Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

The interaction of socioeconomic status with place of death: a qualitative analysis of physician experiences

Authors: Joshua Wales, Allison M. Kurahashi, Amna Husain

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Home is a preferred place of death for many people; however, access to a home death may not be equitable. The impact of socioeconomic status on one’s ability to die at home has been documented, yet there remains little literature exploring mechanisms that contribute to this disparity. By exploring the experiences and insights of physicians who provide end-of-life care in the home, this study aims to identify the factors perceived to influence patients’ likelihood of home death and describe the mechanisms by which they interact with socioeconomic status.

Methods

In this exploratory qualitative study, we conducted interviews with 9 physicians who provide home-based care at a specialized palliative care centre. Participants were asked about their experiences caring for patients at the end of life, focusing on factors believed to impact likelihood of home death with an emphasis on socioeconomic status, and opportunities for intervention. We relied on participants’ perceptions of SES, rather than objective measures. We used an inductive content analysis to identify and describe factors that physicians perceive to influence a patient’s likelihood of dying at home.

Results

Factors identified by physicians were organized into three categories: patient characteristics, physical environment and support network. Patient preference for home death was seen as a necessary factor. If this was established, participants suggested that having a strong support network to supplement professional care was critical to achieving home death. Finally, safe and sustainable housing were also felt to improve likelihood of home death. Higher SES was perceived to increase the likelihood of a desired home death by affording access to more resources within each of the categories. This included better health and health care understanding, a higher capacity for advocacy, a more stable home environment, and more caregiver support.

