Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Administrative health data in Canada: lessons from history

Authors: Kelsey Lucyk, Mingshan Lu, Tolulope Sajobi, Hude Quan

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health decision-making requires evidence from high-quality data. As one example, the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) compiles data from the majority of Canadian hospitals to form one of the most comprehensive and highly regarded administrative health databases available for health research, internationally. However, despite the success of this and other administrative health data resources, little is known about their history or the factors that have led to their success. The purpose of this paper is to provide an historical overview of Canadian administrative health data for health research to contribute to the institutional memory of this field.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative content analysis of approximately 20 key sources to construct an historical narrative of administrative health data in Canada. Specifically, we searched for content related to key events, individuals, challenges, and successes in this field over time.

Results

In Canada, administrative health data for health research has developed in tangent with provincial research centres. Interestingly, the lessons learned from this history align with the original recommendations of the 1964 Royal Commission on Health Services: (1) standardization, and (2) centralization of data resources, that is (3) facilitated through governmental financial support.

Conclusions

The overview history provided here illustrates the need for longstanding partnerships between government and academia, for classification, terminology and standardization are time-consuming and ever-evolving processes. This paper will be of interest to those who work with administrative health data, and also for countries that are looking to build or improve upon their use of administrative health data for decision-making.
Footnotes
1
Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia.
 
2
Roos, NP, Henteleff PD, and LL Roos. “A New Audit Procedure Applied to an Old Question: Is the Frequency of T&A Justified?” Medical Care 15 (1977):1–18.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Quan H, Smith M, Barlett-Esquilant G, Johansen H, Tu K, Lix L. Mining administrative health databases to advance medical science: Geographical considerations and untapped potential in Canada. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28:152–4.CrossRefPubMed Quan H, Smith M, Barlett-Esquilant G, Johansen H, Tu K, Lix L. Mining administrative health databases to advance medical science: Geographical considerations and untapped potential in Canada. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28:152–4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Canadian Institute for Health Information. Data quality documentation, Discharge Abstract Database—Multiyear information. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2012. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Data quality documentation, Discharge Abstract Database—Multiyear information. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2012.
5.
go back to reference Howell M, Prevenier W. From reliable sources: An introduction to historical methods. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2001. Howell M, Prevenier W. From reliable sources: An introduction to historical methods. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2001.
6.
go back to reference Krippendorf K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004. Krippendorf K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004.
9.
go back to reference Worton D. The Dominion Bureau of Statistics: A history of Canada’s central statistical office and its antecedants, 1841–1972. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press; 1998. Worton D. The Dominion Bureau of Statistics: A history of Canada’s central statistical office and its antecedants, 1841–1972. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press; 1998.
11.
go back to reference Hall E. Royal Commission on Health Services. Ottawa: Queen's Printer; 1964. Hall E. Royal Commission on Health Services. Ottawa: Queen's Printer; 1964.
12.
go back to reference Robertson CM. The Hospital Medical Records Institute. Med Care. 1970;8:93–7.CrossRef Robertson CM. The Hospital Medical Records Institute. Med Care. 1970;8:93–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yungblut RM. Managing information and the Hospital Medical Records Institute. Ottawa: Canadian Hospital Association Press; 1991. Yungblut RM. Managing information and the Hospital Medical Records Institute. Ottawa: Canadian Hospital Association Press; 1991.
18.
go back to reference Dolan D, Grainger J, MacCallum N, Creatura D, Forrester J, Shiller S. The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences: 20 Years and Counting. Healthcare Quarterly. 2012;15:19–21.CrossRefPubMed Dolan D, Grainger J, MacCallum N, Creatura D, Forrester J, Shiller S. The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences: 20 Years and Counting. Healthcare Quarterly. 2012;15:19–21.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Administrative health data in Canada: lessons from history
Authors
Kelsey Lucyk
Mingshan Lu
Tolulope Sajobi
Hude Quan
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0196-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2015 Go to the issue