Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Cleft Lip and Palate | Research article

Assessment of dental arch stability after orthodontic treatment and oral rehabilitation in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and non-clefts patients using 3D stereophotogrammetry

Authors: Maria Giulia Rezende Pucciarelli, Guilherme Hideki de Lima Toyoshima, Thais Marchini Oliveira, Heitor Marques Honório, Chiarella Sforza, Simone Soares

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although arch stability has been studied in patients without a cleft, evidence for patients with a cleft is sparse. Therefore, we compared the dimensions and stability of dental arches in cleft lip and palate patients and those without a cleft.

Methods

Forty participants, 20 with a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and 20 non-cleft patients aged from 18 to 30 years, with anterior and/or posterior crossbite and receiving orthodontic treatment were evaluated retrospectively. Eighty gypsum casts were digitized using a laser model scanner casts for both groups made immediately after the orthodontic treatment was completed (T1). Also, for the Cleft Lip and Palate group, casts were obtained and digitized 1 year after implant-supported rehabilitation (T2) and for the Non-Cleft Lip and Palate group, 1 year after the conclusion of the orthodontic treatment (T2). The formula: Δ = T2-T1 evaluated the stability of dental arches for inter-canine distances (C-C′), inter-molar distances (M-M’), arch length (I-M), palate surface and volume. The dimensions of the dental arches were measured digitally. The independent t test was used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).

Results

A statistical difference was found in the stability of the groups for inter-canine (cleft area) measurement. At the times T1 and T2, a statistically significant difference was found in the arch length, surface and volume.

Conclusions

This study concluded that in the Cleft Lip and Palate group, the maxillary dimensions were not stabilized after 1 year of orthodontic and prosthodontic treatment (mainly for the inter-canine linear measurement) and that the transverse arch dimensions were smaller compared with those of non-cleft patients.
Literature
11.
16.
go back to reference Lilja J, Mars M, Elander A, et al. Analysis of dental arch relationships in Swedish unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects: 20-year longitudinal consecutive series treated with delayed hard palate closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(5):606–11. https://doi.org/10.1597/05-069.CrossRefPubMed Lilja J, Mars M, Elander A, et al. Analysis of dental arch relationships in Swedish unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects: 20-year longitudinal consecutive series treated with delayed hard palate closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(5):606–11. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1597/​05-069.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference De Menezes M, Ceron-Zapata AM, Lopez-Palacio AM, Mapelli A, Pisoni L, Sforza C. Evaluation of a three-dimensional Stereophotogrammetric method to identify and measure the palatal surface area in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(1):16–21. https://doi.org/10.1597/14-076.CrossRefPubMed De Menezes M, Ceron-Zapata AM, Lopez-Palacio AM, Mapelli A, Pisoni L, Sforza C. Evaluation of a three-dimensional Stereophotogrammetric method to identify and measure the palatal surface area in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(1):16–21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1597/​14-076.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Falzoni M, Jorge P, Laskos K, et al. Three-dimensional dental arch evaluation of children with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Dent Oral Craniofac Res. 2016;2(2):238–41.CrossRef Falzoni M, Jorge P, Laskos K, et al. Three-dimensional dental arch evaluation of children with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Dent Oral Craniofac Res. 2016;2(2):238–41.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen and Urwin; 1940. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen and Urwin; 1940.
35.
go back to reference Athanasiou AE, Mazaheri M, Zarrinnia K. Dental arch dimensions in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1988;25(2):139–45.PubMed Athanasiou AE, Mazaheri M, Zarrinnia K. Dental arch dimensions in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1988;25(2):139–45.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Lo LJ, Wong FH, Chen YR, Lin WY, Wen-Ching Ko E, Kirschner RE. Palatal surface area measurement: comparisons among different cleft types. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50(1):18–23 discussion 23-4.CrossRef Lo LJ, Wong FH, Chen YR, Lin WY, Wen-Ching Ko E, Kirschner RE. Palatal surface area measurement: comparisons among different cleft types. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50(1):18–23 discussion 23-4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of dental arch stability after orthodontic treatment and oral rehabilitation in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and non-clefts patients using 3D stereophotogrammetry
Authors
Maria Giulia Rezende Pucciarelli
Guilherme Hideki de Lima Toyoshima
Thais Marchini Oliveira
Heitor Marques Honório
Chiarella Sforza
Simone Soares
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01143-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Oral Health 1/2020 Go to the issue