Conclusions

SES was not perceived to be an isolated factor impacting likelihood of home death, but rather a means to address shortfalls in the three identified categories. Identifying the factors that influence ability is the first step in ensuring home death is accessible to all patients who desire it, regardless of socioeconomic status.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Burge F, Lawson B, Johnston G. Trends in the place of death of cancer patients, 1992-1997. CMAJ. 2003;168(3):265–70. [published Online First: 2003/02/05]PubMedPubMedCentral Burge F, Lawson B, Johnston G. Trends in the place of death of cancer patients, 1992-1997. CMAJ. 2003;168(3):265–70. [published Online First: 2003/02/05]PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Bruera E, Sweeney C, Russell N, et al. Place of death of Houston area residents with cancer over a two-year period. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2003;26(1):637–43. [published Online First: 2003/07/10]CrossRef Bruera E, Sweeney C, Russell N, et al. Place of death of Houston area residents with cancer over a two-year period. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2003;26(1):637–43. [published Online First: 2003/07/10]CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Guerriere DN, Husain A, Marshall D, et al. Predictors of place of death for those in receipt of home-based palliative Care Services in Ontario, Canada. J Palliat Care. 2015;31(2):76–88.CrossRefPubMed Guerriere DN, Husain A, Marshall D, et al. Predictors of place of death for those in receipt of home-based palliative Care Services in Ontario, Canada. J Palliat Care. 2015;31(2):76–88.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cai J, Guerriere DN, Zhao H, et al. Socioeconomic differences in and predictors of home-based palliative care health service use in Ontario, Canada. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(7) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070802. [published Online First: 2017/07/19] Cai J, Guerriere DN, Zhao H, et al. Socioeconomic differences in and predictors of home-based palliative care health service use in Ontario, Canada. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(7) https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​ijerph14070802. [published Online First: 2017/07/19]
23.
go back to reference McCusker J. Where cancer patients die: an epidemiologic study. Public Health Rep (Washington, DC : 1974). 1983;98(2):170–6. McCusker J. Where cancer patients die: an epidemiologic study. Public Health Rep (Washington, DC : 1974). 1983;98(2):170–6.
27.
go back to reference De Conno F, Caraceni A, Groff L, et al. Effect of home care on the place of death of advanced cancer patients. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 1996;32(7):1142–7.CrossRef De Conno F, Caraceni A, Groff L, et al. Effect of home care on the place of death of advanced cancer patients. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 1996;32(7):1142–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cantwell P, Turco S, Brenneis C, et al. Predictors of home death in palliative care cancer patients. J Palliat Care. 2000;16(1):23–8. [published Online First: 2000/05/10]PubMed Cantwell P, Turco S, Brenneis C, et al. Predictors of home death in palliative care cancer patients. J Palliat Care. 2000;16(1):23–8. [published Online First: 2000/05/10]PubMed
30.
go back to reference Masucci L, Guerriere DN, Cheng R, et al. Determinants of place of death for recipients of home-based palliative care. J Palliat Care. 2010;26(4):279–86. [published Online First: 2011/01/28]PubMed Masucci L, Guerriere DN, Cheng R, et al. Determinants of place of death for recipients of home-based palliative care. J Palliat Care. 2010;26(4):279–86. [published Online First: 2011/01/28]PubMed
35.
go back to reference Social Policy Analysis & Research. Profile of low income in the city of Toronto. Toronto Demographics. Toronto: City of Toronto; 2011. Social Policy Analysis & Research. Profile of low income in the city of Toronto. Toronto Demographics. Toronto: City of Toronto; 2011.
46.
go back to reference Donner G, Fooks C, McReynolds J, et al. Bringing care home. Toronto: Ministry of Health and Long Germ Care; 2015. Donner G, Fooks C, McReynolds J, et al. Bringing care home. Toronto: Ministry of Health and Long Germ Care; 2015.
47.
go back to reference Sinha M, Bleakney A. Spotlight on Canadians: results from the General Social Survey. Receiving care at home. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2014. Sinha M, Bleakney A. Spotlight on Canadians: results from the General Social Survey. Receiving care at home. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2014.
48.
go back to reference Um S-g, Lightman N. Ensuring healthy aging for all: home care access for diverse senior populations in the GTA. Toronto: Wellesley Institute; 2016. Um S-g, Lightman N. Ensuring healthy aging for all: home care access for diverse senior populations in the GTA. Toronto: Wellesley Institute; 2016.
49.
go back to reference Sinha M. Spotlight on Canadians: results from the General Social Survey. Portrait of caregivers, 2012. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2013. Sinha M. Spotlight on Canadians: results from the General Social Survey. Portrait of caregivers, 2012. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2013.
51.
go back to reference The Change Foundation. A profile of family caregivers in Ontario. Toronto: The Change Foundation; 2016. The Change Foundation. A profile of family caregivers in Ontario. Toronto: The Change Foundation; 2016.
52.
go back to reference Chochinov HM, Janson K. Dying to pay: the cost of end of life care. J Palliat Care. 1998;14(4):5–15.PubMed Chochinov HM, Janson K. Dying to pay: the cost of end of life care. J Palliat Care. 1998;14(4):5–15.PubMed
59.
go back to reference Stewart M, Reutter L, Makwarimba E, et al. Determinants of health-service use by low-income people. Can J Nurs Res. 2005;37(3):104–31. [published Online First: 2005/11/05]PubMed Stewart M, Reutter L, Makwarimba E, et al. Determinants of health-service use by low-income people. Can J Nurs Res. 2005;37(3):104–31. [published Online First: 2005/11/05]PubMed
62.
go back to reference Goodridge D, Lawson J, Rennie D, et al. Rural/urban differences in health care utilization and place of death for persons with respiratory illness in the last year of life. Rural Remote Health. 2010;10(2):1349. [published Online First: 2010/05/05]PubMed Goodridge D, Lawson J, Rennie D, et al. Rural/urban differences in health care utilization and place of death for persons with respiratory illness in the last year of life. Rural Remote Health. 2010;10(2):1349. [published Online First: 2010/05/05]PubMed
64.
go back to reference Hervada-Page M, Fayock KS, Sifri R, et al. The home visit experience: a medical student's perspective. Care Manag J. 2007;8(4):206–10. [published Online First: 2008/02/02]CrossRefPubMed Hervada-Page M, Fayock KS, Sifri R, et al. The home visit experience: a medical student's perspective. Care Manag J. 2007;8(4):206–10. [published Online First: 2008/02/02]CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The interaction of socioeconomic status with place of death: a qualitative analysis of physician experiences
Authors
Joshua Wales
Allison M. Kurahashi
Amna Husain
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0341-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Palliative Care 1/2018 Go to the issue