Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Technical advance

Introducing PALETTE: an iterative method for conducting a literature search for a review in palliative care

Authors: Marieke Zwakman, Lisa M. Verberne, Marijke C. Kars, Lotty Hooft, Johannes J. M. van Delden, René Spijker

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the rapidly developing specialty of palliative care, literature reviews have become increasingly important to inform and improve the field. When applying widely used methods for literature reviews developed for intervention studies onto palliative care, challenges are encountered such as the heterogeneity of palliative care in practice (wide range of domains in patient characteristics, stages of illness and stakeholders), the explorative character of review questions, and the poorly defined keywords and concepts. To overcome the challenges and to provide guidance for researchers to conduct a literature search for a review in palliative care, Palliative cAre Literature rEview iTeraTive mEthod (PALLETE), a pragmatic framework, was developed. We assessed PALETTE with a detailed description.

Methods

PALETTE consists of four phases; developing the review question, building the search strategy, validating the search strategy and performing the search. The framework incorporates different information retrieval techniques: contacting experts, pearl growing, citation tracking and Boolean searching in a transparent way to maximize the retrieval of literature relevant to the topic of interest. The different components and techniques are repeated until no new articles are qualified for inclusion. The phases within PALETTE are interconnected by a recurrent process of validation on ‘golden bullets’ (articles that undoubtedly should be part of the review), citation tracking and concept terminology reflecting the review question.
To give insight in the value of PALETTE, we compared PALETTE with the recommended search method for reviews of intervention studies.

Results

By using PALETTE on two palliative care literature reviews, we were able to improve our review questions and search strategies. Moreover, in comparison with the recommended search for intervention reviews, the number of articles needed to be screened was decreased whereas more relevant articles were retrieved. Overall, PALETTE helped us in gaining a thorough understanding of the topic of interest and made us confident that the included studies comprehensively represented the topic.

