Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Oral Health
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Marginal and internal fit of full ceramic crowns milled using CADCAM systems on cadaver full arch scans

Authors: János Vág, Zsolt Nagy, Christopher Bocklet, Tamás Kiss, Ákos Nagy, Botond Simon, Ákos Mikolicz, Walter Renne

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Chairside systems are becoming more popular for fabricating full-ceramic single restorations, but there is very little knowledge about the effect of the entire workflow process on restoration fit. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) and the full internal fit (FULL) of all-ceramic crowns made by two chairside systems, Planmeca FIT and CEREC, with detailed and standard mill settings.

Methods

One upper molar was prepared for an all-ceramic crown in human cadaver maxilla. Full-arch scans were made by Emerald or Omnicam four times each. Twenty-four e.max crowns were designed and milled by the Planmill 30s or 40s or CEREC MCXL mills with either detailed or standard settings. The cadaver tooth was extracted, and each crown was fixed on it and scanned by a high-resolution microCT scanner. The AMD and FULL were measured digitally in mesio-distal and bucco-lingual 2D slices. The actual and predicted times of the milling were also registered.

Results

No differences were observed between detailed or standard settings in either system. The AMD was significantly higher with CEREC (132 ± 12 μm) than with either Planmill 30s (71 ± 6.9 μm) or 40s (78 ± 7.7 μm). In standard mode, the FULL was significantly higher with CEREC (224 ± 9.6 μm) than with either Planmill 30s (169 ± 8.1 μm) or 40s (178 ± 8.5 μm). There was no difference between actual and predicted time with the two Planmeca models, but with CEREC, the actual time was significantly higher than the predicted time. The 30s had significantly higher actual and predicted times compared to all other models. Across all models, the average milling time was 7.2 min less in standard mode than in detailed mode.

