Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

A qualitative study of culturally embedded factors in complementary and alternative medicine use

Authors: Szilvia Zörgő, György Purebl, Ágnes Zana

Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Within the intercultural milieu of medical pluralism, a nexus of worldviews espousing distinct explanatory models of illness, our research aims at exploring factors leading to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use with special attention to their cultural context.

Methods

The results are based on medical anthropological fieldwork (participant observation and in-depth interviews) spanning a period from January 2015 to May 2017 at four clinics of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Budapest, Hungary. Participant observation involved 105 patients (males N = 42); in-depth interviews were conducted with patients (N = 9) and practitioners (N = 9). The interviews were coded with Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis; all information was aggregated employing Atlas.ti software.

Results

In order to avoid the dichotomization of “push and pull factors,” results obtained from the fieldwork and interviews were structured along milestones of the patient journey. These points of reference include orientation among sources of information, biomedical diagnosis, patient expectations and the physician-patient relationship, the biomedical treatment trajectory and reasons for non-adherence, philosophical congruence, and alternate routes of entry into the world of CAM. All discussed points which are a departure from the strictly western therapy, entail an underlying socio-cultural disposition and must be scrutinized in this context.

Conclusions

The influence of one’s culturally determined explanatory model is ubiquitous from the onset of the patient journey and exhibits a reciprocal relationship with subjective experience. Firsthand experience (or that of the Other) signifies the most reliable source of information in matters of illness and choice of therapy. Furthermore, the theme of (building and losing) trust is present throughout the patient journey, a determining factor in patient decision-making and dispositions toward both CAM and biomedicine.
Literature
1.
Frass M, Strassl RP, Friehs H, Müllner M, Kundi M, Kaye AD. Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review. Ochsner J. 2012;12(1):45–56.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Bishop FL, Yardley L, Lewith GT. Why consumers maintain complementary and alternative medicine use: a qualitative study. J Complement Altern Med. 2010;16(2):175–82.CrossRef
3.
Yarney J, Donkor A, Opoku SY, Yarney L, Agyeman-Duah I, Abakah AC, Asampong E. Characteristics of users and implications for the use of complementary and alternative medicine in Ghanaian cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13(1):16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Hasan SS, See CK, Choong CL, Ahmed SI, Ahmadi K, Anwar M. Reasons, perceived efficacy, and factors associated with complementary and alternative medicine use among Malaysian patients with HIV/AIDS. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16(11):1171–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Hlubocky FJ, Ratain MJ, Wen M, Daugherty CK. Complementary and alternative medicine among advanced cancer patients enrolled on phase I trials: a study of prognosis, quality of life, and preferences for decision making. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):548–54.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Lövgren M, Wilde-Larsson B, Hök J, Leveälahti H, Tishelman C. Push or pull? Relationships between lung cancer patients’ perceptions of quality of care and use of complementary and alternative medicine. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15(4):311–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM. Nahin RL. Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002–2012. National health statistics reports; no 79. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015.
8.
Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, Kessler RC. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States 1990–1997. JAMA. 1998;280:1569–75.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Kelner M, Wellman B. Health care and consumer choice: medical and alternative therapies. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45:203–12.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Barnes P, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin R. CDC advance data report #343. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2004.
11.
Eardley S, Bishop FL, Prescott P, Cardini F, Brinkhaus B, Santos-Rey K, Vas J, von Ammon K, Hegyi G, Dragan S, Uehleke B, Fønnebø V, Lewith G. A systematic literature review of complementary and alternative medicine prevalence in EU. Forsch Komplementmed. 2012;19(Suppl 2):18–28.PubMed
12.
Molassiotis A, Fernandez-Ortega P, Pud D, Ozden G, Scott JA, Panteli V, Margulies A, Browall M, Magri M, Selvekerova S, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:655–63.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Thomas KJ, Nicholl JP, Coleman P. Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey. Complement Ther Med. 2001;9:2–11.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM. Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997-2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005;11(1):42–9.PubMed
15.
Stratton TD, McGivern-Snofsky JL. Toward a sociological understanding of complementary and alternative medicine use. J Altern Complement Med. 2008;14(6):777–83.CrossRefPubMed
16.
