Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Evaluation of the maxillary midline, curve of the upper lip, smile line and tooth shape: a prospective study of 140 Caucasian patients

Authors: María Melo, Javier Ata-Ali, Fadi Ata-Ali, Marco Bulsei, Perluigi Grella, Teresa Cobo, José María Martínez-González

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A number of reference patterns such as the interincisal line, curve of the upper lip, width of the smile or shape of the teeth have been studied in different populations. Determining the frequency of different smile aesthetic parameters in a European Caucasian population and exploring possible gender differences is important in order to obtain predictable treatment outcomes.

Methods

Photographs were obtained under resting and forced smiling conditions in 140 individuals (70 males and 70 females) with a mean age of 20.1 ± 4.3 years. Different variables were recorded, including the position of the maxillary interincisal midline in relation to the facial midline, the arc and width of the smile, and the shape of the teeth. The data were processed using the SPSS version 15.0 statistical package, with application of the chi-squared test and a confidence level of 95%. The statistical power was 80%, and the level of significance 5% (α = 0.05).

Results

A total of 94.3% of the sample presented a maxillary interincisal midline coinciding with the facial midline, and 80% had a consonant smile line. The curve of the upper lip was upwards in 47.1% of the cases, followed by a straight curve in 41.4%. Most of the subjects (84.3%) presented a medium smile line with tooth exposure to the second premolar (61.4%). There were no significant differences between males and females.