Conclusions

All fit parameters were in an acceptable range. No differences in fit between Planmeca models suggest no effect of spindle number on accuracy. The detailed setting has no improvement in the marginal or internal fit of the restoration, yet it increases milling time.
Literature
1.
McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131(3):107–11.PubMed
2.
Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater. 1985;1(5):197–9.PubMed
3.
Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(5):459–64.PubMed
4.
Tamac E, Toksavul S, Toman M. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(4):909–13.PubMed
5.
Gonzalo E, Suarez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102(6):378–84.PubMed
6.
Siervo S, Pampalone A, Siervo P, Siervo R. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Quintessence Int. 1994;25(11):773–9.PubMed
7.
Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(6):441–7.PubMed
8.
Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(3):250–7.PubMed
9.
Almasri R, Drago CJ, Siegel SC, Hardigan PC. Volumetric misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a university laboratory study. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(4):267–74.PubMed
10.
Nagarkar SR, Perdigao J, Seong WJ, Theis-Mahon N. Digital versus conventional impressions for full-coverage restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149(2):139–147 e131.PubMed
11.
Tsirogiannis P, Reissmann DR, Heydecke G. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):328–335.e322.PubMed
12.
Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(1):11–9.PubMed
13.
Hack GD, Patzelt SB. Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: an in-vitro investigation. ADA Prof Prod Rev. 2015;10(4):5.
14.
Mennito AS, Evans ZP, Lauer AW, Patel RB, Ludlow ME, Renne WG. Evaluation of the effect scan pattern has on the trueness and precision of six intraoral digital impression systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(2):113–8.PubMed
15.
Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: an in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(1):36–42.PubMed
16.
Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D. Influence of different CAM strategies on the fit of partial crown restorations: a digital three-dimensional evaluation. Oper Dent. 2018;43(5):530–8.PubMed
17.
Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent. 2007;35(1):68–73.PubMed
18.
Renne W, McGill ST, Forshee KV, DeFee MR, Mennito AS. Predicting marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns based on the presence or absence of common preparation errors. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108(5):310–5.PubMed
19.
Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(3):244–8.PubMed
20.
Shim JS, Lee JS, Lee JY, Choi YJ, Shin SW, Ryu JJ. Effect of software version and parameter settings on the marginal and internal adaptation of crowns fabricated with the CAD/CAM system. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015;23(5):515–22.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Sadid-Zadeh R, Katsavochristou A, Squires T, Simon M. Accuracy of marginal fit and axial wall contour for lithium disilicate crowns fabricated using three digital workflows. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(1):121–7.PubMed
22.
Lee KB, Park CW, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(3):422–6.PubMed
23.
Bocklet C, Renne W, Mennito A, Bacro T, Latham J, Evans Z, Ludlow M, Kelly A, Nash J. Effect of scan substrates on accuracy of 7 intraoral digital impression systems using human maxilla model. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22:168–74.PubMed
24.
Dutton E, Ludlow M, Mennito A, Kelly A, Evans Z, Culp A, Kessler R, Renne W. The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(2):204–18.PubMed
25.
Flügge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144(3):471–8.
26.
Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2006.
27.
Shillingburg HT. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co.; 1997.
28.
Vag J, Nagy Z, Simon B, Mikolicz A, Kover E, Mennito A, Evans Z, Renne W. A novel method for complex three-dimensional evaluation of intraoral scanner accuracy. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(3):239–49.PubMed
29.
Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Tandecka K, Szatkiewicz T, Sporniak-Tutak K, Grocholewicz K. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of adhesive remnants and enamel loss resulting from debonding orthodontic molar tubes. Head Face Med. 2014;10:37.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Dold P, Bone MC, Flohr M, Preuss R, Joyce TJ, Deehan D, Holland J. Validation of an optical system to measure acetabular shell deformation in cadavers. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2014;228(8):781–6.PubMed
31.
Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(4):405–8.PubMed
32.
Vaz S, Falkmer T, Passmore AE, Parsons R, Andreou P. The case for using the repeatability coefficient when calculating test-retest reliability. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73990.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Bi J, Kuesten C. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): a framework for monitoring and assessing performance of trained sensory panels and panelists. J Sens Stud. 2012;27(5):352–64.
35.
Tew GA, Klonizakis M, Crank H, Briers JD, Hodges GJ. Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging with laser Doppler for assessing microvascular function. Microvasc Res. 2011;82(3):326–32.PubMed
36.
Shoukri MM, Colak D, Kaya N, Donner A. Comparison of two dependent within subject coefficients of variation to evaluate the reproducibility of measurement devices. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:24.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Euser AM, Dekker FW, le Cessie S. A practical approach to bland-Altman plots and variation coefficients for log transformed variables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(10):978–82.PubMed
38.
Bronson MR, Lindquist TJ, Dawson DV. Clinical acceptability of crown margins versus marginal gaps as determined by pre-doctoral students and prosthodontists. J Prosthodont. 2005;14(4):226–32.PubMed
39.
Rossetti PH, do Valle AL, de Carvalho RM, De Goes MF, Pegoraro LF. Correlation between margin fit and microleakage in complete crowns cemented with three luting agents. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16(1):64–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
White SN, Ingles S, Kipnis V. Influence of marginal opening on microleakage of cemented artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71(3):257–64.PubMed
41.
Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(3):357–64.PubMed
42.
McLean JW. Polycarboxylate cements. Five years experience in general practice. Br Dent J. 1972;132(1):9–15.PubMed
43.
Akin A, Toksavul S, Toman M. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of maxillary anterior single all-ceramic crowns and 2-year randomized controlled clinical trial. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(5):345–50.PubMed
44.
Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(Suppl):22S–31S.PubMed
45.
Aziz A, El-Mowafy O, Tenenbaum HC, Lawrence HP, Shokati B. Clinical performance of chairside monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(6):613–9.PubMed
46.
Roulet JF. Marginal integrity: clinical significance. J Dent. 1994;22(Suppl 1):S9–12.PubMed
47.
Romeo E, Iorio M, Storelli S, Camandona M, Abati S. Marginal adaptation of full-coverage CAD/CAM restorations: in vitro study using a non-destructive method. Minerva Stomatol. 2009;58(3):61–72.PubMed
48.
Olley RC, Andiappan M, Frost PM. An up to 50-year follow-up of crown and veneer survival in a dental practice. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(6):935–41.PubMed