McLaughlin D, Lui CW, Adams J. Complementary and alternative medicine use among older Australian women – a qualitative analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012;12:34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Bahall M. Complementary and alternative medicine usage among cardiac patients: a descriptive study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:100. Published online 2015 March 31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Furnham A, Vincent C. Reasons for using CAM. In: Kelner M, Wellman B, Pescosolido B, Saks M, editors. Complementary and alternative medicine: challenge and change. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2000. p. 61–78.
19.
Pawluch D, Cain R, Gillett J. Lay constructions of HIV and complementary therapy use. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:251–64.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Stevinson C, Ernst E. Why patients use complementary and alternative medicine. In: Ernst E, Pittler MH, Wider B, editors. The desktop guide to complementary and alternative medicine – an evidence-based approach. London: Mosby Elsevier Ltd.; 2006. p. 501–10.
21.
Foote-Ardah CE. The meaning of complementary and alternative medicine practices among people with HIV in the United States: strategies for managing everyday life. Sociol Health Illn. 2003;25(5):481–500.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Knoll AM. The reawakening of complementary and alternative medicine at the turn of the twenty-first century: filling the void in conventional biomedicine. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2004;20(2):329–66.PubMed
23.
Connor LH. Relief, risk and renewal: mixed therapy regimens in an Australian suburb. Soc Sci Med. 2004 Oct;59(8):1695–705.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Molnár AK. New religious phenomena. In: Lugosi Á, Lugosi G, editors. Sects, new religious phenomena. [Új vallási jelenségek. In: Szekták, új vallási jelenségek.] Budapest: Pannonica Kiadó; 1998. [Hungarian].
25.
Eriksen TH. Small places, large issues: an introduction to social and cultural anthropology. London: Pluto Press; 2001.
26.
Van Wolputte S. Hang on to your self: of bodies, embodiment, and selves. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2004;33:251–69.CrossRef
27.
Smith JA. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. London: Sage Publications; 2008. p. 53–80.
28.
Morse JM. Emerging from the data: cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In: Morse JM, editor. Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994. p. 23–43.
29.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick and London: Aldine; 1967.
30.
Varga O. Who would you choose? [Mondd, te kit választanál?]. Lege Artis Medicinae. 2007;17(4–5):368–70. [Hungarian]
31.
Helman CG. Culture, health and illness. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1994.
32.
Geertz C. The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. New York: Basic Books; 1973.
33.
Kleinman A. Patients and healers in the context of culture. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1980.
34.
Garro LC. Cultural meaning, explanations of illness, and the development of comparative frameworks. Ethnology. 2000;39(4):305–33.CrossRef
35.
Thorne S, Paterson B, Russell C, Schultz A. Complementary/alternative medicine in chronic illness as informed self-care decision making. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002;39:671–83.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Faith J, Thorburn S, Tippens KM. Examining CAM use disclosure using the behavioral model of health services use. Complement Ther Med. 2013;21(5):501–8.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Soós SÁ, Eőry A, Eőry A, Harsányi L, Kalabay L. Complementary and alternative medicine from the primary care physicians’ viewpoint. Orv Hetil. 2015;156(28):1133–9.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA. 1998;279:1548–53.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Bishop FL, Yardley L, Lewith GT. A systematic review of beliefs involved in the use of complementary and alternative medicine. J Health Psychol. 2007;12(6):851–67.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Freyler A, Kohegyi Z, Köteles F, Kökönyei G, Bárdos G. Modern health worries, subjective somatic symptoms, somatosensory amplification, and health anxiety in adolescents. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(6):773–81.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Köteles F, Simor P, Czető M, Sárog N, Szemerszky R. Modern health worries – the dark side of spirituality? Scand J Psychol. 2016;57(4):313–20.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Sivén J, Mishtal J. Yoga as entrée to complementary and alternative medicine, and medically pluralistic practices. Human Organiz. 2012;71(4):348–57.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A qualitative study of culturally embedded factors in complementary and alternative medicine use
Authors
Szilvia Zörgő
György Purebl
Ágnes Zana
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2662-7671
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2093-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

The management strategies of cancer-associated anorexia: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews

Research article

Anacardic acid inhibits pancreatic cancer cell growth, and potentiates chemotherapeutic effect by Chmp1A - ATM - p53 signaling pathway

Research article

Patterns of conventional and complementary non-pharmacological health practice use by US military veterans: a cross-sectional latent class analysis

Research article

Genoprotective, antioxidant, antifungal and anti-inflammatory evaluation of hydroalcoholic extract of wild-growing Juniperus communis L. (Cupressaceae) native to Romanian southern sub-Carpathian hills

Research article

Acute and sub-acute oral toxicity of Dracaena cinnabari resin methanol extract in rats

Research article

Australian integrative oncology services: a mixed-method study exploring the views of cancer survivors