Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Palliative Care
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Keep in touch (KIT): perspectives on introducing internet-based communication and information technologies in palliative care

Authors: Qiaohong Guo, Beverley Cann, Susan McClement, Genevieve Thompson, Harvey Max Chochinov

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hospitalized palliative patients need to keep in touch with their loved ones. Regular social contact may be especially difficult for individuals on palliative care in-patient units due to the isolating nature of hospital settings. Technology can help mitigate isolation by facilitating social connection. This study aimed to explore the acceptability of introducing internet-based communication and information technologies for patients on a palliative care in-patient unit.

Methods

In the first phase of the Keep in Touch (KIT) project, a diverse group of key informants were consulted regarding their perspectives on web-based communication on in-patient palliative care units. Participants included palliative patients, family members, direct care providers, communication and information technology experts, and institutional administrators. Data was collected through focus groups, interviews and drop-in consultations, and was analyzed for themes, consensus, and major differences across participant groups.

Results

Hospitalized palliative patients and their family members described the challenges of keeping in touch with family and friends. Participants identified numerous examples of ways that communication and information technologies could benefit patients’ quality of life and care. Patients and family members saw few drawbacks associated with the use of such technology. While generally supportive, direct care providers were concerned that patient requests for assistance in using the technology would place increased demands on their time. Administrators and IT experts recognized issues such as privacy and costs related to offering these technologies throughout an organization and in the larger health care system.

Conclusions

This study affirmed the acceptability of offering internet-based communication and information technologies on palliative care in-patient units. It provides the foundation for trialing these technologies on a palliative in-patient unit. Further study is needed to confirm the feasibility of offering these technologies at the bedside.
Literature
1.
Chochinov HM. Dignity-conserving care—a new model for palliative care: helping the patient feel valued. JAMA. 2002;287(17):2253–60.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Griffin JP, Koch KA, Nelson JE, Cooley ME, American College of Chest Physicians. Palliative care consultation, quality-of-life measurements, and bereavement for end-of-life care in patients with lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. 2nd ed. Chest. 2007;132(Suppl3):404S–22S.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Higginson IJ, Costantini M. Dying with cancer, living well with advanced cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(10):1414–24.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Meghani SH. A concept analysis of palliative care in the United States. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(2):152–61.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Lin HR, Bauer-Wu SM. Psycho-spiritual well-being in patients with advanced cancer: an integrative review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44(1):69–80.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Mickus MA, Luz CC. Televisits: sustaining long distance family relationships among institutionalized elders through technology. Aging Ment Health. 2002;6(4):387–96.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Savenstedt S, Brulin C, Sandman PO. Family members’ narrated experiences of communicating via video-phone with patients with dementia staying at a nursing home. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(4):216–20.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Buckwalter KC, Davis LL, Wakefield BJ, Kienzle MG, Murray MA. Telehealth for elders and their caregivers in rural communities. Fam Community Health. 2002;25(3):31–40.CrossRef
9.
Murray E, Burns J, See TS, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;19(4), CD004274.
10.
Demiris G, Oliver DR, Hensel B, Dickey G, Rantz M, Skubic M. Use of videophones for distant caregiving: an enriching experience for families and residents in long-term care. J Gerontol Nurs. 2008;34(7):50–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Bender JL, O’Grady L, Jadad AR. Supporting cancer patients through the continuum of care: a view from the age of social networks and computer-mediated communication. Curr Oncol. 2008;15(Suppl 2:s107):es42–7.
12.
Brecher DB. The use of Skype in a community hospital inpatient palliative medicine consultation service. J Palliat Med. 2013;16(1):110–2.PubMed
13.
Battley J, Balding L, Gilligan O, O’Connell C, O’Brien T. From Cork to Budapest by Skype: living and dying. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2012;2(2):168–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Baecker R, Moffatt K, Massimi M. Technologies for aging gracefully. Interactions. 2012;19(3):32–6.CrossRef
15.
Johnston J, Hillier LM, Purdon M, Pears D, Robson M. Opportunities for improving the quality of life of dying persons: use of technology to connect people at the end of life. J Palliat Care. 2012;28(3):178–80.PubMed
16.
Washington K, Demiris G, Oliver DP, Day M. Telehospice acceptance among providers: a multidisciplinary comparison. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2009;25(6):452–7.CrossRef
17.
18.
Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.
19.
Andre´ B, Ringdal GI, Loge JH, Rannestad T, Kaasa S. Implementation of computerized technology in a palliative care unit. Palliat Support Care. 2009;7(1):57–63.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
22.
23.
Rokach A, Matalon R, Safarov A, Bercovitch M. The dying, those who care for them, and how they cope with loneliness. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007;24(5):399–407.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Keep in touch (KIT): perspectives on introducing internet-based communication and information technologies in palliative care
Authors
Qiaohong Guo
Beverley Cann
Susan McClement
Genevieve Thompson
Harvey Max Chochinov
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0140-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Palliative Care 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Physical activity interests and preferences of cancer patients with brain metastases: a cross-sectional survey

Research article

The size of the population potentially in need of palliative care in Germany - an estimation based on death registration data

Research article

Improving the quality of life of palliative and chronic disease patients and carers in remote Australia with the establishment of a day respite facility

Research article

Using linked administrative and disease-specific databases to study end-of-life care on a population level

Study protocol

Protocol: Evaluating the impact of a nation-wide train-the-trainer educational initiative to enhance the quality of palliative care for children with cancer

Research article

Dying among older adults in Switzerland: who dies in hospital, who dies in a nursing home?