Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Women's Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

3-dimensional versus conventional laparoscopy for benign hysterectomy: protocol for a randomized clinical trial

Authors: Elise Hoffmann, Gitte Bennich, Christian Rifbjerg Larsen, Jannie Lindschou, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Pernille Danneskiold Lassen

Published in: BMC Women's Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures for women of reproductive age. Laparoscopy was introduced in the 1990es and is today one of the recommended routes of surgery. A recent observational study showed that operative time for hysterectomy was significantly lower for 3-dimensional compared to conventional laparoscopy. Complication rates were similar for the two groups. No other observational studies or randomized clinical trials have compared 3-dimensional to conventional laparoscopy in patients undergoing total hysterectomy for benign disease.
The objective of the study is to determine if 3D laparoscopy gives better quality of life, less postoperative pain, less per- and postoperative complications, shorter operative time, or a shorter stay in hospital and a faster return to work or normal life, compared to conventional laparoscopy for benign hysterectomy.

Methods/design

The design is a randomised multicentre clinical trial. Participants will be 400 women referred for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. Patients will be randomized to 3-dimensional or conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy. Operative procedures will follow the same principles and the same standard whether the surgeon’s vision is 3-dimensional or conventional laparoscopy. Primary outcomes will be the impact of surgery on quality of life, assessed by the SF 36 questionnaire, and postoperative pain, assessed by a Visual Analogue scale for pain measurement. With a standard deviation of 12 points on SF 36 questionnaire, a risk of type I error of 3.3% and a risk of type II error of 10% a sample size of 190 patients in each arm of the trial is needed. Secondarily, we will investigate operative time, time to return to work, length of hospital stay, and - and postoperative complications.

Discussion

This trial will be the first randomized clinical trial investigating the potential clinical benefits and harms of 3-dimensional compared to conventional laparoscopy. The results may provide more evidence regarding the future place of 3-dimensional laparoscopy in the range of endoscopic approaches for benign hysterectomy.

Trial registration

This study is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02610985 November 16th 2015. November 2015. The regional Ethical committee approved it on the 12. November 2015, approval number: SJ-498. Data handling was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency: REG-109-2015 on the 13. November 2015.
Literature
1.
go back to reference David-Montefiore E, Rouzier R, Chapron C, Daraï E. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):260–5.CrossRefPubMed David-Montefiore E, Rouzier R, Chapron C, Daraï E. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):260–5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Olsson JH, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M. A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG. 1996;103:345–50.CrossRef Olsson JH, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M. A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG. 1996;103:345–50.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Johnsson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330:1478.CrossRef Johnsson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330:1478.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference AAGL. Advancing minimally invasive gynecology worldwide. AAGL position statement: route of hysterectomy to treat benign uterine disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2001;18:1–3. AAGL. Advancing minimally invasive gynecology worldwide. AAGL position statement: route of hysterectomy to treat benign uterine disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2001;18:1–3.
5.
go back to reference Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Hawe J, Napp V, Abbott J, et al. The evaluate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328:129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Hawe J, Napp V, Abbott J, et al. The evaluate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328:129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Madsen C, Baandrup L, Dehlendorff C, Kjaer SK. Tubal ligation and salpingectomy and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors: a nationwide case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2015;94:86–94.CrossRef Madsen C, Baandrup L, Dehlendorff C, Kjaer SK. Tubal ligation and salpingectomy and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors: a nationwide case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2015;94:86–94.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg. 2006;191(4):555–60.CrossRefPubMed Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg. 2006;191(4):555–60.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Liu H, Lu D, Wang L, Shi G, Song H, Clarke J. Robotic surgery for benign gynecologic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;15:2. Liu H, Lu D, Wang L, Shi G, Song H, Clarke J. Robotic surgery for benign gynecologic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;15:2.
10.
go back to reference Paraiso MFR, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, Jelovsek E, Barber MD, Falcone T, Einarsson JI. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:368.CrossRefPubMed Paraiso MFR, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, Jelovsek E, Barber MD, Falcone T, Einarsson JI. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:368.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Becker H, Melzer A, Schurr MO, Buess G. 3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1993;1:40–6.PubMed Becker H, Melzer A, Schurr MO, Buess G. 3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1993;1:40–6.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ulsta TA, Karacan T, Naki MM, Calik A, Turkgeldi L, Kasimogullari V. Comparison of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional laparoscopic vision system in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290:705–9.CrossRef Ulsta TA, Karacan T, Naki MM, Calik A, Turkgeldi L, Kasimogullari V. Comparison of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional laparoscopic vision system in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290:705–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lassen PD, Moeller-Larsen H, Nully PD. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:1339–41.CrossRefPubMed Lassen PD, Moeller-Larsen H, Nully PD. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:1339–41.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jakobsen JC, Gluud C, Winkel P, Lange T, Wetterslev J. The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance - a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jakobsen JC, Gluud C, Winkel P, Lange T, Wetterslev J. The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance - a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Jacobsen JC, Wetterslev J, Winkel P, Lange Y, Gluud C. Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;21(14):120.CrossRef Jacobsen JC, Wetterslev J, Winkel P, Lange Y, Gluud C. Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;21(14):120.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, Als-Nielsen B, Balk EM, Gluud C, Gluud LL, Ioannidis JPA, Schulz KF, Beynon R, Welton NJ, Wood L, Moher D, Deeks JJ, Sterne JAC. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:429–38.CrossRefPubMed Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, Als-Nielsen B, Balk EM, Gluud C, Gluud LL, Ioannidis JPA, Schulz KF, Beynon R, Welton NJ, Wood L, Moher D, Deeks JJ, Sterne JAC. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:429–38.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman DG, Gluud C, Martin RM, Wood AJG, Sterne JAC. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2008;336:601–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman DG, Gluud C, Martin RM, Wood AJG, Sterne JAC. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2008;336:601–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
3-dimensional versus conventional laparoscopy for benign hysterectomy: protocol for a randomized clinical trial
Authors
Elise Hoffmann
Gitte Bennich
Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
Jannie Lindschou
Janus Christian Jakobsen
Pernille Danneskiold Lassen
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Women's Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6874
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0434-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Women's Health 1/2017 Go to the issue