Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Oral Health
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Evaluation of the effects of different sand particles that used in dental implant roughened for osseointegration

Authors: Mehmet Emre Yurttutan, Ahmet Keskin

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Successful dental implant treatment is directly related to osseointegration. In achieving osseointegration, the surface property of the implant is of great importance. Sandblasting is the most commonly used basic method for modifying the surface. Many companies use different sand particles for surface roughening and claim their sand is the best. This leads clinicians to mix their minds in product selection. In this study, we tried to find the appropriate sand material by working objectively without praising any brand. We believe that the results of the study will help clinicians choose the right dental implant. In this study, machined-surfaced implants and implants sandblasted with Aluminum oxide (Al2O3), Titanium dioxide (TiO2) and Silicon dioxide (SiO2) were compared via biomechanical testing.

Methods

For the study, four 2 year-old sheep, weighing 45 kilograms (kg), were used. Eight implants (Al2O3, TiO2, and SiO2 sandblasted implants and machined-surfaced implants), each with different surface characteristics, were inserted into the bilateral tibia of each sheep under general anesthesia. Results of the initial Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) were recorded just after implant insertion. The sheep were then randomly divided into two groups, each with 2 sheep, to undergo either a 1-month or a 3-month assessment. At the end of the designated evaluation period, RFA and removal torque tests were performed.

Results

Although there were no statistically significant differences between the groups, the implants sandblasted with Al2O3 showed a higher Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and removal torque value at the end of the 1st and 3rd month.

Conclusions

In short, the results of the study demonstrate that Aluminum oxide is superior to other sand particles.
Literature
1.
Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012.
2.
Hobkirk JA, Watson RM, Searson LJJ. Introducing dental implants. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2003.
3.
Hobo S, Ichida E, Garcia LT. Osseointegration and occlusal rehabilitation. 3rd ed. Germany: Quintessence Publishing; 1991.
4.
Brånemark PI. The Osseointegration book: from Calvarium to calcaneus. Berlin: Quintessence; 2005.
5.
Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25(7):889–902.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P. Titanium in Medicine. Berlin: Springer; 2001.
7.
Novaes AB Jr, Souza SL, de Oliveira PT, Souza AM. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17(3):377–83.PubMed
8.
Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol. 2002;28(1):2–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Mueller WD, Gross U, Fritz T, Voigt C, Fischer P, Berger G, Rogaschewski S, Lange KP. Evaluation of the interface between bone and titanium surfaces being blasted by aluminium oxide or bioceramic particles. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(3):349–56.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):172–84.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Yurttutan ME, Kestane R, Keskin A, Dereci O. Biomechanical evaluation of oversized drilling on implant stability - an experimental study in sheep. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(2):147–50.PubMed
12.
13.
Nishimoto SK, Nishimoto M, Park SW, Lee KM, Kim HS, Koh JT, Ong JL, Liu Y, Yang Y. The effect of titanium surface roughening on protein absorption, cell attachment, and cell spreading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(4):675–80.PubMed
14.
15.
Guo CY, ATH T, Matinlinna JP. A novel effect of sandblasting on titanium surface: static charge generation. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2012;26(23):2603–13.CrossRef
16.
Guo CT, ATH T, Matinlinna JP. Insights into surface treatment methods of titanium dental implants. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2012;26:189–205.CrossRef
17.
Ban S, Iwaya Y, Kono H, Sato H. Surface modification of titanium by etching in concentrated sulfuric acid. Dent Mater. 2006;22(12):1115–20.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Coelho PG, Lemons JE. Physico/chemical characterization and in vivo evaluation of nanothickness bioceramic depositions on alumina-blasted/acid-etched Ti-6Al-4V implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;90(2):351–61.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Szmukler-Moncler S, Perrin D, Ahossi V, Magnin G, Bernard JP. Biological properties of acid etched titanium implants: effect of sandblasting on bone anchorage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;68(2):149–59.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Kim MJ, Kim CW, Lim YJ, Heo SJ. Microrough titanium surface affects biologic response in MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;79(4):1023–32.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Bushinsky DA, Sprague SM, Hallegot P, Girod C, Chabala JM, Levi-Setti R. Effects of aluminum on bone surface ion composition. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10(12):1988–97.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Gotfredsen K, Wennerberg A, Johansson C, Skovgaard LT, Hjorting-Hansen E. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: an experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29(10):1223–31.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Ishikawa K, Miyamoto Y, Nagayama M, Asaoka K. Blast coating method: new method of coating titanium surface with hydroxyapatite at room temperature. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;38(2):129–34.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Mustafa K, Wennerberg A, Wroblewski J, Hultenby K, Lopez BS, Arvidson K. Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO(2) blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(5):515–25.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Ronold HJ, Ellingsen JE. Effect of micro-roughness produced by TiO2 blasting--tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants. Biomaterials. 2002;23(21):4211–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Gotfredsen K, Nimb L, Hjorting-Hansen E, Jensen JS, Holmen A. Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3(2):77–84.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Choi CR, Yu HS, Kim CH, Lee JH, Oh CH, Kim HW, Lee HH. Bone cell responses of titanium blasted with bioactive glass particles. J Biomater Appl. 2010;25(2):99–117.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Abron A, Hopfensperger M, Thompson J, Cooper LF. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(1):40–6.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Sela MN, Badihi L, Rosen G, Steinberg D, Kohavi D. Adsorption of human plasma proteins to modified titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(5):630–8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Ramp LC, Jeffcoat RL. Dynamic behavior of implants as a measure of osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(5):637–45.PubMed
31.
Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(5):520–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Becker W, Becker BE, Hujoel P, Abu Ras Z, Goldstein M, Smidt A. Prospective clinical trial evaluating a new implant system for implant survival, implant stability and radiographic bone changes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(1):15–21.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Gehrke SA, Ramirez-Fernandez MP, Granero Marin JM, Barbosa Salles M, Del Fabbro M, Calvo Guirado JL. A comparative evaluation between aluminium and titanium dioxide microparticles for blasting the surface titanium dental implants: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;
34.
Ferguson SJ, Langhoff JD, Voelter K, von Rechenberg B, Scharnweber D, Bierbaum S, Schnabelrauch M, Kautz AR, Frauchiger VM, Mueller TL, et al. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(6):1037–46.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of the effects of different sand particles that used in dental implant roughened for osseointegration
Authors
Mehmet Emre Yurttutan
Ahmet Keskin
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0509-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Oral Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

The prevalence of edentulism and their related factors in Indonesia, 2014/15

Research article

Macroeconomic changes and trends in dental care utilization in Estonia and Lithuania in 2004–2012: a repeated cross-sectional study

Research article

Combining virtual model and cone beam computed tomography to assess periodontal changes after anterior tooth movement

Research article

Relations of drug use and socioeconomic factors with adherence to dental treatment among adolescents

Research article

The effectiveness of Dental Health Support Workers at linking families with primary care dental practices: a population-wide data linkage cohort study

Case report

Nonsurgical periodontal treatment and prosthetic rehabilitation of a renal transplant patient with gingival enlargement: a case report with 2-year follow-up