Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Technical advance

Individual mandibular movement registration and reproduction using an optoeletronic jaw movement analyzer and a dedicated robot: a dental technique

Authors: Massimo Carossa, Davide Cavagnetto, Paola Ceruti, Federico Mussano, Stefano Carossa

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Fully adjustable articulators and pantographs record and reproduce individual mandibular movements. Although these instruments are accurate, they are operator-dependant and time-consuming. Pantographic recording is affected by inter and intra operator variability in the individuation of clinical reference points and afterwards in reading pantographic recording themselves. Finally only border movements can be reproduced.

Methods

Bionic Jaw Motion system is based on two components: a jaw movement analyzer and a robotic device that accurately reproduces recorded movements. The jaw movement analyzer uses an optoelectronic motion system technology made of a high frequency filming camera that acquires 140frames per second and a custom designed software that recognizes and determines the relative distance at each point in time of markers with known geometries connected to each jaw. Circumferential modified retainers connect markers and do not cover any occlusal surfaces neither obstruct occlusion. The recording process takes 5 to 10 s. Mandibular movement performance requires six degrees of freedom of movement, 3 rotations and 3 translations. Other robots are based on the so-called delta mechanics that use several parallel effectors to perform desired movements in order to decompose a complex trajectory into multiple more simple linear movements. However, each parallel effector introduces mechanical inter-component tolerances and mathematical transformations that are required to transform a recorded movement into the combination of movements to be performed by each effector. Bionic Jaw Motion Robot works differently, owing to three motors that perform translational movements and three other motors that perform rotations as a gyroscope. This configuration requires less mechanical components thus reducing mechanical tolerances and production costs. Both the jaw movement analyzer and the robot quantify the movement of the mandible as a rigid body with six degrees of freedom. This represents an additional advantage as no mathematical transformation is needed for the robot to reproduce recorded movements.

Results

Based on the described procedure, Bionic Jaw Motion provide accurate recording and reproduction of maxillomandibular relation in static and dynamic conditions.