Conclusions

PALETTE is a coherent and transparent pragmatic framework to overcome the challenges of performing a literature review in palliative care. The method enables researchers to improve question development and to maximise both sensitivity and precision in their search process.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vissers KCP, van den Brand MWM, Jacobs J, Groot M, Veldhoven C, Verhagen C, et al. Palliative medicine update: A multidisciplinary approach. Pain Pract. 2013;13:576–88. Vissers KCP, van den Brand MWM, Jacobs J, Groot M, Veldhoven C, Verhagen C, et al. Palliative medicine update: A multidisciplinary approach. Pain Pract. 2013;13:576–88.
3.
go back to reference Singer PA, Martin DK, Kelner M. Quality end-of-life care: patients’ perspectives. JAMA. 1999;281:163–8.CrossRefPubMed Singer PA, Martin DK, Kelner M. Quality end-of-life care: patients’ perspectives. JAMA. 1999;281:163–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wang L, Piet L, Kenworthy CM, Dy SM. Association between palliative case management and utilization of inpatient, intensive care unit, emergency department, and hospice in Medicaid beneficiaries. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015;32:216–20.CrossRefPubMed Wang L, Piet L, Kenworthy CM, Dy SM. Association between palliative case management and utilization of inpatient, intensive care unit, emergency department, and hospice in Medicaid beneficiaries. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015;32:216–20.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Piggott M, McGee H, Feuer D. Has CONSORT improved the reporting of randomized controlled trials in the palliative care literature? A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2004;18:32–8.CrossRefPubMed Piggott M, McGee H, Feuer D. Has CONSORT improved the reporting of randomized controlled trials in the palliative care literature? A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2004;18:32–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tieman JJ, Sladek RM, Currow DC. Multiple sources: mapping the literature of palliative care. Palliat Med. 2009;23:425–31.CrossRefPubMed Tieman JJ, Sladek RM, Currow DC. Multiple sources: mapping the literature of palliative care. Palliat Med. 2009;23:425–31.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tieman J, Sladek R, Currow D. Changes in the quantity and level of evidence of palliative and hospice care literature: the last century. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5679–83.CrossRefPubMed Tieman J, Sladek R, Currow D. Changes in the quantity and level of evidence of palliative and hospice care literature: the last century. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5679–83.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Boland A, Cherry MG, Dickson R. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. First edit. Igarss 2014. In: SAGE publications; 2014. Boland A, Cherry MG, Dickson R. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. First edit. Igarss 2014. In: SAGE publications; 2014.
10.
go back to reference Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. First edit. United Kingdom: SAGE publications; 2012. Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. First edit. United Kingdom: SAGE publications; 2012.
11.
go back to reference Papaioannou D, Sutton A, Carroll C, Booth A, Wong R. Literature searching for social science systematic reviews. Heal Inf Libr J. 2010;27:114–22.CrossRef Papaioannou D, Sutton A, Carroll C, Booth A, Wong R. Literature searching for social science systematic reviews. Heal Inf Libr J. 2010;27:114–22.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hui D, Parsons HA, Damani S, Fulton S, Liu J, Evans A, et al. Quantity, design, and scope of the palliative oncology literature. Oncologist. 2011;16:694–703.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hui D, Parsons HA, Damani S, Fulton S, Liu J, Evans A, et al. Quantity, design, and scope of the palliative oncology literature. Oncologist. 2011;16:694–703.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Booth A, Brice A. Evidence based practice for information professionals: a handbook. 2004;CrossRef Booth A, Brice A. Evidence based practice for information professionals: a handbook. 2004;CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Damarell RA, Tieman JJ. Searching PubMed for a broad subject area: how effective are palliative care clinicians in finding the evidence in their field? Health Inf Libr J. 2016;33:49–60.CrossRef Damarell RA, Tieman JJ. Searching PubMed for a broad subject area: how effective are palliative care clinicians in finding the evidence in their field? Health Inf Libr J. 2016;33:49–60.CrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Ewing G, Rogers M, Barclay S, McCabe J, Martin A, Todd C. Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: why is it so difficult? Palliat Med. 2004;18:452–9.CrossRefPubMed Ewing G, Rogers M, Barclay S, McCabe J, Martin A, Todd C. Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: why is it so difficult? Palliat Med. 2004;18:452–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Thornton H. Patient perspectives on involvement in cancer research in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2002;11:205–9.CrossRef Thornton H. Patient perspectives on involvement in cancer research in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2002;11:205–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gysels M, Shipman C, Higginson IJ. Is the qualitative research interview an acceptable medium for research with palliative care patients and carers? BMC Med Ethics. 2008;9:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gysels M, Shipman C, Higginson IJ. Is the qualitative research interview an acceptable medium for research with palliative care patients and carers? BMC Med Ethics. 2008;9:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Booth A. Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review. Syst Rev Systematic Reviews. 2016;5:74.CrossRefPubMed Booth A. Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review. Syst Rev Systematic Reviews. 2016;5:74.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Leeflang MMG, Scholten RJPM, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM. Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:234–40. Leeflang MMG, Scholten RJPM, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM. Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:234–40.
24.
go back to reference Bates MJ. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Inf Rev. 1989;13:407–24.CrossRef Bates MJ. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Inf Rev. 1989;13:407–24.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schlosser RW, Wendt O, Bhavnani S, Nail-Chiwetalu B. Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice: the application of traditional and comprehensive pearl growing. A review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006;41:567–82.CrossRefPubMed Schlosser RW, Wendt O, Bhavnani S, Nail-Chiwetalu B. Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice: the application of traditional and comprehensive pearl growing. A review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006;41:567–82.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;6:1–28. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;6:1–28.
27.
go back to reference Oliver S, Harden A, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Garcia J, et al. An emerging framework for including different types of evidence in systematic reviews for public policy. Evaluation. 2005;11:428–46.CrossRef Oliver S, Harden A, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Garcia J, et al. An emerging framework for including different types of evidence in systematic reviews for public policy. Evaluation. 2005;11:428–46.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Harris JL, Booth A, Cargo M, Hannes K, Harden A, Flemming K, et al. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 6: Methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;97:39–48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.023. Harris JL, Booth A, Cargo M, Hannes K, Harden A, Flemming K, et al. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 6: Methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;97:39–48. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jclinepi.​2017.​10.​023.
30.
go back to reference Niven DJ, Mrklas KJ, Holodinsky JK, Straus SE, Hemmelgarn BR, Jeffs LP, et al. Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review. BMC Med. 2015;13:255.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Niven DJ, Mrklas KJ, Holodinsky JK, Straus SE, Hemmelgarn BR, Jeffs LP, et al. Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review. BMC Med. 2015;13:255.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Beverley C, Booth A, Bath P. The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study. Heal Inf Libr J. 2003;20:65–74.CrossRef Beverley C, Booth A, Bath P. The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study. Heal Inf Libr J. 2003;20:65–74.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wallace BC, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Brodley C, Schmid CH. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:55. Wallace BC, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Brodley C, Schmid CH. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:55.
33.
go back to reference Thomas J, Brunton J, Graziosi S. EPPI-Reviewer 4.0: software for research synthesis. In: EPPI-Centre Software. London: Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2010. Thomas J, Brunton J, Graziosi S. EPPI-Reviewer 4.0: software for research synthesis. In: EPPI-Centre Software. London: Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2010.
34.
go back to reference Howard BE, Phillips J, Miller K, Tandon A, Mav D, Shah MR, et al. SWIFT-review: a text-mining workbench for systematic review. Syst Rev. 2016;5:87. Howard BE, Phillips J, Miller K, Tandon A, Mav D, Shah MR, et al. SWIFT-review: a text-mining workbench for systematic review. Syst Rev. 2016;5:87.
35.
go back to reference Frantzi K, Ananiadou S, Mima H. Automatic recognition of multi-word terms: the C-value/NC-value method. Int J Digit Libr. 2000;3:115–30.CrossRef Frantzi K, Ananiadou S, Mima H. Automatic recognition of multi-word terms: the C-value/NC-value method. Int J Digit Libr. 2000;3:115–30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Introducing PALETTE: an iterative method for conducting a literature search for a review in palliative care
Authors
Marieke Zwakman
Lisa M. Verberne
Marijke C. Kars
Lotty Hooft
Johannes J. M. van Delden
René Spijker
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0335-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Palliative Care 1/2018 Go to the issue