son CS, Kim YN, Kim HS, Park HS, Kim MS. Decision-making model for early diagnosis of congestive heart failure using rough set and decision tree approaches. J Biomed Inform. 2012; 5(45):999–1008.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2001; 129(1):1–47.CrossRef Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2001; 129(1):1–47.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Stefanowski J. The rough set based rule induction technique for classification problems. In: Proceedings of 6th European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing EUFIT 98. Aachen: IEEE Computer Society: 1998. p. 109–113. Stefanowski J. The rough set based rule induction technique for classification problems. In: Proceedings of 6th European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing EUFIT 98. Aachen: IEEE Computer Society: 1998. p. 109–113.
41.
go back to reference Stefanowski J. On combined classifiers, rule induction and rough sets In: Peters J, Skowron A, Düntsch I, Grzymała-Busse J, Orłowska E, Polkowski L, editors. Transactions on Rough Sets VI, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4374. Springer: 2007. p. 329–50. Stefanowski J. On combined classifiers, rule induction and rough sets In: Peters J, Skowron A, Düntsch I, Grzymała-Busse J, Orłowska E, Polkowski L, editors. Transactions on Rough Sets VI, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4374. Springer: 2007. p. 329–50.
42.
go back to reference Blaszczyński J, Slowiński R, Szelag M. Probabilistic rough set approaches to ordinal classification with monotonicity constraints In: Hüllermeier E, Kruse R, Hoffmann F, editors. Computational Intelligence for Knowledge-Based Systems Design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6178. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2010. p. 99–108. Blaszczyński J, Slowiński R, Szelag M. Probabilistic rough set approaches to ordinal classification with monotonicity constraints In: Hüllermeier E, Kruse R, Hoffmann F, editors. Computational Intelligence for Knowledge-Based Systems Design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6178. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2010. p. 99–108.
43.
go back to reference Bazan JG, Nguyen HS, Nguyen SH, Synak P, Wróblewski J. Rough set algorithms in classification problem In: Polkowski L, Tsumoto S, Lin T, editors. Rough Set Methods and Applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 56. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag GmbH: 2000. p. 49–88. Bazan JG, Nguyen HS, Nguyen SH, Synak P, Wróblewski J. Rough set algorithms in classification problem In: Polkowski L, Tsumoto S, Lin T, editors. Rough Set Methods and Applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 56. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag GmbH: 2000. p. 49–88.
44.
go back to reference Han J. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 2005. Han J. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 2005.
45.
go back to reference Grzymala-Busse JW, Stefanowski J. Three discretization methods for rule induction. Int J Intell Syst. 2001; 16(1):29–38.CrossRef Grzymala-Busse JW, Stefanowski J. Three discretization methods for rule induction. Int J Intell Syst. 2001; 16(1):29–38.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Clark P, Boswell R. Rule induction with cn2: Some recent improvements In: Kodratoff Y, editor. Machine Learning – EWSL-91. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 482. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 1991. p. 151–63. Clark P, Boswell R. Rule induction with cn2: Some recent improvements In: Kodratoff Y, editor. Machine Learning – EWSL-91. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 482. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 1991. p. 151–63.
47.
go back to reference Blaszczynski J, Slowinski R, Szelag M. Sequential covering rule induction algorithm for variable consistency rough set approaches. Inf Sci. 2011; 181(5):987–1002.CrossRef Blaszczynski J, Slowinski R, Szelag M. Sequential covering rule induction algorithm for variable consistency rough set approaches. Inf Sci. 2011; 181(5):987–1002.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Stein SC. Minor head injury: 13 is an unlucky number. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2001; 50(4):759–60.CrossRef Stein SC. Minor head injury: 13 is an unlucky number. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2001; 50(4):759–60.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Martin L. Reviews, notes, and listings: pulmonary medicine: All you really need to know to interpret arterial blood gases. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 8(118):656. Martin L. Reviews, notes, and listings: pulmonary medicine: All you really need to know to interpret arterial blood gases. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 8(118):656.
