Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Streptococci | Research article

Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity

Authors: Alexander-Simon Engel, Hagen Tizian Kranz, Marvin Schneider, Jan Peter Tietze, Andree Piwowarcyk, Thorsten Kuzius, Wolfgang Arnold, Ella A. Naumova

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Bacterial biofilms adhere to all tissues and surfaces in the oral cavity. Oral biofilms are responsible for the decay of human dental structures and the inflammatory degeneration of the alveolar bone. Moreover, oral biofilms on artificial materials influence the lifespan of dental prostheses and restoratives.

Methods

To investigate in vivo oral biofilm formation and growth, five different dental restorative materials were analyzed and compared to human enamel. The roughness of the materials and the human enamel control probe were measured at the start of the study. The dental restorative materials and the human enamel control probe were placed in dental splints and worn for 3 h, 24 h and 72 h.

Results

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed major differences between oral biofilm formation and growth on the materials compared to those on human enamel. Microbiological analyses showed that bacterial strains differed between the materials. Significant differences were observed in the roughness of the dental materials.

Conclusions

It can be concluded that material roughness affects biofilm formation on dental surfaces and restoratives, but other factors, such as surface charge, surface energy and material composition, may also have an influence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Marsh PD, Devine DA. How is the development of dental biofilms influenced by the host? J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(Suppl 11):28–35.CrossRef Marsh PD, Devine DA. How is the development of dental biofilms influenced by the host? J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(Suppl 11):28–35.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Auschill TM, et al. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110(1):48–53.CrossRef Auschill TM, et al. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110(1):48–53.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Papapanou PN, et al. Periodontitis: consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and Peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S173–s182.CrossRef Papapanou PN, et al. Periodontitis: consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and Peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S173–s182.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Marsh PD. Dental plaque: biological significance of a biofilm and community life-style. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(Suppl 6):7–15.CrossRef Marsh PD. Dental plaque: biological significance of a biofilm and community life-style. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(Suppl 6):7–15.CrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Chia N, Woese CR, Goldenfeld N. A collective mechanism for phase variation in biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(38):14597–602.CrossRef Chia N, Woese CR, Goldenfeld N. A collective mechanism for phase variation in biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(38):14597–602.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm. Caries Res. 2004;38(3):204–11.CrossRef Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm. Caries Res. 2004;38(3):204–11.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shemesh M, Tam A, Steinberg D. Differential gene expression profiling of Streptococcus mutans cultured under biofilm and planktonic conditions. Microbiology. 2007;153(Pt 5):1307–17.CrossRef Shemesh M, Tam A, Steinberg D. Differential gene expression profiling of Streptococcus mutans cultured under biofilm and planktonic conditions. Microbiology. 2007;153(Pt 5):1307–17.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(2):95–108.CrossRef Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(2):95–108.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shemesh M, et al. Genetic adaptation of Streptococcus mutans during biofilm formation on different types of surfaces. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:51.CrossRef Shemesh M, et al. Genetic adaptation of Streptococcus mutans during biofilm formation on different types of surfaces. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:51.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brown TA Jr, et al. A hypothetical protein of Streptococcus mutans is critical for biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2005;73(5):3147–51.CrossRef Brown TA Jr, et al. A hypothetical protein of Streptococcus mutans is critical for biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2005;73(5):3147–51.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(9):623–33.CrossRef Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(9):623–33.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Burne RA, Chen YY, Penders JE. Analysis of gene expression in Streptococcus mutans in biofilms in vitro. Adv Dent Res. 1997;11(1):100–9.CrossRef Burne RA, Chen YY, Penders JE. Analysis of gene expression in Streptococcus mutans in biofilms in vitro. Adv Dent Res. 1997;11(1):100–9.CrossRef
14.
16.
go back to reference Hannig C, et al. Impact of the springtail's cuticle nanotopography on bioadhesion and biofilm formation in vitro and in the oral cavity. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5(7):171742.CrossRef Hannig C, et al. Impact of the springtail's cuticle nanotopography on bioadhesion and biofilm formation in vitro and in the oral cavity. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5(7):171742.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hudson MC, Curtiss R 3rd. Regulation of expression of Streptococcus mutans genes important to virulence. Infect Immun. 1990;58(2):464–70.CrossRef Hudson MC, Curtiss R 3rd. Regulation of expression of Streptococcus mutans genes important to virulence. Infect Immun. 1990;58(2):464–70.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Li YH, et al. Cell density modulates acid adaptation in Streptococcus mutans: implications for survival in biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(23):6875–84.CrossRef Li YH, et al. Cell density modulates acid adaptation in Streptococcus mutans: implications for survival in biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(23):6875–84.