Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Women's Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Unfulfilled need for contraception among women with unmet need but with the intention to use contraception in Rakai, Uganda: a longitudinal study

Authors: Tom Lutalo, Ron Gray, John Santelli, David Guwatudde, Heena Brahmbhatt, Sanyukta Mathur, David Serwadda, Fred Nalugoda, Fredrick Makumbi

Published in: BMC Women's Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Longitudinal data from a rural Ugandan cohort was used to estimate rates of unfulfilled need for contraception, defined as having unmet need and intent to use contraception at baseline but having an unintended pregnancy or with persistent unmet need for contraception at follow up.

Methods

Between 2002 and 2009 (5 survey rounds), a total of 2610 sexually active non-pregnant women with unmet need for contraception at the start of an inter-survey period were asked whether they intended to use any method of contraception until they desired a child. Modified Poisson multivariate regression was used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% CI of unfulfilled need for contraception.

Results

The proportion of women with unmet need at the start of an interval who intended to use contraception significantly increased from 61 to 69.1% (p < 0.05). However the majority of women who said they intended to use contraception had unfulfilled need for contraception at the subsequent survey (64.8 to 56.8%). In the adjusted analysis, significant predictors of unfulfilled need for contraception included age 40–49 years (PR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.04–1.74) and those with unknown HIV status (PR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.06–1.26).

Conclusions

There is a significant discrepancy between women’s intent to use contraception (> 60%) and subsequent initiation of use (< 30%) with many having unintended pregnancies which might explain the persistent high fertility in Uganda. Future research needs to address unfulfilled need for contraception among women at risk of unintended pregnancies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cleland J, Harbison S, Shah IH. Unmet need for contraception: issues and challenges. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45(2):105–22.CrossRef Cleland J, Harbison S, Shah IH. Unmet need for contraception: issues and challenges. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45(2):105–22.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sinding SW, Ross JA, Rosenfield AG. Seeking common ground: unmet need and demographic goals. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1994;20(1):23–32.CrossRef Sinding SW, Ross JA, Rosenfield AG. Seeking common ground: unmet need and demographic goals. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1994;20(1):23–32.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bongaarts J. The impact of family planning programs on unmet need and demand for contraception. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45(2):247–62.CrossRef Bongaarts J. The impact of family planning programs on unmet need and demand for contraception. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45(2):247–62.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pritchett LH. Desired fertility and the impact of population policies. Popul Dev Rev. 1994;20(1):1–55.CrossRef Pritchett LH. Desired fertility and the impact of population policies. Popul Dev Rev. 1994;20(1):1–55.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ross, J.A. and W.L. Winfrey, Contraceptive use, intention to use and unmet need during the extended postpartum period. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 2001. 27 (1): p. 20-27. Ross, J.A. and W.L. Winfrey, Contraceptive use, intention to use and unmet need during the extended postpartum period. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 2001. 27 (1): p. 20-27.
6.
go back to reference Westoff CF, Ochoa LH. Unmet need and the demand for family planning, in DHS Comparative Studies No. 5. Columbia: Institute for Resource Development; 1991. Westoff CF, Ochoa LH. Unmet need and the demand for family planning, in DHS Comparative Studies No. 5. Columbia: Institute for Resource Development; 1991.
7.
go back to reference Singh S, Darroch JE, Ashford LS. Adding it up: the costs and benefits of investing in sexual and reproductive health 2014, vol. 2014. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2014. Singh S, Darroch JE, Ashford LS. Adding it up: the costs and benefits of investing in sexual and reproductive health 2014, vol. 2014. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2014.
8.
go back to reference Canning D, Schultz TP. The economic consequences of reproductive health and family planning. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):165–71.CrossRefPubMed Canning D, Schultz TP. The economic consequences of reproductive health and family planning. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):165–71.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sedgh G, Ashford LS, Hussain R. Unmet Need for Contraception in Developing Countries: Examining Women's Reasons for Not Using a Method. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2016. Sedgh G, Ashford LS, Hussain R. Unmet Need for Contraception in Developing Countries: Examining Women's Reasons for Not Using a Method. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2016.
10.
go back to reference Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and ICF., Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key indicators report. 2016. Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and ICF., Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key indicators report. 2016.
11.
go back to reference Wawer MJ, et al. A randomized, community trial of intensive sexually transmitted disease control for AIDS prevention, Rakai, Uganda. AIDS. 1998;12(10):1211–25.CrossRefPubMed Wawer MJ, et al. A randomized, community trial of intensive sexually transmitted disease control for AIDS prevention, Rakai, Uganda. AIDS. 1998;12(10):1211–25.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wawer MJ, et al. Control of sexually transmitted diseases for AIDS prevention in Uganda: a randomised community trial. Rakai Project Study Group. Lancet. 1999;353(9152):525–35.CrossRefPubMed Wawer MJ, et al. Control of sexually transmitted diseases for AIDS prevention in Uganda: a randomised community trial. Rakai Project Study Group. Lancet. 1999;353(9152):525–35.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bradley, S.E.K., et al., Revising unmet need for family planning. DHS Analytical Studies No 25, 2012. Bradley, S.E.K., et al., Revising unmet need for family planning. DHS Analytical Studies No 25, 2012.
14.
go back to reference Ayele, W., et al., Trends and Deteriminants of unmet need for family planning and program options for Ethiopia. Further analysis of the 2000, 2005, 2011 demographic and health surveys. DHS Further Analysis Reports No. 81, 2013. Ayele, W., et al., Trends and Deteriminants of unmet need for family planning and program options for Ethiopia. Further analysis of the 2000, 2005, 2011 demographic and health surveys. DHS Further Analysis Reports No. 81, 2013.
15.
go back to reference Khan S, et al. Unmet need and the demand for family planning in Uganda: further analysis of the Uganda demographic and health surveys, 1995–2006. Calverton: Macro International Inc.; 2008. Khan S, et al. Unmet need and the demand for family planning in Uganda: further analysis of the Uganda demographic and health surveys, 1995–2006. Calverton: Macro International Inc.; 2008.
16.
go back to reference Makumbi F, et al. Use of HIV-related services and modern contraception among women of reproductive age, Rakai Uganda. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010;14(4 Spec):87–97.PubMed Makumbi F, et al. Use of HIV-related services and modern contraception among women of reproductive age, Rakai Uganda. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010;14(4 Spec):87–97.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Unfulfilled need for contraception among women with unmet need but with the intention to use contraception in Rakai, Uganda: a longitudinal study
Authors
Tom Lutalo
Ron Gray
John Santelli
David Guwatudde
Heena Brahmbhatt
Sanyukta Mathur
David Serwadda
Fred Nalugoda
Fredrick Makumbi
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Women's Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6874
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0551-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Women's Health 1/2018 Go to the issue