Conclusion

This robotic system represents an important advancement compared to available analogical and digital alternatives both in clinical and research contexts for cost reduction, precision and time saving opportunities.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Starcke EN. The history of articulators: a perspective on the early years. Part I J Prosthodont. 2006;8(3):209–11.CrossRef Starcke EN. The history of articulators: a perspective on the early years. Part I J Prosthodont. 2006;8(3):209–11.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Starcke EN. The history of articulators: a perspective on the early years, part 2. J Prosthodont. 2012;8(4):277–80.CrossRef Starcke EN. The history of articulators: a perspective on the early years, part 2. J Prosthodont. 2012;8(4):277–80.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Starcke EN, Engelmeier RL. The history of articulators: the wonderful world of “grinders”, Part III. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(2):156–69.PubMedCrossRef Starcke EN, Engelmeier RL. The history of articulators: the wonderful world of “grinders”, Part III. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(2):156–69.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Engelmeier RL, Belles DM, Starcke EN. The history of articulators: the contributions of Rudolph L. Hanau and his company-part II. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(8):688–95.PubMedCrossRef Engelmeier RL, Belles DM, Starcke EN. The history of articulators: the contributions of Rudolph L. Hanau and his company-part II. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(8):688–95.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Javid NS, Porter MR. The importance of the Hanau formula in construction of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1975;34(4):397–404.PubMedCrossRef Javid NS, Porter MR. The importance of the Hanau formula in construction of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1975;34(4):397–404.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tregaskes JN. The procedures involved in the use of the Hanau 130–21 articulator. 1st ed. Health Sciences Consortium: Chapel Hill; 1982. Tregaskes JN. The procedures involved in the use of the Hanau 130–21 articulator. 1st ed. Health Sciences Consortium: Chapel Hill; 1982.
7.
go back to reference Stuart CE. Use of the Stuart articulator in obtaining optimal occlusion. Dent Clin N Am. 1979;23(2):259–70.PubMed Stuart CE. Use of the Stuart articulator in obtaining optimal occlusion. Dent Clin N Am. 1979;23(2):259–70.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ebel HE, Guyer SE, Lefkowitz W. Reliability of fully adjustable, articulators using a computerized analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;35(6):630–42.PubMedCrossRef Ebel HE, Guyer SE, Lefkowitz W. Reliability of fully adjustable, articulators using a computerized analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;35(6):630–42.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bellanti ND. The significance of articulator capabilities. I. Adjustable vs. semiadjustable articulators. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29(3):269–75.PubMedCrossRef Bellanti ND. The significance of articulator capabilities. I. Adjustable vs. semiadjustable articulators. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29(3):269–75.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Curtis DA, Sorensen JA. Errors incurred in programming a fully adjustable articulator with a pantograph. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55(4):427–9.PubMedCrossRef Curtis DA, Sorensen JA. Errors incurred in programming a fully adjustable articulator with a pantograph. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55(4):427–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tryde G, McMillan DR, Christensen J, Brill N. The fallacy of facial measurements of occlusal height in edentulous subjects. J Oral Rehabil. 1976;3(4):353–8.PubMedCrossRef Tryde G, McMillan DR, Christensen J, Brill N. The fallacy of facial measurements of occlusal height in edentulous subjects. J Oral Rehabil. 1976;3(4):353–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Christensen LV, Slabbert JC. The concept of the sagittal condylar guidance: biological fact or fallacy? J Oral Rehabil. 1978;5(1):1–7.PubMedCrossRef Christensen LV, Slabbert JC. The concept of the sagittal condylar guidance: biological fact or fallacy? J Oral Rehabil. 1978;5(1):1–7.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Price RB, Gerrow JD, Ramier WC. Potential errors when using a computerized pantograph. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61(2):155–60.PubMedCrossRef Price RB, Gerrow JD, Ramier WC. Potential errors when using a computerized pantograph. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61(2):155–60.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, Serrao G, Tartaglia G. Open-close movements in the human temporomandibular joint: does a pure rotation around the intercondylar hinge axis exist? J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23(6):401–8.PubMedCrossRef Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, Serrao G, Tartaglia G. Open-close movements in the human temporomandibular joint: does a pure rotation around the intercondylar hinge axis exist? J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23(6):401–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pelletier LB, Campbell SD. Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(2):193–200.PubMedCrossRef Pelletier LB, Campbell SD. Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(2):193–200.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Park C. Application of ARCUS digma I, II systems for full mouth reconstruction: a case report. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2016;32(4):353–8.CrossRef Park C. Application of ARCUS digma I, II systems for full mouth reconstruction: a case report. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2016;32(4):353–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Takamori T, Tsuchiya K. Robotics, mechatronics and manufacturing systems. 1st ed. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co; 1993. Takamori T, Tsuchiya K. Robotics, mechatronics and manufacturing systems. 1st ed. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co; 1993.
19.
go back to reference Xu W, Bronlund JE. Mastication robots: biological inspiration to implementation. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2010.CrossRef Xu W, Bronlund JE. Mastication robots: biological inspiration to implementation. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2010.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kim J-E, Park J-H, Moon H-S, Shim J-S. Complete assessment of occlusal dynamics and establishment of a digital workflow by using target tracking with a three-dimensional facial scanner. J Prosthodont Res. 2019;63(1):120–4.PubMedCrossRef Kim J-E, Park J-H, Moon H-S, Shim J-S. Complete assessment of occlusal dynamics and establishment of a digital workflow by using target tracking with a three-dimensional facial scanner. J Prosthodont Res. 2019;63(1):120–4.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Röhrle O, Waddell JN, Foster KD, Saini H, Pullan AJ. Using a motion-capture system to record dynamic articulation for application in CAD/CAM software. J Prosthodont. 2009;18(8):703–10.PubMedCrossRef Röhrle O, Waddell JN, Foster KD, Saini H, Pullan AJ. Using a motion-capture system to record dynamic articulation for application in CAD/CAM software. J Prosthodont. 2009;18(8):703–10.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Guiard-Marigny T, Ostry DJ. A system for three-dimensional visualization of human jaw motion in speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40(5):1118–21.PubMedCrossRef Guiard-Marigny T, Ostry DJ. A system for three-dimensional visualization of human jaw motion in speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40(5):1118–21.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Med Etika Bioet. 2002;9(1–2):12–9. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Med Etika Bioet. 2002;9(1–2):12–9.
25.
go back to reference Karlsson S, Carlsson GE. Characteristics of mandibular masticatory movement in young and elderly dentate subjects. J Dent Res. 1990;69(2):473–6.PubMedCrossRef Karlsson S, Carlsson GE. Characteristics of mandibular masticatory movement in young and elderly dentate subjects. J Dent Res. 1990;69(2):473–6.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Karlsson S, Persson M, Carlsson GE. Mandibular movement and velocity in relation to state of dentition and age. J Oral Rehabil. 1991;18(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRef Karlsson S, Persson M, Carlsson GE. Mandibular movement and velocity in relation to state of dentition and age. J Oral Rehabil. 1991;18(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bando E, Nishigawa K, Nakano M, Takeuchi H, Shigemoto S, Okura K, Satsuma T, Yamamoto T. Current status of researches on jaw movement and occlusion for clinical application. Jap Dent Sci Rev. 2009;45(2):83–97.CrossRef Bando E, Nishigawa K, Nakano M, Takeuchi H, Shigemoto S, Okura K, Satsuma T, Yamamoto T. Current status of researches on jaw movement and occlusion for clinical application. Jap Dent Sci Rev. 2009;45(2):83–97.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Schäfer P, Schiehlen W. Application of parallel computing to robot dynamics. Robot Mechatronics Manuf Syst. 1993;2:16–20. Schäfer P, Schiehlen W. Application of parallel computing to robot dynamics. Robot Mechatronics Manuf Syst. 1993;2:16–20.
Metadata
Title
Individual mandibular movement registration and reproduction using an optoeletronic jaw movement analyzer and a dedicated robot: a dental technique
Authors
Massimo Carossa
Davide Cavagnetto
Paola Ceruti
Federico Mussano
Stefano Carossa
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01257-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Oral Health 1/2020 Go to the issue