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Li YH, et al. Natural genetic transformation of Streptococcus mutans growing in biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(3):897–908.CrossRef Li YH, et al. Natural genetic transformation of Streptococcus mutans growing in biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(3):897–908.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Senadheera MD, et al. A VicRK signal transduction system in Streptococcus mutans affects gtfBCD, gbpB, and ftf expression, biofilm formation, and genetic competence development. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(12):4064–76.CrossRef Senadheera MD, et al. A VicRK signal transduction system in Streptococcus mutans affects gtfBCD, gbpB, and ftf expression, biofilm formation, and genetic competence development. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(12):4064–76.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Naumova EA, et al. Low-pressure plasma sterilization for test specimens to be worn on splints in the Oral cavity. Coatings. 2019;9:99.CrossRef Naumova EA, et al. Low-pressure plasma sterilization for test specimens to be worn on splints in the Oral cavity. Coatings. 2019;9:99.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hannig M, Joiner A. The structure, function and properties of the acquired pellicle. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;19:29–64.PubMed Hannig M, Joiner A. The structure, function and properties of the acquired pellicle. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;19:29–64.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Hannig C, Hannig M. The oral cavity--a key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in man. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13(2):123–39.CrossRef Hannig C, Hannig M. The oral cavity--a key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in man. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13(2):123–39.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nobbs AH, Lamont RJ, Jenkinson HF. Streptococcus adherence and colonization. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009;73(3):407–50 Table of Contents.CrossRef Nobbs AH, Lamont RJ, Jenkinson HF. Streptococcus adherence and colonization. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009;73(3):407–50 Table of Contents.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kolenbrander PE, London J. Adhere today, here tomorrow: oral bacterial adherence. J Bacteriol. 1993;175(11):3247–52.CrossRef Kolenbrander PE, London J. Adhere today, here tomorrow: oral bacterial adherence. J Bacteriol. 1993;175(11):3247–52.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Teughels W, et al. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(Suppl 2):68–81.CrossRef Teughels W, et al. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(Suppl 2):68–81.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22(1):1–14.CrossRef Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22(1):1–14.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Anselme K, et al. The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(10):3824–46.CrossRef Anselme K, et al. The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(10):3824–46.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference van Dijk J, et al. Surface-free energy and bacterial adhesion. An in vivo study in beagle dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14(5):300–4.CrossRef van Dijk J, et al. Surface-free energy and bacterial adhesion. An in vivo study in beagle dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14(5):300–4.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Siegrist BE, et al. In vivo early human dental plaque formation on different supporting substances. A scanning electron microscopic and bacteriological study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991;2(1):38–46.CrossRef Siegrist BE, et al. In vivo early human dental plaque formation on different supporting substances. A scanning electron microscopic and bacteriological study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991;2(1):38–46.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Dogruoz N, et al. Pioneer colonizer microorganisms in biofilm formation on galvanized steel in a simulated recirculating cooling-water system. J Basic Microbiol. 2009;49(Suppl 1):S5–12.CrossRef Dogruoz N, et al. Pioneer colonizer microorganisms in biofilm formation on galvanized steel in a simulated recirculating cooling-water system. J Basic Microbiol. 2009;49(Suppl 1):S5–12.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Tanner J, et al. Adsorption of parotid saliva proteins and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans ATCC 21752 to dental fiber-reinforced composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;66(1):391–8.CrossRef Tanner J, et al. Adsorption of parotid saliva proteins and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans ATCC 21752 to dental fiber-reinforced composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;66(1):391–8.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Souza JC, et al. Biofilm formation on different materials used in Oral rehabilitation. Braz Dent J. 2016;27(2):141–7.CrossRef Souza JC, et al. Biofilm formation on different materials used in Oral rehabilitation. Braz Dent J. 2016;27(2):141–7.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Carlen A, et al. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials. 2001;22(5):481–7.CrossRef Carlen A, et al. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials. 2001;22(5):481–7.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Aas JA, et al. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(11):5721–32.CrossRef Aas JA, et al. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(11):5721–32.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Dewhirst FE, et al. The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(19):5002–17.CrossRef Dewhirst FE, et al. The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(19):5002–17.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity
Authors
Alexander-Simon Engel
Hagen Tizian Kranz
Marvin Schneider
Jan Peter Tietze
Andree Piwowarcyk
Thorsten Kuzius
Wolfgang Arnold
Ella A. Naumova
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Streptococci
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01147-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Oral Health 1/2020 Go to the issue