Conclusions

The integration of aesthetic criteria is needed in order to guarantee satisfactory and predictable dental treatment outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences between males and females. The maxillary interincisal midline coincided with the facial midline, with a consonant smile arc and a medium smile line, upward lip curve and oval tooth shape.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rodrigues CD, Magnani R, Machado MS, Oliveira OB. The perception of smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:634–9.CrossRef Rodrigues CD, Magnani R, Machado MS, Oliveira OB. The perception of smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:634–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, Arslan I. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:530–8.PubMedCrossRef Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, Arslan I. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:530–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shetty S, Pitti V, Satish Babu C, Surendra Kumar G, Jnanadev K. To evaluate the validity of recurring esthetic dental proportion in natural dentition. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14:314–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shetty S, Pitti V, Satish Babu C, Surendra Kumar G, Jnanadev K. To evaluate the validity of recurring esthetic dental proportion in natural dentition. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14:314–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Silva BP, Jiménez-Castellanos E, Martinez-de-Fuentes R, Greenberg JR, Chu S. Laypersons’ perception of facial and dental asymmetries. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33:e162–71.PubMedCrossRef Silva BP, Jiménez-Castellanos E, Martinez-de-Fuentes R, Greenberg JR, Chu S. Laypersons’ perception of facial and dental asymmetries. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33:e162–71.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Walder JF, Freeman K, Lipp MJ, Nicolay OF, Cisneros GJ. Photographic and videographic assessment of the smile: objective and subjective evaluations of posed and sponta- neous smiles. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;1446:793–801.CrossRef Walder JF, Freeman K, Lipp MJ, Nicolay OF, Cisneros GJ. Photographic and videographic assessment of the smile: objective and subjective evaluations of posed and sponta- neous smiles. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;1446:793–801.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dindaroğlu F, Ertan Erdinç AM, Doğan S. Perception of smile esthetics by orthodontists and laypersons: full face and a localized view of the social and spontaneous smiles. Turk J Orthod. 2016;29:59–68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dindaroğlu F, Ertan Erdinç AM, Doğan S. Perception of smile esthetics by orthodontists and laypersons: full face and a localized view of the social and spontaneous smiles. Turk J Orthod. 2016;29:59–68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Duran GS, Dindaroğlu F, Görgülü S. Three-dimensional evaluation of social smile symmetry. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:96–103.PubMedCrossRef Duran GS, Dindaroğlu F, Görgülü S. Three-dimensional evaluation of social smile symmetry. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:96–103.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ackerman JL, Ackerman MB, Brensinger CM, Landis JR. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:2–11.PubMedCrossRef Ackerman JL, Ackerman MB, Brensinger CM, Landis JR. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:2–11.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sarver D. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120:98–111.CrossRef Sarver D. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120:98–111.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Miller E, Bodden W, Jamison H. A study of the relationship of the dental midline to the facial median line. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:657–60.PubMedCrossRef Miller E, Bodden W, Jamison H. A study of the relationship of the dental midline to the facial median line. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:657–60.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Latta GH. The midline and its relation to anatomic landmarks in the edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:681–3.PubMedCrossRef Latta GH. The midline and its relation to anatomic landmarks in the edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:681–3.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kokich VO, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11:311–24.PubMedCrossRef Kokich VO, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11:311–24.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sadrhaghighi H, Zarghami A, Sadrhaghighi S, Eskandarinezhad M. Esthetic perception of smile components by orthodontists, general dentists, dental students, artists, and laypersons. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017;8:e12235.CrossRef Sadrhaghighi H, Zarghami A, Sadrhaghighi S, Eskandarinezhad M. Esthetic perception of smile components by orthodontists, general dentists, dental students, artists, and laypersons. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017;8:e12235.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132:748–53.CrossRef Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132:748–53.CrossRef
18.
20.
go back to reference Pereira Da Silva B, Jiménez-Castellanos E, Martínez de Fuentes R, Greenberg JR, Chu S. Laypersons’ perception of facial and dental asymmetries. Int J Periodont Res. 2013;33:163–71. Pereira Da Silva B, Jiménez-Castellanos E, Martínez de Fuentes R, Greenberg JR, Chu S. Laypersons’ perception of facial and dental asymmetries. Int J Periodont Res. 2013;33:163–71.
22.
go back to reference Desai S, Upadhyay M, Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis: changes with age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:310.e1–10. Desai S, Upadhyay M, Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis: changes with age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:310.e1–10.
23.
go back to reference Mavroskoufis F, Ritchie GM. Variation in size and form between left and right maxillary central incisor teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:254–7.PubMedCrossRef Mavroskoufis F, Ritchie GM. Variation in size and form between left and right maxillary central incisor teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:254–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sah SK, Zhang HD, Chang T, Dhungana M, Acharya L, Chen LL. Ding YM maxillary anterior teeth dimensions and proportions in a central mainland chinese population. Chin J Dent Res. 2014;17:117–24.PubMed Sah SK, Zhang HD, Chang T, Dhungana M, Acharya L, Chen LL. Ding YM maxillary anterior teeth dimensions and proportions in a central mainland chinese population. Chin J Dent Res. 2014;17:117–24.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Gran SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Sex difference in tooth size. J Dent Res. 1964;43:306–15.CrossRef Gran SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Sex difference in tooth size. J Dent Res. 1964;43:306–15.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Jiménez-Castellanos E, Orozco-Varo A, Arroyo-Cruz G, Iglesias-Linares A. Prevalence of alterations in the characteristics of smile symmetry in an adult population from southern Europe. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:736–40.PubMedCrossRef Jiménez-Castellanos E, Orozco-Varo A, Arroyo-Cruz G, Iglesias-Linares A. Prevalence of alterations in the characteristics of smile symmetry in an adult population from southern Europe. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:736–40.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Calçada D, Correia A, Araújo F. Anthropometric analysis of anterior maxillary teeth with digital photography—a study in a Portuguese sample. Int J Esthet Dent. 2014;9:370–80.PubMed Calçada D, Correia A, Araújo F. Anthropometric analysis of anterior maxillary teeth with digital photography—a study in a Portuguese sample. Int J Esthet Dent. 2014;9:370–80.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Al-Johany SS, Alqahtani AS, Alqahtani FY, Alzahrani AH. Evaluation of different esthetic smile criteria. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24:64–70.PubMed Al-Johany SS, Alqahtani AS, Alqahtani FY, Alzahrani AH. Evaluation of different esthetic smile criteria. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24:64–70.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Sabri R. The eight components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39:155–67.PubMed Sabri R. The eight components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39:155–67.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Maulik C, Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132:307–15.CrossRef Maulik C, Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132:307–15.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Weber B, Fuentes R, García N, Cantin M. Relationships between shape and proportion of the maxillary central incisor with facial measurements, dental and facial midline in adults. Int J Morphol. 2014;32:1101–7.CrossRef Weber B, Fuentes R, García N, Cantin M. Relationships between shape and proportion of the maxillary central incisor with facial measurements, dental and facial midline in adults. Int J Morphol. 2014;32:1101–7.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Nold SL, Horvath SD, Stampf S, Blatz MB. Analysis of select facial and dental esthetic parameters. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34:622–9.CrossRef Nold SL, Horvath SD, Stampf S, Blatz MB. Analysis of select facial and dental esthetic parameters. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34:622–9.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Del Monte S, Afrashtehfar KI, Emami E, Nader SA, Tamimi F. Lay preferences for dentogingival esthetic parameters: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:717–24.PubMedCrossRef Del Monte S, Afrashtehfar KI, Emami E, Nader SA, Tamimi F. Lay preferences for dentogingival esthetic parameters: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:717–24.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Peck D, Peck L. Some vertical lineaments of lip position. Am J Orthop Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:519–24.CrossRef Peck D, Peck L. Some vertical lineaments of lip position. Am J Orthop Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:519–24.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29:358–82.PubMedCrossRef Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29:358–82.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Owens EG, Goodacre CJ, Loh PL, Hanke G, Okamura M, Jo KH, Muñoz CA, Naylor WP. A multicenter interracial study of facial appearance. Part 1: a comparison of extraoral parameters. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:273–82.PubMed Owens EG, Goodacre CJ, Loh PL, Hanke G, Okamura M, Jo KH, Muñoz CA, Naylor WP. A multicenter interracial study of facial appearance. Part 1: a comparison of extraoral parameters. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:273–82.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Parrini S, Rossini G, Castroflorio T, Fortini A, Deregibus A, Debernardi C. Laypeople's perceptions of frontal smile esthetics: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2016;150:740–50.CrossRef Parrini S, Rossini G, Castroflorio T, Fortini A, Deregibus A, Debernardi C. Laypeople's perceptions of frontal smile esthetics: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2016;150:740–50.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:517–22.PubMedCrossRef Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:517–22.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Thomas JL, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:359–64.PubMed Thomas JL, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:359–64.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Wolfart S, Menzel H, Kern M. Inability to relate tooth forms to face shape and gender. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112:471–6.PubMedCrossRef Wolfart S, Menzel H, Kern M. Inability to relate tooth forms to face shape and gender. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112:471–6.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Brunetto J, Becker MM, Volpato CA. Gender differences in the form of maxillary central incisors analyzed using auto-CAD software. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106:95–101.PubMedCrossRef Brunetto J, Becker MM, Volpato CA. Gender differences in the form of maxillary central incisors analyzed using auto-CAD software. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106:95–101.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Álvarez-Álvarez L, Orozco-Varo A, Arroyo-Cruz G, Jimenez-Castellanos E. Width/length ratio in maxillary anterior teeth. Comparative study of esthetic preferences among professionals and laypersons. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:416–20.PubMedCrossRef Álvarez-Álvarez L, Orozco-Varo A, Arroyo-Cruz G, Jimenez-Castellanos E. Width/length ratio in maxillary anterior teeth. Comparative study of esthetic preferences among professionals and laypersons. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:416–20.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Anderson KM, Behrents RG, McKinney T, Buschang PH. Tooth shape preferences in an esthetic smile. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;128:458–65.CrossRef Anderson KM, Behrents RG, McKinney T, Buschang PH. Tooth shape preferences in an esthetic smile. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;128:458–65.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Frush JP, Fisher RD. How dentogenic restorations interpret the sex factor. J Prosthet Dent. 1956;6:160–72.CrossRef Frush JP, Fisher RD. How dentogenic restorations interpret the sex factor. J Prosthet Dent. 1956;6:160–72.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationship present in the smile. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:132–44.PubMedCrossRef Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationship present in the smile. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:132–44.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of the maxillary midline, curve of the upper lip, smile line and tooth shape: a prospective study of 140 Caucasian patients
Authors
María Melo
Javier Ata-Ali
Fadi Ata-Ali
Marco Bulsei
Perluigi Grella
Teresa Cobo
José María Martínez-González
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1031-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Oral Health 1/2020 Go to the issue