51.
go back to reference Cohen J. The cost of dichotomization. Appl Psychol Meas. 1983; 7(3):249–53.CrossRef Cohen J. The cost of dichotomization. Appl Psychol Meas. 1983; 7(3):249–53.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Van Belle G. Statistical Rules of Thumb vol. 699. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. Van Belle G. Statistical Rules of Thumb vol. 699. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
54.
go back to reference Błaszczyński J, Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowiński R, Szelag M. jmaf - dominance-based rough set data analysis framework In: Skowron A, Suraj Z, editors. Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems - Professor Zdzisław Pawlak in Memoriam. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 42. Springer: 2013. p. 185–209. Błaszczyński J, Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowiński R, Szelag M. jmaf - dominance-based rough set data analysis framework In: Skowron A, Suraj Z, editors. Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems - Professor Zdzisław Pawlak in Memoriam. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 42. Springer: 2013. p. 185–209.
55.
go back to reference Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2011; 2(3):1–27.CrossRef Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2011; 2(3):1–27.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Bender R, Grouven U. Ordinal logistic regression in medical research. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1997; 31(5):546–51.PubMed Bender R, Grouven U. Ordinal logistic regression in medical research. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1997; 31(5):546–51.PubMed
57.
go back to reference Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995; 20(3):273–97. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995; 20(3):273–97.
58.
go back to reference Van Belle V, Pelckmans K, Van Huffel S, Suykens JA. Support vector methods for survival analysis: a comparison between ranking and regression approaches. Artificial Intelligence In Medicine. 2011; 53(2):107–18.CrossRefPubMed Van Belle V, Pelckmans K, Van Huffel S, Suykens JA. Support vector methods for survival analysis: a comparison between ranking and regression approaches. Artificial Intelligence In Medicine. 2011; 53(2):107–18.CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Barakat N, Bradley AP. Rule extraction from support vector machines: a review. Neurocomputing. 2010; 74(1-3):178–90.CrossRef Barakat N, Bradley AP. Rule extraction from support vector machines: a review. Neurocomputing. 2010; 74(1-3):178–90.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Quinlan JR. C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning vol. 1. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 1993. Quinlan JR. C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning vol. 1. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 1993.
62.
go back to reference Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20(1):37–46.CrossRef Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20(1):37–46.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2. IJCAI’95. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.: 1995. p. 1137–1143. Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2. IJCAI’95. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.: 1995. p. 1137–1143.
64.
go back to reference Ben-David A. Comparison of classification accuracy using Cohen’s weighted kappa. Expert Systems with Applications. 2008; 34(2):825–32.CrossRef Ben-David A. Comparison of classification accuracy using Cohen’s weighted kappa. Expert Systems with Applications. 2008; 34(2):825–32.CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Podgorelec V, Kokol P, Stiglic B, Rozman I. Decision trees: an overview and their use in medicine. J Med Syst. 2002; 26(5):445–463.CrossRefPubMed Podgorelec V, Kokol P, Stiglic B, Rozman I. Decision trees: an overview and their use in medicine. J Med Syst. 2002; 26(5):445–463.CrossRefPubMed
66.
go back to reference Bohanec M, Bratko I. Trading accuracy for simplicity in decision trees. Mach Learn. 1994; 15(3):223–50. Bohanec M, Bratko I. Trading accuracy for simplicity in decision trees. Mach Learn. 1994; 15(3):223–50.
67.
go back to reference Stiglic G, Kocbek S, Pernek I, Kokol P. Comprehensive decision tree models in bioinformatics. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(3):33812.CrossRef Stiglic G, Kocbek S, Pernek I, Kokol P. Comprehensive decision tree models in bioinformatics. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(3):33812.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Tsalatsanis A, Hoz I, Andrew V, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Vickers A, Djulbegovic B. A regret theory approach to decision curve analysis: a novel method for eliciting decision makers’ preferences and decision-making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010; 10(51):51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tsalatsanis A, Hoz I, Andrew V, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Vickers A, Djulbegovic B. A regret theory approach to decision curve analysis: a novel method for eliciting decision makers’ preferences and decision-making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010; 10(51):51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
69.
go back to reference Han PKJ, Lee M, Reeve BB, Mariotto AB, Wang Z, Hays RD, et al. Development of a prognostic model for six-month mortality in older adults with declining health. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011; 43(3):527–39.CrossRef Han PKJ, Lee M, Reeve BB, Mariotto AB, Wang Z, Hays RD, et al. Development of a prognostic model for six-month mortality in older adults with declining health. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011; 43(3):527–39.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rough set theory based prognostic classification models for hospice referral
Authors
Eleazar Gil-Herrera
Garrick Aden-Buie
Ali Yalcin
Athanasios Tsalatsanis
Laura E. Barnes
Benjamin Djulbegovic
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0216-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2015 Go to the issue