49.
Stoll R, Sieweke M, Pieper K, Stachniss V, Schulte A. Longevity of cast gold inlays and partial crowns--a retrospective study at a dental school clinic. Clin Oral Investig. 1999;3(2):100–4.PubMed
50.
May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(4):394–404.PubMed
51.
Naert I, Van der Donck A, Beckers L. Precision of fit and clinical evaluation of all-ceramic full restorations followed between 0.5 and 5 years. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(1):51–7.PubMed
52.
Peroz I, Mitsas T, Erdelt K, Kopsahilis N. Marginal adaptation of lithium disilicate ceramic crowns cemented with three different resin cements. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(1):315–20.PubMed
53.
Meirowitz A, Bitterman Y, Levy S, Mijiritsky E, Dolev E. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):103.PubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Alajaji NK, Bardwell D, Finkelman M, Ali A. Micro-CT evaluation of ceramic inlays: comparison of the marginal and internal fit of five and three Axis CAM Systems with a heat press technique. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(1):49–58.PubMed
55.
Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P, Wostmann B. Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(8):2027–34.PubMed
56.
Son K, Lee S, Kang SH, Park J, Lee KB, Jeon M, Yun BJ. A comparison study of marginal and internal fit assessment methods for fixed dental prostheses. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):785.PubMedCentral
57.
Tabata LF, de Lima Silva TA, de Paula Silveira AC, Ribeiro APD. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM composite resin and ceramic crowns before and after internal adjustment. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(3):500–5.PubMed
58.
Riccitiello F, Amato M, Leone R, Spagnuolo G, Sorrentino R. In vitro evaluation of the marginal fit and internal adaptation of zirconia and Lithium Disilicate single crowns: micro-CT comparison between different manufacturing procedures. Open Dent J. 2018;12:160–72.PubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Saab RC, da Cunha LF, Gonzaga CC, Mushashe AM, Correr GM. Micro-CT analysis of Y-TZP copings made by different CAD/CAM Systems: marginal and internal fit. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:5189767.PubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Groten M, Axmann D, Pröbster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(1):40–9.PubMed
61.
De Freitas BN, Tonin BSH, Macedo AP, Dos Santos TMP, De Mattos M, Hotta TH, Matsumoto W. Adaptation accuracy of milled lithium disilicate crowns: a 2D and 3D microCT analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32:403–9.PubMed
62.
Aditya P, Madhav VN, Bhide SV, Aditya A. Marginal discrepancy as affected by selective placement of die-spacer: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2012;12(3):143–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
63.
Gressler May L, Kelly JR, Bottino MA, Hill T. Influence of the resin cement thickness on the fatigue failure loads of CAD/CAM feldspathic crowns. Dent Mater. 2015;31(8):895–900.PubMed
64.
Boening KW, Walter MH, Reppel PD. Non-cast titanium restorations in fixed prosthodontics. J Oral Rehabil. 1992;19(3):281–7.PubMed
65.
Karlsson S. The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1993;51(3):129–34.PubMed
66.
Gaintantzopoulou MD, El-Damanhoury HM. Effect of preparation depth on the marginal and internal adaptation of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture Endocrowns. Oper Dent. 2016;41(6):607–16.PubMed
67.
Grajower R, Zuberi Y, Lewinstein I. Improving the fit of crowns with die spacers. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61(5):555–63.PubMed
68.
Mule SA, Dange SP, Khalikar AN, Vaidya SP. Effect of varying layers of two die spacers on Precementation space of full coverage restorations. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14(Suppl 1):67–75.PubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Soriani NC, Leal MB, Paulino SM, Pagnano VO, Bezzon OL. Effect of the use of die spacer on the marginal fit of copings cast in NiCr, NiCrBe and commercially pure titanium. Braz Dent J. 2007;18(3):225–30.PubMed
70.
Fusayama T, Ide K, Hosoda H. Relief of resistance of cement of full cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1964;14(1):95–106.
71.
Eames WB, O'Neal SJ, Monteiro J, Miller C, Roan JD Jr, Cohen KS. Techniques to improve the seating of castings. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978;96(3):432–7.PubMed
72.
Hmaidouch R, Neumann P, Mueller WD. Influence of preparation form, luting space setting and cement type on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crown copings. Int J Comput Dent. 2011;14(3):219–26.PubMed
73.
Zhang Y, Dudley J. The influence of different cement spaces on the marginal gap of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J. 2019;64(2):167–74.PubMed
74.
Jorgensen KD, Esbensen AL. The relationship between the film thickness of zinc phosphate cement and the retention of veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand. 1968;26(3):169–75.PubMed
75.
Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater. 1996;12(4):245–9.PubMed
76.
Cekic-Nagas I, Canay S, Sahin E. Bonding of resin core materials to lithium disilicate ceramics: the effect of resin cement film thickness. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(5):469–71.PubMed
77.
Mobilio N, Fasiol A, Mollica F, Catapano S. Effect of different luting agents on the retention of Lithium Disilicate ceramic crowns. Materials (Basel). 2015;8(4):1604–11.
78.
May LG, Kelly JR, Bottino MA, Hill T. Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing. Dent Mater. 2012;28(8):e99–e109.PubMed
79.
Sagsoz NP, Yanikoglu N. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing monolithic crowns prepared in different cement thicknesses. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21(4):417–22.PubMed
80.
Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG, Belser UC, Meyer J-M. Effect of cement film thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass-ceramic. Dent Mater. 1994;10(3):172–7.PubMed
81.
Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008;204(9):505–11.PubMed
82.
Kirsch C, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(2):551–8.PubMed
83.
Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nystrom I, Thor A. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):27.PubMedPubMedCentral
84.
Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: from data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(6):749–54.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Marginal and internal fit of full ceramic crowns milled using CADCAM systems on cadaver full arch scans
Authors
János Vág
Zsolt Nagy
Christopher Bocklet
Tamás Kiss
Ákos Nagy
Botond Simon
Ákos Mikolicz
Walter Renne
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01181-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Oral Health 1/2020 Go to the issue

Research article

The use of the laser confocal scanning microscopy to measure resin remnants on customized lingual bracket

Research article

Orthodontic incisor retraction caused changes in the soft tissue chin area: a retrospective study

Research article

Comparison of antimicrobial prescribing for dental and oral infections in England and Scotland with Norway and Sweden and their relative contribution to national consumption 2010–2016

Research article

3D assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the Herbst appliance

Case report

Mandibular first premolar with five root canals: a case report

Research article

The reliability of surgeons to avoid traumatic insertion of dental implants into high-risk regions: a panoramic radiograph study